@article{vivas_vera_dasmohapatra_marquez_van schoubroeck_forfora_azuaje_phillips_jameel_delborne_et al._2024, title={A Multi-Criteria Approach for Quantifying the Impact of Global Megatrends on the Pulp and Paper Industry: Insights into Digitalization, Social Behavior Change, and Sustainability}, volume={8}, ISSN={["2305-6290"]}, url={https://www.mdpi.com/2305-6290/8/2/36}, DOI={10.3390/logistics8020036}, abstractNote={Background: The pulp and paper industry (P&PI) is undergoing significant disruption driven by global megatrends that necessitate advanced tools for predicting future behavior and adapting strategies accordingly. Methods: This work utilizes a multi-criteria framework to quantify the effects of digitalization, changes in social behavior, and sustainability as three major megatrends transforming the P&PI industry, with a specific focus on hygiene tissue products. Thus, the research combines a comprehensive literature review, insights from a Delphi study, and topic modeling to qualitatively and quantitatively assess the present and future impacts of these global megatrends. Results: The findings suggest an urgent need to identify alternative raw materials to prevent potential supply chain disruptions. Moreover, due to shifts in social behavior, it becomes critical for businesses to substantiate their sustainability claims with hard data to avoid the risk of a “greenwashing” perception among consumers. Conclusions: This study provides decision support for strategic planning by highlighting actionable insights, quantitative predictions, and trend analysis, alongside the examination of consumer and market trends. It aims to incorporate diverse stakeholder perspectives and criteria into decision-making processes, thereby enriching the strategic planning and sustainability efforts within the P&PI industry.}, number={2}, journal={LOGISTICS-BASEL}, author={Vivas, Keren A. and Vera, Ramon E. and Dasmohapatra, Sudipta and Marquez, Ronald and Van Schoubroeck, Sophie and Forfora, Naycari and Azuaje, Antonio Jose and Phillips, Richard B. and Jameel, Hasan and Delborne, Jason A. and et al.}, year={2024}, month={Jun} }
 @article{vivas_vera_phillips_forfora_azuaje_zering_chang_delborne_saloni_dasmohapatra_et al._2024, title={An economic analysis of bamboo plantations and feedstock delivered cost in the Southern US for the manufacturing of fiber-based bioproducts}, volume={6}, ISSN={["1932-1031"]}, url={https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.2634}, DOI={10.1002/bbb.2634}, abstractNote={Abstract Bamboo, recognized for its rapid growth, high yield, and fiber performance is prominent in the fiber‐based bioproduct industry. However, the absence of US industrial bamboo plantations for fiber production necessitates reliance on imports or locally manufactured products using imported bamboo fibers, predominantly from China. This study evaluates the economic viability of cultivating bamboo in the Southern US for fiber production, with a case study on hygiene tissue products. The supply‐chain analysis was assessed to calculate bamboo chips' minimum selling price (MSP) at the farm gate for an 8% internal rate of return (IRR). The MSP, influenced primarily by land rental costs, ranges from USD 48 to 55 per bone‐dry metric ton (BDt). Despite an initial establishment cost of ~USD 2 000 ha −1 and profitability by year 5, bamboo is a viable, long‐term fiber alternative. Successful bamboo cultivation in the US could lead to a more sustainable implementation of alternative non‐wood fibers for hygiene tissue applications.}, journal={BIOFUELS BIOPRODUCTS & BIOREFINING-BIOFPR}, author={Vivas, Keren A. and Vera, Ramon E. and Phillips, Richard B. and Forfora, Naycari and Azuaje, Ivana and Zering, Kelly and Chang, Hou-Min and Delborne, Jason and Saloni, Daniel and Dasmohapatra, Sudipta and et al.}, year={2024}, month={Jun} }
 @article{mugwanya_jayaratne_bloom_donaldson_delborne_2024, title={Competencies and training needs of extension agents for educating farmers on genetically engineered crops in Uganda}, url={https://doi.org/10.37433/aad.v5i1.395}, DOI={10.37433/aad.v5i1.395}, abstractNote={The purpose of this study was to determine the training needs of extension agents in Uganda to lead successful education programs on genetically engineered (GE) crops. This was a descriptive survey research study conducted online with public agricultural extension agents in the eastern agro-ecological zone of Uganda. This study used Borich’s method to identify training needs. A survey instrument was designed to determine extension agents’ perceived importance and proficiency of 60 competencies organized under the eight Public Issues Education (PIE) framework competency constructs. The survey received 58 usable responses comprising an 83% response rate. All eight PIE competency constructs were perceived by the extension agents to be important. This study identified additional four competencies important for PIE in addition to the eight competencies in the model. Agents’ greatest training needs were creating partnerships and designing GE education programs. The lowest training needs were creating an environment of professionalism and managing conflicts. The findings indicate the importance of training extension agents on how to engage with farmers in new ways to educate them on GE technology. This study provides implications for determining the training needs of extension agents in PIE such as educating farmers on GE technology.}, journal={Advancements in Agricultural Development}, author={Mugwanya, Nassib and Jayaratne, K. S. U. and Bloom, J. Dara and Donaldson, Joseph L. and Delborne, Jason}, year={2024}, month={Mar} }
 @article{pezzini_delborne_reisig_2023, title={How can policymakers and researchers develop effective insect resistance management guidelines? A quantitative and qualitative study of Brazilian farmers' perspectives and attitudes}, volume={1}, ISSN={["2572-2611"]}, url={https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp3.10352}, DOI={10.1002/ppp3.10352}, abstractNote={Societal Impact StatementToday, over 80% of the US and Brazil row crop acreage has plants expressing insecticidal proteins to prevent the damage caused by caterpillars. These plants (crops expressing Bacillus thuringiensis, Bt, toxins) have brought several benefits to farmers, the environment, and society. However, these can be eroded when insects develop resistance to these toxins. Researchers and regulatory agencies have developed tactics that should be followed by farmers to avoid resistance but with limited efficacy. Our research provides recommendations for researchers and policymakers that are based on farmers' perspectives, thereby offering changes for current guidelines to successfully manage insect resistance and protect Bt crops' efficacy.}, number={5}, journal={PLANTS PEOPLE PLANET}, author={Pezzini, Daniela and Delborne, Jason A. A. and Reisig, Dominic}, year={2023}, month={Jan} }
 @article{hartley_stelmach_delborne_barnhill-dilling_2023, title={Moving beyond narrow definitions of gene drive: Diverse perspectives and frames enable substantive dialogue among science and humanities teachers in the United States and United Kingdom}, volume={32}, url={https://doi.org/10.1177/09636625221148697}, DOI={10.1177/09636625221148697}, abstractNote={ Gene drive is an emerging biotechnology with applications in global health, conservation and agriculture. Scientists are preparing for field trials, triggering debate about when and how to release gene-drive organisms. These decisions depend on public understandings of gene drive, which are shaped by language. While some studies on gene drive communication assume the need to persuade publics of expert definitions of gene drive, we highlight the importance of meaning-making in communication and engagement. We conducted focus groups with humanities and science teachers in the United Kingdom and United States to explore how different media framings stimulated discussions of gene drive. We found diversity in the value of these framings for public debate. Interestingly, the definition favoured by gene drive scientists was the least popular among participants. Rather than carefully curating language, we need opportunities for publics to make sense and negotiate the meanings of a technology on their own terms. }, number={6}, journal={Public Understanding of Science}, author={Hartley, Sarah and Stelmach, Aleksandra and Delborne, Jason A. and Barnhill-Dilling, S. Kathleen}, year={2023}, month={Aug}, pages={727–744} }
 @article{jacobs_dumroese_brennan_campbell_conrad_delborne_fitzsimmons_flores_giardina_greenwood_et al._2023, title={Reintroduction of at-risk forest tree species using biotechnology depends on regulatory policy, informed by science and with public support}, volume={6}, ISSN={["1573-5095"]}, url={https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-023-09980-y}, DOI={10.1007/s11056-023-09980-y}, abstractNote={Abstract}, number={4}, journal={NEW FORESTS}, author={Jacobs, Douglass F. F. and Dumroese, R. Kasten and Brennan, Andrea N. N. and Campbell, Faith T. T. and Conrad, Anna O. O. and Delborne, Jason A. A. and Fitzsimmons, Sara and Flores, David and Giardina, Christian P. P. and Greenwood, Leigh and et al.}, year={2023}, month={Jun} }
 @misc{macfarlane_adams_bennett_brooks_delborne_eggermont_endy_esvelt_kolodziejczyk_kuiken_et al._2022, title={Direct and indirect impacts of synthetic biology on biodiversity conservation}, volume={25}, ISSN={["2589-0042"]}, url={http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-85141258368&partnerID=MN8TOARS}, DOI={10.1016/j.isci.2022.105423}, abstractNote={The world's biodiversity is in crisis. Synthetic biology has the potential to transform biodiversity conservation, both directly and indirectly, in ways that are negative and positive. However, applying these biotechnology tools to environmental questions is fraught with uncertainty and could harm cultures, rights, livelihoods, and nature. Decisions about whether or not to use synthetic biology for conservation should be understood alongside the reality of ongoing biodiversity loss. In 2022, the 196 Parties to the United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity are negotiating the post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework that will guide action by governments and other stakeholders for the next decade to conserve the worlds' biodiversity. To date, synthetic biologists, conservationists, and policy makers have operated in isolation. At this critical time, this review brings these diverse perspectives together and emerges out of the need for a balanced and inclusive examination of the potential application of these technologies to biodiversity conservation.}, number={11}, journal={ISCIENCE}, publisher={Elsevier BV}, author={Macfarlane, Nicholas B. W. and Adams, Jonathan and Bennett, Elizabeth L. and Brooks, Thomas M. and Delborne, Jason A. and Eggermont, Hilde and Endy, Drew and Esvelt, Kevin M. and Kolodziejczyk, Bartlomiej and Kuiken, Todd and et al.}, year={2022}, month={Nov} }
 @article{taitingfong_triplett_vasquez_rajagopalan_raban_roberts_terradas_baumgartner_emerson_gould_et al._2022, title={Exploring the value of a global gene drive project registry}, volume={41}, ISSN={["1546-1696"]}, url={http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-85144085721&partnerID=MN8TOARS}, DOI={10.1038/s41587-022-01591-w}, number={1}, journal={NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY}, author={Taitingfong, Riley I. and Triplett, Cynthia and Vasquez, Valeri N. and Rajagopalan, Ramya M. and Raban, Robyn and Roberts, Aaron and Terradas, Gerard and Baumgartner, Bridget and Emerson, Claudia and Gould, Fred and et al.}, year={2022}, month={Dec} }
 @article{kokotovich_barnhill-dilling_elsensohn_li_delborne_burrack_2022, title={Stakeholder engagement to inform the risk assessment and governance of gene drive technology to manage spotted-wing drosophila}, volume={307}, ISSN={["1095-8630"]}, url={https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114480}, DOI={10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114480}, abstractNote={Emerging biotechnologies, such as gene drive technology, are increasingly being proposed to manage a variety of pests and invasive species. As one method of genetic biocontrol, gene drive technology is currently being developed to manage the invasive agricultural pest spotted-wing drosophila (Drosophila suzukii, SWD). While there have been calls for stakeholder engagement on gene drive technology, there has been a lack of empirical work, especially concerning stakeholder engagement to inform risk assessment. To help address this gap and inform future risk assessments and governance decisions for SWD gene drive technology, we conducted a survey of 184 SWD stakeholders to explore how they define and prioritize potential benefits and potential adverse effects from proposed SWD gene drive technology. We found that stakeholders considered the most important potential benefits of SWD gene drive technology to be: 1) Decrease in the quantity or toxicity of pesticides used, and 2) Decrease in SWD populations. Stakeholders were most concerned about the potential adverse effects of: 1) Decrease in beneficial insects, 2) Increase in non-SWD secondary pest infestations, and 3) Decrease in grower profits. Notably, we found that even stakeholders who expressed support for the use of SWD gene drive technology expressed concerns about potential adverse effects from the technology, emphasizing the need to move past simplistic, dichotomous views of what it means to support or oppose a technology. These findings suggest that instead of focusing on the binary question of whether stakeholders support or oppose SWD gene drive technology, it is more important to identify and assess the factors that are consequential to stakeholder decision making - including, for example, exploring whether and under what conditions key potential adverse effects and potential benefits would result from the use of SWD gene drive technology.}, journal={JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT}, publisher={Elsevier BV}, author={Kokotovich, Adam E. and Barnhill-Dilling, S. Kathleen and Elsensohn, Johanna E. and Li, Richard and Delborne, Jason A. and Burrack, Hannah}, year={2022}, month={Apr} }
 @article{barnes_delborne_2022, title={The politics of genetic technoscience for conservation: The case of blight-resistant American chestnut}, volume={5}, url={https://doi.org/10.1177/25148486211024910}, DOI={10.1177/25148486211024910}, abstractNote={ Innovations in genetics and genomics have been heavily critiqued as technologies that have widely supported the privatization and commodification of natural resources. However, emerging applications of these tools to ecological restoration challenge narratives that cast genetic technoscience as inevitably enrolled in the enactment and extension of neoliberal capitalism. In this paper, we draw on Langdon Winner’s theory of technological politics to suggest that the context in which genetic technologies are developed and deployed matters for their political outcomes. We describe how genetic approaches to the restoration of functionally extinct American chestnut trees—by non-profit organizations, for the restoration of a wild, heritage forest species, and with unconventional intellectual property protections—are challenging precedents in the political economy of plant biotechnology. Through participant observation, interviews with scientists, and historical analysis, we employ the theoretical lens provided by Karl Polanyi’s double movement to describe how the anticipations and agency of the developers of blight-resistant American chestnut trees, combined with chestnut biology and the context of restoration, have thus far resisted key forms of the genetic privatization and commodification of chestnut germplasm. Still, the politics of blight-resistant American chestnut remain incomplete and undetermined; we thus call upon scholars to use the uneven and socially constructed character of both technologies and neoliberalism to help shape this and other applications of genetic technoscience for conservation. }, number={3}, journal={Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space}, author={Barnes, Jessica C and Delborne, Jason A}, year={2022}, month={Sep}, pages={1518–1540} }
 @article{delborne_2022, title={When Biotechnology Goes “Wild”: GE Chestnut Trees}, url={https://doi.org/10.52750/260237}, DOI={10.52750/260237}, abstractNote={What does it mean when biotechnology moves from agricultural fields, dinner plates and pharmacies out into the “wild?” How do we make sense of controversies over GMOs (genetically modified organisms) when they are designed for public benefit and environmental restoration? Jason A. Delborne, Ph.D., explores the case of the genetically engineered (GE) American chestnut tree, which could be the first genetically modified organism (GMO) approved in the U.S. that is designed to spread and persist in unmanaged environments. Currently under regulatory review, the GE chestnut raises a host of ethical, political and social questions that require an interdisciplinary approach. Such complexity is what drives the research, teaching and outreach of NC State’s Genetic Engineering and Society Center.}, author={Delborne, Jason}, year={2022}, month={Aug} }
