@article{ford_dotray_keeling_wilkerson_wilcut_gilbert_2011, title={Site-Specific Weed Management in Cotton Using WebHADSS (TM)}, volume={25}, ISSN={["1550-2740"]}, DOI={10.1614/wt-d-10-00060.1}, abstractNote={Field trials were established in 2005 and continued in 2006 to evaluate a conventional broadcast herbicide sprayer compared to a variable spray (sensor-activated) weed-sensing sprayer (WSS). The computer-based Herbicide Application Decision Support System (WebHADSS™) was used to determine a portion of the herbicides applied (based on herbicide efficacy and economics). Weed control, herbicide usage, crop yield, and net returns were compared across treatments. The broadcast applications were usually the most effective at controlling weeds. A PPI herbicide did not always improve weed control compared to treatments in which no PPI herbicide was applied. Variable treatments used less herbicide than the broadcast system in both years. Cotton lint yields in broadcast applications were similar to the weed-free check in both years of the study. Variable treatments often provided equivalent net returns (gross yield revenue less weed control cost) to the broadcast treatments. Although herbicide savings were observed in the variable treatments when compared to a broadcast system, a reduction in weed control was observed, indicating the need for future improvements of this system. A site-specific weed management program used in conjunction with WebHADSS™ may have potential in cotton production systems in the Texas Southern High Plains where weed densities are low.}, number={1}, journal={WEED TECHNOLOGY}, author={Ford, A. J. and Dotray, P. A. and Keeling, J. W. and Wilkerson, J. B. and Wilcut, J. W. and Gilbert, L. V.}, year={2011}, pages={107–112} } @article{everman_mayhew_burton_york_wilcut_2009, title={Absorption, Translocation, and Metabolism of C-14-Glufosinate in Glufosinate-Resistant Corn, Goosegrass (Eleusine indica), Large Crabgrass (Digitaria sanguinalis), and Sicklepod (Senna obtusifolia)}, volume={57}, ISSN={["1550-2759"]}, DOI={10.1614/WS-08-089.1}, abstractNote={Greenhouse studies were conducted to evaluate14C-glufosinate absorption, translocation, and metabolism in glufosinate-resistant corn, goosegrass, large crabgrass, and sicklepod. Glufosinate-resistant corn plants were treated at the four-leaf stage, whereas goosegrass, large crabgrass, and sicklepod were treated at 5, 7.5, and 10 cm, respectively. All plants were harvested at 1, 6, 24, 48, and 72 h after treatment (HAT). Absorption was less than 20% at all harvest intervals for glufosinate-resistant corn, whereas absorption in goosegrass and large crabgrass increased from approximately 20% 1 HAT to 50 and 76%, respectively, 72 HAT. Absorption of14C-glufosinate was greater than 90% 24 HAT in sicklepod. Significant levels of translocation were observed in glufosinate-resistant corn, with14C-glufosinate translocated to the region above the treated leaf and the roots up to 41 and 27%, respectively. No significant translocation was detected in any of the weed species at any harvest timing. Metabolites of14C-glufosinate were detected in glufosinate-resistant corn and all weed species. Seventy percent of14C was attributed to glufosinate metabolites 72 HAT in large crabgrass. Less metabolism was observed for sicklepod, goosegrass, and glufosinate-resistant corn, with metabolites composing less than 45% of detectable radioactivity 72 HAT.}, number={1}, journal={WEED SCIENCE}, author={Everman, Wesley J. and Mayhew, Cassandra R. and Burton, James D. and York, Alan C. and Wilcut, John W.}, year={2009}, pages={1–5} } @article{everman_thomas_burton_york_wilcut_2009, title={Absorption, Translocation, and Metabolism of Glufosinate in Transgenic and Nontransgenic Cotton, Palmer Amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri), and Pitted Morningglory (Ipomoea lacunosa)}, volume={57}, ISSN={["1550-2759"]}, DOI={10.1614/WS-09-015.1}, abstractNote={Greenhouse studies were conducted to evaluate absorption, translocation, and metabolism of14C-glufosinate in glufosinate-resistant cotton, nontransgenic cotton, Palmer amaranth, and pitted morningglory. Cotton plants were treated at the four-leaf stage, whereas Palmer amaranth and pitted morningglory were treated at 7.5 and 10 cm, respectively. All plants were harvested at 1, 6, 24, 48, and 72 h after treatment (HAT). Absorption of14C-glufosinate was greater than 85% 24 h after treatment in Palmer amaranth. Absorption was less than 30% at all harvest intervals for glufosinate-resistant cotton, nontransgenic cotton, and pitted morningglory. At 24 HAT, 49 and 12% of radioactivity was translocated to regions above and below the treated leaf, respectively, in Palmer amaranth. Metabolites of14C-glufosinate were detected in all crop and weed species. Metabolism of14C-glufosinate was 16% or lower in nontransgenic cotton and pitted morningglory; however, metabolism rates were greater than 70% in glufosinate-resistant cotton 72 HAT. Intermediate metabolism was observed for Palmer amaranth, with metabolites comprising 20 to 30% of detectable radioactivity between 6 and 72 HAT.}, number={4}, journal={WEED SCIENCE}, author={Everman, Wesley J. and Thomas, Walter E. and Burton, James D. and York, Alan C. and Wilcut, John W.}, year={2009}, pages={357–361} } @article{johnson_owen_kruger_young_shaw_wilson_wilcut_jordan_weller_2009, title={US Farmer Awareness of Glyphosate-Resistant Weeds and Resistance Management Strategies}, volume={23}, ISSN={["1550-2740"]}, DOI={10.1614/WT-08-181.1}, abstractNote={A survey of farmers from six U.S. states (Indiana, Illinois, Iowa, Nebraska, Mississippi, and North Carolina) was conducted to assess the farmers' views on glyphosate-resistant (GR) weeds and tactics used to prevent or manage GR weed populations in genetically engineered (GE) GR crops. Only 30% of farmers thought GR weeds were a serious issue. Few farmers thought field tillage and/or using a non-GR crop in rotation with GR crops would be an effective strategy. Most farmers did not recognize the role that the recurrent use of an herbicide plays in evolution of resistance. A substantial number of farmers underestimated the potential for GR weed populations to evolve in an agroecosystem dominated by glyphosate as the weed control tactic. These results indicate there are major challenges that the agriculture and weed science communities must face to implement long-term sustainable GE GR-based cropping systems within the agroecosystem.}, number={2}, journal={WEED TECHNOLOGY}, author={Johnson, William G. and Owen, Micheal D. K. and Kruger, Greg R. and Young, Bryan G. and Shaw, David R. and Wilson, Robert G. and Wilcut, John W. and Jordan, David L. and Weller, Stephen C.}, year={2009}, pages={308–312} } @article{kruger_johnson_weller_owen_shaw_wilcut_jordan_wilson_bernards_young_2009, title={US Grower Views on Problematic Weeds and Changes in Weed Pressure in Glyphosate-Resistant Corn, Cotton, and Soybean Cropping Systems}, volume={23}, ISSN={["1550-2740"]}, DOI={10.1614/WT-08-040.1}, abstractNote={Corn and soybean growers in Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Mississippi, Nebraska, and North Carolina, as well as cotton growers in Mississippi and North Carolina, were surveyed about their views on changes in problematic weeds and weed pressure in cropping systems based on a glyphosate-resistant (GR) crop. No growers using a GR cropping system for more than 5 yr reported heavy weed pressure. Over all cropping systems investigated (continuous GR soybean, continuous GR cotton, GR corn/GR soybean, GR soybean/non-GR crop, and GR corn/non-GR crop), 0 to 7% of survey respondents reported greater weed pressure after implementing rotations using GR crops, whereas 31 to 57% felt weed pressure was similar and 36 to 70% indicated that weed pressure was less. Pigweed, morningglory, johnsongrass, ragweed, foxtail, and velvetleaf were mentioned as their most problematic weeds, depending on the state and cropping system. Systems using GR crops improved weed management compared with the technologies used before the adoption of GR crops. However, the long-term success of managing problematic weeds in GR cropping systems will require the development of multifaceted integrated weed management programs that include glyphosate as well as other weed management tactics.}, number={1}, journal={WEED TECHNOLOGY}, author={Kruger, Greg R. and Johnson, William G. and Weller, Stephen C. and Owen, Micheal D. K. and Shaw, David R. and Wilcut, John W. and Jordan, David L. and Wilson, Robert G. and Bernards, Mark L. and Young, Bryan G.}, year={2009}, pages={162–166} } @article{everman_clewis_york_wilcut_2009, title={Weed Control and Yield with Flumioxazin, Fomesafen, and S-Metolachlor Systems for Glufosinate-Resistant Cotton Residual Weed Management}, volume={23}, ISSN={["1550-2740"]}, DOI={10.1614/WT-09-007.1}, abstractNote={Field studies were conducted near Clayton, Lewiston, and Rocky Mount, NC in 2005 to evaluate weed control and cotton response to preemergence treatments of pendimethalin alone or in a tank mixture with fomesafen, postemergence treatments of glufosinate applied alone or in a tank mixture withS-metolachlor, and POST-directed treatments of glufosinate in a tank mixture with flumioxazin or prometryn. Excellent weed control (> 91%) was observed where at least two applications were made in addition to glufosinate early postemergence (EPOST). A reduction in control of common lambsquarters (8%), goosegrass (20%), large crabgrass (18%), Palmer amaranth (13%), and pitted morningglory (9%) was observed when residual herbicides were not included in PRE or mid-POST programs. No differences in weed control or cotton lint yield were observed between POST-directed applications of glufosinate with flumioxazin compared to prometryn. Weed control programs containing three or more herbicide applications resulted in similar cotton lint yields at Clayton and Lewiston, and Rocky Mount showed the greatest variability with up to 590 kg/ha greater lint yield where fomesafen was included PRE compared to pendimethalin applied alone. Similarly, an increase in cotton lint yields of up to 200 kg/ha was observed whereS-metolachlor was included mid-POST when compared to glufosinate applied alone, showing the importance of residual herbicides to help maintain optimal yields. Including additional modes of action with residual activity preemergence and postemergence provides a longer period of weed control, which helps maintain cotton lint yields.}, number={3}, journal={WEED TECHNOLOGY}, author={Everman, Wesley J. and Clewis, Scott B. and York, Alan C. and Wilcut, John W.}, year={2009}, pages={391–397} } @article{ducar_clewis_wilcut_jordan_brecke_grichar_johnson_wehtje_2009, title={Weed Management Using Reduced Rate Combinations of Diclosulam, Flumioxazin, and Imazapic in Peanut}, volume={23}, ISSN={["1550-2740"]}, DOI={10.1614/WT-07-180.1}, abstractNote={Experiments were conducted during 2000 and 2001 at a total of 13 locations throughout Alabama, Georgia, Florida, North Carolina, and Texas to evaluate efficacy of herbicides at or below the manufacturer's suggested use rate. Herbicide applications included diclosulam and flumioxazin applied PRE alone or followed by imazapic applied early postemergence (EPOST). All possible combinations of diclosulam at 0, 13.5, or 27 g ai/ha and flumioxazin at 0, 53, or 105 g ai/ha applied PRE were included. Imazapic was applied at 35 g ai/ha. Ivyleaf morningglory was controlled more than 87% when imazapic was applied EPOST regardless of PRE herbicide. Pitted morningglory control > 67% was observed with applications of diclosulam (27 g/ha) followed by imazapic, diclosulam (13.5 g/ha) plus flumioxazin (53 g/ha), diclosulam (13.5 g/ha) plus flumioxazin (105 g/ha), and diclosulam (27 g/ha) plus flumioxazin (105 g/ha). Sicklepod was controlled more than 74% with flumioxazin (53 g/ha) followed by imazapic and diclosulam (27 g/ha) plus flumioxazin (105 g/ha) followed by imazapic. Florida beggarweed was controlled more than 84% by all PRE herbicide combinations except flumioxazin (53 g/ha) alone or diclosulam (27 g/ha) alone or with imazapic. Yellow nutsedge was controlled at least 90% with diclosulam at either rate followed by imazapic and by diclosulam plus flumioxazin followed by imazapic regardless of rate. Pod yield was generally higher when herbicides were applied regardless of herbicide combination or rate. Peanut yield was maximized with the lowest rates of flumioxazin or diclosulam PRE followed by imazapic EPOST.}, number={2}, journal={WEED TECHNOLOGY}, author={Ducar, J. Tredaway and Clewis, S. B. and Wilcut, J. W. and Jordan, D. L. and Brecke, B. J. and Grichar, W. J. and Johnson, W. C., III and Wehtje, G. R.}, year={2009}, pages={236–242} } @article{burke_thomas_allen_collins_wilcut_2008, title={A Comparison of Weed Control in Herbicide-Resistant, Herbicide-Tolerant, and Conventional Corn}, volume={22}, ISSN={["0890-037X"]}, DOI={10.1614/WT-07-184.1}, abstractNote={Experiments were conducted at three North Carolina research stations in 2003 to evaluate weed control and corn yield in glyphosate-resistant, glufosinate-resistant, imidazolinone-tolerant, and conventional corn weed management systems. Late-season control of common lambsquarters, large crabgrass, and yellow nutsedge increased with metolachlor PRE compared with no PRE herbicide treatment. Common lambsquarters, pitted morningglory, entireleaf morningglory, spurred anoda, and tropic croton control was improved by a single early POST (EPOST) application regardless of herbicide system. Control of common lambsquarters, pitted morningglory, entireleaf morningglory, and spurred anoda was similar for glyphosate and glufosinate systems for each POST over-the-top (POT) herbicide system. A single EPOST application of imazethapyr plus imazapyr to imidazolinone-tolerant corn controlled common lambsquarters, pitted morningglory, entireleaf morningglory, and spurred anoda and was better than a single EPOST application of glyphosate, glufosinate, or nicosulfuron. Tropic croton was controlled ≥ 95% with glufosinate or glyphosate, applied once or twice, or in mixture with metolachlor. A single EPOST application of imazethapyr plus imazapyr or nicosulfuron did not control tropic croton. Common lambsquarters, entireleaf morningglory, large crabgrass, Palmer amaranth, and yellow nutsedge control was greater with a late-POST–directed (LAYBY) of ametryn than no LAYBY. Systems that did not include a POT herbicide system had the lowest percentage in the weed-free yield and the lowest yield. Treatments that included a POT system with or without a PRE treatment of metolachlor yielded within 5% of the weed-free treatment, regardless of herbicide system.}, number={4}, journal={WEED TECHNOLOGY}, author={Burke, Ian C. and Thomas, Walter E. and Allen, Jayla R. and Collins, Jim and Wilcut, John W.}, year={2008}, pages={571–579} } @article{everman_burke_clewis_thomas_wilcut_2008, title={Critical period of grass vs. broadleaf weed interference in peanut}, volume={22}, ISSN={["1550-2740"]}, DOI={10.1614/wt-07-037.1}, abstractNote={Studies were conducted to evaluate the effects of grass and broadleaf weeds on peanut growth and peanut yield. In separate studies, grass or broadleaf weeds were allowed to compete with peanut for various intervals to determine both the critical timing of weed removal and the critical weed-free period. Hand-weeding and selective herbicides were used at appropriate times to remove and terminate weed growth. These periods were then used to determine the critical period of weed control. The effects of various weedy intervals on peanut yield were also investigated. The critical period of grass weed control was found to be from 4.3 to 9 wk after planting (WAP), whereas the critical period of broadleaf weed control was from 2.6 to 8 WAP. Peanut yields decreased as weed interference intervals for both grass and broadleaf weeds increased, demonstrating the need for control of both grass and broadleaf weeds throughout much of the growing season. Nomenclature: Peanut, Arachis hypogaea L}, number={1}, journal={WEED TECHNOLOGY}, author={Everman, Wesley J. and Burke, Ian C. and Clewis, Scott B. and Thomas, Walter E. and Wilcut, John W.}, year={2008}, pages={68–73} } @article{everman_clewis_thomas_burke_wilcut_2008, title={Critical period of weed interference in peanut}, volume={22}, ISSN={["1550-2740"]}, DOI={10.1614/wt-07-052.1}, abstractNote={Field studies were conducted near Lewiston–Woodville and Rocky Mount, NC to evaluate the effects of mixed weed species on peanut yield. A combination of broadleaf and grass weeds were allowed to interfere with peanut for various intervals to determine both the critical timing of weed removal and the critical weed-free period. These periods were then combined to determine the critical period of weed control in peanut. The effects of various weedy intervals on peanut yield were also investigated. The predicted critical period of weed control, in the presence of a mixed population of weeds, was found to be from 3 to 8 wk after planting (WAP). Peanut yield decreased as weed interference intervals increased, demonstrating the need for weed control throughout much of the growing season in the presence of mixed weed populations. Nomenclature: Peanut, Arachis hypogaea L}, number={1}, journal={WEED TECHNOLOGY}, author={Everman, Wesley J. and Clewis, Scott B. and Thomas, Walter E. and Burke, Ian C. and Wilcut, John W.}, year={2008}, pages={63–67} } @article{price_koger_wilcut_miller_santen_2008, title={Efficacy of residual and non-residual herbicides used in cotton production systems when applied with glyphosate, glufosinate, or MSMA}, volume={22}, ISSN={["1550-2740"]}, DOI={10.1614/WT-07-083.1}, abstractNote={Field experiments were conducted to evaluate weed control provided by glyphosate, glufosinate, and MSMA applied alone or in mixture with residual and nonresidual last application (LAYBY) herbicides. Herbicide treatments included glyphosate early postemergence (EPOST) alone or followed by glyphosate, glufosinate, or MSMA late-postemergence (LPOST) alone or tank-mixed with one of the following LAYBY herbicides: carfentrazone-ethyl at 0.3 kg ai/ha, diuron at 1.12 kg ai/ha, flumioxazin at 0.07 kg ai/ha, fluometuron at 1.12 kg ai/ha, lactofen at 0.84 kg ai/ha, linuron at 0.56 kg ai/ha, oxyfluorfen at 1.12 kg ai/ha, prometryn at 1.12 kg ai/ha, or prometryn + trifloxysulfuron at 1.12 kg ai/ha + 10 g ai/ha. Residual herbicides were also applied alone LPOST. Weeds evaluated included barnyardgrass, broadleaf signalgrass, coffee senna, entireleaf morningglory, hemp sesbania, ivyleaf morningglory, johnsongrass, large crabgrass, Palmer amaranth, pitted morningglory, prickly sida, redroot pigweed, sicklepod, smooth pigweed, spiny amaranth, and velvetleaf. Treatments containing MSMA provided lower average weed control compared to those containing glyphosate or glufosinate, and residual herbicides applied alone provided inadequate weed control compared to mixtures containing a nonresidual herbicide. Across 315 of 567 comparisons (55%), when a LAYBY herbicide was added, weed control increased. The most difficult to control weed species at all locations was pitted morningglory. Barnyardgrass and hemp sesbania at the Mississippi location and hemp sesbania at the Louisiana location were collectively difficult to control across all treatments as well.}, number={3}, journal={WEED TECHNOLOGY}, author={Price, Andrew J. and Koger, Clifford H. and Wilcut, John W. and Miller, Donnie and Santen, Edzard}, year={2008}, pages={459–466} } @article{clewis_thomas_everman_witcut_2008, title={Glufosinate-resistant corn interference in glufosinate-resistant cotton}, volume={22}, ISSN={["1550-2740"]}, DOI={10.1614/WT-07-085.1}, abstractNote={Studies were conducted at three locations in North Carolina in 2004 to evaluate density-dependent effects of glufosinate-resistant (GUR) corn on GUR cotton growth and lint yield. GUR corn was taller than GUR cotton as early as 11 d after planting, depending on location. A GUR corn density of 5.25 plant/m of crop row reduced late-season cotton height by 38, 43, and 43% at Clayton, Lewiston-Woodville, and Rocky Mount, NC, respectively, compared with weed-free cotton height. GUR corn dry biomass per meter of crop row and GUR corn seed biomass per meter of crop row decreased linearly with increasing GUR corn density at all locations. The relationship between GUR corn density and GUR cotton yield loss was described by the rectangular hyperbola model with the asymptote (a) constrained to 100% maximum yield loss. The estimated coefficient i (yield loss per unit density as density approaches zero) was 7, 5, and 6 at Clayton, Lewiston-Woodville, and Rocky Mount, respectively. Percentage of GUR cotton lint yield loss increased 4, 5, and 8 percentage points at Clayton, Lewiston-Woodville, and Rocky Mount, respectively, with each 500 g increase in weed biomass/m of crop row. The examined GUR corn densities had a significant effect on cotton yield but not as significant as many other problematic grass and broadleaf weeds. Nomenclature: Glufosinate, corn, Zea mays L. ‘Pioneer 34A55LL’ ZEAMX, cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L., ‘FM 958LL’}, number={2}, journal={WEED TECHNOLOGY}, author={Clewis, Scott B. and Thomas, Walter E. and Everman, Wesley J. and Witcut, John W.