@article{hill_bartkowski_pfaffendorf_ritter_burdette_ellison_2022, title={Conservative Protestantism, Sexual Insecurity, and Masculine Discrepancy Stress}, ISSN={["1468-5906"]}, DOI={10.1111/jssr.12774}, abstractNote={AbstractAre conservative Protestant men especially insecure about their sexual prowess and masculinity? A recent state‐level analysis by Perry and Whitehead suggests that they are. In this study, we use national data from the 2021 Crime, Health, and Politics Survey to formally test whether conservative Protestant men are more concerned with their sexual abilities and masculinity than other men. Bivariate and multivariate binary logistic and ordinary least squares regression models consistently show that conservative Protestant men tend to exhibit similar levels of sexual insecurity (self‐reported performance anxiety, erectile dysfunction, and ED medication use) and masculine discrepancy stress (perceived failure to conform to normative expectations associated with hegemonic masculinity) as men of other religious faiths (moderate Protestants, Catholics, and other Christians/religions) and men who report no religious affiliation. Our analyses are noteworthy because they call into question the theory of evangelicalism and phallocentric masculine insecurity at the individual level.}, journal={JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENTIFIC STUDY OF RELIGION}, author={Hill, Terrence D. and Bartkowski, John P. and Pfaffendorf, Jessica and Ritter, Lacey J. and Burdette, Amy M. and Ellison, Christopher G.}, year={2022}, month={Jan} }
 @article{pfaffendorf_davis_kinney_2021, title={Masculinity, Ritual, and Racialized Status Threat: Examining Mass Shooter Manifestos Using Structural Topic Models}, volume={91}, ISSN={["1475-682X"]}, DOI={10.1111/soin.12409}, abstractNote={Both popular media and research often frame mass shootings as an individual issue having to do with mental illness or other individual differences. This work has unfolded in much the same fashion as that on other negative or anti‐social behaviors—such as the individual pathologization of suicide or rape. However, what this work has shown empirically is that there are often a set of circumstances that are uniquely social that motivate such actions. Following work in sociology, which offers social psychological and cultural explanations for gun violence, we argue that mass shooter motivations reflect social conditions—especially those that instantiate toxic masculinity, social exclusion, and racism—conducive to these events. This article uses a computational textual modeling approach to analyze the distinct social logics that motivate mass shooters. To do this, we identify a sample of 27 publicly available mass shooter “manifestos,” or documents left behind by shooters following their actions. Using topic models, we show that mass shooters exhibit a variety of preoccupations that underlie their actions. While shooters can exhibit a multitude of possible motivations, we find that expressions of masculine overcompensation, ritualistic responses to exclusion, and racialized status threat are prominent features of mass shooter manifestos, corroborating recent sociological explanations of mass shootings.}, number={2}, journal={SOCIOLOGICAL INQUIRY}, author={Pfaffendorf, Jessica and Davis, Andrew P. and Kinney, Alexander B.}, year={2021}, month={May}, pages={287–312} }