 @article{mackelprang_aurand_bovenberg_brink_charo_delborne_diggans_ellington_fortman_isaacs_et al._2021, title={Guiding Ethical Principles in Engineering Biology Research}, volume={10}, ISSN={["2161-5063"]}, url={http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-85106481865&partnerID=MN8TOARS}, DOI={10.1021/acssynbio.1c00129}, abstractNote={Engineering biology is being applied toward solving or mitigating some of the greatest challenges facing society. As with many other rapidly advancing technologies, the development of these powerful tools must be considered in the context of ethical uses for personal, societal, and/or environmental advancement. Researchers have a responsibility to consider the diverse outcomes that may result from the knowledge and innovation they contribute to the field. Together, we developed a Statement of Ethics in Engineering Biology Research to guide researchers as they incorporate the consideration of long-term ethical implications of their work into every phase of the research lifecycle. Herein, we present and contextualize this Statement of Ethics and its six guiding principles. Our goal is to facilitate ongoing reflection and collaboration among technical researchers, social scientists, policy makers, and other stakeholders to support best outcomes in engineering biology innovation and development.}, number={5}, journal={ACS SYNTHETIC BIOLOGY}, author={Mackelprang, Rebecca and Aurand, Emily R. and Bovenberg, Roel A. L. and Brink, Kathryn R. and Charo, R. Alta and Delborne, Jason A. and Diggans, James and Ellington, Andrew D. and Fortman, Jeffrey L. Clem and Isaacs, Farren J. and et al.}, year={2021}, month={May}, pages={907–910} }
 @misc{phelan_baumgartner_brand_brister_burgiel_charo_coche_cofrancesco_delborne_edwards_et al._2021, title={Intended consequences statement}, volume={3}, ISSN={["2578-4854"]}, url={http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-85106753330&partnerID=MN8TOARS}, DOI={10.1111/csp2.371}, abstractNote={Citation for published version: Phelan, R, Baumgartner, B, Brand, S, Brister, E, Burgiel, SW, Alta Charo, R, Coche, I, Cofrancesco, A, Delborne, J, Edwards, O, Fisher, JP, Gaywood, M, Gordon, DR, Howald, G, Hunter, ME, Kareiva, P, Mankad, A, Marvier, M, Moseby, K, Newhouse, A, Novak, BJ, Ohrstrom, G, Olson, S, Palmer, M, Palumbi, S, Patterson Jr., N, Pedrono, M, Pelegri, F, Rohwer, Y, Ryder, O, Royden Saah, J, Scheller, RM, Seddon, PJ, Shaffer, HB, Shapiro, B, Sweeney, M, Tercek, MR, Thizy, D, Tilt, W, Weber, M, Wegrzyn, R, Whitelaw, B, Winkler, M, Wodak, J, Zimring, M & Robbins, P 2021, 'Intended Consequences Statement in Conservation Science and Practice', Conservation Science and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.371}, number={4}, journal={CONSERVATION SCIENCE AND PRACTICE}, author={Phelan, Ryan and Baumgartner, Bridget and Brand, Stewart and Brister, Evelyn and Burgiel, Stanley W. and Charo, R. Alta and Coche, Isabelle and Cofrancesco, Al and Delborne, Jason A. and Edwards, Owain and et al.}, year={2021}, month={Apr} }
 @article{thizy_toe_mbogo_matoke-muhia_alibu_barnhill-dilling_chantler_chongwe_delborne_kapiriri_et al._2021, title={Proceedings of an expert workshop on community agreement for gene drive research in Africa - Co-organised by KEMRI, PAMCA and Target Malaria}, volume={5}, url={https://doi.org/10.12688/gatesopenres.13221.2}, DOI={10.12688/gatesopenres.13221.2}, abstractNote={Gene drive research is progressing towards future field evaluation of modified mosquitoes for malaria control in sub-Saharan Africa. While many literature sources and guidance point to the inadequacy of individual informed consent for any genetically modified mosquito release, including gene drive ones, (outside of epidemiological studies that might require blood samples) and at the need for a community-level decision, researchers often find themselves with no specific guidance on how that decision should be made, expressed and by whom. Target Malaria, the Kenya Medical Research Institute and the Pan African Mosquito Control Association co-organised a workshop with researchers and practitioners on this topic to question the model proposed by Target Malaria in its research so far that involved the release of genetically modified sterile male mosquitoes and how this could be adapted to future studies involving gene drive mosquito releases for them to offer reflections about potential best practices. This paper shares the outcomes of that workshop and highlights the remaining topics for discussion before a comprehensive model can be designed.}, note={peer review: 2 approved] Gates Open Res 2021, 5:19 (https://doi.org/10.12688/gatesopenres.13221.2}, journal={Gates Open Research}, publisher={F1000 Research Ltd}, author={Thizy, Delphine and Toe, Lea Pare and Mbogo, Charles and Matoke-Muhia, Damaris and Alibu, Vincent Pius and Barnhill-Dilling, S. Kathleen and Chantler, Tracey and Chongwe, Gershom and Delborne, Jason and Kapiriri, Lydia and et al.}, year={2021}, month={Mar}, pages={19} }
 @article{thizy_toe_mbogo_matoke-muhia_alibu_barnhill-dilling_chantler_chongwe_delborne_kapiriri_et al._2021, title={Proceedings of an expert workshop on community agreement for gene drive research in Africa - Co-organised by KEMRI, PAMCA and Target Malaria [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]}, volume={5}, url={https://gatesopenresearch.org/articles/5-19/v2}, DOI={10.12688/gatesopenres.13221.1}, abstractNote={Gene drive research is progressing towards future field evaluation of modified mosquitoes for malaria control in sub-Saharan Africa. While many literature sources and guidance point to the inadequacy of individual informed consent for any genetically modified mosquito release, including gene drive ones, (outside of epidemiological studies that might require blood samples) and at the need for a community-level decision, researchers often find themselves with no specific guidance on how that decision should be made, expressed and by whom. Target Malaria, the Kenya Medical Research Institute and the Pan African Mosquito Control Association co-organised a workshop with researchers and practitioners on this topic to question the model proposed by Target Malaria in its research so far that involved the release of genetically modified sterile male mosquitoes and how this could be adapted to future studies involving gene drive mosquito releases for them to offer reflections about potential best practices. This paper shares the outcomes of that workshop and highlights the remaining topics for discussion before a comprehensive model can be designed.}, note={peer review: 2 approved] Gates Open Res 2021, 5:19 (https://doi.org/10.12688/gatesopenres.13221.2}, journal={Gates Open Research}, publisher={F1000 Research Ltd}, author={Thizy, Delphine and Toe, Lea Pare and Mbogo, Charles and Matoke-Muhia, Damaris and Alibu, Vincent Pius and Barnhill-Dilling, S. Kathleen and Chantler, Tracey and Chongwe, Gershom and Delborne, Jason and Kapiriri, Lydia and et al.}, year={2021}, month={Mar}, pages={19} }
 @article{barnhill-dilling_kokotovich_delborne_2021, title={The Decision Phases Framework for Public Engagement: Engaging Stakeholders about Gene Editing in the Wild}, volume={51}, url={http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-85121288531&partnerID=MN8TOARS}, DOI={10.1002/hast.1320}, abstractNote={Abstract Some experts and advocates propose environmental biotechnologies such as genetic engineering, gene drive systems, and synthetic biology as potential solutions to accelerating rates of species loss. While these tools may offer hope for a seemingly intractable problem, they also present potential governance challenges for which innovative decision‐making systems are required. Two of the perennial governance challenges include, when are broader stakeholder groups involved in these decisions and who exactly should be involved? We propose the decision phases framework—which includes research and development, regulatory review, and deployment, management, and monitoring—as a framework for identifying which stakeholders might be best suited for different phases throughout the innovation and deployment of emerging environmental biotechnologies for species protection .}, number={S2}, journal={Hastings Center Report}, author={Barnhill-Dilling, S.K. and Kokotovich, A. and Delborne, J.A.}, year={2021}, pages={S48–S61} }
 @article{barnhill-dilling_delborne_2021, title={Whose intentions? What consequences? Interrogating "Intended Consequences" for conservation with environmental biotechnology}, volume={3}, ISSN={["2578-4854"]}, url={http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-85122108259&partnerID=MN8TOARS}, DOI={10.1111/csp2.406}, abstractNote={Abstract}, number={4}, journal={CONSERVATION SCIENCE AND PRACTICE}, author={Barnhill-Dilling, S. Kathleen and Delborne, Jason A.}, year={2021}, month={Apr} }
 @article{kinchy_parthasarathy_delborne_2020, title={A Five-Year Engagement}, volume={6}, ISSN={2413-8053}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.17351/ests2020.749}, DOI={10.17351/ests2020.749}, abstractNote={In this editorial essay, Abby Kinchy, Shobita Parthasarathy, and Jason Delborne look back at the editorial and publishing practices of the first five years of the journal Engaging Science, Technology, and Society (ESTS), the open access journal of The Society for Social Studies of Science (4S). As three members of the inaugural ESTS Editorial Board, Kinchy, Parthasarathy, and Delborne reflect on what they value in academic practice, including publishing, and consider some of the highlights and accomplishments of ESTS’s first five years (2015-2020).}, journal={Engaging Science, Technology, and Society}, publisher={Society for Social Studies of Science (4S)}, author={Kinchy, Abby J. and Parthasarathy, Shobita and Delborne, Jason}, year={2020}, month={Oct}, pages={411} }
 @article{long_alphey_annas_bloss_campbell_champer_chen_choudhary_church_collins_et al._2020, title={Core commitments for field trials of gene drive organisms}, volume={370}, ISSN={0036-8075 1095-9203}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.abd1908}, DOI={10.1126/science.abd1908}, abstractNote={We must ensure that trials are scientifically, politically, and socially robust, publicly accountable, and widely transparent}, number={6523}, journal={Science}, publisher={American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)}, author={Long, Kanya C. and Alphey, Luke and Annas, George J. and Bloss, Cinnamon S. and Campbell, Karl J. and Champer, Jackson and Chen, Chun-Hong and Choudhary, Amit and Church, George M. and Collins, James P. and et al.}, year={2020}, month={Dec}, pages={1417–1419} }
 @article{delborne_hasala_wigner_kinchy_2020, title={Dueling metaphors, fueling futures: “Bridge fuel” visions of coal and natural gas in the United States}, volume={61}, ISSN={2214-6296}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.101350}, DOI={10.1016/j.erss.2019.101350}, abstractNote={Since at least the 1970s, the idea that certain fossil fuels represent transitional fuels on the way to a lower-carbon energy future has persisted in energy discourse. In particular, natural gas has come to occupy a new identity in this discourse, shifting from what was once a negligible portion of the energy mix in the United States to one of the nation's most important energy resources. Though the "bridge fuel" metaphor was once fairly unambiguous in its meaning, the term has evolved over time to incorporate many visions of the future roles of coal and natural gas in the energy mix. To probe the variety of these meanings in public discourse, we assess the bridge fuel narrative in news articles and government publications as a means to understand the complexity and context of political debates over the unfolding future of natural gas. Using a qualitative coding scheme, we examine five different interpretations of the bridge fuel metaphor between 1988 and 2016. We argue that with its unique quality of facilitating both consensus-building and contestation, the bridge fuel metaphor's simplicity and accessibility belie its power to reveal changing expectations, values, and visions of the future of American energy.}, journal={Energy Research & Social Science}, publisher={Elsevier BV}, author={Delborne, Jason A. and Hasala, Dresden and Wigner, Aubrey and Kinchy, Abby}, year={2020}, month={Mar}, pages={101350} }
 @article{kokotovich_delborne_elsensohn_burrack_2020, title={Emerging Technologies for Invasive Insects: The Role of Engagement}, volume={113}, ISSN={0013-8746 1938-2901}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aesa/saz064}, DOI={10.1093/aesa/saz064}, abstractNote={Abstract}, number={4}, journal={Annals of the Entomological Society of America}, publisher={Oxford University Press (OUP)}, author={Kokotovich, Adam E and Delborne, Jason A and Elsensohn, Johanna and Burrack, Hannah}, editor={Morisette, JeffreyEditor}, year={2020}, month={Mar}, pages={266–279} }
 @misc{delborne_2020, title={Emerging Technology in the Field of Island Conservation}, author={Delborne, J.}, year={2020}, month={Jun} }
 @misc{delborne_2020, title={Engaging Stakeholders with Complex and Sometimes Controversial Technologies}, author={Delborne, J.}, year={2020}, month={Mar} }
 @article{aurand_lee_friedman_arkin_aurand_baetica_barrick_beisel_bennett_bratburd_et al._2020, title={Engineering microbiomes looking ahead}, volume={9}, url={http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-85098676006&partnerID=MN8TOARS}, DOI={10.1021/acssynbio.0c00558}, abstractNote={ADVERTISEMENT RETURN TO ISSUEViewpointNEXTEngineering Microbiomes—Looking AheadEric D. LeeEric D. LeeMore by Eric D. Lee, Emily R. Aurand*Emily R. Aurand*Email: [email protected]More by Emily R. Aurandhttp://orcid.org/0000-0003-4092-8551, Douglas C. FriedmanDouglas C. FriedmanMore by Douglas C. Friedmanhttp://orcid.org/0000-0001-7234-4943, and Engineering Biology Research Consortium Microbiomes Roadmapping Working GroupEngineering Biology Research Consortium Microbiomes Roadmapping Working GroupMore by Engineering Biology Research Consortium Microbiomes Roadmapping Working GroupCite this: ACS Synth. Biol. 2020, 9, 12, 3181–3183Publication Date (Web):December 18, 2020Publication History Received3 November 2020Published online18 December 2020Published inissue 18 December 2020https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acssynbio.0c00558https://doi.org/10.1021/acssynbio.0c00558article-commentaryACS PublicationsCopyright © Published 2020 by American Chemical Society. This publication is available under these Terms of Use. Request reuse permissions This publication is free to access through this site. Learn MoreArticle Views2998Altmetric-Citations7LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICSArticle Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated. Share Add toView InAdd Full Text with ReferenceAdd Description ExportRISCitationCitation and abstractCitation and referencesMore Options Share onFacebookTwitterWechatLinked InRedditEmail PDF (1 MB) Get e-AlertscloseSUBJECTS:Bioengineering and biotechnology,Metabolic engineering,Metabolism,Microbiology,Microbiomes Get e-Alerts}, number={12}, journal={ACS Synthetic Biology}, author={Aurand, E.R. and Lee, E.D. and Friedman, D.C. and Arkin, A. and Aurand, E. and Baetica, A.A. and Barrick, J. and Beisel, C. and Bennett, M. and Bratburd, J. and et al.}, year={2020}, pages={3181–3183} }
 @article{delborne_2020, title={Forum: Regulating Gene Drives}, volume={36}, url={https://issues.org/forum36-3/}, number={3}, journal={Issues in Science and Technology}, author={Delborne, J.}, year={2020} }
 @inproceedings{delborne_2020, title={GBIRd Stakeholder Beliefs and Values: Landscape Analysis and Workshop}, publisher={Revive & Restore}, author={Delborne, J.}, year={2020}, month={Jun} }
 @inproceedings{delborne_2020, title={Navigating GMO Misinformation: Frustrations, Controversy, and a Glance in the Mirror}, author={Delborne, J.}, year={2020}, month={Feb} }
 @inproceedings{delborne_2020, title={Perspectives on the new USDA regulations for GM crops}, author={Delborne, J.}, year={2020}, month={Jun} }
 @inproceedings{delborne_2020, title={Public Engagement When Biotechnology Goes ‘Wild’}, author={Delborne, J.}, year={2020}, month={Jan} }
 @misc{delborne_2020, title={Public Engagement when Biotechnology Goes "Wild"}, author={Delborne, J.}, year={2020}, month={Oct} }