}, year={2008}, pages={211–216} } @article{burke_troxler_wilcut_smith_2008, title={Purple and Yellow Nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus and C. esculentus) Response to Postemergence Herbicides in Cotton}, volume={22}, ISSN={["1550-2740"]}, DOI={10.1614/WT-07-183.1}, abstractNote={Greenhouse studies were conducted to evaluate the nature of the cotton postemergence (POST) herbicides followed by (fb) MSMA postemergence-directed (LAYBY) for foliar and tuber reduction of yellow and purple nutsedge when applied to nutsedge at two different application timings. Trifloxysulfuron at 4 and 6 g ai/ha fb MSMA LAYBY reduced 10- to 15- and 20- to 30-cm purple and yellow nutsedge root and shoot dry weights by at least 56%. However, the effect of weed size at the time of application was significant for trifloxysulfuron at 6 g/ha for percent root and shoot reductions in yellow nutsedge and percent root reduction in purple nutsedge. Significance of herbicide rate was only observed for percent shoot and root reduction of 10- to 15-cm yellow nutsedge. Trifloxysulfuron treatments reduced purple and yellow nutsedge shoot and root dry weights equivalent to treatments involving glyphosate POST fb MSMA LAYBY. MSMA at 1,120 and 2,240 g/ha and glufosinate POST fb MSMA LAYBY were effective for reducing purple and yellow nutsedge shoot dry weights, although percent reduction was influenced by nutsedge height at herbicide application. Treatments involving pyrithiobac POST fb MSMA LAYBY slightly increased 10- to 15-cm yellow nutsedge root dry weights. MSMA at either rate produced additive responses when included in tank mixtures with trifloxysulfuron at either rate or pyrithiobac POST fb MSMA LAYBY in yellow nutsedge. Other tank mixes or sequential combinations did not cause additive or synergistic responses.}, number={4}, journal={WEED TECHNOLOGY}, author={Burke, Ian C. and Troxler, Shawn C. and Wilcut, John W. and Smith, W. David}, year={2008}, pages={615–621} } @article{clewis_miller_koger_baughman_price_porterfield_wilcut_2008, title={Weed management and crop response with glyphosate, s-metolachlor, trifloxysulfuron, prometryn, and MSMA in glyphosate-resistant cotton}, volume={22}, ISSN={["0890-037X"]}, DOI={10.1614/wt-07-082.1}, abstractNote={Field studies were conducted in five states at six locations from 2002 through 2003 to evaluate weed control and cotton response to early POST (EPOST), POST/POST-directed spray (PDS), and late POST-directed (LAYBY) systems using glyphosate-trimethylsulfonium salt (TM), s-metolachlor, trifloxysulfuron, prometryn, and MSMA. Early POST applications were made from mid May through mid June; POST/PDS applications were made from early June through mid July; and LAYBY applications were made from early July through mid August. Early season cotton injury and discoloration was minimal (< 1%) with all treatments; mid- and late-season injury was minimal (< 2%) except for trifloxysulfuron POST (11 and 9%, respectively). Annual grasses evaluated included barnyardgrass, broadleaf signalgrass, goosegrass, and large crabgrass. Broadleaf weeds evaluated included entireleaf morningglory, pitted morningglory, sicklepod, and smooth pigweed. For the EPOST, POST/PDS, and LAYBY applications, weeds were at cotyledon to 10 leaf, 1 to 25 leaf, and 2 to 25 leaf stage, respectively. Annual broadleaf and grass control was increased with the addition of s-metolachlor to glyphosate-TM EPOST systems (85 to 98% control) compared with glyphosate-TM EPOST alone (65 to 91% control), except for sicklepod control where equivalent control was observed. Annual grass control was greater with glyphosate-TM plus trifloxysulfuron PDS than with trifloxysulfuron POST or PDS, or trifloxysulfuron plus MSMA PDS (90 to 94% vs. 75 to 83% control). With few exceptions, broadleaf weed control was equivalent for trifloxysulfuron applied POST alone or PDS alone or in combination with glyphosate-TM PDS or MSMA PDS herbicide treatments (81 to 99% control). The addition of a LAYBY herbicide treatment increased broadleaf weed control by 11 to 36 percentage points compared with systems without a LAYBY. Cotton lint yield increased 420 kg/ha with the addition of s-metolachlor to glyphosate-TM EPOST treatments compared with systems without s-metolachlor EPOST. Cotton lint yield was increased 330 to 910 kg/ha with the addition of a POST herbicide treatment compared with systems without a POST/PDS treatment. The addition of a LAYBY herbicide treatment increased cotton lint yield by 440 kg/ha compared with systems without a LAYBY. Nomenclature: Glyphosate-TM, MSMA, prometryn, s-metolachlor, trifloxysulfuron, barnyardgrass, Echinochloa crus-galli (L.) Beauv. ECHCG, broadleaf signalgrass, Brachiaria platyphylla (Griseb.) Nash. BRAPP, entireleaf morningglory, Ipomoea hederacea var. integriuscula Gray. IPOHG, goosegrass, Eleusine indica (L.) Gaertn. ELEIN, arge crabgrass, Digitaria sanguinalis (L.) Scop. DIGSA, pitted morningglory, Ipomoea lacunosa L. IPOLA, sicklepod, Cassia obtusifolia L. CASOB, smooth pigweed, Amaranthus hybridus L. AMACH, cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L. ‘DP 458 RR/BG’, ‘DP 555 RR/BG’, ‘FM 989 RR/BG’, ‘PM 2344 RR/BG’, ‘ST 4793 RR’}, number={1}, journal={WEED TECHNOLOGY}, author={Clewis, Scott B. and Miller, D. K. and Koger, C. H. and Baughman, T. A. and Price, A. J. and Porterfield, D. and Wilcut, J. W.}, year={2008}, pages={160–167} } @article{thomas_everman_burke_koger_wilcut_2007, title={Absorption and translocation of glyphosate and sucrose in glyphosate-resistant cotton}, volume={21}, ISSN={["0890-037X"]}, DOI={10.1614/WT-06-125.1}, abstractNote={Studies were conducted to evaluate absorption and translocation of 14C-glyphosate in glyphosate-resistant (GR) cotton. Both commercial GR cotton events [glyphosate-resistant event 1, marketed as Roundup Ready®, released 1997 (GRE1), and glyphosate-resistant event 2, marketed as Roundup Ready Flex®, released 2006 (GRE2)] were evaluated at the four-leaf and eight-leaf growth stages. Plants were harvested at 1, 3, 5, and 7 d after treatment (DAT). Glyphosate absorption, as a percentage of applied, increased over time with 29 and 36% absorption at 7 DAT in four-leaf GRE1 and GRE2 cotton, respectively. In eight-leaf cotton, glyphosate absorption (33% at 7 DAT) was not different between events. Glyphosate translocation patterns were not different between events or harvest timings and exhibited a source–sink relation. Observed translocation differences between cotton growth stages were probably due to reduced glyphosate export from the treated leaf of eight-leaf cotton. An additional study compared absorption and translocation of 14C-glyphosate and 14C-sucrose in 5- and 10-leaf GRE2 cotton. Averaged over trials, 14C compounds, and growth stages, cotton absorbed 28% of the applied dose at 14 DAT. On the basis of the percentage of 14C exported out of the treated leaf, glyphosate and sucrose translocation patterns were similar, indicating that glyphosate may be used as a photoassimilate model in GRE2 cotton. Nomenclature: Glyphosate; cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L.}, number={2}, journal={WEED TECHNOLOGY}, author={Thomas, Walter E. and Everman, Wesley J. and Burke, Ian C. and Koger, Clifford H. and Wilcut, John W.}, year={2007}, pages={459–464} } @article{troxer_fisher_smith_wilcut_2007, title={Absorption, translocation, and metabolism of foliar-applied trifloxysulfuron in tobacco}, volume={21}, DOI={10.1614/WT-06-126.1}, number={2}, journal={Weed Technology}, author={Troxer, S. C. and Fisher, L. R. and Smith, W. D. and Wilcut, J. W.}, year={2007}, pages={421–425} } @article{clewis_wilcut_2007, title={Economic assessment of weed management in strip- and conventional-tillage nontransgenic and transgenic cotton}, volume={21}, ISSN={["1550-2740"]}, DOI={10.1614/WT-06-014.1}, abstractNote={Studies were conducted to evaluate weed management systems in nontransgenic, bromoxynil-resistant, and glyphosate-resistant cotton in strip- and conventional-tillage environments. Tillage did not affect weed control, cotton lint yields, or net returns. Early season stunting in strip-tillage cotton was 5% or less, regardless of herbicide system or cultivar and was transient. Excellent (> 90%) control of common lambsquarters, common ragweed, andIpomoeaspecies, including entireleaf, ivyleaf, pitted and tall morningglories, jimsonweed, prickly sida, and velvetleaf, was achieved with systems containing bromoxynil, glyphosate, and pyrithiobac early postemergence (EPOST). Glyphosate systems provided better and more consistent control of fall panicum and large crabgrass than bromoxynil and pyrithiobac systems. Bromoxynil and pyrithiobac EPOST did not control sicklepod unless applied in mixture with MSMA and followed by (fb) a late postemergence-directed (LAYBY) treatment of prometryn plus MSMA. Palmer amaranth was controlled (> 90%) with all glyphosate and pyrithiobac systems and with the bromoxynil system that included a broadcast soil-applied herbicide treatment. Bromoxynil systems without a broadcast soil-applied herbicide treatment controlled Palmer amaranth 87% or less. Herbicide systems that included glyphosate EPOST controlled sicklepod with or without a soil-applied herbicide treatment. The highest yielding cotton included all the glyphosate systems and bromoxynil systems that contained a soil-applied herbicide treatment. Nontransgenic systems that included a soil-applied herbicide treatment yielded less than a system with soil-applied treatment plus glyphosate EPOST. Net returns from glyphosate systems were generally higher than net returns from bromoxynil or pyrithiobac systems.}, number={1}, journal={WEED TECHNOLOGY}, author={Clewis, Scott B. and Wilcut, John W.}, year={2007}, pages={45–52} } @article{thomas_everman_allen_collins_wilcut_2007, title={Economic assessment of weed management systems in glufosinate-resistant, glyphosate-resistant, imidazolinone-tolerant, and nontransgenic corn}, volume={21}, ISSN={["1550-2740"]}, DOI={10.1614/WT-06-054.1}, abstractNote={Four field studies were conducted in 2004 to evaluate corn tolerance, weed control, grain yield, and net returns in glufosinate-resistant (GUR), glyphosate-resistant (GYR), imidazolinone-tolerant (IT), and nontransgenic (NT) corn with various herbicide systems. No significant differences between hybrid systems were observed for weed control. Limited corn injury (< 5%) was observed for all herbicide treatments. A single early POST (EPOST) system withoutS-metolachlor and sequential POST over the top (POT) herbicide systems, averaged over corn hybrids and PRE and late POST-directed (LAYBY) herbicide options, provide 93 and 99% control of goosegrass, respectively, and at least 83 and 97% control of Texas panicum, respectively. A single EPOST system withoutS-metolachlor, averaged over corn hybrids and LAYBY treatment options, provided at least 88% control of large crabgrass. When averaged over corn hybrid and PRE herbicide options, a sequential POT herbicide system alone provided at least 98, 99, 98, and 100 control of large crabgrass, morningglory species, Palmer amaranth, and common lambsquarters, respectively. The addition of ametryn at LAYBY to a single EPOST system withoutS-metolachlor was beneficial for improving control of morningglory species, common lambsquarters, and Palmer amaranth, depending on location. However, the observed increases (7 percentage points or less) are likely of limited biological significance. Grain yield was variable between hybrids and locations because of environmental differences. Consequently, net returns for each hybrid system within a location were also variable. Any POT system with or without ametryn at LAYBY, averaged over corn hybrid and PRE herbicide options, provided at least 101, 97, 92, and 92% yield protection at Clayton, Kinston, Lewiston, and Rocky Mount, NC, respectively. Net returns were maximized with treatments that provided excellent weed control with minimal inputs.}, number={1}, journal={WEED TECHNOLOGY}, author={Thomas, Walter E. and Everman, Wesley J. and Allen, Jayla and Collins, Jim and Wilcut, John W.}, year={2007}, pages={191–198} } @article{koger_price_faircloth_wilcut_nichols_2007, title={Effect of residual herbicides used in the last POST-Directed application on weed control and cotton yield in glyphosate- and glufosinate-resistant cotton}, volume={21}, DOI={10.1614/WT-06-026.1}, number={2}, journal={Weed Technology}, author={Koger, C. H. and Price, A. J. and Faircloth, J. C. and Wilcut, J. W. and Nichols, S. P.}, year={2007}, pages={378–383} } @article{scroggs_miller_griffin_wilcut_blouin_stewart_vidrine_2007, title={Effectiveness of preemergence herbicide and postemergence glyphosate programs in second-generation glyphosate-resistant cotton}, volume={21}, ISSN={["0890-037X"]}, DOI={10.1614/WT-07-040.1}, abstractNote={A study was conducted in 2004 and 2005 to evaluate the benefit of applying fluometuron PRE versus glyphosate-only POST programs in second-generation GR cotton (Roundup Ready Flex®). Fluometuron was either included or excluded with POST application timings of glyphosate at the following cotton growth stages: (1) 3 leaf (lf) followed by (fb) 7 lf fb 14 lf (over the top) OT (2) 3 fb 7 lf OT (3) 7 lf OT fb 14 lf postemergence directed (PD), and (4) 7 fb 14 lf OT. Control of goosegrass, Palmer amaranth, pitted morningglory, sicklepod, and smellmelon was increased 2 to 8 percentage points with the addition of fluometuron PRE. The inclusion of fluometuron PRE did not improve control of barnyardgrass, browntop millet, hemp sesbania, johnsongrass, or redroot pigweed and control ranged from 81% to 84%, 69% to 75%, 94% to 94%, 87% to 89%, and 92% to 93%, respectively. By 56 d after the last POST application, control of johnsongrass, Palmer amaranth, pitted morningglory, and smellmelon was at least 83%, 93%, 92%, and 86%, respectively, with only slight differences noted among POST glyphosate programs. Control of barnyardgrass, browntop millet, and redroot pigweed was 68%, 47%, 86%, respectively, with the POST glyphosate program of 3 fb 7 lf OT, which was significantly less than all other glyphosate POST programs. Cotton yield increased 32% and 36% with the addition of fluometuron PRE to glyphosate POST programs consisting of 7 lf OT fb 14 lf PD and 7 lf fb 14 lf OT, respectively. Cotton yield for other glyphosate POST programs including an earlier 3 lf application was not improved when fluometuron was applied PRE. Without inclusion of fluometuron PRE, yield was maximized with the glyphosate POST program that included three applications of glyphosate (2,510 kg/ha). Overall, this research emphasizes the fact that weed control is important in the early season as well as in the late season in second-generation GR cotton.}, number={4}, journal={WEED TECHNOLOGY}, author={Scroggs, Derek M. and Miller, Donnie K. and Griffin, James L. and Wilcut, John W. and Blouin, David C. and Stewart, Alexander M. and Vidrine, P. Roy}, year={2007}, pages={877–881} } @article{thomas_everman_clewis_wilcut_2007, title={Glyphosate-resistant corn interference in glyphosate-resistant cotton}, volume={21}, ISSN={["1550-2740"]}, DOI={10.1614/WT-06-007.1}, abstractNote={Studies were conducted at three locations in North Carolina in 2004 to evaluate density-dependent effects of glyphosate-resistant (GR) corn on GR cotton growth and lint yield. GR corn was taller than GR cotton as early as 25 d after planting, depending on location. A GR corn density of 5.25 plant/m of crop row reduced late season cotton height by 49, 24, and 28% at Clayton, Lewiston–Woodville, and Rocky Mount, respectively, compared to weed-free cotton height. At Clayton, GR corn dry biomass per m crop row and GR corn seed biomass per m of crop row decreased linearly with increasing corn density. The relationship between GR corn and GR cotton yield loss was described by the rectangular hyperbola model with the asymptote (a) constrained to 100% maximum yield loss. The estimated coefficient i (yield loss per unit density as density approaches zero) was 9, 5, and 5 at Clayton, Lewiston–Woodville, and Rocky Mount, respectively. The examined GR corn densities had a significant effect on cotton yield, but not as significant as many other problematic grass and broadleaf weeds. Nomenclature: Glyphosate; corn, Zea mays L., ZEAMX, ‘DKC 69-71RR’; cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L. ‘FM 989RR’, ‘ST 4892RR’.}, number={2}, journal={WEED TECHNOLOGY}, author={Thomas, Walter E. and Everman, Wesley J. and Clewis, Scott B. and Wilcut, John W.}, year={2007}, pages={372–377} } @article{clewis_jordan_spears_wilcut_2007, title={Influence of environmental factors on cutleaf eveningprimrose (Oenothera laciniata) germination, emergence, development, vegetative growth, and control}, volume={55}, ISSN={["1550-2759"]}, DOI={10.1614/WS-06-089}, abstractNote={Abstract Laboratory and greenhouse studies were conducted to determine the effect of temperature, solution pH, water stress, and planting depth on cutleaf eveningprimrose germination and emergence. Field studies were conducted to measure growth parameters of cutleaf eveningprimrose throughout the fall season. When treated with constant temperature, cutleaf eveningprimrose germinated over a range of 15 to 32 C, with the optimum germination occurring at 24 C. Onset, rate, and total germination were greatest in an alternating 20/35 C temperature regime. Germination decreased as solution pH increased, with greatest germination occurring at solution pH of 4. Germination decreased when cutleaf eveningprimrose seed was subjected to increased water stress. Emergence was optimum when seed were buried at depths of 0.5 cm. Germination decreased with increasing burial depth, and no seed emerged from a depth of 10 cm. Cutleaf eveningprimrose control was maximized when 2,4-D was applied in mixture with glyphosate or paraquat. These data suggest that cutleaf eveningprimrose can germinate and gain biomass from early March to late October. These attributes could contribute to poor control before cotton planting if preplant control applications are delayed after early March. Nomenclature: Cutleaf eveningprimrose, Oenothera laciniata Hill OEOLA, cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L}, number={3}, journal={WEED SCIENCE}, author={Clewis, S. B. and Jordan, D. L. and Spears, J. F. and Wilcut, J. W.}, year={2007}, pages={264–272} } @article{burke_holland_burton_york_wilcut_2007, title={Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) pollen expresses ACCase target-site resistance}, volume={21}, ISSN={["1550-2740"]}, url={http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-36448953142&partnerID=MN8TOARS}, DOI={10.1614/WT-06-061.1}, abstractNote={Three studies were conducted to develop pollen tests for the screening of acetyl coenzyme-A carboxylase (ACCase) target-site resistance in a biotype of johnsongrass. The assays were based on germination of johnsongrass pollen in media supplemented with clethodim. Two different methods were used to evaluate pollen germination—a visual assessment and a spectrophotometric assay. The response of pollen to the germination media was linear for 16 h. At 6 h after treatment, absorbance at 500 nm was nearly 0.5; consequently, 6 h was chosen to conduct the pollen assays using the spectrophotometer. Both assessment methods differentiated the susceptible (S) and resistant (R) biotypes. Pollen from the susceptible biotype of johnsongrass was strongly inhibited by increasing concentrations of clethodim, with a GR50 of 25.8 ± 0.6 (SE) µM and GR50 of 16.4 ± 1.7 (SE) µM clethodim by visual assessment and spectrophotometric assessment, respectively. Minimum R/S values were > 3.9 by visual assessment and > 6.1 by spectrophotometric assessment. ACCase target-site resistance is expressed in johnsongrass pollen. Nomenclature: johnsongrass, Sorghum halepense (L.) Pers. SORHA.}, number={2}, journal={WEED TECHNOLOGY}, author={Burke, Ian C. and Holland, James B. and Burton, James D. and York, Alan C. and Wilcut, John W.}, year={2007}, pages={384–388} } @article{koger_burke_miller_kendig_reddy_wilcut_2007, title={MSMA antagonizes glyphosate and glufosinate efficacy on broadleaf and grass weeds}, volume={21}, ISSN={["0890-037X"]}, DOI={10.1614/WT-06-065.1}, abstractNote={Field and greenhouse studies were conducted to investigate the compatibility of MSMA in a tank mixture with glyphosate or glufosinate for broadleaf and grass weed control. Glyphosate, glufosinate, and MSMA were evaluated at 0.5×, 1×, and 2× rates, with 1× rates of 0.84 kgae/ha, 0.5 kgai/ha, and 2.2 kgai/ha, respectively. Glyphosate and glufosinate provided similar levels of control for most weed species and were often more efficacious than MSMA alone. Glyphosate controlled Palmer amaranth better than glufosinate. Glufosinate controlled hemp sesbania, pitted morningglory, and ivyleaf morningglory better than glyphosate at one location. Weed control was not improved with the addition of MSMA to glyphosate or glufosinate when compared with either herbicide alone. MSMA antagonized glyphosate efficacy on barnyardgrass, browntop millet, hemp sesbania, Palmer amaranth, and redroot pigweed. MSMA antagonized glufosinate efficacy on browntop millet, hemp sesbania, ivyleaf morningglory, johnsongrass, Palmer amaranth, pitted morningglory, prickly sida, redroot pigweed, and velvetleaf. Antagonism of glyphosate or glufosinate by MSMA was often overcome by applying the 2× rate of either herbicide alone. MSMA is not a compatible tank-mixture partner with glyphosate or glufosinate for weed control in cotton.}, number={1}, journal={WEED TECHNOLOGY}, author={Koger, Clifford H. and Burke, Ian C. and Miller, Donnie K. and Kendig, J. Andrew and Reddy, Krishna N. and Wilcut, John W.}, year={2007}, pages={159–165} } @article{burke_schroeder_thomas_wilcut_2007, title={Palmer amaranth interference and seed production in peanut}, volume={21}, ISSN={["0890-037X"]}, DOI={10.1614/WT-06-058.1}, abstractNote={Studies were conducted to evaluate density-dependent effects of Palmer amaranth on weed and peanut growth and peanut yield. Palmer amaranth remained taller than peanut throughout the growing season and decreased peanut canopy diameter, although Palmer amaranth density did not affect peanut height. The rapid increase in Palmer amaranth height at Goldsboro correspondingly reduced the maximum peanut canopy diameter at that location, although the growth trends for peanut canopy diameter were similar for both locations. Palmer amaranth biomass was affected by weed density when grown with peanut. Peanut pod weight decreased linearly 2.89 kg/ha with each gram of increase in Palmer amaranth biomass per meter of crop row. Predicted peanut yield loss from season-long interference of one Palmer amaranth plant per meter of crop row was 28%. Palmer amaranth seed production was also described by the rectangular hyperbola model. At the highest density of 5.2 Palmer amaranth plants/m crop row, 1.2 billion Palmer amaranth seed/ha were produced. Nomenclature: Palmer amaranth, Amaranthus palmeri S. Wats. AMAPA; peanut, Arachis hypogaea L. ‘Perry’.