@article{adin_moga_keene_fogle_hopkinson_weyhrauch_marks_ruderman_rosoff_2019, title={Clinical ethics consultation in a tertiary care veterinary teaching hospital}, volume={254}, ISSN={["1943-569X"]}, DOI={10.2460/javma.254.1.52}, number={1}, journal={JAVMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN VETERINARY MEDICAL ASSOCIATION}, author={Adin, Christopher A. and Moga, Jeannine L. and Keene, Bruce W. and Fogle, Callie A. and Hopkinson, Heather R. and Weyhrauch, Charity A. and Marks, Steven L. and Ruderman, Rachel J. and Rosoff, Philip M.}, year={2019}, month={Jan}, pages={52–60} }
 @article{moga_2018, title={JAVMA News}, volume={252}, number={10}, journal={Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association}, author={Moga, J.}, year={2018}, pages={1165–1167} }
 @article{rosoff_moga_keene_adin_fogle_ruderman_hopkinso_weyhrauch_2018, title={Resolving Ethical Dilemmas in a Tertiary Care Veterinary Specialty Hospital: Adaptation of the Human Clinical Consultation Committee Model}, volume={18}, ISSN={["1536-0075"]}, DOI={10.1080/15265161.2017.1409824}, abstractNote={Technological advances in veterinary medicine have produced considerable progress in the diagnosis and treatment of numerous diseases in animals. At the same time, veterinarians, veterinary technicians, and owners of animals face increasingly complex situations that raise questions about goals of care and correct or reasonable courses of action. These dilemmas are frequently controversial and can generate conflicts between clients and health care providers. In many ways they resemble the ethical challenges confronted by human medicine and that spawned the creation of clinical ethics committees as a mechanism to analyze, discuss, and resolve disagreements. The staff of the North Carolina State University Veterinary Hospital, a specialty academic teaching institution, wanted to investigate whether similar success could be achieved in the tertiary care veterinary setting. We discuss the background and rationale for this method, as well as the approach that was taken to create a clinical ethics committee.}, number={2}, journal={AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS}, author={Rosoff, Philip M. and Moga, Jeannine and Keene, Bruce and Adin, Christopher and Fogle, Callie and Ruderman, Rachel and Hopkinso, Heather and Weyhrauch, Charity}, year={2018}, pages={41–53} }
 @misc{rosoff_ruderman_moga_keene_adin_fogle_hopkinson_weyhrauch_2018, title={Response to Open Peer Commentaries on "Resolving Ethical Dilemmas in a Tertiary Care Veterinary Specialty Hospital: Adaptation of the Human Clinical Consultation Committee Model"}, volume={18}, ISSN={["1536-0075"]}, DOI={10.1080/15265161.2017.1413439}, abstractNote={We are gratified that our article, “Resolving Ethical Dilemmas in a Tertiary Care Veterinary Specialty Hospital: Adaptation of the Human Clinical Consultation Committee Model” (Rosoff et al. 2018),...}, number={2}, journal={AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS}, author={Rosoff, Philip M. and Ruderman, Rachel and Moga, Jeannine and Keene, Bruce and Adin, Christopher and Fogle, Callie and Hopkinson, Heather and Weyhrauch, Charity}, year={2018}, pages={W7–W10} }
 @article{macnamara_moga_2014, title={The place and consequence of animals in contemporary social work practice}, DOI={10.1057/9781137372291_10}, abstractNote={Over the last 20 years, studies exploring the links between human health, companion animals, and nature suggest that we must expand our definition of the human psychosocial environment to include the impact of animals and nature on human adaptation and wellbeing. One would think that the social work profession’s person-in-environment perspective — a primary practice construct — would uniquely position social workers to understand and leverage the reciprocal relationship between humans and their environments (Besthorn, 2000; Besthorn & Saleeby, 2003). Yet, the field’s emphasis on a human-centric social environment has neglected the influence of animals and natural ecosystems on individual, family, and community health (Coates, 2003). Besthorn and Saleebey (2003, p. 10) assert that this narrow focus leads practitioners to ignore the resources found in relationship to the nonhuman animals with whom we have a shared ecology: ‘When we do not respect the worth of the natural environment, we do not respect the worth and dignity of the people who reside in and depend upon it.’ Risley-Curtiss (2010) reveals what this myopia looks like in practice: while many social workers report having a basic knowledge of human-animal relationships, only one-third routinely ask about animals during client assessment, and only 23 per cent integrate animals in any form of client treatment.}, journal={Animals in social work: why and how they matter}, author={MacNamara, M. and Moga, J.}, year={2014}, pages={151–166} }