 @misc{delborne_2020, title={Public Engagement when Biotechnology “Goes Wild"}, author={Delborne, J.}, year={2020}, month={Nov} }
 @inproceedings{delborne_2020, title={Public and Stakeholder Engagement in the Governance of Emerging Biotechnologies}, author={Delborne, J.}, year={2020}, month={Jan} }
 @article{delborne_kokotovich_lunshof_2020, title={Social license and synthetic biology: the trouble with mining terms}, volume={7}, ISSN={2329-9460 2329-9037}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2020.1738023}, DOI={10.1080/23299460.2020.1738023}, abstractNote={In the wake of controversies over first-generation biotechnologies, the growing field of synthetic biology appears cognizant of the need to attend to the social, political, cultural, and ethical di...}, number={3}, journal={Journal of Responsible Innovation}, publisher={Informa UK Limited}, author={Delborne, Jason A. and Kokotovich, Adam E. and Lunshof, Jeantine E.}, year={2020}, month={Apr}, pages={280–297} }
 @misc{delborne_2020, title={Stakeholder Engagement and Governance of Emerging Biotechnologies}, author={Delborne, J.}, year={2020}, month={Jan} }
 @misc{delborne_2020, place={Raleigh, NC}, title={Sustainability and wood pellets, and science controversies}, publisher={North Carolina State University}, author={Delborne, J.}, year={2020}, month={Apr} }
 @misc{delborne_2020, place={Belfast, Maine}, title={The Gene Drive Conundrum}, url={https://www.switzernetwork.org/leadership-story/jason-delborne-gene-drive-conundrum}, journal={Switzer Network Leadership Story}, publisher={Robert and Patricia Switzer Foundation}, author={Delborne, J.}, year={2020}, month={May} }
 @misc{delborne_2020, title={The Potential for Biotechnology to Address Forest Health}, author={Delborne, J.}, year={2020}, month={Mar} }
 @misc{delborne_2020, title={Values and Beliefs Influencing Genetic Interventions in the Environment}, author={Delborne, J.}, year={2020}, month={Jun} }
 @inbook{campbell_saah_brown_godwin_gould_howald_piaggio_thomas_tompkins_threadgill_et al._2019, place={Gland, Switzerland}, series={Occasional Paper SSC}, title={A potential new tool for the toolbox: assessing gene drives for eradicating invasive rodent populations}, booktitle={Island Invasives: Scaling up to meet the challenge}, publisher={IUCN}, author={Campbell, K.J. and Saah, J.R. and Brown, P.R. and Godwin, J. and Gould, F. and Howald, G.R. and Piaggio, A. and Thomas, P. and Tompkins, D.M. and Threadgill, D. and et al.}, editor={Veitch, C.R. and Clout, M.N. and Martin, A.R. and Russell, J.C. and West, C.J.Editors}, year={2019}, pages={6–14}, collection={Occasional Paper SSC} }
 @article{barnhill-dilling_delborne_2019, title={An Important Community in Restoration Efforts to Protect the American Chestnut Tree}, url={https://sciencetrends.com/an-important-community-in-restoration-efforts-to-protect-the-american-chestnut-tree/}, journal={Science Trends}, author={Barnhill-Dilling, S.K. and Delborne, J.A.}, year={2019}, month={May} }
 @misc{delborne_2019, title={Approaching the Genetically Engineered Chestnut}, author={Delborne, J.}, year={2019}, month={Oct} }
 @article{george_kuiken_delborne_2019, title={Articulating ‘free, prior and informed consent’ (FPIC) for engineered gene drives}, volume={286}, ISSN={0962-8452 1471-2954}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2019.1484}, DOI={10.1098/rspb.2019.1484}, abstractNote={Recent statements by United Nations bodies point to free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) as a potential requirement in the development of engineered gene drive applications. As a concept developed in the context of protecting Indigenous rights to self-determination in land development scenarios, FPIC would need to be extended to apply to the context of ecological editing. Without an explicit framework of application, FPIC could be interpreted as a narrowly framed process of community consultation focused on the social implications of technology, and award little formal or advisory power in decision-making to Indigenous peoples and local communities. In this paper, we argue for an articulation of FPIC that attends to issues of transparency, iterative community-scale consent, and shared power through co-development among Indigenous peoples, local communities, researchers and technology developers. In realizing a comprehensive FPIC process, researchers and developers have an opportunity to incorporate enhanced participation and social guidance mechanisms into the design, development and implementation of engineered gene drive applications.}, number={1917}, journal={Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences}, publisher={The Royal Society}, author={George, Dalton R. and Kuiken, Todd and Delborne, Jason A.}, year={2019}, month={Dec}, pages={20191484} }
 @inproceedings{palmer_delborne_2019, title={Bioethics and Public Outreach – Starting the Conversation}, author={Palmer, Clare and Delborne, J.}, year={2019}, month={Apr} }
 @misc{delborne_2019, title={Biotechnology in Social and Political Contexts}, author={Delborne, J.}, year={2019}, month={Apr} }
 @misc{delborne_2019, title={Can genetic engineering save disappearing forests?}, url={http://theconversation.com/can-genetic-engineering-save-disappearing-forests-109793}, note={Retrieved from}, journal={The Conversation}, author={Delborne, J.A.}, year={2019}, month={Jan} }
 @misc{delborne_2019, title={Communicating Biotechnology with the Public}, author={Delborne, J.}, year={2019}, month={Dec} }
 @misc{delborne_2019, place={Ithaca, NY}, title={Communicating Biotechnology with the Public}, publisher={Cornell University}, author={Delborne, J.}, year={2019}, month={Oct} }
 @inproceedings{delborne_2019, place={Raleigh, NC}, title={Communicating about Biotechnology with Public Audiences}, author={Delborne, J.A.}, year={2019}, month={Oct} }
 @inproceedings{costantini_george_delborne_2019, place={New Orleans, LA}, title={Creating Space for Reflexivity: Facilitating Dialogue Between Scientists and Stakeholders}, author={Costantini, D. and George, D. and Delborne, J.A.}, year={2019}, month={Sep} }
 @inproceedings{delborne_2019, title={Decision Points in the Design of Deliberative Forums}, author={Delborne, J.}, year={2019}, month={Jun} }
 @misc{delborne_2019, title={Design Choices for Public Engagement}, author={Delborne, J.}, year={2019}, month={Oct} }
 @inproceedings{delborne_barrangou_charo_goodwin_kirschner_2019, title={Discussion of the Documentary Human Nature}, author={Delborne, J. and Barrangou, R. and Charo, R.Alta and Goodwin, Sarah and Kirschner, Elliot}, year={2019}, month={Apr} }
 @article{jones_delborne_elsensohn_mitchell_brown_2019, title={Does the U.S. public support using gene drives in agriculture? And what do they want to know?}, volume={5}, ISSN={2375-2548}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aau8462}, DOI={10.1126/sciadv.aau8462}, abstractNote={With gene drives for agricultural pest control on the horizon, a survey suggests the public is receptive but concerned about risk.}, number={9}, journal={Science Advances}, publisher={American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)}, author={Jones, Michael S. and Delborne, Jason A. and Elsensohn, Johanna and Mitchell, Paul D. and Brown, Zachary S.}, year={2019}, month={Sep}, pages={eaau8462} }
 @inproceedings{delborne_2019, title={Engagement – Motivations and Methods}, author={Delborne, J.}, year={2019}, month={Mar} }
 @inbook{delborne_kokotovich_kolodziejczyk_2019, place={Gland, Switzerland}, title={Evidence in the Context of Synthetic Biology and Biodiversity Conservation}, ISBN={9782831719733 9782831719740}, booktitle={Genetic Frontiers for Conservation}, publisher={IUCN}, author={Delborne, J. and Kokotovich, A. and Kolodziejczyk, B.}, editor={Redford, K.H. and Brooks, T.M. and Macfarlane, N.B.W. and Adams, J.S.Editors}, year={2019}, pages={49–58} }
 @inproceedings{delborne_farooque_shapiro_2019, title={Exploring Stakeholder Perspectives on the Development of a Gene Drive Mouse for Biodiversity Protection}, publisher={DARPA Safe Genes Program}, author={Delborne, J. and Farooque, M. and Shapiro, J.}, year={2019}, month={Mar} }
 @book{farooque_barnhill-dilling_shapiro_delborne_2019, title={Exploring Stakeholder Perspectives on the Development of a Gene Drive Mouse for Biodiversity Protection on Islands}, url={http://go.ncsu.edu/ges-gene-drive-workshop}, author={Farooque, M. and Barnhill-Dilling, S.K. and Shapiro, J. and Delborne, J.}, year={2019}, month={Feb} }
 @book{delborne_shapiro_farooque_ford_george_dermer_2019, title={Exploring Stakeholder Perspectives on the Development of a Gene Drive Mouse for Biodiversity Protection on Islands: Summary Report of Stakeholder Interviews}, url={http://go.ncsu.edu/ges-gene-drive-landscape}, author={Delborne, J. and Shapiro, J. and Farooque, M. and Ford, T. and George, D. and Dermer, S.}, year={2019}, month={Mar} }
 @misc{delborne_2019, title={Forest Biotech}, url={https://academicminute.org/2019/07/jason-delborne-north-carolina-state-university-forest-biotech/}, author={Delborne, J.}, year={2019} }
 @misc{delborne_2019, title={Forest Biotechnology and Public Values}, author={Delborne, J.}, year={2019}, month={Jan} }
 @book{offutt_chhatre_delborne_difazio_gordon_ibanez_jaffe_needham_palmer_romero-severson_et al._2019, place={Washington, D.C}, title={Forest Health and Biotechnology: Possibilities and Considerations}, publisher={National Academies Press}, author={Offutt, S.E. and Chhatre, V.E. and Delborne, J. and DiFazio, S. and Gordon, D. and Ibanez, I. and Jaffe, G. and Needham, M.D. and Palmer, C. and Romero-Severson, J. and et al.}, year={2019} }
 @misc{delborne_offut_difazio_ibanez_2019, title={Forest Health and Biotechnology: Possibilities and Considerations}, author={Delborne, J. and Offut, S. and DiFazio, S. and Ibanez, I.}, year={2019}, month={Jan} }
 @misc{delborne_brown_burrack_sederoff_sozzani_2019, title={Gene Editing in the Food System}, author={Delborne, J. and Brown, Z. and Burrack, Hannah and Sederoff, Heike and Sozzani, Ross}, year={2019}, month={Sep} }
 @misc{delborne_ellison_ong_davis_kirchner_rusk_2019, title={Genetic Arts Intervening in the Anthropocene: Climate, Geoengineering, and Ecosystems}, url={https://research.ncsu.edu/ges/arts-work-in-biotech/}, author={Delborne, J. and Ellison, Aaron and Ong, Joel and Davis, Jon and Kirchner, Erin and Rusk, Rachel}, year={2019}, month={Oct} }
 @inbook{barnes_pitts_barnhill-dilling_delborne_2019, title={Genetic Engineering and Society}, ISBN={9781316691489 9781107165120 9781316616895}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/9781316691489.009}, DOI={10.1017/9781316691489.009}, abstractNote={Genetic engineering disrupts assumed distinctions between nature and culture, between human and nonhuman, and between the production of knowledge and the production of commercially viable products. As a result, this area of technological development continues to inspire science and technology studies (STS) researchers not only to rethink theoretical paradigms, but also to test and retest a variety of ways to intervene in science and society.}, booktitle={Science, Technology, and Society}, publisher={Cambridge University Press}, author={Barnes, Jessica Cavin and Pitts, Elizabeth A. and Barnhill-Dilling, S. Kathleen and Delborne, Jason A.}, year={2019}, month={Nov}, pages={203–233} }
 @inbook{slobodian_winter_thizy_oliva_kingiri_kokotovich_delborne_2019, place={Gland, Switzerland}, title={Governance of synthetic biology and biodiversity conservation}, ISBN={9782831719733 9782831719740}, booktitle={Genetic Frontiers for Conservation: An Assessment of Synthetic Biology and Biodiversity Conservation}, publisher={IUCN}, author={Slobodian, L. and Winter, G. and Thizy, D. and Oliva, M.J. and Kingiri, A. and Kokotovich, A. and Delborne, J.}, editor={Redford, K.H. and Brooks, T.M. and Macfarlane, N.B.W. and Adams, J.S.Editors}, year={2019}, pages={19–48} }
 @inproceedings{delborne_bloom_dankbar_stout_cruz_goodwin_mugwanya_barnhill-dilling_2019, place={Raleigh, NC}, title={Having Conversations about the USDA’s New GMO Labelling Standard}, author={Delborne, J. and Bloom, D. and Dankbar, H. and Stout, R. and Cruz, A. and Goodwin, J. and Mugwanya, N. and Barnhill-Dilling, S.K.}, year={2019}, month={Oct} }
 @inproceedings{barnhill-dilling_delborne_2019, title={Innovations, Interruptions, and Regenerations of Chestnut Restoration: Reciprocal Restoration as a Framework for Reflexivity in Chestnut Restoration Narratives}, author={Barnhill-Dilling, S.K. and Delborne, J.A.}, year={2019}, month={Sep} }
 @inproceedings{delborne_2019, title={Interdisciplinary Research}, author={Delborne, J.}, year={2019}, month={Mar} }
 @article{valdez_peterson_pitts_delborne_2019, title={International news media framing of invasive rodent eradications}, volume={21}, ISSN={1387-3547 1573-1464}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10530-018-01911-9}, DOI={10.1007/s10530-018-01911-9}, number={4}, journal={Biological Invasions}, publisher={Springer Science and Business Media LLC}, author={Valdez, R. X. and Peterson, M. N. and Pitts, E. A. and Delborne, J. A.}, year={2019}, month={Jan}, pages={1439–1449} }
 @inproceedings{delborne_2019, place={New Orleans, LA}, title={Kingdoms of Engagement: Reflecting on Stakeholder Engagement Exercises Focused on GE Algae, Trees, and Mice}, author={Delborne, J.A.}, year={2019}, month={Sep} }
 @misc{delborne_2019, title={Listening and Talking about GMOs}, author={Delborne, J.}, year={2019}, month={Feb} }
 @inproceedings{george_delborne_2019, place={New Orleans, LA}, title={Mapping Engagement for Emerging Technologies: Decision Phases, Stakeholders, and the Genetically Engineered American Chestnut Tree}, author={George, D. and Delborne, J.A.}, year={2019}, month={Sep} }
 @inproceedings{delborne_2019, place={Raleigh, NC}, title={Mapping the Landscape of Interests and Engaging Stakeholders to Inform Research and Development of Gene Drives for Conservation}, author={Delborne, J.}, year={2019}, month={Nov} }
 @inproceedings{delborne_2019, title={Promises and Fears of New Biotechnologies: Making Decisions with Stakeholder and Community Participation}, author={Delborne, J.}, year={2019}, month={Mar} }
 @misc{delborne_2019, place={Paul, MN}, title={Public Engagement and Genetic Biocontrol Technologies for Invasive Species}, author={Delborne, J.}, year={2019}, month={Jun} }
 @inproceedings{delborne_2019, title={Public Engagement when Biotechnology Goes ‘Wild’}, author={Delborne, J.}, year={2019}, month={Aug} }
 @inproceedings{delborne_george_kokotovich_2019, place={New Orleans, LA}, title={Reflecting on Reflexivity in Practice: Responsible Innovation, Engagement, and Governance}, author={Delborne, J. and George, D. and Kokotovich, A.}, year={2019}, month={Sep} }
 @article{barnes_delborne_2019, title={Rethinking restoration targets for American chestnut using species distribution modeling}, volume={28}, ISSN={0960-3115 1572-9710}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10531-019-01814-8}, DOI={10.1007/s10531-019-01814-8}, number={12}, journal={Biodiversity and Conservation}, publisher={Springer Science and Business Media LLC}, author={Barnes, Jessica Cavin and Delborne, Jason A.}, year={2019}, month={Jul}, pages={3199–3220} }
 @article{godwin_serr_barnhill-dilling_blondel_brown_campbell_delborne_lloyd_oh_prowse_et al._2019, title={Rodent gene drives for conservation: opportunities and data needs}, volume={286}, ISSN={0962-8452 1471-2954}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2019.1606}, DOI={10.1098/rspb.2019.1606}, abstractNote={
            Invasive rodents impact biodiversity, human health and food security worldwide. The biodiversity impacts are particularly significant on islands, which are the primary sites of vertebrate extinctions and where we are reaching the limits of current control technologies. Gene drives may represent an effective approach to this challenge, but knowledge gaps remain in a number of areas. This paper is focused on what is currently known about natural and developing synthetic gene drive systems in mice, some key areas where key knowledge gaps exist, findings in a variety of disciplines relevant to those gaps and a brief consideration of how engagement at the regulatory, stakeholder and community levels can accompany and contribute to this effort. Our primary species focus is the house mouse,
            Mus musculus
            , as a genetic model system that is also an important invasive pest. Our primary application focus is the development of gene drive systems intended to reduce reproduction and potentially eliminate invasive rodents from islands. Gene drive technologies in rodents have the potential to produce significant benefits for biodiversity conservation, human health and food security. A broad-based, multidisciplinary approach is necessary to assess this potential in a transparent, effective and responsible manner.