}, number={2}, journal={WEED TECHNOLOGY}, author={Burke, Ian C. and Schroeder, Michelle and Thomas, Walter E. and Wilcut, John W.}, year={2007}, pages={367–371} } @article{thomas_everman_collins_koger_wilcut_2007, title={Rain-free requirement and physiological properties of cotton plant growth regulators}, volume={88}, ISSN={["1095-9939"]}, DOI={10.1016/j.pestbp.2006.12.002}, abstractNote={Greenhouse studies were conducted to (1) evaluate the rain-free requirement for mepiquat chloride and mepiquat chloride plus cyclanilide with and without surfactant and to (2) evaluate absorption and translocation of cyclanilide, a component of a new cotton plant growth regulator. No significant differences in the number of nodes, leaf area, and plant organ fresh and dry weight were observed with any PGR treatment and rainfall simulation combination. Both plant growth regulators responded similarly to rainfall interval. As rain-free period increased, cotton height was reduced. Based on these data, a rain-free period of 8 h is needed to maximize efficacy, regardless of the use of surfactant. Absorption of cyclanilide ranged from 11 to 15% at 3 and 48 h after treatment, respectively. Averaged over harvest intervals, 18% of the applied cyclanilide remained in the treated leaf while 1.7 and 6.5% of the applied cyclanilide was found in the above and below treated leaf tissue, respectively.}, number={3}, journal={PESTICIDE BIOCHEMISTRY AND PHYSIOLOGY}, author={Thomas, Walter E. and Everman, Wesley J. and Collins, James R. and Koger, Clifford H. and Wilcut, John W.}, year={2007}, month={Jul}, pages={247–251} } @article{burke_koger_reddy_wilcut_2007, title={Reduced translocation is the cause of antagonism of glyphosate by MSMA in browntop millet (Brachiaria ramosa) and Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmerii)}, volume={21}, ISSN={["0890-037X"]}, DOI={10.1614/WT-06-064.1}, abstractNote={Studies were conducted in growth chambers to characterize absorption and translocation of14C-glyphosate applied alone or in mixture with MSMA in browntop millet and Palmer amaranth. MSMA antagonized activity of glyphosate in both weed species. Absorption of14C-glyphosate in Palmer amaranth was rapid and increased with time from 11.1% at 0.5 h after treatment to 68.1% at 168 HAT. Absorption of14C-glyphosate in browntop millet ranged from 1.6% at 0.5 HAT to 39.1% at 168 HAT. MSMA in mixture with glyphosate did not affect the absorption of glyphosate. In browntop millet, only 2.8% of the applied radioactivity translocated out of the treated leaf to the rest of the plant when glyphosate was applied in mixture with MSMA compared to 10.8% when glyphosate was applied alone at 72 HAT. Similarly, in Palmer amaranth, 3.2% of the applied radioactivity had translocated out of the treated leaf when glyphosate was applied in mixture with MSMA compared to 10.6% when glyphosate was applied alone. Reduced translocation appears to be the cause of the previously observed antagonism of glyphosate by MSMA.}, number={1}, journal={WEED TECHNOLOGY}, author={Burke, Ian C. and Koger, Clifford H. and Reddy, Krishna N. and Wilcut, John W.}, year={2007}, pages={166–170} } @article{price_wilcut_2007, title={Response of ivyleaf morningglory (Ipomoea hederacea) to neighboring plants and objects}, volume={21}, ISSN={["0890-037X"]}, DOI={10.1614/WT-06-146.1}, abstractNote={Field observations of morningglory (Ipomoeaspp.) showed that many plants grew out from places of comparable competitive advantage (alleys in field experiments with little or no vegetation) into neighboring plants or structures that provided climbing support. Of 223 native morningglory plants growing in rows and row middles in a 121-m2area within established corn research plots that contained no other weeds, 68% of the mature plants climbed up corn. More significant, of the 152 climbing morningglory plants, 96% grew toward and climbed the row in its closest proximity instead of growing across the row middle. Greenhouse and field experiments were initiated to determine whether morningglory grew preferentially toward certain colored structures or corn plants. Greenhouse-grown ivyleaf morningglory displayed varying frequency in locating and climbing toward black (17%), blue (58%), red (58%), white (67%), green (75%), and yellow (75%) stakes or corn (92%). Pots containing black stakes had the fewest climbing morningglory plants. In the field study, fewer ivyleaf morningglories climbed black structures compared with white- or green-colored structures or corn. The morningglory initial planting distance from colored structures or corn was also significant in the percentage of ivyleaf morningglories that exhibited climbing growth and in its final weight; morningglories that successfully located and climbed structures or corn weighed more and produced more seed than morningglories that remained on the ground. Ivyleaf morningglory appears to respond to spatial distribution of surrounding objects and possibly uses reflectance to preferentially project its stems toward a likely prospective structure for climbing.}, number={4}, journal={WEED TECHNOLOGY}, author={Price, Andrew J. and Wilcut, John W.}, year={2007}, pages={922–927} } @article{burke_wilcut_allen_2007, title={Viability and in vitro germination of Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) pollen}, volume={21}, ISSN={["1550-2740"]}, DOI={10.1614/WT-05-171.1}, abstractNote={A high proportion of viable pollen grains must germinate to study the physiology of pollen growth to reduce the confounding effects of environmental influences on pollen germination. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the nuclear state and develop a suitable medium and culture method for in vitro germination of johnsongrass pollen. Johnsongrass pollen was trinucleate, and in vitro tests for pollen viability using Alexander's stain and a fluorochromatic reaction method (FCR) indicated johnsongrass pollen was viable (92.6 to 98.4%). A factorial treatment arrangement of four concentrations of sucrose, two concentrations of boric acid, and two concentrations of calcium nitrate were used to determine the optimum pollen-germination medium composition in suspension culture, agar culture, and cellophane membrane culture. Germination was highest in a suspension culture with a medium containing 0.3 M sucrose, 2.4 mM boric acid, and 3 mM calcium nitrate. Pollen germination using this medium was 78.9% when anthers were harvested just before anthesis.}, number={1}, journal={WEED TECHNOLOGY}, author={Burke, Ian C. and Wilcut, John W. and Allen, Nina S.}, year={2007}, pages={23–29} } @article{everman_burke_allen_collins_wilcut_2007, title={Weed control and yield with glufosinate-resistant cotton weed management systems}, volume={21}, DOI={10.1614/W7-06-164.1}, number={3}, journal={Weed Technology}, author={Everman, W. J. and Burke, I. C. and Allen, J. R. and Collins, J. and Wilcut, J. W.}, year={2007}, pages={695–701} } @article{clewis_everman_jordan_wilcut_2007, title={Weed management in north Carolina peanuts (Arachis hypogaea) with s-metolachlor, diclosulam, flumioxazin, and sulfentrazone systems}, volume={21}, ISSN={["1550-2740"]}, DOI={10.1614/WT-06-139.1}, abstractNote={Experiments were conducted at the Upper Coastal Plain Research Station near Rocky Mount and at the Peanut Belt Research Station near Lewiston-Woodville in 2002 and 2003. Peanut injury was minimal (< 5%) with all soil-applied programs. S-Metolachlor PRE alone or in mixture with sulfentrazone, diclosulam, or flumioxazin controlled annual grasses similarly (66 to 87%). The addition of imazapic plus 2,4-DB POST increased annual grass control (> 93%). Sulfentrazone or diclosulam in mixture with S-metolachlor were the best PRE options, with 94% and 92% control of yellow and purple nutsedge, respectively, with flumioxazin being least effective at 70%. Diclosulam and flumioxazin in mixture with S-metolachlor were the best PRE options, with 99% and 93%, respectively for common ragweed control, whereas sulfentrazone was the least effective at 65%. S-Metolachlor in mixture with sulfentrazone, diclosulam, or flumioxazin PRE were similar (87 to 90%) for common lambsquarters control. S-Metolachlor in mixture with sulfentrazone, diclosulam, or flumioxazin provided similar levels of entireleaf, ivyleaf, pitted, and tall morningglory control (87, 86, and 87%, respectively) and better than S-metolachlor alone at 64%. Flumioxazin in mixture with S-metolachlor was the best PRE option for control of Palmer amaranth at 96%, whereas diclosulam with S-metolachlor was the best PRE option for control of eclipta at 100%. The prepackaged mixture of acifluorfen and bentazon plus 2,4-DB POST and imazapic plus 2,4-DB POST were similar for all morningglory species (> 96%) and Palmer amaranth control (93 and 97%, respectively). Peanut treated with S-metolachlor plus diclosulam PRE numerically yielded the highest at 3,210 kg/ha, but were statistically equivalent to S-metolachlor plus flumioxazin PRE at 3,040 kg/ha. Peanut treated with imazapic plus 2,4-DB POST yielded the most at 3,400 kg/ha, while peanut treated with a prepackaged mixture of acifluorfen and bentazon plus 2,4-DB POST yielded less (3,070 kg/ha). Nomenclature: 2,4-DB, acifluorfen, bentazon, diclosulam, flumioxazin, imazapic, S-metolachlor, sulfentrazone, common lambsquarters, Chenopodium album L. CHEAL, common ragweed, Ambrosia artemisiifolia L. AMBEL, eclipta, Eclipta prostrata L. ECLAL, entireleaf morningglory, Ipomoea hederacea var. integriuscula Gray IPOHG, ivyleaf morningglory, Ipomoea hederacea (L.) Jacq. IPOHE, Palmer amaranth, Amaranthus palmeri S. Wats. AMAPA, pitted morningglory, Ipomoea lacunosa L. IPOLA, purple nutsedge, Cyperus rotundus L. CYPRO, tall morningglory, Ipomoea purpurea (L.) Roth PHBPU, yellow nutsedge, Cyperus esculentus L. CYPES, peanut, Arachis hypogaea L., ‘NCV-11’, ‘VA-98R’}, number={3}, journal={WEED TECHNOLOGY}, author={Clewis, Scott B. and Everman, Wesley J. and Jordan, David L. and Wilcut, John W.}, year={2007}, pages={629–635} } @article{lassiter_burke_thomas_pline-srnic_jordan_wilcut_wilkerson_2007, title={Yield and physiological response of peanut to glyphosate drift}, volume={21}, ISSN={["0890-037X"]}, DOI={10.1614/WT-07-045.1}, abstractNote={Five experiments were conducted during 2001 and 2002 in North Carolina to evaluate peanut injury and pod yield when glyphosate was applied to 10 to 15 cm diameter peanut plants at rates ranging from 9 to 1,120 g ai/ha. Shikimic acid accumulation was determined in three of the five experiments. Visual foliar injury (necrosis and chlorosis) was noted 7 d after treatment (DAT) when glyphosate was applied at 18 g/ha or higher. Glyphosate at 280 g/ha or higher significantly injured the peanut plant and reduced pod yield. Shikimic acid accumulation was negatively correlated with visual injury and pod yield. The presence of shikimic acid can be detected using a leaf tissue assay, which is an effective diagnostic tool for determining exposure of peanut to glyphosate 7 DAT.}, number={4}, journal={WEED TECHNOLOGY}, author={Lassiter, Bridget R. and Burke, Ian C. and Thomas, Walter E. and Pline-Srnic, Wendy A. and Jordan, David L. and Wilcut, John W. and Wilkerson, Gall G.}, year={2007}, pages={954–960} } @article{burke_thomas_burton_spears_wilcut_2006, title={A seedling assay to screen aryloxyphenoxypropionic acid and cyclohexanedione resistance in johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense)}, volume={20}, ISSN={["0890-037X"]}, DOI={10.1614/WT-05-160.1}, abstractNote={A seedling bioassay was developed for the rapid diagnosis of resistance to clethodim and fluazifop-P in johnsongrass. The assay was based on differences in the coleoptile length of susceptible (S) and resistant (R) seedlings exposed to clethodim and fluazifop-P in petri dishes for 5 d. Bioassay concentrations of 0.09 mg/L clethodim and 0.18 mg/L fluazifop-P were chosen as discriminant based on rate responses of each biotype to increasing herbicide dose. At 5 d after treatment (DAT), the amounts of clethodim required to reduce coleoptile length by 50% (GR50) for the R and S seedlings were 462.5 and 24.8 mg/L, respectively, resulting in an R:S ratio of 18.7. The fluazifopGR50values for the R and S seedlings were 618.7 and 17.5 mg/L, respectively, resulting in a R:S ratio of 35.4.}, number={4}, journal={WEED TECHNOLOGY}, author={Burke, Ian C. and Thomas, Walter E. and Burton, James D. and Spears, Janet F. and Wilcut, John W.}, year={2006}, pages={950–955} } @article{porterfield_wilcut_2006, title={Corn (Zea mays L.) response to trifloxysulfuron}, volume={20}, ISSN={["1550-2740"]}, DOI={10.1614/WT-04-315R.1}, abstractNote={Experiments were conducted in weed-free environments to determine corn tolerance to trifloxysulfuron applied PRE or POST, and to determine the potential for trifloxysulfuron applied PRE or POST to cotton to injure corn grown in rotation the following year. Trifloxysulfuron at 3.75, 7.5, or 15 g ai/ha applied PRE or POST resulted in 98% stand reduction of imidazolinone-tolerant (IT) corn and 100% stand reduction in conventional corn. No injury occurred to imidazolinone-resistant (IR) corn. A corn cultivar yield response was observed, with conventional nontreated corn yielding 8,850 kg/ha and greater than nontreated IT corn at 7,900 kg/ha. Nontreated IR corn yielded the least, at 6,400 kg/ha, and these yields were equivalent to trifloxysulfuron-treated IR corn at 6,590 kg/ha. Cotton treated with trifloxysulfuron PRE at any rate was injured less than 8%. Both trifloxysulfuron at 7.5 g/ha POST and pyrithiobac at 70 g ai/ha POST injured cotton 11% early in the season. Neither trifloxysulfuron nor pyrithiobac influenced weed-free cotton lint yields. When grown in rotation, corn was not injured by trifloxysulfuron or pyrithiobac applied the previous year to cotton, and yields were not influenced.}, number={1}, journal={WEED TECHNOLOGY}, author={Porterfield, D and Wilcut, JW}, year={2006}, pages={81–85} } @article{burke_wilcut_cranmer_2006, title={Cross-resistance of a johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) biotype to aryloxyphenoxypropionate and cyclohexanedione herbicides}, volume={20}, ISSN={["0890-037X"]}, DOI={10.1614/WT-05-110R.1}, abstractNote={Dose-response experiments were conducted in a greenhouse on a biotype of johnsongrass from Washington County, Mississippi, to determine the level of resistance to the aryloxyphenoxypropionate (AOPP) herbicide fluazifop-P-butyl and the cyclohexanedione (CHD) herbicides clethodim and sethoxydim. Both seedling and rhizomatous plants were evaluated. Resistant/susceptible (R/S) ratios were calculated based onGR50values (the rate required to reduce shoot dry biomass, expressed as a percent of the control, 50%). TheGR50values for the resistant and susceptible seedling plants were 110 and 10 g ai/ha for clethodim, 193 and 34 g ai/ha for fluazifop-P-butyl, and 265 and 48 g ai/ha for sethoxydim, resulting in R/S ratios of 11.0, 5.7, and 5.5, respectively. TheGR50values for the resistant and susceptible rhizomatous plants were 609 and 39 g/ha for clethodim, 657 and 29 g/ha for fluazifop-P-butyl, and 668 and 30 g/ha for sethoxydim, resulting in R/S ratios of 15.6, 22.7, and 22.3, respectively.}, number={3}, journal={WEED TECHNOLOGY}, author={Burke, Ian C. and Wilcut, John W. and Cranmer, John}, year={2006}, pages={571–575} } @article{thomas_britton_clewis_askew_wilcut_2006, title={Glyphosate-resistant cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) response and weed management with trifloxysulfuron, glyphosate, prometryn, and MSMA}, volume={20}, ISSN={["1550-2740"]}, DOI={10.1614/WT-04-257R1.1}, abstractNote={Field studies were conducted at three locations to evaluate glyphosate-resistant (GR) cotton response, weed control, and cotton lint yields to two formulations of glyphosate (diammonium salt– glyphosate and isopropylamine salt–glyphosate) and trifloxysulfuron applied early postemergence (EPOST) alone or to tank mixtures of trifloxysulfuron with each glyphosate formulation, with and without a late postemergence-directed (LAYBY) treatment of prometryn plus MSMA. Trifloxysulfuron and both formulations of glyphosate controlled common lambsquarters and pitted morningglory. Both glyphosate formulations provided equivalent control of common lambsquarters, goosegrass, pitted morningglory, prickly sida, and smooth pigweed. Trifloxysulfuron controlled smooth pigweed better than either glyphosate formulation but did not control goosegrass or prickly sida. Prometryn plus MSMA LAYBY improved late-season control of common lambsquarters, goosegrass, large crabgrass, and pitted morningglory for all EPOST systems and improved late-season smooth pigweed control for EPOST systems that did not include trifloxysulfuron. Cotton injury was 2% or less from both glyphosate formulations, while trifloxysulfuron injured ‘Deltapine 5415RR’ 7 to 16% at two locations. At a third location, trifloxysulfuron injured ‘Paymaster 1218RR/BG’ 24%, and when applied in mixture with either glyphosate formulation, injury increased to at least 72%. Cotton injury was transient at the first two locations and was not visually apparent 3 to 5 wk later. Cotton yield at the third location was reduced. High cotton yields reflected high levels of weed control.}, number={1}, journal={WEED TECHNOLOGY}, author={Thomas, WE and Britton, TT and Clewis, SB and Askew, SD and Wilcut, JW}, year={2006}, pages={6–13} } @article{everman_clewis_taylor_wilcut_2006, title={Influence of diclosulam postemergence application timing on weed control and peanut tolerance}, volume={20}, ISSN={["0890-037X"]}, DOI={10.1614/WT-05-087R1.1}, abstractNote={Field studies were conducted at Lewiston–Woodville and Rocky Mount, NC in 2001 and 2002 to evaluate weed control and peanut response to POST treatments of diclosulam at various rates and application timings. Diclosulam controlled common ragweed and entireleaf morningglory when applied within 35 d after planting (DAP). Common ragweed 61 cm tall was controlled ≥92% with 4 to 13 g ai/ha diclosulam and larger common ragweed (107 to 137 cm tall) were controlled ≥97% with 27 g/ha diclosulam. Common lambsquarters was controlled 62% or less with all diclosulam POST treatments following metolachlor applied PRE, which provided 48% control. Peanut injury was less than 15% with all diclosulam POST treatments and was transitory. In separate studies, POST diclosulam treatments did not affect peanut yield in a weed-free environment. Peanut yield in weedy environments was reduced as the diclosulam application timing was delayed because of early season weed interference. A linear relationship was observed between yield and application timing with yield decreasing as application timing was delayed. This yield response documents the importance of early season weed management for maximizing peanut yield potential. Virginia peanut varieties were not affected by different POST rates of diclosulam; however, early season peanut injury showed a linear and quadratic relationship with diclosulam rate and was less than 14% at rates as high as 71 g/ha, and was not apparent by late season.}, number={3}, journal={WEED TECHNOLOGY}, author={Everman, Wesley J. and Clewis, Scott B. and Taylor, Zachary G. and Wilcut, John W.}, year={2006}, pages={651–657} } @article{thomas_burke_spears_wilcut_2006, title={Influence of environmental factors on slender amaranth (Amaranthus viridis) germination}, volume={54}, DOI={10.1614/ws-05-54.2.316}, abstractNote={Germination response of slender amaranth to temperature, solution pH, moisture stress, and depth of emergence was evaluated under controlled environmental conditions. Results indicated that 30 C was the optimum constant temperature for germination. Germination of slender amaranth seed at 21 d was similar, with 35/25, 35/20, 30/25, and 30/20 alternating temperature regimes. As temperatures in alternating regimes increased, time to onset of germination decreased and rate of germination increased. Slender amaranth germination was greater with acidic than with basic pH conditions. Germination declined with increasing water stress and was completely inhibited at water potentials below −0.6 MPa. Slender amaranth emergence was greatest at depths of 0.5 to 2 cm, but some seeds emerged from as deep as 6 cm. Information gained in this study will contribute to an integrated control program for slender amaranth.}, number={2}, journal={Weed Science}, author={Thomas, W. E. and Burke, I. C. and Spears, J. F. and Wilcut, J. W.}, year={2006}, pages={316–320} } @article{burke_burton_york_cranmer_wilcut_2006, title={Mechanism of resistance to clethodim in a johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) biotype}, volume={54}, ISSN={["1550-2759"]}, DOI={10.1614/WS-05-153R.1}, abstractNote={Abstract A biotype of johnsongrass cross resistant to clethodim, sethoxydim, quizalofop-P, and fluazifop-P was identified in several fields in Washington County, MS. Absorption, translocation, and metabolism studies using 14C-clethodim and acetyl-coenzyme A carboxylase (ACCase) activity assays were conducted to determine the resistance mechanism. Absorption of 14C-clethodim was higher in the resistant than the susceptible biotype 4 hours after treatment (HAT), but at 24, 48, and 72 HAT, similar levels of radioactivity were detected in both johnsongrass biotypes. Consequently, resistant plants had more radioactivity present in the treated leaves at 4 and 24 HAT. However, there was no difference between resistant and susceptible biotypes in the translocation of 14C out of the treated leaf at 4, 8, 24, 48, and 72 HAT as a percentage of total absorbed. Metabolism of clethodim was similar in the resistant and susceptible biotypes. There was no difference in the specific activity of ACCase from the susceptible and resistant johnsongrass biotypes (means of 0.221 and 0.223 nmol mg−1 protein min−1, respectively). ACCase from the susceptible biotype was sensitive to clethodim, with an I50 value of 0.29 μM clethodim. The ACCase enzyme from the resistant biotype was less sensitive, with an I50 value of 1.32 μM clethodim. The resultant R/S ratio for clethodim was 4.5. These results indicate that resistance to clethodim in this johnsongrass biotype resulted from an altered ACCase enzyme that confers resistance to clethodim. Nomenclature: Clethodim; johnsongrass, Sorghum halepense (L.) Pers., SORHA.