Works (17)
Updated: August 16th, 2024 13:38
2004 journal article
Public attitudes towards agricultural biotechnology
Valuation Methods for Environmental Benefits in Forestry and Watershed Investment Projects.
Source: NC State University Libraries
Added: August 6, 2018
2003 journal article
Environmental worldview and behavior - Consequences of dimensionality in a survey of North Carolinians
ENVIRONMENT AND BEHAVIOR, 35(6), 763–783.
author keywords: New Environmental Paradigm; environmental behavior; environmental worldviews; demographics of environmentalism
UN Sustainable Development Goal Categories
15. Life on Land
(OpenAlex)
Source: Web Of Science
Added: August 6, 2018
1999 journal article
Consumer acceptance of biotechnology in the United States and Japan
Food Technology, 53(5), 50–53.
Source: NC State University Libraries
Added: August 6, 2018
1999 review
Research in social problems and public policy, vol 6
[Review of ]. Contemporary Sociology, 28(1), 47–48.
Source: NC State University Libraries
Added: August 6, 2018
1999 journal article
Testing for temporal reliability in contingent valuation with time for changes in factors affecting demand
LAND ECONOMICS, 75(3), 453–465.
Source: Web Of Science
Added: August 6, 2018
1998 journal article
American consumer views on biotechnology
Cereal Foods World, 43(1), 20–22.
Source: NC State University Libraries
Added: August 6, 2018
1998 journal article
Food industry innovation: efficient consumer response
Agribusiness, 14(3), 235–245.
Source: NC State University Libraries
Added: August 6, 2018
1998 journal article
Improving the success of new product development
Food Technology, 52(1), 46–49.
Source: NC State University Libraries
Added: August 6, 2018
1997 journal article
Cognitive determinants of risk perceptions associated with biotechnology
SCIENTOMETRICS, 40(2), 299–331.
TL;DR:
Using data from a 1992 US-nationwide telephone survey the statistical research identifies those cognitive factors that significantly influence risk perceptions and reveals those potential influences that, despite their prominence in political and popular debates on risk communication and science education, do not determine the perception of risks on biotechnology in any significant manner.
(via Semantic Scholar)
UN Sustainable Development Goal Categories
2. Zero Hunger
(OpenAlex)
13. Climate Action
(Web of Science)
Source: Web Of Science
Added: August 6, 2018
1997 journal article
Consumer acceptance of biotechnology: An international perspective
NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY, 15(3), 232–234.
MeSH headings : Awareness; Biotechnology; Food Technology; Perception; Public Opinion
TL;DR:
Consumers' willingness to buy biotechnology products will depend on biotechnology's willingness to educate consumers, according to a Pew Research study.
(via Semantic Scholar)
UN Sustainable Development Goal Categories
13. Climate Action
(Web of Science)
Source: Web Of Science
Added: August 6, 2018
1997 journal article
Denominational subcultures of environmentalism
REVIEW OF RELIGIOUS RESEARCH, 38(4), 325–343.
Source: Web Of Science
Added: August 6, 2018
1997 journal article
Industrialization of poultry and swine production: Implications for natural resource management
Journal of Soil & Water Conservation, 52(6), 406–409.
Source: NC State University Libraries
Added: August 6, 2018
1997 journal article
Social and demographic influences on environmental attitudes
Southern Rural Sociology, 13(1), 89–107.
Source: NC State University Libraries
Added: August 6, 2018
1997 journal article
Substantive religious belief and environmentalism
Social Science Quarterly, 78(1), 96–108.
Source: NC State University Libraries
Added: August 6, 2018
1996 journal article
Anticipating public reaction to the use of genetic engineering in infant nutrition
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 63(4), 657.
Source: NC State University Libraries
Added: August 6, 2018
1996 journal article
How Japanese consumers view biotechnology
Food Technology, 50(7), 85.
Source: NC State University Libraries
Added: August 6, 2018
1992 journal article
Public opposition to genetic engineering
Rural Sociology, 57(4), 476.
MeSH headings : Agriculture; Animals; Animals, Genetically Modified; DNA, Recombinant; Data Collection; Female; Food; Humans; Men; Morals; North Carolina; Public Opinion; Socioeconomic Factors; Women
TL;DR:
The extent and sources of public opposition to the use of genetic engineering in agricultural production are examined through data from telephone interviews with 220 farmers and 332 nonfarmers living in eight North Carolina counties.
(via Semantic Scholar)
Source: NC State University Libraries
Added: August 6, 2018
Citation Index includes data from a number of different sources. If you have questions about the sources of data in the Citation Index or need a set of data which is free to re-distribute, please contact us.
Certain data included herein are derived from the Web of Science© and InCites© (2024) of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved. You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.