          }, number={1914}, journal={Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences}, publisher={The Royal Society}, author={Godwin, John and Serr, Megan and Barnhill-Dilling, S. Kathleen and Blondel, Dimitri V. and Brown, Peter R. and Campbell, Karl and Delborne, Jason and Lloyd, Alun L. and Oh, Kevin P. and Prowse, Thomas A. A. and et al.}, year={2019}, month={Nov}, pages={20191606} }
 @article{barnhill-dilling_rivers_delborne_2019, title={Rooted in Recognition: Indigenous Environmental Justice and the Genetically Engineered American Chestnut Tree}, volume={33}, ISSN={0894-1920 1521-0723}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2019.1685145}, DOI={10.1080/08941920.2019.1685145}, abstractNote={Abstract The restoration plan for the American chestnut tree includes the potential wild release of a genetically engineered tree in close proximity to the sovereign Haudenosaunee communities of Central and Upstate New York. As such, inclusive deliberative frameworks are needed to consider the implications for these communities. Indigenous environmental justice highlights the importance of recognizing tribal sovereignty and Indigenous worldviews as foundational to more just environmental governance. This paper examines how the case of genetically engineered American chestnut tree highlights the importance of recognizing tribal sovereignty and Indigenous worldviews in considering a GE organism for species restoration.}, number={1}, journal={Society & Natural Resources}, publisher={Informa UK Limited}, author={Barnhill-Dilling, S. Kathleen and Rivers, Louie and Delborne, Jason A.}, year={2019}, month={Nov}, pages={83–100} }
 @inproceedings{delborne_2019, place={Washington, DC}, title={Rooting Innovation in Forest Biotechnology in Public Engagement}, author={Delborne, J.}, year={2019}, month={Feb} }
 @inbook{redford_brooks_macfarlane_delborne_adams_2019, place={Gland, Switzerland}, title={Summing Up and Looking Forward}, ISBN={9782831719733 9782831719740}, booktitle={Genetic Frontiers for Conservation: An Assessment of Synthetic Biology and Biodiversity Conservation}, publisher={IUCN}, author={Redford, K.H. and Brooks, T.M. and Macfarlane, N.B.W. and Delborne, J. and Adams, J.S.}, editor={Redford, K.H. and Brooks, T.M. and Macfarlane, N.B.W. and Adams, J.S.Editors}, year={2019}, pages={119–126} }
 @inproceedings{hedgespeth_rashash_shea_strynar_delborne_nichols_2019, title={Suspect screening and prioritization of chemicals of concern (COCs) in a comprehensive, field-scale study of a forested water reuse system}, author={Hedgespeth, M.L. and Rashash, D. and Shea, D. and Strynar, M.J. and Delborne, J.A. and Nichols, E.G.}, year={2019}, month={Mar} }
 @inproceedings{delborne_2019, title={The Potential for Biotechnology to Address Forest Health (NASEM Report)}, author={Delborne, J.}, year={2019}, month={Feb} }
 @article{barnhill-dilling_delborne_2019, title={The genetically engineered American chestnut tree as opportunity for reciprocal restoration in Haudenosaunee communities}, volume={232}, ISSN={0006-3207}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.01.018}, DOI={10.1016/j.biocon.2019.01.018}, abstractNote={As genetic engineering becomes a part of the toolkit for the conservation and restoration of biodiversity, a broad range of social science frameworks are required to understand how different groups of people perceive these emerging technologies. Reciprocal restoration is one such framework that offers Indigenous-specific perspective on new applications of genetic engineering for conservation and restoration. The restoration plan for the American chestnut tree includes the potential wild release of a genetically engineered tree in close proximity to the sovereign Haudenosaunee communities of Central and Upstate New York. This paper uses reciprocal restoration as a framework for evaluating if a restoration project that uses a genetically engineered species could support broader cultural restoration efforts in these communities. Results are complex, but suggest that reciprocal restoration may be possible if certain foundational dimensions – such as kincentric relationships and spiritual responsibilities – are attended to. Reciprocal restoration also offers insight for future cases where Indigenous perspectives on the use of genetic engineering for conservation and restoration are important dimensions of broader governance considerations.}, journal={Biological Conservation}, publisher={Elsevier BV}, author={Barnhill-Dilling, S. Kathleen and Delborne, Jason A.}, year={2019}, month={Apr}, pages={1–7} }
 @article{backus_delborne_2019, title={Threshold-Dependent Gene Drives in the Wild: Spread, Controllability, and Ecological Uncertainty}, volume={69}, ISSN={0006-3568 1525-3244}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biz098}, DOI={10.1093/biosci/biz098}, abstractNote={Abstract}, number={11}, journal={BioScience}, publisher={Oxford University Press (OUP)}, author={Backus, Gregory A and Delborne, Jason A}, year={2019}, month={Sep}, pages={900–907} }
 @inproceedings{delborne_2019, title={Wicked, Post-Normal, Complex: Using Social Science to Enhance Academies Work in the Life Sciences}, author={Delborne, J.}, year={2019}, month={Apr} }
 @inproceedings{delborne_kokotovich_redford_2019, title={Workshop on the Impacts and Management of Free-Ranging Cats in U.S. National Parks}, author={Delborne, J. and Kokotovich, A. and Redford, K.}, year={2019}, month={Mar} }
 @article{kuzma_gould_brown_collins_delborne_frow_esvelt_guston_leitschuh_oye_et al._2018, title={A roadmap for gene drives: using institutional analysis and development to frame research needs and governance in a systems context}, volume={5}, ISSN={2329-9460 2329-9037}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2017.1410344}, DOI={10.1080/23299460.2017.1410344}, abstractNote={ABSTRACTThe deployment of gene drives is emerging as an alternative for protecting endangered species, controlling agricultural pests, and reducing vector-borne diseases. This paper reports on a workshop held in February 2016 to explore the complex intersection of political, economic, ethical, and ecological risk issues associated with gene drives. Workshop participants were encouraged to use systems thinking and mapping to describe the connections among social, policy, economic, and ecological variables as they intersect within governance systems. In this paper, we analyze the workshop transcripts and maps using the Institutional Analysis and Development (IAD) framework to categorize variables associated with gene drive governance and account for the complexities of socio-ecological systems. We discuss how the IAD framework can be used in the future to test hypotheses about how features of governance systems might lead to certain outcomes and inform the design of research programs, public engagement, and...}, number={sup1}, journal={Journal of Responsible Innovation}, publisher={Informa UK Limited}, author={Kuzma, J. and Gould, F. and Brown, Z. and Collins, J. and Delborne, J. and Frow, E. and Esvelt, K. and Guston, D. and Leitschuh, C. and Oye, K. and et al.}, year={2018}, month={Dec}, pages={S13–S39} }
 @inproceedings{elsensohn_jones_brown_mitchell_delborne_2018, title={Assessing attitudes on gene drives: What consumers want to know}, author={Elsensohn, J.E. and Jones, M.S. and Brown, Z.S. and Mitchell, P. and Delborne, J.A.}, year={2018}, month={Mar} }
 @inproceedings{elsensohn_burrack_brown_delborne_2018, title={Assessing risks of emerging technologies in pest management through expert elicitation}, author={Elsensohn, J.E. and Burrack, H.J. and Brown, Z.S. and Delborne, J.A.}, year={2018}, month={Nov} }
 @inproceedings{delborne_2018, title={Biotechnology and Biodiversity}, author={Delborne, J.}, year={2018}, month={Aug} }
 @book{delborne_binder_rivers_barnhill-dilling_barnes_george_kokotovich_sudweeks_2018, title={Biotechnology, the American Chestnut Tree, and Public Engagement}, url={http://go.ncsu.edu/ges-chestnut-report}, institution={Genetic Engineering and Society Center, North Carolina State University}, author={Delborne, J.A. and Binder, A.R. and Rivers, L. and Barnhill-Dilling, S.K. and Barnes, J.C. and George, D. and Kokotovich, A. and Sudweeks, J.}, year={2018} }
 @misc{delborne_2018, title={Biotechnology, the American Chestnut Tree, and Public Engagement}, author={Delborne, J.}, year={2018}, month={Apr} }
 @misc{delborne_2018, title={Communicating Biotechnology with the Public}, author={Delborne, J.}, year={2018}, month={Dec} }
 @misc{delborne_2018, title={Communicating Biotechnology with the Public}, author={Delborne, J.}, year={2018}, month={Oct} }
 @misc{delborne_2018, title={Communicating Biotechnology with the Public}, author={Delborne, J.}, year={2018}, month={Sep} }
 @inproceedings{jones_elsensohn_brown_delborne_mitchell_2018, title={Consideration of diverse publics and diverse markets in ethical debates of gene drives in agriculture}, author={Jones, M.S. and Elsensohn, J.E. and Brown, Z.S. and Delborne, J.A. and Mitchell, P.J.}, year={2018}, month={Nov} }
 @inproceedings{kokotovich_delborne_2018, place={Amherst, MA}, title={Contemplative practices for engaging with emerging biotechnologies}, author={Kokotovich, A. and Delborne, J.}, year={2018}, month={Oct} }
 @inproceedings{delborne_2018, title={Emerging Biotechnologies and Public Engagement}, author={Delborne, J.}, year={2018}, month={Oct} }
 @misc{delborne_2018, title={Engaging Stakeholders, Policymakers, and Publics}, author={Delborne, J.}, year={2018}, month={May} }
 @misc{delborne_2018, place={Raleigh, NC}, title={Frankenstein}, author={Delborne, J.}, year={2018}, month={Mar} }
 @misc{delborne_2018, title={Genetic Engineering in Agriculture}, author={Delborne, J.}, year={2018}, month={Feb} }
 @article{delborne_kokotovich_barnhill-dilling_2018, title={Letters: Engaging Community with Humility}, volume={362}, ISSN={0036-8075 1095-9203}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.aav4987}, DOI={10.1126/science.aav4987}, number={6414}, journal={Science}, publisher={American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)}, author={Delborne, Jason and Kokotovich, Adam and Barnhill-Dilling, S. Kathleen}, editor={Sills, JenniferEditor}, year={2018}, pages={532–33} }
 @inproceedings{nichols_hedgespeth_gibson_mceachran_rashash_shea_strynar_delborne_2018, title={Municipal Wastewater Application to Forests: Using Participatory Science to Understand Human Exposure and Risks to Chemical Contaminants of Concern}, author={Nichols, E.G. and Hedgespeth, M.L. and Gibson, N. and McEachran, A.D. and Rashash, D. and Shea, D. and Strynar, M.J. and Delborne, J.A.}, year={2018}, month={Nov} }
 @misc{hedgespeth_gibson_mceachran_rashash_shea_strynar_delborne_nichols_2018, title={Municipal Wastewater Application to Forests: Using Participatory Science to Understand Human Exposure and Risks to Chemical Contaminants of Concern}, author={Hedgespeth, M.L. and Gibson, N. and McEachran, A.D. and Rashash, D. and Shea, D. and Strynar, M. and Delborne, J.A. and Nichols, E.G.}, year={2018}, month={Dec} }
 @inproceedings{nichols_hedgespeth_delborne_rashash_shea_strynar_2018, title={Municipal Wastewater Reuse: Participatory Science to Understand Human Exposure and Risks to Chemical Contaminants of Concern}, author={Nichols, E.G. and Hedgespeth, M.L. and Delborne, J.A. and Rashash, D. and Shea, D. and Strynar, M.}, year={2018}, month={Jan} }
 @inproceedings{binder_barnes_barnhill-dilling_george_kokotovich_rivers_sudweeks_delborne_2018, place={New Orleans, LA}, title={Restoring Biotechnology’s Moral Fiber? Lessons from a stakeholder workshop on genetically modified American chestnut trees and public engagement}, author={Binder, A.R. and Barnes, J.C. and Barnhill-Dilling, S.K. and George, D. and Kokotovich, A. and Rivers, L. and Sudweeks, J. and Delborne, J.A.}, year={2018}, month={Dec} }
 @article{delborne_kuzma_gould_frow_leitschuh_sudweeks_2018, title={Roadmap to Gene Drives: Research and Governance Needs in Social, Political, and Ecological Contexts}, volume={5}, number={sup1, special issue}, journal={The Journal of Responsible Innovation}, year={2018} }
 @inproceedings{delborne_2018, title={Stakeholder and Community Engagement – U.S. Context}, author={Delborne, J.}, year={2018}, month={Nov} }
 @misc{delborne_2018, title={Stakeholders, Policymakers, and the Public: Opportunities for Faculty Engagement}, author={Delborne, J.}, year={2018}, month={Feb} }
 @inproceedings{kokotovich_delborne_2018, title={Synthesizing engagement for synthetic biology governance: A review of existing engagement exercises}, author={Kokotovich, A. and Delborne, J.}, year={2018}, month={May} }
 @inproceedings{costantini_sudweeks_delborne_2018, title={The Diversity of Discourse around the GM American Chestnut Tree}, author={Costantini, D. and Sudweeks, J. and Delborne, J.}, year={2018}, month={Jun} }
 @article{ryan_adamson_aktipis_andersen_austin_barnes_beasley_bedell_briggs_chapman_et al._2018, title={The role of citizen science in addressing grand challenges in food and agriculture research}, volume={285}, ISSN={0962-8452 1471-2954}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2018.1977}, DOI={10.1098/rspb.2018.1977}, abstractNote={The power of citizen science to contribute to both science and society is gaining increased recognition, particularly in physics and biology. Although there is a long history of public engagement in agriculture and food science, the term ‘citizen science’ has rarely been applied to these efforts. Similarly, in the emerging field of citizen science, most new citizen science projects do not focus on food or agriculture. Here, we convened thought leaders from a broad range of fields related to citizen science, agriculture, and food science to highlight key opportunities for bridging these overlapping yet disconnected communities/fields and identify ways to leverage their respective strengths. Specifically, we show that (i) citizen science projects are addressing many grand challenges facing our food systems, as outlined by the United States National Institute of Food and Agriculture, as well as broader Sustainable Development Goals set by the United Nations Development Programme, (ii) there exist emerging opportunities and unique challenges for citizen science in agriculture/food research, and (iii) the greatest opportunities for the development of citizen science projects in agriculture and food science will be gained by using the existing infrastructure and tools of Extension programmes and through the engagement of urban communities. Further, we argue there is no better time to foster greater collaboration between these fields given the trend of shrinking Extension programmes, the increasing need to apply innovative solutions to address rising demands on agricultural systems, and the exponential growth of the field of citizen science.}, number={1891}, journal={Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences}, publisher={The Royal Society}, author={Ryan, S. F. and Adamson, N. L. and Aktipis, A. and Andersen, L. K. and Austin, R. and Barnes, L. and Beasley, M. R. and Bedell, K. D. and Briggs, S. and Chapman, B. and et al.}, year={2018}, month={Nov}, pages={20181977} }