}, number={3}, journal={WEED SCIENCE}, author={Burke, Ian C. and Burton, James D. and York, Alan C. and Cranmer, John and Wilcut, John W.}, year={2006}, pages={401–406} } @article{porterfield_everman_wilcut_2006, title={Soybean response to residual and in-season treatments of trifloxysulfuron}, volume={20}, ISSN={["1550-2740"]}, DOI={10.1614/WT-05-033R.1}, abstractNote={Experiments were conducted from 1998 to 2000 at Rocky Mount, NC, in weed-free environments to determine soybean tolerance to preplant (PP) applications of trifloxysulfuron and the potential for trifloxysulfuron applied preemergence (PRE) and postemergence (POST) to cotton to injure soybean grown in rotation the following year. Trifloxysulfuron at 3.75 and 7.5 g ai/ha applied PP 2 wk before seeding injured conventional soybean less than 5%, whereas no injury was observed when seeding was delayed 4 or 6 wk after PP treatment. No injury to sulfonylurea-resistant soybean (SR) was observed for any treatment. Soybean yields were not influenced by trifloxysulfuron treatment. Cotton injury was 7% or less with trifloxysulfuron applied PRE or POST at 3.75 and 7.5 g/ha. Trifloxysulfuron at 15 g/ha PRE or POST injured cotton a maximum of 14 to 18%. Trifloxysulfuron did not reduce cotton lint yields regardless of method or rate of application. Both conventional and SR soybean were not injured nor were yields influenced by trifloxysulfuron applied PRE or POST the previous year to cotton.}, number={2}, journal={WEED TECHNOLOGY}, author={Porterfield, Dunk and Everman, Wesley J. and Wilcut, John W.}, year={2006}, pages={384–388} } @article{fisher_burke_price_smith_wilcut_2006, title={Uptake, translocation, and metabolism of root absorbed sulfentrazone and sulfentrazone plus clomazone in flue-cured tobacco transplants}, volume={20}, ISSN={["0890-037X"]}, DOI={10.1614/WT-05-182.1}, abstractNote={Research was conducted to evaluate root uptake, translocation, and metabolism of14C-sulfentrazone alone or in a mixture with clomazone in solution in flue-cured tobacco transplants. Uptake and translocation of sulfentrazone was rapid and was not affected by the addition of clomazone. Fifty-nine and 65% of the14C absorbed by the plant was translocated to the leaves within 24 h with sulfentrazone alone and in the clomazone plus sulfentrazone mixture, respectively. Differences in plant metabolism were observed between sulfentrazone alone and sulfentrazone plus clomazone. After 3 h, 66% of the14C recovered from the leaves was metabolized when sulfentrazone was applied alone, compared to 91% when sulfentrazone was applied with clomazone. The difference could indicate that metabolism of sulfentrazone by tobacco transplants was enhanced by the presence of clomazone.}, number={4}, journal={WEED TECHNOLOGY}, author={Fisher, Loren R. and Burke, Ian C. and Price, Andrew J. and Smith, W. David and Wilcut, John W.}, year={2006}, pages={898–902} } @article{clewis_wilcut_porterfield_2006, title={Weed management with S-metolachlor and glyphosate mixtures in glyphosate-resistant strip- and conventional-tillage cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)}, volume={20}, ISSN={["1550-2740"]}, DOI={10.1614/WT-05-030R.1}, abstractNote={Five studies were conducted at Clayton, Rocky Mount, and Lewiston-Woodville, NC, in 2001 and 2002, to evaluate weed management, crop tolerance, and yield in strip- and conventional-tillage glyphosate-resistant cotton. Cotton was treated with two glyphosate formulations; glyphosate-IP (isopropylamine salt) or glyphosate-TM (trimethylsulfonium salt), early postemergence (EPOST) alone or in a mixture withS-metolachlor. Early season cotton injury was minimal (3%) with either glyphosate formulation alone or in mixture withS-metolachlor. Weed control and cotton yields were similar for both glyphosate formulations. The addition ofS-metolachlor to either glyphosate formulation increased control of broadleaf signalgrass, goosegrass, large crabgrass, and yellow foxtail 14 to 43 percentage points compared with control by glyphosate alone.S-metolachlor was not beneficial for late-season control of entireleaf morningglory, jimsonweed, pitted morningglory, or yellow nutsedge. The addition ofS-metolachlor to either glyphosate formulation increased control of common lambsquarters, common ragweed, Palmer amaranth, smooth pigweed, and velvetleaf 6 to 46 percentage points. The addition of a late postemergence-directed (LAYBY) treatment of prometryn plus MSMA increased control to greater than 95% for all weed species regardless of EPOST treatment, and control was similar with or withoutS-metolachlor EPOST. Cotton lint yield was increased 220 kg/ha with the addition ofS-metolachlor to either glyphosate formulation compared with yield from glyphosate alone. The addition of the LAYBY treatment increased yields 250 and 380 kg/ha for glyphosate plusS-metolachlor and glyphosate systems, respectively.S-metolachlor residual activity allowed for an extended window for more effective LAYBY application to smaller weed seedlings instead of weeds that were possibly larger and harder to control.}, number={1}, journal={WEED TECHNOLOGY}, author={Clewis, SB and Wilcut, JW and Porterfield, D}, year={2006}, pages={232–241} } @article{koger_shaner_henry_nadler-hassar_thomas_wilcut_2005, title={Assessment of two nondestructive assays for detecting glyphosate resistance in horseweed (Conyza canadensis)}, volume={53}, ISSN={["1550-2759"]}, DOI={10.1614/WS-05-010R}, abstractNote={Two rapid, nondestructive assays were developed and tested for their potential in differentiating glyphosate-resistant from glyphosate-susceptible biotypes of horseweed. In one assay, leaves of glyphosate-resistant and -susceptible corn, cotton, and soybean plants, as well as glyphosate-resistant and -susceptible horseweed plants, were dipped in solutions of 0, 300, 600, and 1,200 mg ae L−1glyphosate for 3 d, and subsequent injury was evaluated. In the second assay, plant sensitivity to glyphosate was evaluated in vivo by incubating excised leaf disc tissue from the same plants used in the first assay in 0.7, 1.3, 2.6, 5.3, 10.6, 21.1, 42.3, and 84.5 mg ae L−1glyphosate solutions for 16 h and measuring shikimate levels with a spectrophotometer. The leaf dip assay differentiated between glyphosate-resistant and -susceptible crops and horseweed biotypes. The 600 mg L−1rate of glyphosate was more consistent in differentiating resistant and susceptible plants compared with the 300 and 1,200 mg L−1rates. The in vivo assay detected significant differences between susceptible and glyphosate-resistant plants of all species. Shikimate accumulated in a glyphosate dose–dependent manner in leaf discs from susceptible crops, but shikimate did not accumulate in leaf discs from resistant crops, and levels were similar to nontreated leaf discs. Shikimate accumulated at high (≥ 21.1 mg ae L−1) concentrations of glyphosate in leaf discs from all horseweed biotypes. Shikimate accumulated at low glyphosate concentrations (≤ 10.6 mg L−1) in leaf discs from susceptible horseweed biotypes but not in resistant biotypes. Both assays were able to differentiate resistant from susceptible biotypes of horseweed and could have utility for screening other weed populations for resistance to glyphosate.}, number={4}, journal={WEED SCIENCE}, author={Koger, CH and Shaner, DL and Henry, WB and Nadler-Hassar, T and Thomas, WE and Wilcut, JW}, year={2005}, pages={438–445} } @article{koger_shaner_henry_nadler-hassar_thomas_wilcut_2005, title={Assessment of two nondestructive assays for detecting glyphosate resistance in horseweed (Conyza canadensis)}, volume={53}, ISSN={["1550-2759"]}, DOI={10.1614/WS-05-010R.1}, abstractNote={Two rapid, nondestructive assays were developed and tested for their potential in differentiating glyphosate-resistant from glyphosate-susceptible biotypes of horseweed. In one assay, leaves of glyphosate-resistant and -susceptible corn, cotton, and soybean plants as well as glyphosate-resistant and -susceptible horseweed plants were dipped in solutions of 0, 300, 600, and 1200 mg ae L−1glyphosate for 3 d and subsequent injury was evaluated. In the second assay, plant sensitivity to glyphosate was evaluated in vivo by incubating excised leaf disc tissue from the same plants used in the first assay in 0.7, 1.3, 2.6, 5.3, 10.6, 21.1, 42.3, and 84.5 mg ae L−1glyphosate solutions for 16 h and measuring shikimate levels with a spectrophotometer. The leaf-dip assay differentiated between glyphosate-resistant and -susceptible crops and horseweed biotypes. The 600 mg L−1rate of glyphosate was more consistent in differentiating resistant and susceptible plants compared with the 300 and 1,200 mg L−1rates. The in vivo assay detected significant differences between susceptible and glyphosate-resistant plants of all species. Shikimate accumulated in a glyphosate dose-dependent manner in leaf discs from susceptible crops, but shikimate did not accumulate in leaf discs from resistant crops and levels were similar to nontreated leaf discs. Shikimate accumulated at high (≥ 21.1 mg ae L−1) concentrations of glyphosate in leaf discs from all horseweed biotypes. Shikimate accumulated at low glyphosate concentrations (≤ 10.6 mg L−1) in leaf discs from susceptible horseweed biotypes but not in resistant biotypes. Both assays were able to differentiate resistant from susceptible biotypes of horseweed and might have utility for screening other weed populations for resistance to glyphosate.}, number={5}, journal={WEED SCIENCE}, author={Koger, CH and Shaner, DL and Henry, WB and Nadler-Hassar, T and Thomas, WE and Wilcut, JW}, year={2005}, pages={559–566} } @article{paulsgrove_barker_wilcut_2005, title={Bromoxynil-resistant cotton and selected weed response to mixtures of bromoxynil and pyrithiobac}, volume={19}, ISSN={["1550-2740"]}, DOI={10.1614/WT-04-306R.1}, abstractNote={An experiment was conducted at four locations in North Carolina in 1996 and 1997 to evaluate weed control and cotton response in conventional-tillage bromoxynil-resistant cotton. Weed management systems evaluated included a factorial arrangement of bromoxynil postemergence (POST) at 0, 0.28, 0.42, or 0.56 kg ai/ha in mixture with pyrithiobac POST at 0, 0.018, 0.032, or 0.072 kg ai/ha. Additional treatments evaluated included trifluralin preplant-incorporated (PPI) plus fluometuron preemergence (PRE). All systems received a postemergence-directed (PDS) treatment of fluometuron plus MSMA. Bromoxynil at 0.42 kg/ha POST followed by (fb) fluometuron plus MSMA PDS controlled common lambsquarters, common ragweed, eclipta, prickly sida, redroot pigweed, spurred anoda; and entireleaf, ivyleaf, pitted, and tall morningglory at least 93%, whereas smooth pigweed and volunteer peanut were controlled 73 and 86%, respectively. Pyrithiobac at 0.036 kg/ha POST fb fluometuron plus MSMA PDS controlled eclipta, common ragweed, prickly sida, redroot, and smooth pigweed, and spurred anoda at least 94%. Volunteer peanut was controlled 84% by pyrithiobac at 0.032 kg/ha, whereas pitted, ivyleaf, and entireleaf morningglory were controlled by 63, 78, and 83%, respectively. Pyrithiobac at 0.072 kg/ha fb fluometuron plus MSMA PDS controlled common lambsquarters 48%. Cotton yield with bromoxynil plus pyrithiobac POST mixtures were equivalent to trifluralin PPI plus fluometuron PRE at three locations and better at the fourth location. Bromoxynil-resistant cotton ‘47’ and ‘57’ had excellent tolerance to all POST herbicide treatments.}, number={3}, journal={WEED TECHNOLOGY}, author={Paulsgrove, MD and Barker, WL and Wilcut, JW}, year={2005}, pages={753–761} } @article{thomas_pline-srnic_viator_wilcut_2005, title={Effects of glyphosate application timing and rate on sicklepod (Senna obtusifolia) fecundity}, volume={19}, ISSN={["1550-2740"]}, DOI={10.1614/WT-03-223R}, abstractNote={Greenhouse experiments were conducted to examine the effect of glyphosate on reproductive development in sicklepod. Glyphosate was applied postemergence over the top at 112 and 280 g ai/ha to sicklepod at 4-leaf stage (L), 8-L, 4-L followed by 8-L, and 12-L. A nontreated control was included. Immediately after the 12-L application, number of flowers was recorded for all treatments twice per week for 8 wk. Pollen viability was measured on 1 open flower/plant/sampling time using Alexander stain. The number of pods, pod length, seeds per plant, 50-seed weight, total seed weight, seed germination, seed viability, and dry weight of aboveground biomass were also recorded. No significant differences among the treatments were found for average pod length, 50-seed weight, seed germination, seed viability, and aboveground biomass. The nontreated had 18 flowers counted over 8 wk. Glyphosate applied at 12-L and sequentially at 4-L and 8-L, averaged over glyphosate rates, reduced cumulative flower production after 8 wk by 65 and 54%, respectively, compared with the nontreated. Similarly, glyphosate at 280 g/ha, averaged over treatment timings, reduced flower production by 58% compared with the nontreated. Because the number of flowers produced was limited by glyphosate treatment due to flower abscission, pollen viability measurements could not be analyzed because of large numbers of missing data points. The number of pods, seeds, and total seed weight were reduced by 79, 80, and 81%, respectively, with 280 g/ha of glyphosate compared with the nontreated. Nomenclature: Glyphosate; sicklepod, Senna obtusifolia (L.) Irwin and Barneby #3 CASOB. Additional index words: Alexander stain, pollen viability, tetrazolium chloride. Abbreviations: fb, followed by; IAA, indoleacetic acid; L, leaf stage.}, number={1}, journal={WEED TECHNOLOGY}, author={Thomas, WE and Pline-Srnic, WA and Viator, RP and Wilcut, JW}, year={2005}, pages={55–61} } @article{burke_askew_corbett_wilcut_2005, title={Glufosinate antagonizes clethodim control of goosegrass (Eleusine indica)}, volume={19}, ISSN={["1550-2740"]}, DOI={10.1614/WT-04-214R1.1}, abstractNote={Because of a previously reported antagonism of clethodim activity by other herbicides, greenhouse experiments were conducted to determine goosegrass control with clethodim and glufosinate postemergence alone, in tank mixtures, and as sequential treatments. Herbicide treatments consisted of glufosinate at 0, 290, or 410 g ai/ha and clethodim at 0, 105, or 140 g ai/ha, each applied alone, in all possible combinations of the above application rates, or sequentially. Glufosinate at either rate alone controlled goosegrass at the two- to four-leaf growth stage <44%, and control was less for goosegrass at the one- to two- and four- to six-tiller growth stages. Clethodim controlled two- to four-leaf and one- to two-tiller goosegrass 91 and 99% at application rates of 105 and 140 g/ha, respectively, and controlled four- to six-tiller goosegrass 68 and 83% at application rates of 105 and 140 g ai/ha, respectively. All tank mixtures of glufosinate with clethodim reduced goosegrass control at least 52 percentage points when compared to the control with clethodim alone. Glufosinate at 290 or 410 g/ha when applied sequentially 7 or 14 d prior to clethodim reduced goosegrass control at least 50 percentage points compared to the control obtained with clethodim applied alone. Clethodim at rates of 105 or 140 g/ha when applied 7 or 14 d prior to glufosinate controlled goosegrass equivalent to the control obtained with each respective rate of clethodim applied alone at the two- to four-leaf and one- to two-tiller growth stage. Clethodim should be applied to goosegrass no larger than at the one- to two-tiller growth stage at least 7 d prior to glufosinate application or 14 d after a glufosinate application for effective goosegrass control.}, number={3}, journal={WEED TECHNOLOGY}, author={Burke, IC and Askew, SD and Corbett, JL and Wilcut, JW}, year={2005}, pages={664–668} } @article{lancaster_jordan_york_burke_corbin_sheldon_wilcut_monks_2005, title={Influence of selected fungicides on efficacy of clethodim and sethoxydim}, volume={19}, ISSN={["1550-2740"]}, DOI={10.1614/WT-04-172R}, abstractNote={Field experiments were conducted to compare large crabgrass control by clethodim or sethoxydim applied alone and with selected fungicides registered for use in peanut. Fluazinam, propiconazole plus trifloxystrobin, or tebuconazole did not affect efficacy of clethodim or sethoxydim. Azoxystrobin, boscalid, chlorothalonil, and pyraclostrobin reduced efficacy of clethodim and sethoxydim in some experiments. Increasing the herbicide rate increased large crabgrass control regardless of the addition of chlorothalonil. In laboratory experiments,14C absorption was less when14C-clethodim or14C-sethoxydim was applied with chlorothalonil. Pyraclostrobin and tebuconazole did not affect absorption of14C-clethodim or14C-sethoxydim.}, number={2}, journal={WEED TECHNOLOGY}, author={Lancaster, SH and Jordan, DL and York, AC and Burke, IC and Corbin, FT and Sheldon, YS and Wilcut, JW and Monks, DW}, year={2005}, pages={397–403} } @article{lancaster_jordan_york_wilcut_monks_brandenburg_2005, title={Interactions of clethodim and sethoxydim with selected agrichemicals applied to peanut}, volume={19}, ISSN={["1550-2740"]}, DOI={10.1614/WT-04-232R}, abstractNote={Experiments were conducted in North Carolina during 2002 and 2003 to evaluate broadleaf signalgrass and large crabgrass control by clethodim and sethoxydim applied in two-, three-, or four-way mixtures with fungicides, insecticides, and foliar fertilizer–plant growth regulator treatments. Broadleaf signalgrass and large crabgrass control by clethodim and sethoxydim was not reduced by the insecticides esfenvalerate, indoxacarb, or lambda-cyhalothrin. The fungicides azoxystrobin, chlorothalonil, pyraclostrobin, and tebuconazole reduced large crabgrass control by clethodim or sethoxydim in one or more of three experiments for each herbicide. Disodium octaborate and the plant growth regulator prohexadione calcium plus urea ammonium nitrate (UAN) mixed with clethodim and fungicides improved large crabgrass control in some experiments. In contrast, prohexadione calcium plus UAN and disodium octaborate did not affect broadleaf signalgrass or large crabgrass control by sethoxydim.}, number={2}, journal={WEED TECHNOLOGY}, author={Lancaster, SH and Jordan, DL and York, AC and Wilcut, JW and Monks, DW and Brandenburg, RL}, year={2005}, pages={456–461} } @article{lancaster_jordan_york_wilcut_brandenburg_monks_2005, title={Interactions of late-season morningglory (Ipomoea spp.) management practices in peanut (Arachis hypogaea)}, volume={19}, ISSN={["1550-2740"]}, DOI={10.1614/WT-04-229R.1}, abstractNote={Experiments were conducted in North Carolina during 2002 and 2003 to evaluate entireleaf morningglory control by 2,4-DB applied alone or with seven fungicides. In a separate group of experiments, tall morningglory control by 2,4-DB was evaluated when applied in four-way mixtures with the following: the fungicides azoxystrobin, chlorothalonil, pyraclostrobin, or tebuconazole; the insecticide lambda-cyhalothrin; and the foliar fertilizer disodium octaborate or the plant growth regulator (PGR) prohexadione calcium plus urea ammonium nitrate. Pyraclostrobin, but not azoxystrobin, boscalid, chlorothalonil, fluazinam, propiconazole plus trifloxystrobin, or tebuconazole, reduced entireleaf morningglory control by 2,4-DB. Mixtures of fungicides, insecticides, and foliar fertilizer/ PGR did not affect tall morningglory control by 2,4-DB. Placing artificial morningglory in the peanut canopy when fungicides were applied did not intercept enough fungicide to increase peanut defoliation by early leaf spot and web blotch or reduce pod yield compared with fungicide applied without artificial morningglory. Nomenclature: 2,4-DB; azoxystrobin; boscalid; chlorothalonil; fluazinam; lambda-cyhalothrin; prohexadione calcium; propiconazole; pyraclostrobin; tebuconazole; trifloxystrobin; entireleaf morningglory, Ipomoea hederacaea var integriuscula Gray #3 IPOHG; tall morningglory, Ipomoea purpurea (L.) Roth # PHBPU; early leaf spot, Cercospora arachidicola S. Hori; web blotch, Phoma arachidicola (Marsas et al.); peanut, Arachis hypogaea L. ‘NC-V 11’, ‘VA 98R’. Additional index words: Fungicide deposition, pesticide interactions, weed interference. Abbreviations: PGR, plant growth regulator; UAN, urea ammonium nitrate.}, number={4}, journal={WEED TECHNOLOGY}, author={Lancaster, SH and Jordan, DL and York, AC and Wilcut, JW and Brandenburg, RL and Monks, DW}, year={2005}, pages={803–808} } @article{koger_shaner_krutz_walker_buehring_henry_thomas_wilcut_2005, title={Rice (Oryza satiova) response to drift rates of glyphosate}, volume={61}, DOI={10.1002/pt.1113}, number={12}, journal={Pest Management Science}, author={Koger, C. H. and Shaner, D. L. and Krutz, L. J. and Walker, T. W. and Buehring, N. and Henry, W. B. and Thomas, W. E. and Wilcut, J. W.