Jean Goodwin

Incorporate ethics into US public health plans

Anthony, R., Miller, D. S., Hoenig, D. E., Millar, K. M., Goodwin, J., Dean, W. R., … De Paula Vieira, A. (2024, March 8).

An Iterative Approach toward Development of Ensemble Visualization Techniques for High-Impact Winter Weather Hazards

BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 104(9), E1649–E1669.

An Iterative Approach toward Development of Ensemble Visualization Techniques for High-Impact Winter Weather Hazards Part I: Product Development

BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 104(9), E1630–E1648.

A Digital Communication Twin for Addressing Misinformation: Vision, Challenges, Opportunities

IEEE Internet Computing, 26(2), 36–41.

Extreme arguments: Anwar al-Awlaki's radicalizing discourse

JOURNAL OF PRAGMATICS, 200, 39–48.

Two Views of Speech Acts: Analysis and Implications for Argumentation Theory

LANGUAGES, 7(2).

What is community-level environmental literacy, and how can we measure it? A report of a convening to conceptualize and operationalize CLEL

Gibson, L. M., Busch, K. C., Stevenson, K. T., Cutts, B. B., DeMattia, E. A., Aguilar, O. M., … Wheaton, M. (2022, April 19). ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION RESEARCH, Vol. 4.

Norms of advocacy

In J. A. Blair & C. W. Tindale (Eds.), Rigour and Reason : Essays in Honour of Hans Vilhelm Hansen (pp. 111–142).

Should Climate Scientists Fly?

Informal Logic, 40(2), 157–203.

Chapter 9. Radically reframing the climate debate

In Argumentation in Context (pp. 157–172).

Sophistical refutations in the climate change debates

Journal of Argumentation in Context, 8(1), 40–64.

The Pragmatic Force of Making an Argument

Topoi, 38(4), 669–680.

The role of citizen science in addressing grand challenges in food and agriculture research

Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 285(1891), 20181977.

Ethics and Practice in Science Communication

Confronting the challenges of public participation: Issues in environmental, planning and health decision-making

Charleston, SC: CreateSpace.

Comment exercer une autorité experte ? Un scientifique confronté aux Sceptiques

Argumentation Et Analyse Du Discours, 9(15).

Conceptions of Speech Acts in the Theory and Practice of Argumentation: A Case Study of a Debate About Advocating

Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric, 36(1), 79–98.

Walter Lippmann, the indispensable opposition

In B. Jackson & G. Clark (Eds.), Trained capacities: John Dewey, rhetoric, and democratic practice (pp. 142–158). Columbia, SC: University of South Caroline Press.

Communication strategies for earning trust in climate change debates

Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 5(1), 151–160.

Ethical issues in science communication: A theory-based approach

https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/sciencecommunication/2013/

L'autorità di Wikipedia

Sistemi Intelligenti, 25, 9–38.

Between Scientists & Citizens: Assessing Expertise In Policy Controversies

Between Scientists & Citizens: Assessing Expertise In Policy Controversies. Ames, IA: Great Plains Society for the Study of Argumentation and the Science Communication at Iowa State University Project.

Accounting for the Appeal to the Authority of Experts

Argumentation, 25(3), 285–296.

Talking Sustainability: Identification and Division in an Iowa Community

Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, 35(4), 436–461.

Theorists’ and practitioners’ spatial metaphors for argumentation: A corpus-based approach

Verbum, 23(1), 163–178.

Trust in experts as a principal-agent problem

In C. Reed & C. W. Tindale (Eds.), Dialectics, dialogue, and argumentation: An Examination of Douglas Walton's Theories of Reasoning and Argument (pp. 133–143). London: College Publications.

Actually Existing Rules for Closing Arguments

In Pondering on Problems of Argumentation (pp. 287–298).

When science goes public: From technical arguments to appeals to authority

Studies in Communication Sciences, 9(2), 125–136.

Argument Has No Function

Informal Logic, 27(1), 69.

Theoretical Pieties, Johnstone's Impiety, and Ordinary Views of Argumentation

Philosophy and Rhetoric, 40(1), 36–50.

Using environmental and ethical issues for debate in an introductory agronomy course

North American Colleges & Teachers of Agriculture Journal, 50(4), 54–61.

Designing premises

In F. H. Eemeren & P. Houtlosser (Eds.), Argumentation in practice (pp. 99–114). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Benjamins.

The Public Sphere and the Norms of Transactional Argument

Informal Logic, 25(2).

What Does Arguing Look Like?

Informal Logic, 25(1).

Students' Perspectives on Debate Exercises in Content Area Classes

Communication Education, 52(2), 157–163.

Designing Issues

In Dialectic and Rhetoric (pp. 81–96).

We should be studying the norms of debate

In G. T. Goodnight (Ed.), Arguing Communication & Culture Selected papers from the Twelfth NCA/AFA Conference on Argumentation (pp. 51–58). Washington, DC: National Communication Association.

Cicero's Authority

Philosophy and Rhetoric, 34(1), 38–60.

Henry Johnstone, Jr.'s Still-Unacknowledged Contributions to Contemporary Argumentation Theory

Informal Logic, 21(1).

The noncooperative pragmatics of arguing

In E. T. Nemeth (Ed.), Pragmatics in 2000 (pp. 263–277). Antwerp, Belgium: International Pragmatics Association.

Comments on [Jacobs's] Rhetoric and dialectic from the standpoint of normative pragmatics

Argumentation, 14, 287–292.

Dialogic Figures and Dialectical Argument in Lincoln's Rhetoric

Rhetoric & Public Affairs, 3(1), 59–69.

Three Faces of the Future

Argumentation and Advocacy, 37(2), 71–85.

Wigmore's Chart Method

Informal Logic, 20(3).

Argumentation, 12(2), 267–280.

Deliberation and character

In J. F. Klumpp & T. A. Hollihan (Eds.), Argument in a time of change : definitions, frameworks, and critiques : proceedings of the Tenth NCA/AFA Conference on Argumentation (pp. 70–74). Annandale, VA: National Communication Association.

Deliberation in the ancient Roman Senate

Parliamentary Journal, 38(1), 33–36.

Perelman, adhering and convictions

Philosophy and Rhetoric, 28(3), 215–233.