 @article{stirling_hayes_delborne_2018, title={Towards Inclusive Social Appraisal: Risk, Participation and Democracy in Governance of Synthetic Biology}, volume={12}, ISSN={1753-6561}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12919-018-0111-3}, DOI={10.1186/s12919-018-0111-3}, abstractNote={Frameworks that govern the development and application of novel products, such as the products of synthetic biology, should involve all those who are interested or potentially affected by the products. The governance arrangements for novel products should also provide a democratic mechanism that allows affected parties to express their opinions on the direction that innovation does or does not take. In this paper we examine rationales, obstacles and opportunities for public participation in governance of novel synthetic biology products. Our analysis addresses issues such as uncertainties, the considering of alternative innovations, and broader social and environmental implications. The crucial issues in play go beyond safety alone, to include contending social values around diverse notions of benefit and harm. The paper highlights the need for more inclusive social appraisal mechanisms to inform governance of Synthetic Biology and alternative products, and discusses a few practical methods to help achieve this goal.}, number={Suppl 8}, journal={BMC Proceedings}, publisher={Springer Science and Business Media LLC}, author={Stirling, A. and Hayes, K.R. and Delborne, J.}, year={2018}, pages={15} }
 @inproceedings{delborne_2018, title={U.S. Public Engagement}, author={Delborne, J.}, year={2018}, month={Nov} }
 @inproceedings{jones_elsensohn_brown_mitchell_delborne_2018, title={U.S. public attitudes and uncertainties on using gene drive on invasive insects in agriculture}, author={Jones, M.S. and Elsensohn, J.E. and Brown, Z.S. and Mitchell, P.W. and Delborne, J.A.}, year={2018}, month={Nov} }
 @inproceedings{hedgespeth_rashash_shea_strynar_delborne_nichols_2018, title={Understanding Community Values and Perceptions on Wastewater Reuse and Chemical Contaminants of Concern}, author={Hedgespeth, M.L. and Rashash, D. and Shea, D. and Strynar, M. and Delborne, J.A. and Nichols, E.G.}, year={2018}, month={Mar} }
 @inproceedings{nichols_hedgespeth_rashash_shea_strynar_delborne_2018, title={Wastewater Reuse and Chemical Contaminants of Concern: Understanding Water Quality and Community Perceptions}, author={Nichols, E.Guthrie and Hedgespeth, M.L. and Rashash, D. and Shea, D. and Strynar, M.J. and Delborne, J.A.}, year={2018}, month={Nov} }
 @article{delborne_kuzma_gould_frow_leitschuh_sudweeks_2018, title={‘Mapping research and governance needs for gene drives’}, volume={5}, ISSN={2329-9460 2329-9037}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2017.1419413}, DOI={10.1080/23299460.2017.1419413}, abstractNote={‘Mapping research and governance needs for gene drives’ Jason Delborne, Jennifer Kuzma, Fred Gould, Emma Frow, Caroline Leitschuh & Jayce Sudweeks To cite this article: Jason Delborne, Jennifer Kuzma, Fred Gould, Emma Frow, Caroline Leitschuh & Jayce Sudweeks (2018): ‘Mapping research and governance needs for gene drives’, Journal of Responsible Innovation, DOI: 10.1080/23299460.2017.1419413 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2017.1419413}, number={sup1}, journal={Journal of Responsible Innovation}, publisher={Informa UK Limited}, author={Delborne, Jason and Kuzma, Jennifer and Gould, Fred and Frow, Emma and Leitschuh, Caroline and Sudweeks, Jayce}, year={2018}, month={Jan}, pages={S4–S12} }
 @misc{delborne_2017, title={A Decade of Synthetic Biology}, author={Delborne, J.}, year={2017}, month={Dec} }
 @misc{delbourne_godwin_2017, place={Raleigh, NC}, title={CRISPR and the Ethics of Editing Genes}, author={Delbourne, Jason and Godwin, John}, year={2017}, month={Sep} }
 @inproceedings{delbourne_2017, title={Emerging Technologies and Public Engagement}, author={Delbourne, Jason}, year={2017}, month={Oct} }
 @inproceedings{delborne_2017, title={Emerging Technologies, New Governance Arrangements, and the Time-Honored Challenges: Searching for Novelty in Anticipatory Governance}, booktitle={Advancing Science for Policy through Interdisciplinary Research in Regulation}, author={Delborne, J.}, year={2017}, month={Nov} }
 @misc{delborne_2017, title={Emerging biotechnologies and public engagement: Reflections on the NASEM report on gene drives}, author={Delborne, Jason}, year={2017}, month={Mar} }
 @inproceedings{delborne_2017, title={Engineering: responsible innovation}, author={Delborne, Jason}, year={2017}, month={Feb} }
 @inproceedings{delborne_2017, title={Envisioning Responsible Innovation in Biotechnology for Conservation: Engagement, GM Chestnut Trees, and Gene Drive Mice}, author={Delborne, J.A.}, year={2017}, month={Aug} }
 @inproceedings{backus_delborne_2017, title={Gene Drives over the Horizon: A Model, for Anticipatory Governance}, author={Backus, G.A. and Delborne, J.A.}, year={2017}, month={Aug} }
 @book{delborne_farooque_shapiro_2017, place={Tempe, AZ}, title={Genetically Engineered Algae Public Engagement Strategies: A Stakeholder Workshop Report}, url={https://ecastnetwork.org/research/genetically-engineered-algae-public-engagement-strategies/}, institution={ECAST: Expert and Citizen Assessment of Science and Technology}, author={Delborne, J. and Farooque, M. and Shapiro, J.}, year={2017} }
 @inproceedings{delborne_2017, title={Incorporating public engagement in research and governance}, author={Delborne, Jason}, year={2017}, month={Feb} }
 @inproceedings{hedgespeth_mceachran_rashash_shea_strynar_delborne_nichols_2017, title={Municipal Wastewater Application to Forests: Using Participatory Science to Understand Human Exposure and Risks to Chemical Contaminants of Concern}, author={Hedgespeth, M.L. and McEachran, A.D. and Rashash, D. and Shea, D. and Strynar, M. and Delborne, J.A. and Nichols, E.G.}, year={2017}, month={May} }
 @inproceedings{hedgespeth_mceachran_rashash_shea_strynar_delborne_nichols_2017, title={Municipal Wastewater Application to Forests: Using Participatory Science to Understand Human Exposure and Risks to Chemical Contaminants of Concern}, author={Hedgespeth, M.L. and McEachran, A.D. and Rashash, D. and Shea, D. and Strynar, M. and Delborne, J.A. and Nichols, E.G.}, year={2017}, month={Nov} }
 @inbook{delborne_schneider_2017, title={Perspective part 2: Moving forward with citizen deliberation: Lessons and inspiration from the national citizens' technology forum}, url={http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-85075276103&partnerID=MN8TOARS}, booktitle={Nanotechnology and the Public: Risk Perception and Risk Communication}, author={Delborne, J. and Schneider, J.}, year={2017}, pages={103–111} }
 @book{foley_asare_delborne_lach_misra_2017, title={Prototype to Patient Treatment: Dialogue on Safety, Regulation, Privacy, Security, and Acceptability for Wearable Medical Devices}, url={https://doi.org/10.18130/V3804XJ4K}, DOI={10.18130/V3804XJ4K}, number={11604831160483}, institution={University of Virginia}, author={Foley, R.W. and Asare, P. and Delborne, J. and Lach, J. and Misra, V.}, year={2017} }
 @inproceedings{delbourne_2017, title={Public engagement: Rationales, methods, and intended outcomes}, author={Delbourne, Jason}, year={2017}, month={Oct} }
 @article{adelman_akbari_bauer_bier_bloss_carter_callender_denis_cowhey_dass_et al._2017, title={Rules of the road for insect gene drive research and testing}, volume={35}, ISSN={1087-0156 1546-1696}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3926}, DOI={10.1038/nbt.3926}, abstractNote={Approximately two years ago, two of us (E.B. and V.G.) demonstrated the first experimental application of CRISPR–Cas9 to 'drive' a desired trait throughout a population of fruit flies. In November 2015, this same team at the University of California, San Diego, joined with A.A.J. and others at the University of California, Irvine, to develop a CRISPR-based gene drive for population modification of the malaria vector mosquito Anopheles stephensi. A month later, a group in the United Kingdom applied a CRISPR-based gene drive to another malaria vector, Anopheles gambiae.}, number={8}, journal={Nature Biotechnology}, publisher={Springer Science and Business Media LLC}, author={Adelman, Zach and Akbari, Omar and Bauer, John and Bier, Ethan and Bloss, Cinnamon and Carter, Sarah R and Callender, Craig and Denis, Adriana Costero-Saint and Cowhey, Peter and Dass, Brinda and et al.}, year={2017}, month={Aug}, pages={716–718} }
 @article{adelman_akbari_bauer_bier_bloss_carter_callender_denis_cowhey_dass_et al._2017, title={Rules of the road for insect gene drive research and testing}, volume={35}, DOI={10.1038/nbt.392620}, number={8}, journal={Nature Biotechnology}, author={Adelman, Z. and Akbari, O. and Bauer, J. and Bier, E. and Bloss, C. and Carter, S.R. and Callender, C. and Denis, A.C. and Cowhey, P. and Dass, B. and et al.}, year={2017}, pages={716–718} }
 @inproceedings{delbourne_2017, title={Strategies of engagement in synthetic biology}, author={Delbourne, Jason}, year={2017}, month={Sep} }
 @misc{delborne_2017, place={Boulder, Co}, title={The Ring of Engagement}, url={http://ciresblogs.colorado.edu/prometheus/2017/03/03/the-ring-of-engagement/}, journal={Prometheus: The Science Policy Blog}, publisher={Center for Science and Technology Policy Research, University of Colorado at Boulder}, author={Delborne, J.A.}, year={2017}, month={Mar} }
 @inproceedings{delborne_2016, title={Biotechnology and Engaging the Public as Experts}, author={Delborne, Jason}, year={2016}, month={Mar} }
 @misc{delborne_2016, title={Community Engagement and Informed Consent, Policy and Regulatory Issues for Gene Drives in Insects}, author={Delborne, Jason}, year={2016}, month={Jan} }
 @inproceedings{elsensohn_brown_delborne_burrack_2016, title={Comparative risk analysis for agricultural genetic pest management technologies}, author={Elsensohn, J.E. and Brown, Z.S. and Delborne, J.A. and Burrack, H.J.}, year={2016}, month={Dec} }
 @inproceedings{delborne_2016, title={Diverse approaches for public engagement}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1603/ice.2016.92373}, DOI={10.1603/ice.2016.92373}, publisher={Entomological Society of America}, author={Delborne, Jason A}, year={2016} }
 @misc{delborne_2016, title={Engagement as governance}, author={Delborne, Jason}, year={2016}, month={Nov} }
 @inproceedings{delborne_2016, title={Engaging Publics as Experts,” Effective Management of Plant-Parasitic Nematodes,}, author={Delborne, Jason}, year={2016}, month={Mar} }
 @misc{delborne_2016, title={GMOs, public perception, and opportunities for public engagement}, author={Delborne, Jason}, year={2016}, month={Sep} }
 @book{collins_heitman_achee_chandler_delborne_gaut_higgs_kaebnick_kingiri_landis_et al._2016, place={Washington, D.C}, title={Gene Drives on the Horizon}, ISBN={9780309437875 9780309437905}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.17226/23405}, DOI={10.17226/23405}, publisher={National Academies Press}, author={Collins, J.P. and Heitman, E. and Achee, N.L. and Chandler, V. and Delborne, J.A. and Gaut, B.S. and Higgs, S. and Kaebnick, G.E. and Kingiri, A. and Landis, W. and et al.}, year={2016} }
 @misc{delborne_2016, title={Gene drives on the horizon}, author={Delborne, Jason}, year={2016}, month={Sep} }
 @misc{delborne_2016, title={Genetic Engineering and Society}, author={Delborne, Jason}, year={2016}, month={Apr} }
 @inproceedings{delborne_farooque_shapiro_2016, title={Genetically Engineered Algae Public Engagement Strategies: A Stakeholder Workshop}, author={Delborne, Jason and Farooque, M. and Shapiro, J.}, year={2016}, month={Oct} }
 @inproceedings{delborne_2016, title={Governing emerging biotechnologies: Expertise, democracy, and public engagement}, author={Delborne, Jason}, year={2016}, month={Nov} }
 @inproceedings{delborne_2016, title={Incorporating public engagement throughout phased testing [of gene drives]}, author={Delborne, Jason}, year={2016}, month={Nov} }
 @inproceedings{delborne_2016, title={Mapping gene drive governance}, author={Delborne, Jason}, year={2016}, month={Sep} }
 @inproceedings{elsensohn_brown_delborne_burrack_2016, title={New kids on the block: Regulatory issues around emerging pests and emerging technologies}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1603/ice.2016.108380}, DOI={10.1603/ice.2016.108380}, publisher={Entomological Society of America}, author={Elsensohn, Johanna and Brown, Z.S. and Delborne, J.A. and Burrack, H.J.}, year={2016} }
 @inproceedings{delborne_2016, title={Perspectives from recent proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and its June 2016 report, Gene Drives on the Horizon}, author={Delborne, Jason}, year={2016}, month={Jul} }
 @article{kaebnick_heitman_collins_delborne_landis_sawyer_taneyhill_winickoff_2016, title={Precaution and governance of emerging technologies}, volume={354}, ISSN={0036-8075 1095-9203}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.aah5125}, DOI={10.1126/science.aah5125}, abstractNote={Precaution can be consistent with support of science}, number={6313}, journal={Science}, publisher={American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)}, author={Kaebnick, Gregory E. and Heitman, Elizabeth and Collins, James P. and Delborne, Jason A. and Landis, Wayne G. and Sawyer, Keegan and Taneyhill, Lisa A. and Winickoff, David E.}, year={2016}, month={Nov}, pages={710–711} }
 @misc{delborne_2016, title={Public attitudes, perceptions, and engagement in the field of genetic modification}, author={Delborne, Jason}, year={2016}, month={Aug} }
 @misc{delborne_2016, title={Public engagement and emerging biotechnologies: Opportunities and challenges for response-able science}, author={Delborne, Jason}, year={2016}, month={Dec} }