}, year={2005}, pages={1161–1167} } @article{lancaster_jordan_spears_york_wilcut_monks_batts_brandenburg_2005, title={Sicklepod (Senna obtusifolia) control and seed production after 2,4-DB applied alone and with fungicides or insecticides}, volume={19}, ISSN={["1550-2740"]}, DOI={10.1614/WT-04-227R}, abstractNote={Experiments were conducted during 1999, 2002, and 2003 to evaluate sicklepod control by 2,4-DB applied alone or in mixture with selected fungicides and insecticides registered for use in peanut. The fungicides boscalid, chlorothalonil, fluazinam, propiconazole plus trifloxystrobin, pyraclostrobin, or tebuconazole and the insecticides acephate, carbaryl, esfenvalerate, fenpropathrin, lambda-cyhalothrin, methomyl, or indoxacarb applied in mixtures with 2,4-DB did not reduce sicklepod control by 2,4-DB compared with 2,4-DB alone. The fungicide azoxystrobin reduced control in some but not all experiments. Sicklepod control was highest when 2,4-DB was applied before flowering regardless of fungicide treatment. Seed production and germination were reduced when 2,4-DB was applied 81 to 85 d after emergence when sicklepod was flowering. Applying 2,4-DB before flowering and at pod set and pod fill did not affect seed production.}, number={2}, journal={WEED TECHNOLOGY}, author={Lancaster, SH and Jordan, DL and Spears, JE and York, AC and Wilcut, JW and Monks, DW and Batts, RB and Brandenburg, RL}, year={2005}, pages={451–455} } @article{porterfield_fisher_wilcut_smith_2005, title={Tobacco response to residual and in-season treatments of CGA-362622}, volume={19}, DOI={10.1614/wt-02-006}, abstractNote={Experiments were conducted to determine tobacco tolerance to CGA-362622 applied pretransplant (PRE-T) and postemergence (POST) to tobacco and applied the previous year preemergence (PRE) and POST to cotton. CGA-362622 applied at 3.75 or 7.5 g ai/ha PRE-T injured ‘K326’ flue-cured tobacco 1%, whereas POST treatments resulted in 4 to 5% injury. Tobacco injury was transient with no mid- or late-season injury noted. Tobacco yields from all CGA-362622 POST treatments were not different from the nontreated weed-free check. Tobacco treated with 7.5 g/ha CGA-362622 PRE-T yielded greater than nontreated weed-free tobacco or tobacco treated with CGA-362622 POST. When grown in rotation, tobacco was not injured, and yields were not influenced by CGA-362622 applied PRE or POST to cotton the previous year. Nomenclature: CGA-362622; cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L.; tobacco, Nicotiana tabacum L. Additional index words: Carryover, crop injury, sulfonylurea herbicide. Abbreviations: ALS, acetolactate synthase; LAYBY, late POST-directed; POST, postemergence; PPI, preplant incorporated; PRE, preemergence; PRE-T, pretransplant.}, number={1}, journal={Weed Technology}, author={Porterfield, D. and Fisher, L. R. and Wilcut, J. W. and Smith, W. D.}, year={2005}, pages={05-} } @article{miller_downer_burris_wilcut_cook_2005, title={Trifloxysulfuron-insecticide combination effects on broadleaf weed and thrips (Frankliniella spp.) control in cotton}, volume={19}, ISSN={["1550-2740"]}, DOI={10.1614/WT-04-323R.1}, abstractNote={Coapplication of herbicides and insecticides affords growers an opportunity to control multiple pests with one application given that efficacy is not compromised. Trifloxysulfuron was applied at 5.3 g ai/ha both alone and in combination with the insecticides acephate (370 g ai/ha), oxamyl (370 g ai/ha), lambda-cyhalothrin (34 g ai/ha), acetamiprid (45 g ai/ha), thiamethoxam (45 g ai/ha), endosulfan (379 g ai/ha), indoxacarb (123 g ai/ha), emamectin benzoate (11 g ai/ha), methoxyfenozide (67 g ai/ha), spinosad (75 g ai/ha), and pyridalyl (112 g ai/ha) to determine the effects of coapplication on control of some of the more common and/or troublesome broadleaf weeds infesting cotton. In addition, the insecticides acephate, oxamyl, lambda-cyhalothrin, thiamethoxam, and endosulfan, at the rates listed above, were applied either alone or in combination with trifloxysulfuron at 7.9 g/ha to assess the effects of coapplication on thrips control. Control of hemp sesbania (insecticides oxamyl and lambda-cyhalothrin), sicklepod (insecticides methoxyfenozide and pyridalyl), redroot pigweed (insecticides thiamethoxam, methoxyfenozide, spinosad, and pyridalyl), and smooth pigweed, Palmer amaranth, and common lambsquarters (all insecticides) with trifloxysulfuron may be reduced when coapplied with the indicated insecticides for each species. Control of pitted, tall, ivyleaf, and entireleaf morningglory with trifloxysulfuron was not affected by the insecticides evaluated. Coapplication of trifloxysulfuron with the insecticides evaluated also resulted in no negative effects on thrips control.}, number={3}, journal={WEED TECHNOLOGY}, author={Miller, DK and Downer, RG and Burris, E and Wilcut, JW and Cook, DR}, year={2005}, pages={762–767} } @article{thomas_troxler_smith_fisher_wilcut_2005, title={Uptake, translocation, and metabolism of sulfentrazone in peanut, prickly sida (Sida spinosa), and pitted morningglory (Ipomoea lacunosa)}, volume={53}, ISSN={["1550-2759"]}, DOI={10.1614/WS-04-085R2}, abstractNote={Studies were conducted to evaluate uptake, translocation, and metabolism of root-absorbed14C-sulfentrazone in peanut, prickly sida, and pitted morningglory. Peanut absorbed more than five and three times greater14C-sulfentrazone than pitted morningglory and prickly sida, respectively. All plant species translocated appreciable amounts (≥ 39%) of radioactivity to the leaves. The three plant species had some capacity to metabolize14C-sulfentrazone. At 3 h after treatment, 7, 29, and 71% of the radioactivity in the shoots of peanut, prickly sida, and pitted morningglory, respectively, was sulfentrazone. Sulfentrazone levels in the shoots at 3 and 6 h after treatment correspond to reported tolerance levels, with peanut being the most tolerant of the three species, whereas prickly sida and pitted morningglory are moderately tolerant and completely susceptible to sulfentrazone, respectively. Levels of metabolites varied among species, plant part, and harvest timing. On the basis of these data, tolerance in peanut is largely due to its ability to rapidly metabolize sulfentrazone.}, number={4}, journal={WEED SCIENCE}, author={Thomas, WE and Troxler, SC and Smith, WD and Fisher, LR and Wilcut, JW}, year={2005}, pages={446–450} } @article{burke_troxler_askew_wilcut_smith_2005, title={Weed management systems in glyphosate-resistant cotton}, volume={19}, ISSN={["1550-2740"]}, DOI={10.1614/WT-04-182R1}, abstractNote={Studies were conducted at Clayton, Lewiston-Woodville, and Rocky Mount, NC, to evaluate weed and cotton response to herbicide systems in glyphosate-resistant cotton in 1995 and 1997. Herbicide systems evaluated included various combinations of soil-applied (trifluralin and fluometuron) and postemergence (POST) (glyphosate or pyrithiobac) herbicides with or without late postemergence-directed (LAYBY) treatments of cyanazine plus MSMA. Glyphosate-resistant cotton injury was less than 5% with all herbicide treatments. Glyphosate POST systems were as efficacious in weed control as other herbicide systems. Depending on location, glyphosate and pyrithiobac POST systems usually required cyanazine plus MSMA LAYBY for season-long control of common lambsquarters, goosegrass, large crabgrass, pitted morningglory, prickly sida, and Texas panicum. Glyphosate POST applied as needed provided weed control equivalent to soil-applied plus POST herbicides, although lint yield was slightly reduced depending on location. Herbicide systems that included soil-applied herbicides required one to two treatments of glyphosate POST and post-directed for season-long weed control and high cotton lint yields, whereas the same herbicide systems without soil-applied herbicides required two to three glyphosate treatments. In all herbicide systems, a residual soil-applied or LAYBY herbicide treatment increased yield compared with glyphosate POST only systems. Location influenced weed control and cotton yield. Generally, as herbicide inputs increased, yield increased.}, number={2}, journal={WEED TECHNOLOGY}, author={Burke, IC and Troxler, SC and Askew, SD and Wilcut, JW and Smith, WD}, year={2005}, pages={422–429} } @article{burke_thomas_pline-srnic_fisher_smith_wilcut_2005, title={Yield and physiological response of flue-cured tobacco to simulated glyphosate drift}, volume={19}, ISSN={["0890-037X"]}, DOI={10.1614/WT-03-219R}, abstractNote={Field trials were conducted in 2001 at the Tobacco Research Station near Oxford, NC, and in 2002 at the Lower Coastal Plains Research Station near Kinston, NC, to determine tobacco yield, injury, and shikimic acid accumulation in response to simulated glyphosate drift. Glyphosate was applied to 12- to 13-cm-high tobacco ‘K326’ early postemergence at 0, 9, 18, 35, 70, 140, 280, 560, and 1,120 (1×) g ai/ha. Crop injury was rated 7 and 35 d after treatment (DAT) and shikimic acid accumulation in leaves at 7 DAT, tobacco yield, and leaf grade index (whole-plant index of harvest interval leaf value) were also assessed. Shikimic acid accumulation and injury symptoms increased similarly as glyphosate rate increased. Glyphosate rates of 140 g/ha (0.125 of recommended rate) or higher resulted in significant crop injury, reduced tobacco yield, and decreased leaf grade index. Shikimic acid accumulation at 7 DAT was inversely related to tobacco yield. Shikimic acid accumulation was found to be an effective diagnostic tool to determine glyphosate drift in tobacco; however, in-season data are needed to correlate shikimic acid accumulation with yield loss.}, number={2}, journal={WEED TECHNOLOGY}, author={Burke, IC and Thomas, WE and Pline-Srnic, WA and Fisher, LR and Smith, WD and Wilcut, JW}, year={2005}, pages={255–260} } @article{thomas_burke_robinson_pline-srnic_edmisten_wells_wilcut_2005, title={Yield and physiological response of nontransgenic cotton to simulated glyphosate drift}, volume={19}, ISSN={["1550-2740"]}, DOI={10.1614/WT-03-194R}, abstractNote={Field studies were conducted in 2001 in Lewiston, NC, and in 2002 at Clayton and Lewiston, NC, to investigate the response of nontransgenic cotton to simulated glyphosate drift in a weed-free environment. Nontransgenic cotton variety ‘Fibermax 989’ was planted in a conventional seedbed at all locations. Glyphosate treatments were applied early postemergence (EPOST) at the four-leaf growth stage of cotton at 0, 8.7, 17.5, 35, 70, 140, 280, 560, and 1,120 g ai/ha and represent 0, 0.78, 1.55, 3.13, 6.25, 12.5, 25, 50, and 100% of the commercial use rate, respectively. Rates as low as 140 g/ha caused lint yield reductions depending on year and location. When averaged over all locations, lint yield reductions of 4, 49, 72, and 87% compared with nontreated cotton were observed with glyphosate rates of 140, 280, 560, and 1,120 g/ha, respectively. Visual injury and shikimic acid accumulation were evident at glyphosate rates greater or equal to 70 g/ha. Collectively, visual injury and shikimic acid accumulation at 7 d after EPOST treatment might be used as a diagnostic indicator to predict potential yield reductions from simulated glyphosate drift. Nomenclature: Glyphosate; cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L. ‘Fibermax 989’. Additional index words: Shikimic acid. Abbreviations: DAT, days after early postemergence treatment; DD, degree-day; EPOST, early postemergence; EPSPS, 5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase [EC 2.5.1.19]; HPLC, high-performance liquid chromatography; PDS, postemergence-directed; POST, postemergence; PRE, preemergence.}, number={1}, journal={WEED TECHNOLOGY}, author={Thomas, WE and Burke, IC and Robinson, BL and Pline-Srnic, WA and Edmisten, KL and Wells, R and Wilcut, JW}, year={2005}, pages={35–42} } @article{mcelroy_yelverton_burke_wilcut_2004, title={Absorption, translocation and metabolism of halosulfuron and trifloxysulfuron in green kyllinga (Kyllinga brevifolia) and false-green kyllinga (K-gracillima)}, volume={52}, ISSN={["0043-1745"]}, DOI={10.1614/WS-03-133R}, abstractNote={Abstract Trifloxysulfuron controls green and false-green kyllinga more effectively than halosulfuron. Studies were conducted to evaluate the absorption, translocation, and metabolism of 14C-halosulfuron and 14C-trifloxysulfuron when foliar applied to green and false-green kyllinga. No differences were observed between the two kyllinga spp. with regard to absorption, translocation, or metabolism of either herbicide. The majority of 14C-halosulfuron and 14C-trifloxysulfuron was absorbed by 4 h, with an accumulation of 63 and 47% radioactivity, respectively. Accumulation of both herbicides occurred in the treated leaf and the primary shoot from whence the treated leaf was removed, with minor accumulation occurring in the roots and newly formed rhizomes. Of the total amount of 14C-halosulfuron absorbed into the plant, 77% remained in the form of the parent compound compared with 61% of 14C-trifloxysulfuron. The parent compound was distributed mainly in the treated leaf and primary shoot, whereas polar metabolites were concentrated in the roots and rhizomes. Nonpolar metabolites of 14C-trifloxysulfuron accumulated in the treated leaf and primary shoot. These data indicate that absorption, translocation, or metabolism could not explain the variation in green and false-green kyllinga control between halosulfuron and trifloxysulfuron. Nomenclature: Halosulfuron; trifloxysulfuron; false-green kyllinga, Kyllinga gracillima L.; green kyllinga, Kyllinga brevifolia Rottb. KYLBR.}, number={5}, journal={WEED SCIENCE}, author={McElroy, JS and Yelverton, FH and Burke, IC and Wilcut, JW}, year={2004}, pages={704–710} } @article{burke_price_wilcut_jordan_culpepper_tredaway-ducar_2004, title={Annual grass control in peanut (Arachis hypogaea) with clethodim and imazapic}, volume={18}, ISSN={["1550-2740"]}, DOI={10.1614/WT-03-026R}, abstractNote={Field experiments were conducted to evaluate possible interactions of clethodim with imazapic applied as mixtures or sequentially for control of broadleaf signalgrass, fall panicum, goosegrass, and large crabgrass. Imazapic at 70 g ai/ha alone controlled grass weeds inconsistently, whereas clethodim at 140 g ai/ha alone controlled the same weeds at least 99%. Imazapic did not affect broadleaf signalgrass control by clethodim. Reduced control of fall panicum, goosegrass, and large crabgrass was observed when clethodim and imazapic were applied in mixture. Antagonism of clethodim occurred when clethodim was applied 1 d before or up to 3 d after application of imazapic (fall panicum and large crabgrass). Antagonism of goosegrass control was noted when imazapic was applied 3 d before or up to 7 d after application of clethodim. In other experiments, large crabgrass and Texas panicum control by clethodim (70 and 140 g/ha) applied alone or with imazapic (70 g/ ha) or bentazon (1.1 kg ai/ha) plus 2,4-DB (0.28 kg ai/ha) either with or without ammonium sulfate (2.8 kg/ha) was evaluated. Texas panicum control by clethodim was reduced by imazapic regardless of the ammonium sulfate rate. However, large crabgrass control by imazapic was not affected in these experiments. Control of both grasses by clethodim was reduced substantially by bentazon plus 2,4-DB, although in some instances ammonium sulfate improved control when in mixture. Ammonium sulfate improved control by clethodim in some instances irrespective of the broadleaf–sedge herbicide treatments. Nomenclature: Bentazon; clethodim; 2,4-DB; imazapic; broadleaf signalgrass, Brachiaria platyphylla (Griseb) Nash #3 BRAPP; fall panicum, Panicum dichotomiflorum L. # PANDI; goosegrass, Eleusine indica L. Gaertn. # ELEIN; large crabgrass, Digitaria sanguinalis L. Scop. # DIGSA; Texas panicum, Panicum texanum Buckl. # PANTE. Additional index words: Ammonium sulfate, antagonism, herbicide compatibility, herbicide interaction, sequential application.}, number={1}, journal={WEED TECHNOLOGY}, author={Burke, IC and Price, AJ and Wilcut, JW and Jordan, DL and Culpepper, AS and Tredaway-Ducar, J}, year={2004}, pages={88–92} } @article{price_wilcut_cranmer_2004, title={Flumioxazin preplant or post-directed application timing followed by irrigation at emergence or after post-directed spray treatment does not influence cotton yield}, volume={18}, ISSN={["1550-2740"]}, DOI={10.1614/WT-03-068R}, abstractNote={Three experiments were conducted in Lewiston, NC, from 1999 through 2002 to evaluate the influence of various application timings of flumioxazin preplant (PP) and postemergence-directed spray (PDS) on cotton injury. In experiment 1, flumioxazin was evaluated in a reduced-tillage system at 71, 105, or 140 g ai/ha in mixture with glyphosate, applied at 28, 14, or 7 d before planting (DBP), followed by irrigation at cotton emergence. Flumioxazin applied PP at any rate and irrigated at emergence injured cotton less than 7% at 2 wk after emergence (WAE) and less than 6% 5 WAE. In experiment 2, flumioxazin was evaluated in a conventional-tillage system at 71 or 105 g/ha as a PDS treatment applied to dry soil, wet soil, and dry soil irrigated immediately after application when cotton was 20 to 30 cm height. Cotton treated with flumioxazin PDS at either rate applied to dry soil, wet soil, or dry soil followed immediately by irrigation was not injured. In the third experiment, flumioxazin at 71 g/ha alone or in mixture with glyphosate at 1.12 g/ha was applied at 30, 21, 14, and 0 DBP in a conventional-tillage system. Flumioxazin applied alone or in mixture with glyphosate applied at any time did not injure cotton. In all experiments, cotton lint yields were not influenced by herbicide treatment.}, number={2}, journal={WEED TECHNOLOGY}, author={Price, AJ and Wilcut, JW and Cranmer, JR}, year={2004}, pages={310–314} } @article{mcelroy_yelverton_gannon_wilcut_2004, title={Foliar vs. soil exposure of green kyllinga (Kyllinga brevifolia) and false-green kyllinga (Kyllinga gracillima) to postemergence treatments of CGA-362622, halosulfuron, imazaquin, and MSMA}, volume={18}, ISSN={["1550-2740"]}, DOI={10.1614/WT-03-072R}, abstractNote={Greenhouse studies were conducted to evaluate shoot number, shoot weight, rhizome weight, and root weight reduction of green and false-green kyllinga at three placement levels (soil applied, foliar applied, and soil + foliar applied) and five herbicide treatments (CGA-362622, halosulfuron, imazaquin, MSMA, and imazaquin + MSMA). Averaged over herbicide and placement level, false-green kyllinga shoot number 30 d after treatment (DAT) and rhizome weight 60 DAT were reduced more than those of green kyllinga. Furthermore, imazaquin, MSMA, and imazaquin + MSMA, averaged across placement levels, as well as CGA-362622 and halosulfuron, both foliar and soil applied, reduced false-green kyllinga shoot number greater than that of green kyllinga 60 DAT. Halosulfuron reduced false-green kyllinga shoot weight greater than that of green kyllinga 60 DAT; however, MSMA reduced green kyllinga greater. In general, foliar- and soil + foliar–applied treatments reduced shoot number (30 DAT), rhizome weight, and root weight of both kyllinga species greater than soil-applied treatments, whereas soil + foliar–applied treatments were more effective in reducing shoot weight 60 DAT. CGA-362622 and halosulfuron reduced kyllinga species shoot number (30 DAT), false-green kyllinga shoot weight (60 DAT), and root weight of both species greater than all other herbicides. However, CGA-362622 reduced green kyllinga shoot weight (60 DAT) and rhizome weight of both species greater than all other herbicides. Nomenclature: CGA-362622, N-[(4,6-dimethoxy-2-pyrimidinyl)carbamoyl]-3-(2,2,2-trifluroethoxy)- pyridin-2-sulfonamide sodium salt; halosulfuron; imazaquin; MSMA; false-green kyllinga, Kyllinga gracillima L.; green kyllinga, Kyllinga brevifolia Rottb. #3 KYLBR. Additional index words: Foliar absorption, root absorption. Abbreviations: ALS, acetolactate synthase; DAP, days after planting; DAT, days after treatment; NIS, nonionic surfactant; POST, postemergence.}, number={1}, journal={WEED TECHNOLOGY}, author={McElroy, JS and Yelverton, FH and Gannon, TW and Wilcut, JW}, year={2004}, pages={145–151} } @article{thomas_pline_wilcut_edmisten_wells_viator_paulsgrove_2004, title={Glufosinate does not affect floral morphology and pollen viability in glufosinate-resistant cotton}, volume={18}, ISSN={["1550-2740"]}, DOI={10.1614/WT-03-032R1}, abstractNote={Studies were conducted to determine whether glufosinate treatments to glufosinate-resistant cotton caused changes in floral morphology, pollen viability, and seed set. Four glufosinate treatments were included: (1) glufosinate applied postemergence over the top (POST) at the four-leaf stage, (2) glufosinate applied POST at the eight-leaf stage, (3) the first two treatments sequentially, and (4) a POST application at the four-leaf stage followed by (fb) a postemergence-directed stem application (PDS) at the eight-leaf stage. Glufosinate was consistently applied at 0.49 kg ai/ha. A nontreated control was included. Glufosinate treatments did not affect stigma height, length of the staminal column, or pollen viability. However, the distance from the top anther to the tip of the stigma was less in plants treated with an eight-leaf POST treatment than in nontreated plants, although this difference is not likely to influence pollen deposition because in both cases anthers reached above the stigma tip. Plants receiving four-leaf POST fb eight-leaf PDS treatment with glufosinate had eight seeds per boll less than nontreated plants; however, the more rigorous four-leaf POST fb eight-leaf POST treatment did not differ from the nontreated in seeds per boll.