@article{kaur_wu_lin_countryman_bradford_erie_riehn_opresko_wang_2016, title={Enhanced electrostatic force microscopy reveals higher-order DNA looping mediated by the telomeric protein TRF2}, volume={6}, journal={Scientific Reports}, author={Kaur, P. and Wu, D. and Lin, J. G. and Countryman, P. and Bradford, K. C. and Erie, D. A. and Riehn, R. and Opresko, P. L. and Wang, H.}, year={2016} } @article{lin_countryman_chen_pan_fan_jiang_kaur_miao_gurgel_you_et al._2016, title={Functional interplay between SA1 and TRF1 in telomeric DNA binding and DNA-DNA pairing}, volume={44}, ISSN={["1362-4962"]}, DOI={10.1093/nar/gkw518}, abstractNote={Proper chromosome alignment and segregation during mitosis depend on cohesion between sister chromatids. Cohesion is thought to occur through the entrapment of DNA within the tripartite ring (Smc1, Smc3 and Rad21) with enforcement from a fourth subunit (SA1/SA2). Surprisingly, cohesin rings do not play a major role in sister telomere cohesion. Instead, this role is replaced by SA1 and telomere binding proteins (TRF1 and TIN2). Neither the DNA binding property of SA1 nor this unique telomere cohesion mechanism is understood. Here, using single-molecule fluorescence imaging, we discover that SA1 displays two-state binding on DNA: searching by one-dimensional (1D) free diffusion versus recognition through subdiffusive sliding at telomeric regions. The AT-hook motif in SA1 plays dual roles in modulating non-specific DNA binding and subdiffusive dynamics over telomeric regions. TRF1 tethers SA1 within telomeric regions that SA1 transiently interacts with. SA1 and TRF1 together form longer DNA–DNA pairing tracts than with TRF1 alone, as revealed by atomic force microscopy imaging. These results suggest that at telomeres cohesion relies on the molecular interplay between TRF1 and SA1 to promote DNA–DNA pairing, while along chromosomal arms the core cohesin assembly might also depend on SA1 1D diffusion on DNA and sequence-specific DNA binding.}, number={13}, journal={NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH}, author={Lin, Jiangguo and Countryman, Preston and Chen, Haijiang and Pan, Hai and Fan, Yanlin and Jiang, Yunyun and Kaur, Parminder and Miao, Wang and Gurgel, Gisele and You, Changjiang and et al.}, year={2016}, month={Jul}, pages={6363–6376} } @inproceedings{lin_kaur_chen_countryman_roushan_flaherty_brennan_you_piehler_riehn_et al._2014, title={Single-molecule imaging reveals DNA-binding properties of cohesin proteins SA1 and SA2.}, volume={55}, booktitle={Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis}, author={Lin, J. and Kaur, P. and Chen, H. and Countryman, P. and Roushan, M. and Flaherty, D. and Brennan, E. and You, C. and Piehler, J. and Riehn, R. and et al.}, year={2014}, pages={S29–29} } @article{lin_countryman_buncher_kaur_longjiang_zhang_gibson_you_watkins_piehler_et al._2014, title={TRF1 and TRF2 use different mechanisms to find telomeric DNA but share a novel mechanism to search for protein partners at telomeres}, volume={42}, ISSN={["1362-4962"]}, DOI={10.1093/nar/gkt1132}, abstractNote={Human telomeres are maintained by the shelterin protein complex in which TRF1 and TRF2 bind directly to duplex telomeric DNA. How these proteins find telomeric sequences among a genome of billions of base pairs and how they find protein partners to form the shelterin complex remains uncertain. Using single-molecule fluorescence imaging of quantum dot-labeled TRF1 and TRF2, we study how these proteins locate TTAGGG repeats on DNA tightropes. By virtue of its basic domain TRF2 performs an extensive 1D search on nontelomeric DNA, whereas TRF1’s 1D search is limited. Unlike the stable and static associations observed for other proteins at specific binding sites, TRF proteins possess reduced binding stability marked by transient binding (∼9–17 s) and slow 1D diffusion on specific telomeric regions. These slow diffusion constants yield activation energy barriers to sliding ∼2.8–3.6 κBT greater than those for nontelomeric DNA. We propose that the TRF proteins use 1D sliding to find protein partners and assemble the shelterin complex, which in turn stabilizes the interaction with specific telomeric DNA. This ‘tag-team proofreading’ represents a more general mechanism to ensure a specific set of proteins interact with each other on long repetitive specific DNA sequences without requiring external energy sources.}, number={4}, journal={NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH}, author={Lin, Jiangguo and Countryman, Preston and Buncher, Noah and Kaur, Parminder and Longjiang, E. and Zhang, Yiyun and Gibson, Greg and You, Changjiang and Watkins, Simon C. and Piehler, Jacob and et al.}, year={2014}, month={Feb}, pages={2493–2504} } @article{lin_kaur_countryman_opresko_wang_2014, title={Unraveling secrets of telomeres: One molecule at a time}, volume={20}, ISSN={["1568-7856"]}, DOI={10.1016/j.dnarep.2014.01.012}, abstractNote={Telomeres play important roles in maintaining the stability of linear chromosomes. Telomere maintenance involves dynamic actions of multiple proteins interacting with long repetitive sequences and complex dynamic DNA structures, such as G-quadruplexes, T-loops and t-circles. Given the heterogeneity and complexity of telomeres, single-molecule approaches are essential to fully understand the structure-function relationships that govern telomere maintenance. In this review, we present a brief overview of the principles of single-molecule imaging and manipulation techniques. We then highlight results obtained from applying these single-molecule techniques for studying structure, dynamics and functions of G-quadruplexes, telomerase, and shelterin proteins.}, journal={DNA REPAIR}, author={Lin, Jiangguo and Kaur, Parminder and Countryman, Preston and Opresko, Patricia L. and Wang, Hong}, year={2014}, month={Aug}, pages={142–153} } @misc{tessmer_kaur_lin_wang_2013, title={Investigating bioconjugation by atomic force microscopy}, volume={11}, journal={Journal of Anobiotechnology}, author={Tessmer, I. and Kaur, P. and Lin, J. G. and Wang, H.}, year={2013} }