 @misc{delborne_2016, title={Reflections from the National Academies of Sciences committee on non-human gene drives and responsible conduct}, author={Delborne, Jason}, year={2016}, month={Dec} }
 @misc{delborne_2016, title={Research, Advocacy, and Engagement: Exploring the Roles of Experts in Democracy}, author={Delborne, Jason}, year={2016}, month={Oct} }
 @article{kimmel_toohey_delborne_2016, title={Roadblocks to Responsible Innovation: Exploring technology assessment and adoption in U.S Public Highway Construction}, volume={44}, ISSN={0160-791X}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2015.12.002}, DOI={10.1016/j.techsoc.2015.12.002}, abstractNote={U.S. public highway construction industry professionals are responsible for assessing and adopting new technology that can improve the cost and quality of roadways. This paper investigates features of the technology assessment and adoption process in the U.S. public highway construction industry that both facilitate and hinder responsible innovation. Often technological innovations are incongruent with current specifications, i.e., regulatory construction standards, whereby specification reform serves as a precursor to implementation. We examine this aspect of technology assessment and adoption through a novel application of Kingdon's theory of policy agenda setting to a highly technical state bureaucratic institution using a case study on Intelligent Compaction. Specification reform relating to Intelligent Compaction is occurring in nearly a quarter of U.S. states. Analysis of interviews with industry professionals revealed that institutional incentives for supporting innovations were not the main drivers for adoption, and there exists a conservative culture that inhibits change. Individuals that go against this grain by championing change do so based on their personal character, ideological affiliations and a perceived sense of social obligation, which coincides with the principles set forth in the responsible research and innovation literature. These individuals, whom we identify as Kingdon's policy entrepreneurs, appear to present themselves in four roles in this industry: explorer, pioneer, gatekeeper, and leader. Our findings indicate that alignment of these roles creates an environment conducive to responsible technology assessment and adoption, and therefore greater societal benefit. Ultimately, we hope this study will benefit U.S. Highway Construction Industry regulatory environments by enhancing identification of specification processes, key roles, and personal/ethical ideologies that may be conducive to fostering a culture of responsible innovation.}, journal={Technology in Society}, publisher={Elsevier BV}, author={Kimmel, S. and Toohey, N. and Delborne, J.}, year={2016}, pages={66–77} }
 @inbook{delborne_2016, place={Singapore}, title={Suppression and Dissent in Science}, ISBN={9789812870971 9789812870988}, url={https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-098-8_30}, DOI={10.1007/978-981-287-098-8_30}, booktitle={Handbook of Academic Integrity}, publisher={Springer Reference}, author={Delborne, J.A.}, editor={Bretag, T.Editor}, year={2016}, pages={943–956} }
 @inproceedings{delborne_2015, title={Anticipating Responsible Innovation: Genetically-Modified Trees and Conceptualizations of Technological and Regulatory Futures}, author={Delborne, J.}, year={2015}, month={May} }
 @inproceedings{delborne_rivers_robinson_2015, title={Anticipatory Governance and Responsible Innovation: Technological and Regulatory Futures of Genetically Modified Trees}, author={Delborne, J.A. and Rivers, L. and Robinson, M.}, year={2015}, month={Sep} }
 @inproceedings{delborne_harrison_2015, title={Boasting Chestnuts: Genetically-Modified Trees, Responsible Innovation, & Anticipatory Governance}, author={Delborne, J.A. and Harrison, R.}, year={2015}, month={Nov} }
 @inproceedings{delborne_2015, title={Engaging Publics in Science and Technology, When Science and Citizens Connect: Public Engagement on Genetically Modified Organisms}, url={https://research.ncsu.edu/ges/files/2015/08/Engaging-Publics-Delborne.pdf}, author={Delborne, Jason}, year={2015}, month={Jan} }
 @misc{delborne_2015, title={Genome Engineering for Biological Insights and Product Development}, author={Delborne, Jason}, year={2015}, month={Apr} }
 @inbook{hoopes_delborne_2015, place={Farmington Hills, MI}, edition={2nd}, title={HeLa Cells}, volume={2}, booktitle={Ethics, Science, Technology, and Engineering: A Global Resource}, publisher={Macmillan Reference USA}, author={Hoopes, J. and Delborne, J.}, editor={Holbrook, J.B.Editor}, year={2015}, pages={446–448} }
 @article{kimmel_toohey_delborne_2015, title={Innovation at the Crossroads: Exploring the Intersection of Innovation Adoption and Specification Reform in Public Highway Construction}, volume={E-C199}, ISSN={0097-8515}, url={https://trid.trb.org/view.aspx?id=1371964}, note={place: Washington, DC}, number={199}, journal={Transportation Research Circular}, publisher={Transportation Research Board}, author={Kimmel, Shawn and Toohey, Nathan and Delborne, Jason}, year={2015}, pages={9–18} }
 @inproceedings{delborne_2015, title={Moral Fiber: Genetically Modified Trees, Responsible Innovation, and Environmental Justice}, author={Delborne, Jason}, year={2015}, month={Sep} }
 @inbook{harremoës_delborne_2015, place={Farmington Hills, MI}, edition={2nd}, title={Precautionary Principle}, volume={3}, booktitle={Ethics, Science, Technology, and Engineering: A Global Resource}, publisher={Macmillan Reference USA}, author={Harremoës, P. and Delborne, J.}, editor={Holbrook, J.B.Editor}, year={2015}, pages={449–455} }
 @inproceedings{delborne_2015, title={Public Attitudes, Perceptions, and Engagement in the Field of Genetic Modification}, url={https://research.ncsu.edu/ges/files/2015/08/Public-Attitudes_Delborne.pdf}, author={Delborne, Jason}, year={2015}, month={Apr} }
 @inproceedings{delborne_2015, title={Public Engagement in Science and Technology}, author={Delborne, Jason}, year={2015}, month={Jan} }
 @inproceedings{delborne_2015, title={Roasting (GM) Chestnuts: Disruptions in GMO Innovation, Governance, and Engagement}, author={Delborne, Jason}, year={2015}, month={Nov} }
 @book{siplon_herring_kuzma_delborne_2015, title={Synthetic Biology}, url={https://www.informalscience.org/building-biology-multi-site-public-engagement-science-synthetic-biology-innovations-development}, number={NSF Award #1421179}, journal={Building with Biology: Multi-Site Public Engagement with Science (MSPES)}, author={Siplon, G. and Herring, B. and Kuzma, J. and Delborne, J.}, year={2015} }
 @misc{delborne_2015, place={Washington, D.C}, title={Transgenic Corn and the Monarch Butterfly}, journal={Towards Improving the Interfaces between Scientists and Citizens}, author={Delborne, Jason}, year={2015}, month={Jan} }
 @misc{delborne_2014, title={Anticipating Futures in Forest Biotechnology}, author={Delborne, Jason}, year={2014}, month={Oct} }
 @misc{delborne_2014, title={Anticipatory Translation: Genetically Modified Trees and Conceptualizations of Technological, Regulatory, and Cultural Futures}, author={Delborne, Jason}, year={2014}, month={Dec} }
 @misc{delborne_2014, title={Biofuels, Biodiversity, and Responsible Innovation: The Case of Genetically Engineered Trees}, author={Delborne, Jason}, year={2014}, month={Nov} }
 @article{evans_jasanoff_calvert_delborne_doubleday_frow_funtowicz_green_guston_hurlburt_et al._2014, title={CORRESPONDENCE: Synthetic biology: Missing the point}, volume={510}, ISSN={0028-0836 1476-4687}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/510218b}, DOI={10.1038/510218b}, number={7504}, journal={Nature}, publisher={Springer Science and Business Media LLC}, author={Evans, S.W. and Jasanoff, S. and Calvert, J. and Delborne, J. and Doubleday, R. and Frow, E. and Funtowicz, S. and Green, B. and Guston, D.H. and Hurlburt, B. and et al.}, year={2014}, month={Jun}, pages={218} }
 @inproceedings{robinson_delborne_rivers_2014, title={Does Anticipating Futures Shape Governance? How One NGO Hopes to Predict and Shape Global Regulatory and Commercial Futures in the Creation of Genetically Modified Trees}, author={Robinson, M. and Delborne, J. and Rivers, L.}, year={2014}, month={Nov} }
 @inproceedings{delborne_rivers_robinson_2014, title={Doubling Back on Risk Perception: Scientists, Genetically Modified Trees, and the Risks of Technological Rejection}, author={Delborne, J. and Rivers, L. and Robinson, M.}, year={2014}, month={Aug} }
 @inproceedings{delborne_2014, title={Grasping Synthetic Biology}, author={Delborne, J.}, year={2014}, month={Nov} }
 @inproceedings{delborne_gould_2014, title={Intersections of Genetics and Society}, author={Delborne, Jason and Gould, Fred}, year={2014}, month={Sep} }
 @misc{delborne_2014, place={Waterville Valley, NH}, title={Natural Resources: Socio-Ecological Systems and Policy}, author={Delborne, Jason}, year={2014}, month={Aug} }
 @inbook{delborne_2014, place={New York, NY}, title={Navigating Controversies in Search of Neutrality: Analyzing Efforts by Public Think Tanks to Inform Climate Change Policy}, booktitle={Culture, Politics, and Climate Change: How Information Shapes our Common Future}, publisher={Routledge/Earthscan}, author={Delborne, J.A.}, editor={Crow, D.A. and Boykoff, M.Editors}, year={2014}, pages={163–179} }
 @inbook{delborne_2014, title={Navigating controversies in search of neutrallty: Analyzing efforts by public think tanks to inform c1imate change policy}, ISBN={9780415661485}, url={http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84920433699&partnerID=MN8TOARS}, DOI={10.4324/9780203073407}, abstractNote={Focusing on cultural values and norms as they are translated into politics and policy outcomes, this book presents a unique contribution in combining research from varied disciplines and from both the developed and developing world. This collection draws from multiple perspectives to present an overview of the knowledge related to our current understanding of climate change politics and culture. It is divided into four sections – Culture and Values, Communication and Media, Politics and Policy, and Future Directions in Climate Politics Scholarship – each followed by a commentary from a key expert in the field. The book includes analysis of the challenges and opportunities for establishing successful communication on climate change among scientists, the media, policy-makers, and activists. With an emphasis on the interrelation between social, cultural, and political aspects of climate change communication, this volume should be of interest to students and scholars of climate change, environment studies, environmental policy, communication, cultural studies, media studies, politics, sociology.}, booktitle={Culture, Polltics and Cllmate Change: How Information Shapes our Common Future}, publisher={Routledge/Earthscan}, author={Delborne, Jason}, editor={Crow, D.A. and Boykoff, M.Editors}, year={2014}, pages={163–179} }
 @inproceedings{delborne_2014, title={Perspectives on Public Perceptions of Biotechnology}, author={Delborne, J.}, year={2014}, month={May} }
 @article{bouchey_delborne_2014, title={Redefining safety in commercial space: Understanding debates over the safety of private human spaceflight initiatives in the United States}, volume={30}, ISSN={0265-9646}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.spacepol.2014.03.002}, DOI={10.1016/j.spacepol.2014.03.002}, abstractNote={Abstract In 2009 President Obama proposed a budget for the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) that canceled the Constellation program and included the development of commercial crew transportation systems into low Earth orbit. This significant move to shift human spaceflight into the private sector sparked political debate, but much of the discourse has focused on impacts to “safety.” Although no one disputes the importance of keeping astronauts safe, strategies for defining safety reveal contrasting visions for the space program and opposing values regarding the privatization of U.S. space exploration. In other words, the debate over commercial control has largely become encoded in arguments over safety. Specifically, proponents of using commercial options for transporting astronauts to the International Space Station (ISS) argue that commercial vehicles would be safe for astronauts, while proponents of NASA control argue that commercial vehicles would be unsafe, or at least not as safe as NASA vehicles. The cost of the spaceflight program, the technical requirements for designing a vehicle, the track record of the launch vehicle, and the experience of the launch provider are all incorporated into what defines safety in human spaceflight. This paper analyzes these contested criteria through conceptual lenses provided by fields of science and technology policy (STP) and science, technology, and society (STS). We ultimately contend that these differences in definition result not merely from ambiguous understandings of safety, but from intentional and strategic choices guided by normative positions on the commercialization of human spaceflight. The debate over safety is better considered a proxy debate for the partisan preferences embedded within the dispute over public or private spaceflight.}, number={2}, journal={Space Policy}, publisher={Elsevier BV}, author={Bouchey, M. and Delborne, J.}, year={2014}, pages={53–61} }
 @inproceedings{pitts_delborne_2014, title={Regulatory (Mouse) Traps: Social, Cultural and Ethical Issues in Classifying Genetically Engineered Organisms}, author={Pitts, E.A. and Delborne, J.A.}, year={2014}, month={May} }
 @inproceedings{delborne_2014, place={Texcoco, Mexico}, title={Science, Democracy, and Public Engagement}, author={Delborne, Jason}, year={2014}, month={Mar} }
 @inproceedings{delborne_2014, title={Transgenics & Society: Towards a Productive Dialogue}, author={Delborne, Jason}, year={2014}, month={Jul} }
 @misc{delborne_2014, title={What’s that hiding behind the poll? Perceiving public perceptions of biotechnology}, url={http://www.culturalcognition.net/blog/2014/6/24/whats-that-hiding-behind-the-poll-perceiving-public-percepti.html}, journal={The Cultural Cognition Project at Yale Law School}, author={Delborne, J.}, editor={Kahan, D.Editor}, year={2014}, month={Jun} }
 @inproceedings{delborne_2014, title={‘Next Generation’ Technologies: Expectations, Continuities, and Governance}, author={Delborne, Jason}, year={2014}, month={Aug} }