}, number={2}, journal={WEED TECHNOLOGY}, author={Thomas, WE and Pline, WA and Wilcut, JW and Edmisten, KL and Wells, R and Viator, RR and Paulsgrove, MD}, year={2004}, pages={258–262} } @article{thomas_pline-srnic_thomas_edmisten_wells_wilcut_2004, title={Glyphosate negatively affects pollen viability but not pollination and seed set in glyphosate-resistant corn}, volume={52}, ISSN={["1550-2759"]}, DOI={10.1614/WS-03-134R}, abstractNote={Abstract Experiments were conducted in the North Carolina State University Phytotron greenhouse and field locations in Clayton, Rocky Mount, and Lewiston-Woodville, NC, in 2002 to determine the effect of glyphosate on pollen viability and seed set in glyphosate-resistant (GR) corn. Varieties representing both currently commercial GR corn events, GA21 and NK603, were used in phytotron and field studies. All glyphosate treatments were applied at 1.12 kg ai ha−1 at various growth stages. Regardless of hybrid, pollen viability was reduced in phytotron and field studies with glyphosate treatments applied at the V6 stage or later. Scanning electron microscopy of pollen from affected treatments showed distinct morphological alterations correlating with reduced pollen viability as determined by Alexander stain. Transmission electron microscopy showed pollen anatomy alterations including large vacuoles and lower starch accumulation with these same glyphosate treatments. Although pollen viability and pollen production were reduced in glyphosate treatments after V6, no effect on kernel set or yield was found among any of the reciprocal crosses in the phytotron or field studies. There were also no yield differences among any of the hand self-pollinated (nontreated male × nontreated female, etc.) crosses. Using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay to examine CP4-5-enolpyruvlshikimate-3-phosphate synthase expression in DKC 64-10RR (NK603) at anthesis, we found the highest expression in pollen with progressively less in brace roots, ear leaf, anthers, roots, ovaries, silks, stem, flag leaf, and husk. Nomenclature: Glyphosate; corn, Zea mays L.; ‘DK 662RR’; ‘DK 687RR’; ‘DKC 64-10RR/SIL’.}, number={5}, journal={WEED SCIENCE}, author={Thomas, WE and Pline-Srnic, WA and Thomas, JF and Edmisten, KL and Wells, R and Wilcut, JW}, year={2004}, pages={725–734} } @article{price_wilcut_cranmer_2004, title={Physiological behavior of root-absorbed flumioxazin in peanut, ivyleaf morningglory (Ipomoea hederacea), and sicklepod (Senna obtusifolia)}, volume={52}, ISSN={["0043-1745"]}, DOI={10.1614/WS-04-017R}, abstractNote={Abstract Previous research has shown that flumioxazin has the potential to cause peanut injury. In response to this concern, laboratory and greenhouse experiments were conducted to investigate the influence of temperature on germination of flumioxazin-treated peanut seed and the effect of interval between flumioxazin application and irrigation on peanut emergence and injury. Laboratory experiments using 14C-flumioxazin were also conducted to investigate differential tolerance exhibited by peanut, ivyleaf morningglory, and sicklepod to flumioxazin. Flumioxazin treatments containing either water-dispersible granular or wettable powder formulation at 1.4 μmol L−1 did not influence germination compared with nontreated peanut across all temperature regimes (15 to 40 C). Peanut treated with either formulations of flumioxazin preemergence and receiving irrigation at emergence and 2 and 4 d after emergence were injured between 40 and 60%. Peanut treated at 8 and 12 d after emergence were injured between 25 and 15%, respectively. Total 14C absorbed by ivyleaf mornigglory was 57% of applied whereas sicklepod absorbed 46%, 72 h after treatment (HAT). Peanut absorbed > 74% of applied 14C 72 HAT. The majority of absorbed 14C remained in roots of sicklepod, ivyleaf morningglory, and peanut at all harvest times. Ivyleaf morningglory contained 41% of the parent herbicide 72 HAT whereas sicklepod and peanut contained only 24 and 11% parent compound, respectively. Regression slopes indicated slower flumioxazin metabolism by ivyleaf morningglory (a susceptible species) compared with sicklepod and peanut (tolerant species). Nomenclature: Flumioxazin; ivyleaf morningglory, [Ipomoea hederacea (L.) Jacq.] IPOHE; sicklepod, [Senna obtusifolia (L.) Irwin and Barneby] CASOB; peanut, Arachis hypogaea L. ‘NC 10C’.}, number={5}, journal={WEED SCIENCE}, author={Price, AJ and Wilcut, JW and Cranmer, JR}, year={2004}, pages={718–724} } @article{main_mueller_hayes_wilcut_peeper_talbert_witt_2004, title={Sulfentrazone persistence in southern soils: Bioavailable concentration and effect on a rotational cotton crop}, volume={18}, ISSN={["1550-2740"]}, DOI={10.1614/WT-03-091R1}, abstractNote={Field studies were conducted from 1998 to 2000 in Tennessee, North Carolina, Arkansas, and Oklahoma to determine the effects of sulfentrazone carryover to a cotton rotational crop from sulfentrazone applied the previous year. Sulfentrazone applied the previous year at 400 g/ha caused no yield loss in Tennessee, >30% yield reduction in Oklahoma, and 20% yield loss in Arkansas and North Carolina. In most experiments in this study, visual evaluations of injury closely correlated with final cotton lint yield (r2=0.84).}, number={2}, journal={WEED TECHNOLOGY}, author={Main, CL and Mueller, TC and Hayes, RM and Wilcut, JW and Peeper, TF and Talbert, RE and Witt, WW}, year={2004}, pages={346–352} } @article{thomas_askew_wilcut_2004, title={Tropic croton interference in peanut}, volume={18}, ISSN={["1550-2740"]}, DOI={10.1614/WT-03-018R}, abstractNote={Studies were conducted to evaluate density-dependent effects of tropic croton on weed and peanut growth and peanut yield. Tropic croton remained taller than peanut throughout the growing season, yet tropic croton density did not affect peanut or tropic croton heights. Tropic croton biomass per plant decreased linearly with increasing plant density. Peanut pod weight decreased linearly 4.7 kg/ha with each gram of increase in tropic croton biomass per meter of crop row. The rectangular hyperbola model was used to describe effects of tropic croton density on percent peanut yield loss. Estimated coefficients for a (maximum yield loss) and i (yield loss per unit density as density approaches zero) were 81 and 26 in 1988, 41 and 33 in 1989, and 33 and 61 in 1998, respectively. Although a and i values varied between years, yield loss predictions were stable between years at weed densities below two plants per meter of crop row. Even though the results show that tropic croton is less competitive than many broadleaf weeds in peanut, it has potential to substantially reduce yields and subsequently reduce economic return. Nomenclature: Tropic croton, Croton glandulosus var. septentrionalis Muell.-Arg. #3 CVNGS; peanut, Arachis hypogaea L. ‘NC 10C’, ‘Florigiant’. Additional index words: Competition, economic threshold, models, plant height, weed biomass, weed density. Abbreviations: PRE, preemergence.}, number={1}, journal={WEED TECHNOLOGY}, author={Thomas, WE and Askew, SD and Wilcut, JW}, year={2004}, pages={119–123} } @article{corbett_askew_thomas_wilcut_2004, title={Weed efficacy evaluations for bromoxynil, glufosinate, glyphosate, pyrithiobac, and sulfosate}, volume={18}, ISSN={["1550-2740"]}, DOI={10.1614/WT-03-139R}, abstractNote={Thirteen field trials were conducted in 1999 and 2000 to evaluate postemergence (POST) weed control with single applications of bromoxynil at 420 or 560 g ai/ha, glufosinate at 291 or 409 g ai/ha, glyphosate at 1,120 g ai/ha, pyrithiobac at 36 or 72 g ai/ha, or sulfosate at 1,120 g ai/ha. Additional treatments evaluated included two applications with glufosinate at both rates in all possible combinations, two applications of glyphosate, and two applications of sulfosate. Weeds were 2 to 5 cm or 8 to 10 cm tall for annual grass and broadleaf weeds whereas yellow nutsedge and glyphosate-resistant corn were 8 to 10 cm tall. All herbicide treatments controlled 2- to 5-cm common cocklebur, Florida beggarweed, jimsonweed, ladysthumb smartweed, Pennsylvania smartweed, pitted morningglory, prickly sida, redroot pigweed, smooth pigweed, and velvetleaf at least 90%. All herbicide treatments except pyrithiobac at either rate controlled 2- to 5-cm common lambsquarters, common ragweed, and tall morningglory at least 90%; pyrithiobac at the lower rate was the only treatment that failed to control entireleaf and ivyleaf morningglory at least 90%. Bromoxynil and pyrithiobac at either rate controlled 2- to 5-cm sicklepod 33 to 68% whereas glufosinate, glyphosate, and sulfostate controlled ≥99%. Glyphosate and sulfosate applied once or twice controlled hemp sesbania less than 70% and volunteer peanut less than 80%. Bromoxynil and pyrithiobac were the least effective treatments for control of annual grass species and bromoxynil controlled Palmer amaranth less than 80%. Glufosinate controlled broadleaf signalgrass, fall panicum, giant foxtail, green foxtail, large crabgrass, yellow foxtail, seedling johnsongrass, Texas panicum, and glyphosate-resistant corn at least 90% but controlled goosegrass less than 60%. Glyphosate and sulfosate controlled all grass species except glyphosate-resistant corn at least 90%. In greenhouse research, goosegrass could be controlled with glufosinate POST plus a late POST-directed treatment of prometryn plus monosodium salt of methylarsonic acid.}, number={2}, journal={WEED TECHNOLOGY}, author={Corbett, JL and Askew, SD and Thomas, WE and Wilcut, JW}, year={2004}, pages={443–453} } @article{burke_wilcut_2004, title={Weed management in cotton with CGA-362622, fluometuron, and pyrithiobac}, volume={18}, ISSN={["1550-2740"]}, DOI={10.1614/WT-03-035R}, abstractNote={An experiment was conducted at five locations in North Carolina during 2000 and 2001 to evaluate weed control, crop injury, and cotton yield. Weed management systems included different combinations of pyrithiobac preemergence (PRE), fluometuron PRE, CGA-362622 postemergence (POST), pyrithiobac POST, and monosodium salt of methylarsonic acid (MSMA) plus prometryn applied late POST-directed (LAYBY). At Goldsboro in 2000, cotton was injured 74 to 78% by CGA-362622 POST when evaluated 4 to 7 d after treatment (DAT). Injury at Clayton, Goldsboro, and Lewiston in 2001 and Rocky Mount in 2000 was less than 16% 4 to 7 DAT with the same treatment and was not apparent by 62 DAT. CGA-362622 controlled common lambsquarters, common ragweed, Palmer amaranth, sicklepod, smooth pigweed, andIpomoeaspecies including entireleaf, ivyleaf, and pitted morningglory, and the addition of pyrithiobac to the herbicide system, either PRE or POST, increased control ofAmaranthusspecies, jimsonweed, and prickly sida. CGA-362622 did not control jimsonweed or prickly sida. Fluometuron PRE, pyrithiobac PRE, and MSMA plus prometryn LAYBY were beneficial for increasing weed control and cotton lint yields. Prometryn plus MSMA LAYBY increased control of common ragweed, entireleaf morningglory, jimsonweed, pitted morningglory, and smooth pigweed and provided higher cotton yields than similar systems without a LAYBY. The greatest weed control and greatest cotton lint yields required complete weed management systems that included a combination of PRE, POST, and LAYBY treatments.}, number={2}, journal={WEED TECHNOLOGY}, author={Burke, IC and Wilcut, JW}, year={2004}, pages={268–276} } @article{thomas_burke_wilcut_2004, title={Weed management in glyphosate-resistant corn with glyphosate and halosulfuron}, volume={18}, ISSN={["1550-2740"]}, DOI={10.1614/WT-03-222R}, abstractNote={Three field studies were conducted at Lewiston Woodville, NC, in 2001 and 2002 to evaluate crop tolerance, weed control, grain yield, and net returns in glyphosate-resistant corn with various herbicide systems. Crop injury, weed control, and grain yield were not influenced by glyphosate formulation. Atrazine preemergence (PRE) and atrazine plus metolachlor PRE, averaged over postemergence (POST) systems, controlled Texas panicum at least 80 and 87%, respectively. Sequential glyphosate applications (early postemergence [EPOST] followed by [fb] POST) provided at least 99% control of Texas panicum compared with at least 86 and 88% control with glyphosate EPOST and glyphosate plus halosulfuron EPOST, respectively. Atrazine plus metolachlor PRE fb any glyphosate system controlled large crabgrass and goosegrass 89 to 100% and 94 to 100%, respectively. Sequential glyphosate treatments controlled large crabgrass and goosegrass at least 99 and 95%, respectively. Regardless of PRE system, glyphosate plus halosulfuron EPOST and sequential applications of glyphosate controlled common ragweed and common lambsquarters at least 99%, whereas glyphosate EPOST alone provided at least 88 and 96% control, respectively. Glyphosate plus halosulfuron EPOST and glyphosate sequentially controlled yellow nutsedge similarly and more consistently than glyphosate EPOST. Regardless of PRE treatment, sequential glyphosate applications provided at least 98% control of entireleaf and pitted morningglory, whereas glyphosate EPOST controlled at least 64 and 62%, respectively. Glyphosate EPOST and the sequential glyphosate EPOST fb POST systems yielded similarly at all three locations. Net returns were highest at all three locations with the glyphosate sequential system, with similar net returns obtained with glyphosate EPOST and glyphosate plus halosulfuron EPOST at two and one locations, respectively.}, number={4}, journal={WEED TECHNOLOGY}, author={Thomas, WE and Burke, IC and Wilcut, JW}, year={2004}, pages={1049–1057} } @article{thomas_burke_wilcut_2004, title={Weed management in glyphosate-resistant corn with glyphosate, halosulfuron, and mesotrione}, volume={18}, ISSN={["1550-2740"]}, DOI={10.1614/WT-03-221R}, abstractNote={Four field studies were conducted at the Peanut Belt Research Station near Lewiston Woodville, NC, in 2000, 2001, and 2002 to evaluate crop tolerance, weed control, grain yield, and net returns in glyphosate-resistant corn with various herbicide systems. Preemergence (PRE) treatment options included no herbicide, atrazine at 1.12 kg ai/ha, or atrazine plus metolachlor at 1.68 kg ai/ha. Postemergence (POST) treatment options included glyphosate at 1.12 kg ai/ha as either the isopropylamine salt or the diammonium salt, either alone or in mixtures with mesotrione at 105 g ai/ha plus crop oil concentrate at 1% (v/v) or halosulfuron at 53 g ai/ha plus 0.25% (v/v) nonionic surfactant. All response variables were independent of glyphosate formulation. Addition of metolachlor to atrazine PRE improved large crabgrass and goosegrass control but did not always improve Texas panicum control. POST control of these annual grasses was similar with glyphosate alone or in mixture with halosulfuron or mesotrione. Glyphosate POST controlled common lambsquarters and common ragweed 89 and 93%, respectively. Glyphosate plus halosulfuron POST provided more effective yellow nutsedge control than glyphosate POST. Atrazine PRE or atrazine plus metolachlor PRE followed by any glyphosate POST treatment controlledIpomoeaspp. at least 93%. Glyphosate plus mesotrione in total POST systems always provided greater control ofIpomoeaspp. than glyphosate alone. The highest yielding treatments always included glyphosate POST, either with or without a PRE herbicide treatment. Similarly, systems that included any glyphosate POST treatment had the highest net returns.}, number={3}, journal={WEED TECHNOLOGY}, author={Thomas, WE and Burke, IC and Wilcut, JW}, year={2004}, pages={826–834} } @article{ducar_wilcut_richburg_2004, title={Weed management in imidazolinone-resistant corn with imazapic}, volume={18}, ISSN={["1550-2740"]}, DOI={10.1614/WT-03-204R}, abstractNote={Field studies were conducted in 1992 and 1993 to evaluate imazapic alone and in postemergence (POST) mixtures with atrazine or bentazon for weed control in imidazolinone-resistant corn treated with carbofuran. Nicosulfuron and nicosulfuron plus atrazine also were evaluated. Imazapic at 36 and 72 g ai/ha controlled large crabgrass 85 and 92%, respectively, which was equivalent to control obtained with nicosulfuron plus atrazine. Imazapic at the higher rate controlled large crabgrass better than nicosulfuron alone. Imazapic at 36 and 72 g/ha controlled Texas panicum 88 and 99%, respectively, and at the higher rate control was equivalent to that obtained with nicosulfuron alone or in mixture with atrazine. Imazapic plus bentazon POST controlled Texas panicum less than imazapic at the lower rate applied alone. Redroot pigweed was controlled 100% with all herbicide treatments. Imazapic at either rate alone or in tank mixture with bentazon or atrazine controlled prickly sida >99%, which was superior to control obtained with nicosulfuron or nicosulfuron plus atrazine. Smallflower, entireleaf, ivyleaf, pitted, and tall morningglories were controlled 96% or greater with all herbicide treatments except nicosulfuron alone. Sicklepod control was >88% with all imazapic treatments, whereas control from nicosulfuron alone was 72%. Corn yields were improved by the addition of POST herbicides with no differences among POST herbicide treatments.}, number={4}, journal={WEED TECHNOLOGY}, author={Ducar, JT and Wilcut, JW and Richburg, JS}, year={2004}, pages={1018–1022} } @article{troxler_burke_wilcut_smith_burton_2003, title={Absorption, translocation, and metabolism of foliar-applied CGA-362622 in purple and yellow nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus and C-esculentus)}, volume={51}, ISSN={["0043-1745"]}, DOI={10.1614/0043-1745(2003)051[0013:ATAMOF]2.0.CO;2}, abstractNote={Abstract Studies were conducted to evaluate the absorption, translocation, and metabolism of 14C–CGA-362622 when foliar-applied to purple and yellow nutsedge. Less than 53% of the herbicide was absorbed after 96 h. Both nutsedge species translocated appreciable amounts of herbicide (30%) out of treated leaves. Translocation was both acropetal and basipetal, with at least 25% transported basipetally. Neither nutsedge species translocated more than 4% of applied radioactivity to the tubers and roots. Most of the metabolites formed by the nutsedge species were more polar than 14C–CGA-362622 and averaged 69 and 61% of the radioactivity in purple and yellow nutsedge, respectively. The half-life of CGA-362622 was estimated at 4 h in both purple and yellow nutsedge. Nomenclature: CGA-362622, N-([4,6-dimethoxy-2-pyrimidinyl]carbamoyl)-3-(2,2,2,-trifluoroethoxy)-pyridin-2-sulfonamide sodium salt; purple nutsedge, Cyperus rotundus L. CYPRO; yellow nutsedge, Cyperus esculentus L. CYPES.}, number={1}, journal={WEED SCIENCE}, author={Troxler, SC and Burke, IC and Wilcut, JW and Smith, WD and Burton, J}, year={2003}, pages={13–18} } @article{pline_wells_little_edmisten_wilcut_2003, title={Glyphosate and water-stress effects on fruiting and carbohydrates in glyphosate-resistant cotton}, volume={43}, DOI={10.2135/cropsci2003.0879}, abstractNote={Water stress and glyphosate treatments to glyphosate-resistant (GR) cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) can cause abscission of young bolls although the interaction of these factors is not well defined. Studies were conducted to quantify the effects of water stress and glyphosate treatments on fruit retention, fruit placement, and carbohydrate partitioning in GR and conventional cotton varieties grown in a phytotron environment. Glyphosate-resistant plants treated with glyphosate at the four-leaf stage, postemergence (POST), and at the eight-leaf stage, POST-directed (PDIR), had fewer first-position bolls after 0 and 1 d of water stress than nontreated GR and conventional plants but did not differ after 2 and 3 d of water stress. Glyphosate-treated GR plants reached first bloom 3 to 4 d later than nontreated plants. Five-day-old bolls from plants of one genotype, SG 125RR, treated with glyphosate had lower fructose content than bolls from nontreated plants. Subtending leaf carbohydrates and boll sucrose, glucose, and starch content did not differ after glyphosate treatments. Increasing water stress caused reductions in subtending leaf glucose, sucrose, and starch content, as well as reductions in boll starch and sucrose content. Reductions in boll starch and sucrose content in response to water stress may indicate the potential for abscission. Water stress and glyphosate treatments to GR cotton do not alter carbohydrate profiles in boll or leaf tissues in a like manner. Differences in carbohydrate profiles of young bolls and leaves from glyphosate-treated and water-stressed cotton plants suggest that water stress and glyphosate treatments may promote fruit abscission in different manners.}, number={3}, journal={Crop Science}, author={Pline, W. A. and Wells, R. and Little, G. and Edmisten, K. L. and Wilcut, J. W.}, year={2003}, pages={879–885} } @article{pline_edmisten_wilcut_wells_thomas_2003, title={Glyphosate-induced reductions in pollen viability and seed set in glyphosate-resistant cotton and attempted remediation by gibberellic acid (GA(3))}, volume={51}, ISSN={["0043-1745"]}, DOI={10.1614/0043-1745(2003)051[0019:GIRIPV]2.0.CO;2}, abstractNote={Abstract Glyphosate treatments to glyphosate-resistant (GR) cotton can cause increased fruit loss compared with untreated plants, likely due to reductions in pollen viability and alterations in floral morphology that may reduce pollination efficiency. This study was conducted to determine whether both stamen and pistil are affected by glyphosate treatments by measuring seed set from reciprocal reproductive crosses made between glyphosate-treated GR, untreated GR, and conventional nontransgenic cotton. Pollen viability was 51 and 38% lower for the first and second week of flowering, respectively, in GR plants treated with a four-leaf postemergence (POST) treatment and an eight-leaf POST-directed treatment of glyphosate than in GR plants that were not treated. Seed set per boll was significantly reduced when the pollen donor parent was glyphosate treated vs. untreated for the first 2 wk of flowering. There were no significant differences between treatments applied to male parents as measured by seed set at Weeks 3 and 4 of flowering. Seed set was not influenced by glyphosate treatments applied to female parents at any time. Retention of bolls resulting from crosses was reduced by glyphosate treatment of male parents during the first and third week of flowering but was not affected by glyphosate treatment of female parents. The application of gibberellic acid (GA), which has been shown to reverse male sterility in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.) and to enhance boll retention in cotton, was investigated for similar effects in glyphosate-treated GR cotton. The GA treatments to glyphosate-treated plants increased the anther–stigma distance 12-fold, stigma height, and pollen viability in the second week of flowering but decreased the number of seeds in second-position bolls on Fruiting branches 1 through 3, decreased the number of first-position bolls per plant, and increased the number of squares in comparison with glyphosate-treated GR plants not receiving GA. Although GA applications to glyphosate-treated GR cotton have some remedial effect on pollen viability, the GA-induced increase in the anther–stigma difference exacerbates the increase in anther–stigma distance caused by glyphosate, resulting in low pollination. Nomenclature: Glyphosate; cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L. ‘Delta Pine & Land 5415RR’, ‘Delta Pine & Land 5415’.