@article{choi_kwon_lee_nam_2020, title={Functional Electrical Stimulation Controlled by Motor Imagery Brain-Computer Interface for Rehabilitation}, volume={10}, ISSN={["2076-3425"]}, url={https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3425/10/8/512}, DOI={10.3390/brainsci10080512}, abstractNote={Sensorimotor rhythm (SMR)-based brain–computer interface (BCI) controlled Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES) has gained importance in recent years for the rehabilitation of motor deficits. However, there still remain many research questions to be addressed, such as unstructured Motor Imagery (MI) training procedures; a lack of methods to classify different MI tasks in a single hand, such as grasping and opening; and difficulty in decoding voluntary MI-evoked SMRs compared to FES-driven passive-movement-evoked SMRs. To address these issues, a study that is composed of two phases was conducted to develop and validate an SMR-based BCI-FES system with 2-class MI tasks in a single hand (Phase 1), and investigate the feasibility of the system with stroke and traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients (Phase 2). The results of Phase 1 showed that the accuracy of classifying 2-class MIs (approximately 71.25%) was significantly higher than the true chance level, while that of distinguishing voluntary and passive SMRs was not. In Phase 2, where the patients performed goal-oriented tasks in a semi-asynchronous mode, the effects of the FES existence type and adaptive learning on task performance were evaluated. The results showed that adaptive learning significantly increased the accuracy, and the accuracy after applying adaptive learning under the No-FES condition (61.9%) was significantly higher than the true chance level. The outcomes of the present research would provide insight into SMR-based BCI-controlled FES systems that can connect those with motor disabilities (e.g., stroke and TBI patients) to other people by greatly improving their quality of life. Recommendations for future work with a larger sample size and kinesthetic MI were also presented.}, number={8}, journal={BRAIN SCIENCES}, author={Choi, Inchul and Kwon, Gyu Hyun and Lee, Sangwon and Nam, Chang S.}, year={2020}, month={Aug} }
 @misc{choi_rhiu_lee_yun_nam_2017, title={A systematic review of hybrid brain-computer interfaces: Taxonomy and usability perspectives}, volume={12}, ISSN={["1932-6203"]}, DOI={10.1371/journal.pone.0176674}, abstractNote={A new Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) technique, which is called a hybrid BCI, has recently been proposed to address the limitations of conventional single BCI system. Although some hybrid BCI studies have shown promising results, the field of hybrid BCI is still in its infancy and there is much to be done. Especially, since the hybrid BCI systems are so complicated and complex, it is difficult to understand the constituent and role of a hybrid BCI system at a glance. Also, the complicated and complex systems make it difficult to evaluate the usability of the systems. We systematically reviewed and analyzed the current state-of-the-art hybrid BCI studies, and proposed a systematic taxonomy for classifying the types of hybrid BCIs with multiple taxonomic criteria. After reviewing 74 journal articles, hybrid BCIs could be categorized with respect to 1) the source of brain signals, 2) the characteristics of the brain signal, and 3) the characteristics of operation in each system. In addition, we exhaustively reviewed recent literature on usability of BCIs. To identify the key evaluation dimensions of usability, we focused on task and measurement characteristics of BCI usability. We classified and summarized 31 BCI usability journal articles according to task characteristics (type and description of task) and measurement characteristics (subjective and objective measures). Afterwards, we proposed usability dimensions for BCI and hybrid BCI systems according to three core-constructs: Satisfaction, effectiveness, and efficiency with recommendations for further research. This paper can help BCI researchers, even those who are new to the field, can easily understand the complex structure of the hybrid systems at a glance. Recommendations for future research can also be helpful in establishing research directions and gaining insight in how to solve ergonomics and HCI design issues surrounding BCI and hybrid BCI systems by usability evaluation.}, number={4}, journal={PLOS ONE}, author={Choi, Inchul and Rhiu, Ilsun and Lee, Yushin and Yun, Myung Hwan and Nam, Chang S.}, year={2017}, month={Apr} }
 @article{pankok_zahabi_zhang_choi_liao_nam_kaber_2017, title={The effects of interruption similarity and complexity on performance in a simulated visual-manual assembly operation}, volume={59}, ISSN={["1872-9126"]}, DOI={10.1016/j.apergo.2016.08.022}, abstractNote={The objective of the study was to assess the effects of interruption task similarity and complexity on performance of a simulated industrial assembly operation. Eighteen participants performed a simulated industrial assembly operation, including one trial with no interruption and eight others presenting an interruption task. Interruption conditions comprised a full crossing of task similarity to the primary assembly operation (similar, dissimilar) and complexity (simple, complex) with replication for each participant. Order of condition presentation was randomized. Findings revealed greater time to return to primary visual-manual assembly performance after a similar task interruption. Results also indicated complex interruptions may promote cognitive arousal that increases productivity following assembly interruptions. The majority of results are explained in terms of the Activation-Based Memory for Goals model. Findings provide some guidance for interruption management protocol design for workers engaged in procedural visual-manual assembly operations.}, journal={APPLIED ERGONOMICS}, author={Pankok, Carl, Jr. and Zahabi, Maryam and Zhang, Wenjuan and Choi, Inchul and Liao, Yi-Fan and Nam, Chang S. and Kaber, David}, year={2017}, month={Mar}, pages={94–103} }