 @inbook{wigner_delborne_2013, title={Pickens, T. Boone}, ISBN={9781587658525}, booktitle={Encyclopedia of energy}, publisher={Ipswich, Massachusetts: Salem Press}, author={Wigner, A. and Delborne, J.}, year={2013}, pages={1015–17} }
 @article{delborne_schneider_bal_cozzens_worthington_2013, title={Policy pathways, policy networks, and citizen deliberation: Disseminating the results of World Wide Views on Global Warming in the USA}, volume={40}, ISSN={0302-3427 1471-5430}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scs124}, DOI={10.1093/scipol/scs124}, abstractNote={Leading a coalition spanning 38 countries, the Danish Board of Technology organized World Wide Views on Global Warming (WWViews) on September 26, 2009. WWViews represented a pioneering effort to hold simultaneous citizen deliberations focusing on questions of climate change policy addressed at the UN Climate Change Conference (COP15) in December 2009. Sponsors and organizers envisioned WWViews as a means to affect the COP15 negotiations, and the project included numerous strategies to influence policy-making. This paper examines the success of such strategies in the USA through the lens of 'policy pathways,' routes of influence to affect the behavior of policy-makers and policy-making bodies. Our analysis highlights the difficulty of connecting citizen deliberations to meaningful policy pathways, and the importance of recognizing and enlisting policy networks, which we define as the collection of relationships, nodes, or pre-existing organizational ties that can be mobilized in the service of agenda- or alternative-setting. Copyright The Author 2013. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com, Oxford University Press.}, number={3}, journal={Science and Public Policy}, publisher={Oxford University Press (OUP)}, author={Delborne, J. and Schneider, J. and Bal, R. and Cozzens, S. and Worthington, R.}, year={2013}, month={Feb}, pages={378–392} }
 @inproceedings{delborne_2013, title={Public Think Tanks and Scientific Controversy: Analyzing Efforts by Public Think Tanks to Inform Climate Change Policy}, author={Delborne, J.}, year={2013}, month={Oct} }
 @inproceedings{delborne_2013, title={Public Think Tanks and Scientific Controversy: Analyzing Efforts by Public Think Tanks to Inform Climate Change Policy}, author={Delborne, Jason}, year={2013}, month={Dec} }
 @inbook{schneider_delborne_2013, title={Seeking the spotlight: WWViews and the US media context}, url={http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84872047278&partnerID=MN8TOARS}, booktitle={Citizen Participation in Global Environmental Governance}, author={Schneider, J. and Delborne, J.}, year={2013}, pages={241–260} }
 @book{hollander_miller_delborne_munakata marr_rabkin_sittenfeld_2012, title={Climate Change, Engineered Systems, and Society}, author={Hollander, R. and Miller, C. and Delborne, J. and Munakata Marr, J. and Rabkin, D. and Sittenfeld, D.}, year={2012}, month={Apr} }
 @inproceedings{ikard_delborne_brunsdale_2012, place={Denver, CO}, title={Dammed If You Do, Dammed If You Don’t: Tensions between Ensuring Dam Safety and Maximizing Colorado’s Water Supply}, volume={2}, url={http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84879146050&partnerID=MN8TOARS}, booktitle={Dam Safety 2012 Conference Proceedings}, author={Ikard, S. and Delborne, J. and Brunsdale, K.}, year={2012}, month={Sep}, pages={1526–1558} }
 @inproceedings{lucena_schneider_2012, title={Energy Education at CSM: A Humanities and Social Sciences Approach}, author={Lucena, J. and Schneider, J.}, year={2012}, month={May} }
 @article{delborne_anderson_kleinman_colin_powell_2012, title={Information beyond the forum: Motivations, strategies, and impacts of citizen participants seeking information during a consensus conference}, volume={22}, ISSN={0963-6625 1361-6609}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0963662512447173}, DOI={10.1177/0963662512447173}, abstractNote={ During traditional consensus conferences, organizers control the formal information available to participants—by compiling structured background materials and recruiting expert panelists. Less formally, however, participants are encouraged to bring their own experiences into the deliberations, and in doing so, they often seek outside information. We explore this heretofore understudied phenomenon of information seeking during a deliberative event: the U.S. National Citizens’ Technology Forum (2008), which addressed the convergence of nanotechnology, biotechnology, information technology, and cognitive science on the potential development of human-enhancement technologies. Through interviews with participants and observation of in-person and online deliberations, we identify outside information-seeking strategies and motivations. Our study demonstrates that conceptualizing models of deliberation as standalone settings of communication exchange ignores the reality of the complex information environment from which deliberative participants draw when making sense of technical issues. Future citizen deliberations must incorporate outside information seeking in the design of the exercises. }, number={8}, journal={Public Understanding of Science}, publisher={SAGE Publications}, author={Delborne, Jason and Anderson, A. A. and Kleinman, D. L. and Colin, M. and Powell, M.}, year={2012}, month={Jun}, pages={955–970} }
 @inbook{delborne_schneider_2012, place={London}, title={Moving Forward with Citizen Deliberation: Lessons and Inspiration from the National Citizens’ Technology Forum}, booktitle={Nanotechnology and the Public: Risk Perception and Risk Communication}, publisher={CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group}, author={Delborne, J. and Schneider, J.}, editor={Priest, S.H.Editor}, year={2012}, pages={103–11} }
 @inbook{delborne_j._2012, title={Moving forward with citizen deliberation: Lessons and inspiration from the National Citizens' Technology Forum}, ISBN={9781439826836}, booktitle={Nanotechnology and the public : risk perception and risk communication}, publisher={Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press}, author={Delborne, J. A. and J., Schneider}, year={2012} }
 @book{delborne_2012, title={Navigating Controversy, Seeking Objectivity: Goals and Practices of Public Think Tanks to Provide Expertise to Policymakers}, author={Delborne, Jason}, year={2012}, month={Mar} }
 @inproceedings{delborne_2012, title={Public Engagement in Science and Technology: When the Stakes are High and Debates are Lively}, publisher={University of Colorado-Boulder}, author={Delborne, Jason}, year={2012}, month={Sep} }
 @inproceedings{kimmel_toohey_delborne_2012, title={Roadblocks in Highway Innovation: Public Highway Construction, Innovation, and Regulation}, author={Kimmel, S. and Toohey, N. and Delborne, J.}, year={2012}, month={Mar} }
 @inbook{schneider_delborne_2012, place={London}, title={Seeking the Spotlight: World Wide Views and the U.S. Media Context}, ISBN={9781849713795}, booktitle={Citizen Participation in Global Environmental Governance}, publisher={Earthscan Publications}, author={Schneider, J. and Delborne, J.}, editor={Rask, M. and Worthington, R. and Lammi, M.Editors}, year={2012}, pages={241–60} }
 @book{delborne_2012, title={State-Sponsored Expertise and the Navigation of Political and Scientific Controversy: Reports on Climate Change Policy by U.S. Public Think Tanks}, author={Delborne, Jason}, year={2012}, month={Jun} }
 @inproceedings{delborne_2012, title={Strategies of neutrality between political and scientific controversy: Comparing efforts by U.S. public think tanks to inform debates on climate change policy}, booktitle={International Conference on Culture, Politics, and Climate Change}, author={Delborne, J.}, year={2012} }
 @misc{delborne_wigner_2012, place={Ipswich, MA}, title={T. Boone Pickens}, volume={3}, journal={Encyclopedia of Energy}, publisher={Salem Press}, author={Delborne, J. and Wigner, A.}, editor={Pierce, M.A.Editor}, year={2012}, pages={1015–17} }
 @article{powell_delborne_colin_2011, title={Beyond Engagement Exercises: Exploring the U.S. National Citizens’ Technology Forum from the Bottom-Up}, volume={7}, url={http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-80455130166&partnerID=MN8TOARS}, number={1}, journal={Journal of Public Deliberation}, author={Powell, M. and Delborne, J. and Colin, M.}, year={2011}, pages={47} }
 @article{powell_delborne_m._2011, title={Beyond engagement exercises: Exploring the U.S. National Citizens? Technology Forum from the bottom-up}, volume={7}, number={1}, journal={Journal of Public Deliberation (Online)}, author={Powell, M. and Delborne, J. A. and M., Colin}, year={2011} }
 @article{delborne_2011, title={Constructing Audiences in Scientific Controversy}, volume={25}, ISSN={["1464-5297"]}, url={http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-78650234950&partnerID=MN8TOARS}, DOI={10.1080/02691728.2010.534565}, abstractNote={Scientists, their allies, and opponents engage in struggles not just over what is true, but who may validate, access, and engage contentious knowledge. Viewed through the metaphor of theater, science is always performed for an audience, and that audience is constructed strategically and with consequence. Insights from theater studies, the public understanding of science, and literature on boundary work and framing contribute to a proposal for a framework to explore the construction of audiences during scientific controversy, consisting of three parameters: history, composition, and role. Applying this framework to the controversy over the presence of genetically modified maize in Mexico demonstrates how multiple and contested audiences form during a scientific controversy. Different scientific “productions” construct distinct or overlapping audiences; audiences constructed at one time become “easy recruits” for later stages of the controversy; and the various roles cast for different audiences showcase strategies for building scientific power and reflect assumptions about the capacity for publics to participate in the governance and production of science.}, number={1}, journal={Social Epistemology}, publisher={Informa UK (Taylor & Francis)}, author={Delborne, J.A.}, year={2011}, pages={67–95} }
 @misc{delborne_2011, place={Washington, DC}, title={Effective Interventions in Undergraduate Engineering Education. Networking Educational Priorities for Climate, Engineered Systems, and Society}, author={Delborne, Jason}, year={2011}, month={Oct} }
 @article{kleinman_delborne_anderson_2011, title={Engaging citizens: The high cost of citizen participation in high technology}, volume={20}, ISSN={["0963-6625"]}, url={http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-79954548080&partnerID=MN8TOARS}, DOI={10.1177/0963662509347137}, abstractNote={ This paper contributes to ongoing discussions on democratic engagement through an exploration of citizen participation in two citizen consensus conferences on nanotechnology, one held in 2005 and the second in 2008. We analyze the factors that motivate citizens to participate formally in debates about emerging “high technologies” and consider demographic and related characteristics of the participants in these two consensus conferences and the reasons they provided for participating. We suggest that in an era in which the barriers to civic engagement—most especially time—are large for many citizens, significant incentives are likely to affect participation. These incentives may be internal (e.g. a personal interest in a topic or an investment in a policy outcome) or external (e.g. money). In this context, we critique the aim of recruiting “blank slate” participants for consensus conferences and other deliberative democratic forums. }, number={2}, journal={PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE}, publisher={SAGE Publications}, author={Kleinman, Daniel Lee and Delborne, Jason A. and Anderson, Ashley A.}, year={2011}, month={Mar}, pages={221–240} }
 @inproceedings{delborne_wigner_kinchy_2011, place={Troy, NY}, title={Hope for Sustainability, Hype for Natural Gas: The ‘Bridge Fuel’ Metaphor, Refined}, author={Delborne, J. and Wigner, A. and Kinchy, A.}, year={2011}, month={Apr} }
 @article{powell_colin_kleinman_delborne_anderson_2011, title={Imagining Ordinary Citizens? Conceptualized and Actual Participants for Deliberations on Emerging Technologies}, volume={20}, ISSN={["0950-5431"]}, url={http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-79952466399&partnerID=MN8TOARS}, DOI={10.1080/09505430903567741}, abstractNote={In this paper, we explore conceptualizations of ‘ordinary’ citizens common in public engagement forums on emerging technologies and assumptions from deliberative theory that ordinary people are more likely to be appropriately ‘changed’ through deliberative processes facilitated by experts. Looking at a large US public forum event [the National Citizens Technology Forum (NCTF)], we asked: What were the goals for this exercise and how did they shape conceptualizations of ordinariness and representativeness? Whose goals and conceptualizations were they? Were the engaged citizens ordinary and representative—and were they changed by the exercise? Our exploration revealed that exercise organizers conceived of ordinary citizens as people lacking science and technology backgrounds, without advocacy or business connections to the technologies at hand, and demographically reflecting the US population. Exercise materials also implied that ideal ordinary participants would lack strong opinions and emotions about these technologies. Actual NCTF participants, however, tended to be more educated, have higher incomes, and to be more liberal than the US public, and participants from all backgrounds had a range of relevant knowledge, experiences and opinions about science and technology. They were changed by the exercise in complex and conflicting ways—based as much on their own knowledge and reflections on relational dynamics as on exercise processes, interactions with experts, and information provided in the exercise. We argue that inadequately explored ideas about ordinary citizens are highly problematic. Further, invisible assumptions about what is ‘normal’ among experts and status quo institutions serve to reify the lay–expert divide that engagement exercises are intended to counteract.}, number={1}, journal={Science as Culture}, publisher={Informa UK (Taylor & Francis)}, author={Powell, M. and Colin, M. and Kleinman, D.L. and Delborne, J. and Anderson, A.}, year={2011}, pages={37–70} }