}, number={1}, journal={WEED SCIENCE}, author={Pline, WA and Edmisten, KL and Wilcut, JW and Wells, R and Thomas, J}, year={2003}, pages={19–27} } @article{burke_thomas_spears_wilcut_2003, title={Influence of environmental factors on after-ripened crowfootgrass (Dactyloctenium aegyptium) seed germination}, volume={51}, ISSN={["0043-1745"]}, DOI={10.1614/0043-1745(2003)051[0342:IOEFOA]2.0.CO;2}, abstractNote={Abstract Laboratory and greenhouse studies were conducted to determine the effect of temperature, pH, water stress, and planting depth on crowfootgrass germination. When treated with constant temperature, crowfootgrass germinated over a range of 15 to 40 C, with the optimum germination occurring at 30 C (42%). Onset, rate, and total germination (94%) were greatest in an alternating 20 and 35 C temperature regime. Germination decreased as pH increased, with greatest germination occurring at pH 4 and 5. Germination was reduced when seed was subjected to water stress, and no germination occurred below −0.8 mPa. Emergence was similar when seed were placed on the soil surface or buried at depths of 0.5 or 1 cm. Germination decreased with burial depth, and no seed emerged from 10 cm. These data suggest that crowfootgrass may emerge later in the season with warmer temperatures and after a precipitation event, and may emerge rapidly. These attributes could contribute to poor control later in the season by soil-applied herbicides or allow crowfootgrass to emerge after final postemergence treatments are made. Nomenclature: Crowfootgrass, Dactyloctenium aegyptium (L.) Willd. DTTAE.}, number={3}, journal={WEED SCIENCE}, author={Burke, IC and Thomas, WE and Spears, JF and Wilcut, JW}, year={2003}, pages={342–347} } @article{burke_thomas_spears_wilcut_2003, title={Influence of environmental factors on broadleaf signalgrass (Brachiaria platyphylla) germination}, volume={51}, ISSN={["1550-2759"]}, DOI={10.1614/0043-1745(2003)051[0683:IOEFOB]2.0.CO;2}, abstractNote={Abstract Laboratory and greenhouse studies were conducted to determine the effect of temperature, solution pH, water stress, and planting depth on broadleaf signalgrass germination. Broadleaf signalgrass seed required removal of the husk for germination. When treated with constant temperature, broadleaf signalgrass germinated over a range of 20 to 35 C, with optimum germination occurring at 30 and 35 C. Onset, rate, and total germination (87%) was greatest in an alternating 20/30 C temperature regime. Germination decreased as solution pH increased, with greatest germination occurring at pH values of 4 and 5. Germination decreased with increasing water potential, and no germination occurred below − 0.8 mPa. Emergence was above 42% when seed were placed on the soil surface or buried 0.5 cm deep. Germination decreased with burial depth, but 10% of broadleaf signalgrass seed emerged from 6.0-cm depth. No seed emerged from 10-cm depth. These data suggest that broadleaf signalgrass may emerge later in the season, after rains, and could germinate rapidly and in high numbers. These attributes could contribute to poor control later in the season by soil-applied herbicides or allow broadleaf signalgrass to emerge after final postemergence treatments were made. Nomenclature: Broadleaf signalgrass, Brachiaria platyphylla (Griseb.) Nash BRAPP.}, number={5}, journal={WEED SCIENCE}, author={Burke, IC and Thomas, WE and Spears, JF and Wilcut, JW}, year={2003}, pages={683–689} } @article{porterfield_wilcut_2003, title={Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) response to residual and in-season treatments of CGA-362622}, volume={17}, ISSN={["1550-2740"]}, DOI={10.1614/0890-037X(2003)017[0441:PAHLRT]2.0.CO;2}, abstractNote={Experiments were conducted to determine peanut tolerance to CGA-362622 applied preemergence (PRE) and postemergence (POST) and to determine the potential for CGA-362622 applied PRE and POST to cotton to injure peanut grown in rotation the following year. CGA-362622 at 3.75 and 7.5 g ai/ha applied PRE visually injured peanut 11 and 16%, respectively, at 5 wk after treatment (WAT) but did not influence peanut yield. POST treatments at 3.75 and 7.5 g/ha injured peanut 63 and 93%, respectively, at 4 WAT and reduced peanut stand by 53 and 89% at 11 WAT, respectively. Peanut pod yield was reduced 73.1 and 97.9% by CGA-362622 POST at 3.75 and 7.5 g/ha, respectively, compared with the untreated weed-free control. CGA-362622 PRE at 3.75 and 7.5 g/ha reduced peanut pod yield 7.5 and 12.6%, respectively. Cotton was injured 9% or less by CGA-362622 PRE or POST at 3.75 or 7.5 g/ha and up to 25% with CGA-362622 POST at 15 g/ha. However, CGA-362622 did not influence weed-free cotton lint yields, regardless of method or rate of application. Peanuts grown in rotation were not injured, and yields were not influenced by CGA-362622 applied PRE or POST the previous year to cotton. Nomenclature: CGA-362622, N-[4,6-dimethoxy-(2-pyrimidinyl)carbamoyl]-3-(2,2,2-trifluoroethoxy)-pyridin-2-sulfonamide sodium salt; cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L.; peanut, Arachis hypogaea L. Additional index words: Carryover, crop injury, sulfonylurea herbicide. Abbreviations: ALS, acetolactate synthase; EPOST, early postemergence; LPOST, late postemergence; MPOST, mid postemergence; POST, postemergence; PRE, preemergence; WAT, weeks after treatment.}, number={3}, journal={WEED TECHNOLOGY}, author={Porterfield, D and Wilcut, JW}, year={2003}, pages={441–445} } @article{burke_wilcut_2003, title={Physiological basis for antagonism of clethodim by CGA 362622}, volume={51}, ISSN={["1550-2759"]}, DOI={10.1614/P2002-072}, abstractNote={Abstract Greenhouse and laboratory experiments were conducted to determine the effect of CGA 362622 on the herbicidal activity of clethodim on goosegrass. CGA 362622 did not affect absorption and translocation of 14C-clethodim by goosegrass. Averaged across the two treatments of clethodim alone and clethodim plus CGA 362622, absorption was 27 and 85% of the applied 14C-clethodim at 0.5 and 96 h, respectively. By 96 HAT, only 0.8% of applied 14C had translocated to the shoot below the treated leaf. Metabolism of clethodim was not affected by the presence of CGA 362622. Three metabolites of clethodim were detected in treated tissue at all harvest intervals. By 96 HAT, 56% of absorbed 14C converted to a relatively polar form when clethodim was applied alone or in the presence of CGA 362622. One day after treatment, the photosynthetic rate in plants treated with CGA 362622 had decreased below the rate in the nontreated check and remained lower until 6 d after treatment. These data suggest that the antagonism of clethodim by CGA 362622 may result from CGA 362622 altering the photosynthetic rate of goosegrass and therefore the sensitivity of acetyl-coenzyme A carboxylase to clethodim. Nomenclature: CGA 362622, N-([4,6-dimethoxy-2-pyrimidinyl]carbamoyl)-3-(2,2,2-triflouroethoxy)-pyridin-2-sulfonamide sodium salt; clethodim; goosegrass, Eleusine indica (L.) Gaertn. ELEIN.}, number={5}, journal={WEED SCIENCE}, author={Burke, IC and Wilcut, JW}, year={2003}, pages={671–677} } @article{burke_wilcut_2003, title={Physiological basis for antagonism of clethodim by imazapic on goosegrass (Eleusine indica (L.) Gaertn.)}, volume={76}, ISSN={["0048-3575"]}, DOI={10.1016/S0048-3575(03)00062-2}, abstractNote={Greenhouse and laboratory experiments were conducted to determine the effect of imazapic on the herbicidal activity of clethodim on goosegrass. Imazapic did not affect absorption of [14C]clethodim by goosegrass. Averaged across the two treatments of clethodim alone and clethodim plus imazapic, absorption was 36 and 89% of applied [14C]clethodim at 0.5 and 96 h, respectively. The majority of [14C]clethodim (79% of applied) was absorbed by 24 h. Translocation of 14C was not affected by imazapic, and 3.6% of applied 14C had translocated into the portion of the shoot below the treated leaf at 96 h after treatment. Metabolism of clethodim was not affected by the presence of imazapic. Three major metabolites of clethodim were detected in treated tissue at all harvest intervals. The majority (58%) of [14C]clethodim was converted to a relative polar metabolite form 96 h after treatment, whether clethodim was applied alone or in the presence of imazapic. One day after treatment, the photosynthetic rate in plants treated with imazapic decreased below the rate in the non-treated check, and was less for 8 days, the duration of the study. These data suggest that the antagonism of clethodim by imazapic may be caused by imazapic reducing the photosynthetic rate of goosegrass and therefore the sensitivity of ACCase to clethodim.}, number={2}, journal={PESTICIDE BIOCHEMISTRY AND PHYSIOLOGY}, author={Burke, IC and Wilcut, JW}, year={2003}, month={Jun}, pages={37–45} } @article{mcelroy_yelverton_troxler_wilcut_2003, title={Selective exposure of yellow (Cyperus esculentus) and purple nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus) to postemergence treatments of CGA-362622, imazaquin, and MSMA}, volume={17}, ISSN={["1550-2740"]}, DOI={10.1614/WT02-156}, abstractNote={Greenhouse studies were conducted to evaluate shoot number, shoot weight, and root weight reduction of yellow and purple nutsedge to three placement levels (soil, foliar, and soil + foliar applied) and four herbicide treatments (CGA-362622, imazaquin, MSMA, and imazaquin + MSMA). Soil-applied CGA-362622 reduced shoot number, shoot weight, and root weight greater than foliar-applied CGA-362622. Foliar-applied imazaquin and soil-applied MSMA achieved little reduction in measured variables compared with the nontreated control. Foliar-applied imazaquin and soil-applied MSMA reduced shoot number, shoot weight, and root weight less than imazaquin + MSMA applied in a similar manner. Averaged over placement levels, imazaquin reduced shoot weight of yellow nutsedge greater than purple nutsedge. Averaged over herbicide treatments, soil-applied treatments were more effective in reducing purple nutsedge shoot number, whereas foliar-applied treatments were more effective in reducing yellow nutsedge shoot number. Nomenclature: CGA-362622, N-[(4,6-dimethoxy-2-pyrimidinyl)carbamoyl]-3-(2,2,2-trifluroethoxy)-pyridin-2-sulfonamide sodium salt; imazaquin; MSMA; purple nutsedge, Cyperus rotundus L. #3 CYPRO; yellow nutsedge, Cyperus esculentus L. # CYPES. Additional index words: Foliar absorption, root absorption. Abbreviations: DAP, days after planting; DAT, days after treatment; NIS, nonionic surfactant; POST, postemergence.}, number={3}, journal={WEED TECHNOLOGY}, author={McElroy, JS and Yelverton, FH and Troxler, SC and Wilcut, JW}, year={2003}, pages={554–559} } @article{bailey_wilcut_2003, title={Tolerance of imidazolinone-resistant corn (Zea mays) to diclosulam}, volume={17}, ISSN={["1550-2740"]}, DOI={10.1614/0890-037X(2003)017[0060:TOIRCZ]2.0.CO;2}, abstractNote={Field experiments were conducted in 1996 and 1997 to evaluate the tolerance of imidazolinone-resistant (IR) and non-IR corn cultivars to preemergence (PRE) and postemergence (POST) treatments of diclosulam. Crop injury was evaluated early- (5 to 6 wk after planting [WAP]), mid- (10 to 11 WAP), and late-season (13 to 15 WAP). Early-season injury of IR corn was no more than 12% in systems that included diclosulam PRE or POST at 18, 27, or 36 g ai/ha. Early-season injury of non-IR corn ranged from 85 to 89% in systems that included diclosulam PRE at any rate. At the mid-season evaluation, crop injury to IR corn was 1% or less. Non-IR corn was injured 73 to 94% in systems that included diclosulam PRE, while systems that included diclosulam POST caused 45 to 58% injury at mid-season. At the late-season evaluation, non-IR corn was injured 56, 88, and 96% with diclosulam PRE at 18, 27, and 36 g/ha, respectively, whereas systems that included diclosulam POST had 11 to 14% injury. Injury to IR corn from diclosulam PRE or POST was not apparent at the late-season evaluation. Weed-free yield of IR corn treated with diclosulam was 6,490 to 6,850 kg/ha and was equivalent to or better than yield from IR corn treated only with atrazine plus metolachlor PRE. Yield from non-IR corn treated with any diclosulam-containing system did not exceed 3,770 kg/ha. Nomenclature: Atrazine; diclosulam; metolachlor; corn, Zea mays L. ‘Pioneer 3242’, ‘Pioneer 3223’. Additional index words: Crop injury, crop tolerance, discoloration, stand reduction, stunting. Abbreviations: ALS, acetolactate synthase [EC 4.1.3.18]; IR, imidazolinone-resistant; POST, postemergence; PRE, preemergence; WAP, weeks after planting.}, number={1}, journal={WEED TECHNOLOGY}, author={Bailey, WA and Wilcut, JW}, year={2003}, pages={60–64} } @article{bailey_askew_dorai-raj_wilcut_2003, title={Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) interference and seed production dynamics in cotton}, volume={51}, ISSN={["1550-2759"]}, DOI={10.1614/0043-1745(2003)051[0094:VATIAS]2.0.CO;2}, abstractNote={Abstract Velvetleaf has been a major concern of Southern cotton growers, yet information on its competitiveness and seed production in cotton is lacking. Experiments were conducted in 1997 and 1998 at the Central Crops Research Station in Clayton, NC, to evaluate density-dependent effects of velvetleaf interference and seed production dynamics in conventional tillage cotton. Velvetleaf at densities of up to 3.5 plants m−1 of row did not influence cotton height until at least 4 wk after planting. Velvetleaf height increased as plant density increased throughout the season in 1997, but it was not affected until 9 wk after planting in 1998. Because of differences in environmental conditions, velvetleaf and cotton achieved maximum height later in 1998 than in 1997; however, velvetleaf seed production and cotton yields were higher in 1998 than in 1997 regardless of velvetleaf density. Velvetleaf density had no effect on the fresh weight, dry weight, and stem diameter of velvetleaf plants in 1997. But in 1998, all these parameters decreased significantly with increasing velvetleaf density. Velvetleaf seed production in 1998 was nearly twice that in 1997. Averaged over velvetleaf densities, the greatest number of seed were produced between nodes 6 and 20 in 1997 and between nodes 1 and 10 in 1998. In both years, cotton yield loss increased with velvetleaf density. Maximum yield loss was 84% at 3.5 velvetleaf plants m−1 of row. Yield losses of 5 and 10% were caused by 0.2 and 0.4 velvetleaf plants m−1 of row (1,930 and 4,110 plants ha−1), respectively, in 1997 and by 0.03 and 0.08 velvetleaf plants m−1 of row (360 and 850 plants ha−1), respectively, in 1998. To understand better the applicability of these results, we hypothesized that environmental variation caused differences in measured responses between 1997 and 1998. Therefore, kriging methods were used to fit correlations between observed rainfall and growing degree days (GDD) each year at the experiment site. Results based on climate data from 4 yr at 110 sites indicated that inference space was higher for GDD than for rainfall. The conditions observed at the experiment site in 1997 were deemed most appropriate for the recommendations made in the surrounding area. Nomenclature: Velvetleaf, Abutilon theophrasti Medicus ABUTH; cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L. ‘Stoneville BXN 47‘ and ‘Deltapine 51’.}, number={1}, journal={WEED SCIENCE}, author={Bailey, WA and Askew, SD and Dorai-Raj, S and Wilcut, JW}, year={2003}, pages={94–101} } @article{porterfield_wilcut_wells_clewis_2003, title={Weed management with CGA-362622 in transgenic and nontransgenic cotton}, volume={51}, ISSN={["1550-2759"]}, DOI={10.1614/P2002-014}, abstractNote={Field studies conducted at three locations in North Carolina in 1998 and 1999 evaluated crop tolerance, weed control, and yield with CGA-362622 alone and in combination with various weed management systems in transgenic and nontransgenic cotton systems. The herbicide systems used bromoxynil, CGA-362622, glyphosate, and pyrithiobac applied alone early postemergence (EPOST) or mixtures of CGA-362622 plus bromoxynil, glyphosate, or pyrithiobac applied EPOST. Trifluralin preplant incorporated followed by (fb) fluometuron preemergence (PRE) alone or fb a late POST–directed (LAYBY) treatment of prometryn plus MSMA controlled all the weed species present less than 90%. Herbicide systems that included soil-applied and LAYBY herbicides plus glyphosate EPOST or mixtures of CGA-362622 EPOST plus bromoxynil, glyphosate, or pyrithiobac controlled broadleaf signalgrass, entireleaf morningglory, large crabgrass, Palmer amaranth, prickly sida, sicklepod, and smooth pigweed at least 90%. Only cotton treated with these herbicide systems yielded equivalent to the weed-free check for each cultivar. Bromoxynil systems did not control Palmer amaranth and sicklepod, pyrithiobac systems did not control sicklepod, and CGA-362622 systems did not control prickly sida.}, number={6}, journal={WEED SCIENCE}, author={Porterfield, D and Wilcut, JW and Wells, JW and Clewis, SB}, year={2003}, pages={1002–1009} } @article{bailey_wilcut_hayes_2003, title={Weed management, fiber quality, and net returns in no-tillage transgenic and nontransgenic cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)}, volume={17}, ISSN={["1550-2740"]}, DOI={10.1614/0890-037X(2003)017[0117:WMFQAN]2.0.CO;2}, abstractNote={Studies on weed management systems with bromoxynil-resistant, glyphosate-resistant, and nontransgenic cotton cultivars in a no-tillage environment were evaluated in North Carolina and Tennessee in 1997 and 1998. All weed management systems in nontransgenic and bromoxynil-resistant cotton controlled sicklepod 72 to 78%, whereas sicklepod was controlled at least 94% in glyphosate-resistant cotton. Entireleaf and pitted morningglory, smooth pigweed, and common cocklebur were controlled at least 92% with all management systems. Fiber quality was also measured in Tennessee. Micronaire and fiber strength ranged from 4.35 to 4.55 units and 28.6 to 30.1 g/tex, respectively, in bromoxynil-resistant and glyphosate-resistant cultivars that received postemergence over-the-top (POT) herbicides. Harvest trash content ranged from 0.80 to 1.15% in systems where POT and late postemergence–directed (LAYBY) herbicides were used and was 1.65% where multiple glyphosate applications were used with no LAYBY herbicides. Cotton lint yield and net returns were generally highest in systems that included bromoxynil or pyrithiobac POT followed by cyanazine plus MSMA LAYBY or multiple glyphosate treatments where no LAYBY herbicides were used. Nomenclature: Bromoxynil; cyanazine; glyphosate; MSMA; pyrithiobac; common cocklebur, Xanthium strumarium L. #3 XANST; entireleaf morningglory, Ipomoea hederacea var. integriuscula Gray # IPOHG; pitted morningglory, Ipomoea lacunosa L. # IPOLA; sicklepod, Senna obtusifolia (L.) Irwin and Barnaby # CASOB; smooth pigweed, Amaranthus hybridus L. # AMACH; cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L. ‘Stoneville 474’, ‘Stoneville BXN 47’, ‘Deltapine 5415RR’, ‘Paymaster 1220RR’. Additional index words: Color grade, extraneous material, fiber length, fiber strength, fiber uniformity, harvest trash, high-volume instrumentation, gin turn out, leaf grade, micronaire, staple length. Abbreviations: ASN, as needed; LAYBY, late postemergence–directed; fb; followed by; PDS, postemergence-directed spray; PRE, preemergence; POT, postemergence over-the-top.}, number={1}, journal={WEED TECHNOLOGY}, author={Bailey, WA and Wilcut, JW and Hayes, RM}, year={2003}, pages={117–126} } @article{hollowell_shew_cubeta_wilcut_2003, title={Weed species as hosts of Sclerotinia minor in peanut fields}, volume={87}, ISSN={["0191-2917"]}, DOI={10.1094/PDIS.2003.87.2.197}, abstractNote={ Bleached stems and sclerotia were observed on winter annual weed species growing in harvested peanut fields in northeastern North Carolina in March 2001. Each field had a history of Sclerotinia blight caused by Sclerotinia minor. Symptomatic plants were collected and brought back to the laboratory for identification and isolation. S. minor was isolated and Koch's postulates were fulfilled to confirm pathogenicity of S. minor on nine weed species. They included Lamium aplexicaule (henbit), Cardamine parviflora (smallflowered bittercress), Stellaria media (common chickweed), Cerastium vulgatum (mouse-ear chickweed), Coronopus didymus (swinecress), Oenothera laciniata (cutleaf eveningprimrose), Conyza canadensis (horseweed), Brassica kaber (wild mustard), and Arabidopsis thaliana (mouse-ear cress). This is the first report of these species as hosts of S. minor in the natural environment. All isolates of S. minor obtained from the weed species were pathogenic to peanut. }, number={2}, journal={PLANT DISEASE}, author={Hollowell, JE and Shew, BB and Cubeta, MA and Wilcut, JW}, year={2003}, month={Feb}, pages={197–199} } @article{askew_wilcut_2002, title={Absorption, translocation, and metabolism of foliar-applied CGA 362622 in cotton, peanut, and selected weeds}, volume={50}, ISSN={["0043-1745"]}, DOI={10.1614/0043-1745(2002)050[0293:ATAMOF]2.0.CO;2}, abstractNote={Abstract Studies were conducted to evaluate absorption, translocation, and metabolism of 14C-CGA 362622 when foliar applied to cotton, peanut, jimsonweed, and sicklepod. Differential metabolism is the basis for tolerance in cotton and jimsonweed. In addition, cotton absorbs less herbicide compared with the other three species, thus aiding in tolerance. Only jimsonweed translocated appreciable herbicide (25%) out of treated leaves and acropetally to the meristematic tissue where the herbicide was quickly metabolized. No plant species translocated over 2% of applied radioactivity below the treated leaves. Most of the metabolites formed by the four species were more polar than CGA 362622 and averaged 51, 48, 30, and 25% of the radioactivity detected in the treated leaves of cotton, jimsonweed, peanut, and sicklepod, respectively. The half-life of CGA 362622 was estimated to be 0.8, 1.9, 4, and 6 d in treated leaves of cotton, jimsonweed, sicklepod, and peanut, respectively. Nomenclature: CGA 362622, N-[(4,6-dimethoxy-2-pyrimidinyl)carbamoyl]-3-(2,2,2-trifluoroethoxy)-pyridin-2-sulfonamide sodium salt; jimsonweed, Datura stramonium L. DATST; sicklepod, Senna obtusifolia (L.) Irwin and Barnaby CASOB; cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L. ‘Stoneville 474’; peanut, Arachis hypogaea L. ‘NC 10C’.