 @inproceedings{lucena_delborne_johnson_leydens_munakata-marr_schneider_2011, place={Denver, CO}, title={Integration of Climate Change in the Analysis and Design of Engineered Systems: Barriers and Opportunities for Engineering Education}, volume={5}, url={http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84869185713&partnerID=MN8TOARS}, DOI={10.1115/imece2011-64975}, abstractNote={The goal of this paper is to begin mapping perspectives of engineering faculty on barriers and opportunities related to the integration of climate change in the analysis and design of engineered systems (CC&ES). Although both sustainability and renewable energy have been receiving increasing attention in engineering education for quite some time, climate change, especially as it relates to engineered systems, has yet to become a widely accepted topic of teaching and research. From recent literature on engineering education and from interviews with engineering faculty, a picture emerges of whether and how climate change is an important dimension in the analysis and design of engineered systems. From those sources, we begin to see what it might take to incorporate the relationship between climate change and engineered systems in engineering education, what the barriers and opportunities to this incorporation might be, and what strategies might be available to institutionalize this incorporation in engineering education. Support for this paper comes from a larger research project on “Climate Change, Engineered Systems, and Society” which has the goal to develop conceptual and educational frameworks and networks of change agents to promote effective formal and informal education for engineering students, policymakers and the public at large. The project partners include the National Academy of Engineering (NAE), Arizona State University, Boston Museum of Science, Colorado School of Mines (CSM), and the University of Virginia. Within this larger team, the CSM team is planning to develop a testbed for the incorporation of CC&ES in engineering education. Hence, our first step is to find related curricular innovations in the engineering education literature and perspectives from engineering faculty on barriers and opportunities to the integration of CC&ES in engineering education.}, booktitle={Proceedings of the ASME 2011 International Mechanical Engineering Congress & Exposition, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition}, publisher={ASME International }, author={Lucena, J. and Delborne, J. and Johnson, K. and Leydens, J. and Munakata-Marr, J. and Schneider, J.}, year={2011}, month={Nov}, pages={199–206} }
 @misc{delborne_2011, title={Interactions – Defining the Problems}, author={Delborne, Jason}, year={2011}, month={Jun} }
 @inproceedings{delborne_schneider_bal_cozzens_worthington_2011, title={Policy Pathways, Policy Networks, and Citizen Deliberation: Disseminating the Results of World Wide Views on Global Warming in the United States}, author={Delborne, J. and Schneider, J. and Bal, R. and Cozzens, S. and Worthington, R.}, year={2011}, month={Sep} }
 @inproceedings{bouchey_delborne_2011, title={Redefining Safety in Commercial Space}, author={Bouchey, M. and Delborne, J.}, year={2011}, month={Sep} }
 @inbook{delborne_galusky_2011, place={Cambridge, MA}, title={Toxic Transformations: Constructing Audiences for Environmental Justice}, ISBN={9780262516181}, url={http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84895643483&partnerID=MN8TOARS}, DOI={10.7551/mitpress/9780262015790.003.0004}, booktitle={Technoscience and Environmental Justice: Expert Cultures in a Grassroots Movement}, publisher={MIT Press}, author={Delborne, J.A. and Galusky, W.}, editor={Ottinger, G. and Cohen, B.Editors}, year={2011}, pages={63–92} }
 @article{delborne_anderson_kleinman_colin_powell_2011, title={Virtual Deliberation? Prospects and Challenges for Integrating the Internet in Consensus Conferences}, volume={20}, ISSN={["1361-6609"]}, url={http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-79956366904&partnerID=MN8TOARS}, DOI={10.1177/0963662509347138}, abstractNote={ Consensus conferences have functioned well in small, relatively homogeneous countries such as Denmark. In the geographically sprawling and socially diverse United States, however, meaningful citizen deliberation and decision-making on science and technology depends upon the ability to bring more participants “into the room.” The National Citizens’ Technology Forum, held in March 2008, responded to this need by integrating panels of citizens from multiple US cities in structured face-to-face and online deliberation. We analyze the success of this experiment by focusing on the experience of participants during the online deliberation component. We conclude with recommendations for future organizers of online deliberation, focusing on the benefits of combining synchronous and asynchronous engagement and improving facilitation practice and software capabilities. }, number={3}, journal={Public Understanding of Science}, author={Delborne, J.A. and Anderson, A. and Kleinman, D.L. and Colin, M. and Powell, M.}, year={2011}, pages={367–84} }
 @inproceedings{delborne_wigner_kinchy_2011, title={‘Bridge Fuel’: Metaphorical Hope and Hype}, author={Delborne, J.A. and Wigner, A. and Kinchy, A.}, year={2011}, month={Nov} }
 @inbook{delborne_2010, place={New Rochelle, NY}, title={Biofuels: Streams and Themes}, volume={3: From evolution to energy}, ISBN={9781934854204}, booktitle={Controversies in Science and Technology}, publisher={Mary Ann Liebert, Inc}, author={Delborne, J.A.}, editor={Kleinman, D. and Delborne, J. and Cloud-Hansen, K. and Handelsman, J.Editors}, year={2010}, pages={175–90} }
 @inproceedings{schneider_delborne_2010, title={Citizen Voices in the Global Climate and Energy Challenge: Worldwide Views and Citizen Deliberation}, author={Schneider, J. and Delborne, Jason}, year={2010}, month={Feb} }
 @inproceedings{delborne_2010, title={Constructing Audiences in Scientific Controversy}, author={Delborne, Jason}, year={2010}, month={Sep} }
 @book{kleinman_delborne_cloud-hansen_handelsman_2010, title={Controversies in Science and Technology, Volume 3: From Evolution to Energy}, ISBN={9780299203948}, publisher={New Rochelle, NY: Mary Ann Liebert}, author={Kleinman, D. L. and Delborne, J. A. and Cloud-Hansen, K. and Handelsman, J.}, year={2010} }
 @inproceedings{parekh_stone_delborne_2010, title={Coordinating intelligent and continuous performance monitoring with dam and levee safety management policy*}, url={http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84879066622&partnerID=MN8TOARS}, booktitle={Association of State Dam Safety Officials Annual Conference 2010, Dam Safety 2010}, author={Parekh, M. and Stone, K. and Delborne, J.}, year={2010}, pages={1766–1776} }
 @book{kleinman_delborne_cloud-hansen_handelsman_2010, place={New Rochelle, NY}, series={Controversies in Science and Technology}, title={From Evolution to Energy}, volume={3}, publisher={Mary Ann Liebert, Inc}, year={2010}, collection={Controversies in Science and Technology} }
 @inproceedings{parekh_stone_delborne_2010, title={Intelligent Monitoring of Dams and Levees: Can Technological Advancements in Continuous Monitoring Stimulate Policy Change?}, author={Parekh, M.L. and Stone, K.A. and Delborne, J.}, year={2010}, month={Sep} }
 @inbook{delborne_kleinman_cloud-hansen_handelsman_2010, place={New Rochelle, NY}, title={Introduction: From Evolution to Energy}, volume={3: From Evolution to Energy}, booktitle={Controversies in Science and Technology}, publisher={Mary Ann Liebert, Inc}, author={Delborne, J.A. and Kleinman, D.L. and Cloud-Hansen, K.A. and Handelsman, J.}, editor={Kleinman, D. and Delborne, J. and Cloud-Hansen, K. and Handelsman, J.Editors}, year={2010}, pages={xi-xxvi} }
 @inproceedings{delborne_2010, title={Reaching Across or Reaching Within? STS and STP Networks, Communities, and Questions}, author={Delborne, Jason}, year={2010}, month={Aug} }
 @inproceedings{delborne_2010, title={Reflections on the United Nations Climate Conference in Copenhagen (COP15)}, author={Delborne, Jason}, year={2010}, month={Jan} }
 @inproceedings{delborne_2010, title={Translating World Wide Views Results into Policy – Media and Dissemination to Policymakers}, author={Delborne, Jason}, year={2010}, month={Jun} }
 @inproceedings{kleinman_delborne_anderson_2009, place={Washington, D.C}, title={Engaging Citizens: The High Cost of Citizen Participation in High Technology}, author={Kleinman, D.L. and Delborne, J. and Anderson, A.}, year={2009}, month={Oct} }
 @inproceedings{delborne_2009, title={Nanotechnology and the Public: Data for Decision Makers}, author={Delborne, Jason}, year={2009}, month={Mar} }
 @inproceedings{delborne_warner_2009, place={Washington, D.C}, title={The Practice of Scientific Dissent}, author={Delborne, Jason and Warner, K.D.}, year={2009}, month={Oct} }
 @misc{delborne_2009, title={The Practice of Scientific Dissent in Agricultural Biotechnology}, author={Delborne, Jason}, year={2009}, month={Mar} }
 @inproceedings{delborne_galusky_2009, title={Toxic Transformations: Constructing Audiences for Environmental Justice}, author={Delborne, J. and Galusky, W.}, year={2009}, month={Oct} }
 @article{kleinman_delborne_autry_2008, title={Beyond the Precautionary Principle in Progressive Politics: Toward the Social Regulation of Genetically Modified Organisms}, volume={4}, url={http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-54449093171&partnerID=MN8TOARS}, number={1/2}, journal={Tailoring Biotechnologies}, author={Kleinman, D.L. and Delborne, J.A. and Autry, R.}, year={2008}, pages={41–54} }
 @inbook{delborne_kinchy_2008, place={Westport, CT}, title={Genetically Modified Organisms}, volume={1}, ISBN={9780313341649}, booktitle={Battleground: Science and Technology}, publisher={Greenwood Press}, author={Delborne, J.A. and Kinchy, A.J.}, editor={Restivo, S. and Denton, P.H.Editors}, year={2008}, pages={182–95} }
 @article{delborne_2008, title={Transgenes and Transgressions: Scientific Dissent as Heterogeneous Practice}, volume={38}, ISSN={["1460-3659"]}, url={http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-49249108240&partnerID=MN8TOARS}, DOI={10.1177/0306312708089716}, abstractNote={ Although scholars in science and technology studies have explored many dynamics and consequences of scientific controversy, no coherent theory of scientific dissent has emerged. This paper proposes the elements of such a framework, based on understanding scientific dissent as a set of heterogeneous practices. I use the controversy over the presence of transgenic DNA in Mexican maize in the early 2000s to point to a processual model of scientific dissent. `Contrarian science' includes knowledge claims that challenge the dominant scientific trajectory, but need not necessarily lead to dissent. `Impedance' represents efforts to undermine the credibility of contrarian science (or contrarian scientists) and may originate within or outside of the scientific community. In the face of impedance, contrarian scientists may become dissenters. The actions of the scientist at the center of the case study, Professor Ignacio Chapela of the University of California, Berkeley, demonstrate particular practices of scientific dissent, ranging from `agonistic engagement' to `dissident science'. These practices speak not only to functional strategies of winning scientific debate, but also to attempts to reconfigure relations among scientists, publics, institutions, and politics that order knowledge production. }, note={winner of 2010 David Edge Prize, Society for Social Studies of Science (4S)}, number={4}, journal={Social Studies of Science}, publisher={SAGE Publications}, author={Delborne, J.A.}, year={2008}, pages={509–41} }
 @inproceedings{delborne_glover_harsh_2007, place={Montreal, Canada}, title={Agricultural (Bio)Technologies and International Development: Engaging STS to Make a Difference}, author={Delborne, Jason and Glover, D. and Harsh, M.}, year={2007}, month={Oct} }
 @inproceedings{delborne_2007, title={Casting an Audience in Scientific Controversy}, author={Delborne, Jason}, year={2007}, month={Sep} }
 @inproceedings{delborne_2007, title={Constructing Audiences in Scientific Controversy}, author={Delborne, J.}, year={2007}, month={Oct} }
 @inproceedings{delborne_2007, title={STS at the Intersection of Science and Activism}, author={Delborne, Jason}, year={2007}, month={Mar} }
 @inproceedings{delborne_2006, title={Dissident Science in Agricultural Biotechnology}, author={Delborne, Jason}, year={2006}, month={Mar} }
 @inproceedings{delborne_kinchy_2006, title={Transgene Transgressions: Controversies Over Transgenic Maize in Mexico}, author={Delborne, Jason and Kinchy, A.}, year={2006}, month={Nov} }
 @inproceedings{delborne_2006, title={Transgenes and Transgressions: Spectrums of Scientific Dissent}, author={Delborne, J.}, year={2006}, month={Nov} }
 @inbook{worthy_strohman_billings_delborne_duarte-trattner_gove_latham_manahan_2005, title={Agricultural Biotechnology Science Compromised}, ISBN={0299203905}, booktitle={Controversies in Science and Technology: From Maize to Menopause}, publisher={Madison, Wis. : University of Wisconsin Press}, author={Worthy, K. A. and Strohman, R. C. and Billings, P. R. and Delborne, J. A. and Duarte-Trattner, E. and Gove, N. and Latham, D. R. and Manahan, Carol M.}, editor={Daniel Lee Kleinman, Abby J. Kinchy and Handelsman, JoEditors}, year={2005}, pages={135–49} }
 @inproceedings{delborne_2005, title={Pathways of Scientific Dissent in Agricultural Biotechnology}, author={Delborne, J.}, year={2005}, month={Oct} }
 @inproceedings{howard_durant_delborne_2005, title={Practicing Scientific Dissent}, author={Howard, J. and Durant, D. and Delborne, Jason}, year={2005}, month={Oct} }
 @inproceedings{delborne_2004, title={Transforming Scientific Dissent into Dissidence: Analysis of ‘The Pulse of Scientific Freedom in the Age of the Biotech Industry}, author={Delborne, J.}, year={2004}, month={Aug} }
 @inproceedings{delborne_2003, title={Dissident Science in Agricultural Biotechnology: The Discovery, Controversy and Significance of Transgenes}, author={Delborne, J.}, year={2003}, month={Oct} }
 @article{kleinman_delborne_anderson, title={Engaging Citizens: The High Cost of Citizen Participation in High Technology}, volume={20}, number={2}, journal={Public Understanding of Science}, author={Kleinman, D.L. and Delborne, J.A. and Anderson, A.}, pages={221–240} }