}, number={3}, journal={WEED SCIENCE}, author={Askew, SD and Wilcut, JW}, year={2002}, pages={293–298} } @article{corbett_askew_porterfield_wilcut_2002, title={Bromoxynil, prometryn, pyrithiobac, and MSMA weed management systems for bromoxynil-resistant cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)}, volume={16}, ISSN={["1550-2740"]}, DOI={10.1614/0890-037X(2002)016[0712:BPPAMW]2.0.CO;2}, abstractNote={Abstract: Field studies were conducted at two locations in North Carolina in 1999 and 2000 to evaluate weed and bromoxynil-resistant cotton response to bromoxynil, pyrithiobac, and MSMA applied early postemergence (EPOST), alone or mixtures in all combinations (two way and three way), and to prometryn plus MSMA applied late postemergence directed (LAYBY). Trifluralin preplant incorporated followed by fluometuron preemergence controlled common lambsquarters, eclipta, and smooth pigweed at least 90%. These herbicides also provided greater than 90% common ragweed control at two locations but only 65% control at a third location. Pyrithiobac and pyrithiobac plus MSMA EPOST increased sicklepod control more than did bromoxynil or bromoxynil plus MSMA EPOST. Bromoxynil and pyrithiobac were more effective for sicklepod control when applied in mixture with MSMA. Bromoxynil plus pyrithiobac EPOST or with MSMA controlled (≥ 90%) common lambsquarters, common ragweed, entireleaf morningglory, prickly sida, and smooth pigweed early season. But the LAYBY treatment of prometryn plus MSMA frequently improved late-season control of entireleaf morningglory, large crabgrass, prickly sida, and sicklepod. A tank mixture of MSMA plus bromoxynil or pyrithiobac and the three-component tank mixture (bromoyxnil, MSMA, plus pyrithiobac) provided a broader weed control spectrum than did either bromoxynil or pyrithiobac alone. Cotton lint yields were increased with all postemergence systems, and the LAYBY treatment of prometryn plus MSMA increased cotton yields in 13 out of 16 comparisons. High cotton yields were indicative of high levels of weed control. Nomenclature: Bromoxynil, fluometuron, MSMA, prometryn, pyrithiobac, trifluralin, common lambsquarters, Chenopodium album L. #3 CHEAL; common ragweed, Ambrosia artemisiifolia L. # AMBEL; eclipta, Eclipta prostrata L. # ECLAL; entireleaf morningglory, Ipomoea hederacea var. integriuscula Gray # IPOHG; large crabgrass, Digitaria sanguinalis (L.) Scop. # DIGSA; prickly sida, Sida spinosa L. # SIDSP; sicklepod, Senna obtusifolia (L.) Irwin and Barneby # CASOB; smooth pigweed, Amaranthus hybridus L. # AMACH; cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L. ‘Stoneville BXN 47’. Additional index words: Crop injury, herbicide-resistant cotton, Brachiaria platyphylla, BRAPP. Abbreviations: EPOST, early postemergence; fb, followed by; LAYBY, late postemergence directed; PDS, postemergence directed; PRE, preemergence; PPI, preplant incorporated.}, number={4}, journal={WEED TECHNOLOGY}, author={Corbett, JL and Askew, SD and Porterfield, D and Wilcut, JW}, year={2002}, pages={712–718} } @article{burke_wilcut_porterfield_2002, title={CGA-362622 antagonizes annual grass control with clethodim}, volume={16}, ISSN={["0890-037X"]}, DOI={10.1614/0890-037X(2002)016[0749:CAAGCW]2.0.CO;2}, abstractNote={Abstract: Field and greenhouse experiments were conducted to evaluate clethodim, CGA-362622, mixtures thereof, and sequential treatments for control of broadleaf signalgrass, fall panicum, goosegrass, and large crabgrass. In greenhouse experiments, clethodim alone provided 93 and 100% control of three- to four-leaf goosegrass at the low (105 g ai/ha) and high (140 g/ha) rates, respectively, whereas CGA-362622 did not control grasses in greenhouse or field experiments. Control of six- to eight-leaf goosegrass in the greenhouse with clethodim was 75% for the low rate and 89% for the high rate. Control of goosegrass in greenhouse studies was reduced at least 43 percentage points with CGA-362622 and clethodim at the high rate in mixture compared with control provided by clethodim at the high rate alone. When CGA-362622 and clethodim were applied in mixture in field studies, the effectiveness of the graminicide was decreased from > 97 to < 57% control for all annual grasses. Antagonism of clethodim activity was greater than that of the tank mixture when clethodim was applied 1 d after CGA-362622 on large crabgrass, goosegrass, and fall panicum. Clethodim applied 7 d before or after CGA-362622 controlled the four grass species as well as did clethodim applied alone. When CGA-362622 was applied to goosegrass alone, fresh weight accumulation stopped for a period of 4 d compared with untreated plants. Normal growth resumed after 4 d. Nomenclature: CGA-362622, N-[(4,6-dimethoxy-2-pyrimidinyl)carbamoyl]-3-(2,2,2-trifluoroethoxy)-pyridin-2-sulfonamide sodium salt; clethodim; broadleaf signalgrass, Brachiaria platyphylla (Griseb.) Nash #3 BRAPP; fall panicum, Panicum dichotomiflorum (L.) # PANDI; goosegrass, Eleusine indica (L.) Gaertn. # ELEIN; large crabgrass, Digitaria sanguinalis (L.) Scop. # DIGSA. Additional index words: Antagonism, growth analysis, orthogonal contrasts. Abbreviations: ALS, acetolactase synthase (EC 4.1.3.18); DAT, days after treatment; POST, postemergence.}, number={4}, journal={WEED TECHNOLOGY}, author={Burke, IC and Wilcut, JW and Porterfield, D}, year={2002}, pages={749–754} } @article{troxler_askew_wilcut_smith_paulsgrove_2002, title={Clomazone, fomesafen, and bromoxynil systems for bromoxynil-resistant cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)}, volume={16}, ISSN={["1550-2740"]}, DOI={10.1614/0890-037X(2002)016[0838:CFABSF]2.0.CO;2}, abstractNote={Abstract: Studies were conducted at Clayton, Lewiston, and Rocky Mount, NC, to evaluate weed and cotton response to herbicide systems in bromoxynil-resistant Stoneville BXN 47 cotton. Herbicide systems that included clomazone preemergence (PRE) controlled broadleaf signalgrass, common lambsquarters, common ragweed, goosegrass, large crabgrass, and prickly sida greater than 88%. Inconsistent Palmer amaranth control was observed with the addition of fomesafen PRE to clomazone PRE and pendimethalin preplant-incorporated (PPI) herbicide systems. Addition of bromoxynil early postemergence (EPOST) to clomazone and pendimethalin systems increased ivyleaf morningglory control to greater than 84% and provided higher yields than did the same systems without bromoxynil. Bromoxynil EPOST followed by (fb) cyanazine + MSMA late postemergence directed (LAYBY) improved weed control in clomazone and pendimethalin systems. Clomazone PRE and pendimethalin PPI with or without fomesafen PRE fb bromoxynil EPOST fb LAYBY herbicides controlled weeds and yielded equivalent to the standard herbicide system of pendimethalin PPI fb fluometuron PRE fb bromoxynil EPOST fb LAYBY. Nomenclature: Bromoxynil; clomazone; cyanazine; fluometuron; fomesafen; MSMA; pendimethalin; broadleaf signalgrass, Brachiaria platyphylla (Griseb) Nash. #3 BRAPP; common lambsquarters, Chenopodium album L. # CHEAL; common ragweed, Ambrosia artemisiifolia L. # AMBEL; goosegrass, Eleusine indica (L.) Gaertn. # ELEIN; ivyleaf morningglory, Ipomoea hederacea (L.) Jacq. # IPOHE; large crabgrass, Digitaria sanguinalis L. # DIGSA; Palmer amaranth, Amaranthus palmeri S. Wats. # AMAPA; prickly sida, Sida spinosa L. # SIDSP; cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L. ‘Stoneville BXN 47’. Additional index words: Herbicide-tolerant crops. Abbreviations: EPOST, early postemergence; fb, followed by; LAYBY, late postemergence directed; PD, postemergence directed; POST, postemergence; PPI, preplant incorporated; PRE, preemergence.}, number={4}, journal={WEED TECHNOLOGY}, author={Troxler, SC and Askew, SD and Wilcut, JW and Smith, WD and Paulsgrove, MD}, year={2002}, pages={838–844} } @article{askew_wilcut_cranmer_2002, title={Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) and weed response to flumioxazin applied preplant and postemergence directed}, volume={16}, ISSN={["0890-037X"]}, DOI={10.1614/0890-037X(2002)016[0184:CGHAWR]2.0.CO;2}, abstractNote={Separate field experiments were conducted to evaluate weed control and cotton response to flumioxazin in North Carolina. Flumioxazin postemergence directed (PD) at 70 g ai/ha applied alone or mixed with glyphosate or MSMA completely controlled common lambsquarters, common ragweed, entireleaf morningglory, ivyleaf morningglory, Palmer amaranth, pitted morningglory, prickly sida, sicklepod, smooth pigweed, and tall morningglory 4 wk after treatment. Glyphosate at 1,120 g ai/ha controlled sicklepod and entireleaf, ivyleaf, pitted, and tall morningglory less than flumioxazin. Weed-free experiments were conducted to evaluate cotton injury, fresh biomass reduction, and yield response to flumioxazin at 70 g ai/ha preplant (PP) and two rates PD. Nine PP applications were made at various timings between 0 and 10 wk prior to planting. Cotton was stunted 12% initially, and midseason cotton biomass was reduced when flumioxazin was applied at planting in 1 yr. Flumioxazin did not injure 15- or 30-cm–tall cotton when applied PD at 36 or 70 g/ha. Cotton yield differed between years, but was not affected by various flumioxazin treatments compared with commercial standards and nontreated controls. Nomenclature: Flumioxazin; glyphosate; MSMA; common lambsquarters, Chenopodium album L. #3 CHEAL; common ragweed, Ambrosia artemisiifolia L. # AMBEL; entireleaf morningglory, Ipomoea hederacea var. integriuscula Gray # IPOHG; ivyleaf morningglory, Ipomoea hederacea (L.) Jacq. # IPOHE; Palmer amaranth, Amaranthus palmeri S.Wats. # AMAPA; pitted morningglory, Ipomoea lacunosa L. # IPOLA; prickly sida, Sida spinosa L. # SIDSP; sicklepod, Senna obtusifolia Irwin and Banaby # CASOB; smooth pigweed, Amaranthus hybridus L. # AMACH; tall morningglory, Ipomoea purpurea (L.) Roth # PHBPU; cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L. ‘Deltapine 51’, ‘Suregrow 125’. Additional index words: Burn-down application, fresh biomass, injury, LAYBY, stale seedbed. Abbreviations: LAYBY, the last postemergence-directed herbicide application; PD, postemergence directed; POST, postemergence; PP, preplant; PRE, preemergence; WAP, weeks after planting.}, number={1}, journal={WEED TECHNOLOGY}, author={Askew, SD and Wilcut, JW and Cranmer, JR}, year={2002}, pages={184–190} } @article{bailey_wilcut_2002, title={Diclosulam systems for weed management in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.)}, volume={16}, ISSN={["1550-2740"]}, DOI={10.1614/0890-037X(2002)016[0807:DSFWMI]2.0.CO;2}, abstractNote={Abstract: Field studies were conducted at Lewiston and Rocky Mount, NC, in 1996 and 1997 to evaluate weed control and peanut response to preplant incorporated (PPI) treatments of diclosulam alone and in systems with postemergence (POST) commercial standard herbicides. All plots received ethalfluralin PPI at 840 g ai/ha. In both years, ethalfluralin plus diclosulam PPI at 17 or 26 g ai/ha followed by (fb) acifluorfen plus bentazon POST, paraquat plus bentazon POST, or imazapic POST controlled common lambsquarters, ivyleaf morningglory, pitted morningglory, prickly sida, smooth pigweed, spurred anoda, and yellow nutsedge in a manner similar to or better than did the commercial standards of ethalfluralin PPI fb metolachlor preemergence (PRE) fb acifluorfen plus bentazon or ethalfluralin PPI fb acifluorfen plus bentazon POST. Yield from peanut treated with diclosulam systems that included POST herbicides was equivalent to or higher than that from peanut treated with ethalfluralin PPI fb metolachlor PRE fb acifluorfen plus bentazon POST or ethalfluralin PPI fb acifluorfen plus bentazon POST. Peanut exhibited excellent tolerance to diclosulam PPI at all rates. Nomenclature: Acifluorfen; bentazon; diclosulam; ethalfluralin; imazapic; metolachlor; paraquat; common lambsquarters, Chenopodium album L. #3 CHEAL; ivyleaf morningglory, Ipomoea hederacea (L.) Jacq. # IPOHE; pitted morningglory, Ipomoea lacunosa L. # IPOLA; prickly sida, Sida spinosa L. # SIDSP; smooth pigweed, Amaranthus hybridus L. # AMACH; spurred anoda, Anoda cristata (L.) Schlecht. # ANVCR; yellow nutsedge, Cyperus esculentus L. # CYPES; peanut, Arachis hypogaea L. ‘NC 7’, ‘NC 10C’. Additional index words: Herbicide injury. Abbreviations: fb, followed by; POST, postemergence; PPI, preplant incorporated; PRE, preemergence.}, number={4}, journal={WEED TECHNOLOGY}, author={Bailey, WA and Wilcut, JW}, year={2002}, pages={807–814} } @article{clewis_shawn_wilcut_2002, title={Economic assessment of diclosulam and flumioxazin in strip- and conventional-tillage peanut}, volume={50}, ISSN={["1550-2759"]}, DOI={10.1614/0043-1745(2002)050[0378:EAODAF]2.0.CO;2}, abstractNote={Abstract Experiments were conducted in Lewiston, NC, in 1999 and 2000 and Rocky Mount, NC, in 1999 to evaluate weed management systems in strip- and conventional-tillage peanut. The peanut cultivars grown were ‘NC 10C’, ‘NC 12C’, and ‘NC 7’, respectively. Weed management systems consisted of different combinations of preemergence (PRE) herbicides including diclosulam and flumioxazin plus commercial postemergence (POST) herbicide systems. Dimethenamid plus diclosulam or flumioxazin PRE controlled common lambsquarters, eclipta, and prickly sida at least 91%. Diclosulam and flumioxazin provided variable control of three Ipomoea species (59 to 91%) and bentazon plus acifluorfen POST provided > 90% control. Only diclosulam systems controlled yellow nutsedge 90% late season. Annual grass control required clethodim late POST, regardless of tillage system. Dimethenamid plus diclosulam or flumioxazin PRE produced equivalent yields and net returns with no significant differences between the two PRE options. Both systems produced higher yields and net returns than dimethenamid regardless of the POST herbicide option. The tillage production system did not influence weed control of eight weeds, peanut yields, or net returns. The addition of diclosulam or flumioxazin to dimethenamid PRE improved weed control compared with dimethenamid PRE alone. Nomenclature: Acifluorfen; bentazon; clethodim; diclosulam; dimethenamid; flumioxazin; common lambsquarters, Chenopodium album L. CHEAL; eclipta, Eclipta prostrata L. ECLAL; prickly sida, Sida spinosa L. SIDSP; yellow nutsedge, Cyperus esculentus L. CYPES; peanut, ‘NC-7’, ‘NC-10’, ‘NC-12’, Arachis hypogaea L.}, number={3}, journal={WEED SCIENCE}, author={Clewis, SB and Shawn, A and Wilcut, J}, year={2002}, pages={378–385} } @article{askew_bailey_scott_wilcut_2002, title={Economic assessment of weed management for transgenic and nontransgenic cotton in tilled and nontilled systems}, volume={50}, ISSN={["0043-1745"]}, DOI={10.1614/0043-1745(2002)050[0512:EAOWMF]2.0.CO;2}, abstractNote={Abstract Studies were conducted to evaluate weed management programs in nontransgenic, bromoxynil-resistant, and glyphosate-resistant cotton in nontilled and tilled environments. Tillage did not affect weed control provided by herbicides. Early-season stunting in nontilled cotton was 3% regardless of the herbicide system and was no longer evident at midseason. Cotton yield was 10 to 15% greater, on an average, under tilled conditions than that under nontilled conditions. Excellent (> 90%) common lambsquarters, entireleaf morningglory, ivyleaf morningglory, jimsonweed, pitted morningglory, prickly sida, tall morningglory, and velvetleaf control was achieved with treatments containing pyrithiobac, bromoxynil, and glyphosate. Preemergence (PRE) or postemergence-directed (PD) herbicide inputs were necessary for adequate large crabgrass and goosegrass control. Bromoxynil and pyrithiobac postemergence did not control sicklepod unless supplemented with MSMA and followed by a late-postdirected treatment of cyanazine plus MSMA. Treatments that included glyphosate controlled sicklepod regardless of the late-PD treatment. Economic returns were at least $930 ha−1 and not different from the higher yielding programs in nontransgenic cotton when fluometuron applied PRE was included in the bromoxynil programs. Late-season weed control was usually greater than 90% from glyphosate programs, and net returns from glyphosate programs were as high or higher than the net returns from programs that used midseason treatments of bromoxynil, pyrithiobac, or fluometuron plus MSMA. Nomenclature: Bromoxynil; cyanazine; fluometuron; glyphosate; MSMA; pendimethalin; pyrithiobac; common lambsquarters, Chenopodium album L. CHEAL; entireleaf morningglory, Ipomoea hederacea var. integriuscula Gray IPOHG; goosegrass, Eleusine indica (L.) Gaertn. ELEIN; ivyleaf morningglory, Ipomoea hederacea (L.) Jacq. IPOHE; jimsonweed, Datura stramonium L. DATST; large crabgrass, Digitaria sanguinalis (L.) Scop. DIGSA; pitted morningglory, Ipomoea lacunosa L. IPOLA; prickly sida, Sida spinosa L. SIDSP; sicklepod, Senna obtusifolia (L.) Irwin and Barnaby CASOB; smooth pigweed, Amaranthus hybridus L. AMACH; tall morningglory, Ipomoea purpurea L. PHBPU; velvetleaf, Abutilon theophrasti Medicus ABUTH; cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L. ‘Paymaster 1330RR’, ‘Stoneville BXN47’, ‘Stoneville 474’.}, number={4}, journal={WEED SCIENCE}, author={Askew, SD and Bailey, WA and Scott, GH and Wilcut, JW}, year={2002}, pages={512–520} } @article{scott_askew_wilcut_bennett_2002, title={Economic evaluation of HADSS (TM) computer program in North Carolina peanut}, volume={50}, ISSN={["1550-2759"]}, DOI={10.1614/0043-1745(2002)050[0091:EEOHCP]2.0.CO;2}, abstractNote={Abstract Field studies were conducted at four locations in North Carolina in 1998 and 1999 to evaluate a computer program, Herbicide Application Decision Support System (HADSS™), for weed management in peanut (Arachis hypogaea). Weed management systems included metolachlor or ethalfluralin preplant-incorporated (PPI) used alone or in combination with diclosulam preemergence (PRE) or flumioxazin PRE. These herbicide combinations were used alone, followed by (fb) postemergence (POST) herbicides recommended by HADSS™ or fb a standard POST program of paraquat plus bentazon early postemergence (EPOST) fb acifluorfen plus bentazon POST. The standard POST herbicide system and HADSS™ POST recommendations were also used without soil-applied herbicides. Ethalfluralin PPI alone controlled large crabgrass (Digitaria sanguinalis) better than metolachlor PPI. Combinations of metolachlor or ethalfluralin PPI with either diclosulam or flumioxazin PRE provided equivalent control of all weeds evaluated except yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus). The addition of diclosulam or flumioxazin PRE to systems containing metolachlor or ethalfluralin PPI always improved control of ivyleaf morningglory (Ipomoea hederacea) and yellow nutsedge and improved yield and net returns in 15 of 16 comparisons where no POST herbicides were used. For systems that used diclosulam or flumioxazin PRE, the HADSS™ POST and standard POST herbicide systems improved yield in 4 of 12 and 2 of 12 comparisons, respectively, compared with similar systems that did not use diclosulam or flumioxazin. However, in systems using either HADSS™ POST or the standard POST system, yield was always improved when compared with metolachlor or ethalfluralin PPI alone. HADSS™ POST provided equal or higher weed control, peanut yield, and net returns when compared with the standard POST herbicide system. Nomenclature: Acifluorfen; bentazon; ethalfluralin; metolachlor; paraquat; ivyleaf morningglory, Ipomoea hederacea (L.) Jacq. IPOHE; large crabgrass, Digitaria sanguinalis (L.) Scop. DIGSA; yellow nutsedge, Cyperus esculentus L. CYPES; peanut, Arachis hypogaea L. ‘NC 7’ and ‘NC 10C’.}, number={1}, journal={WEED SCIENCE}, author={Scott, GH and Askew, SD and Wilcut, JW and Bennett, AC}, year={2002}, pages={91–100} } @article{price_wilcut_cranmer_2002, title={Flumioxazin preplant burndown weed management in strip-tillage cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) planted into wheat (Triticum aestivum)}, volume={16}, ISSN={["1550-2740"]}, DOI={10.1614/0890-037X(2002)016[0762:FPBWMI]2.0.CO;2}, abstractNote={Abstract: Experiments were conducted at two locations in North Carolina from 1999 to 2000 to evaluate flumioxazin preplant (PP) for weed management in strip-tillage cotton planted in winter-wheat cover. Flumioxazin PP was evaluated at two rates alone and in mixture with two commonly used PP herbicides and one experimental PP herbicide. Flumioxazin PP at 71 or 105 g ai/ha tank mixed with the isopropylamine salt of glyphosate at 1.12 kg ai/ha, paraquat at 1.05 kg ai/ha, or the trimethylsulfonium salt of glyphosate at 1.12 kg ai/ha controlled common chickweed, common lambsquarters, common ragweed, Palmer amaranth, and smooth pigweed ≥ 96% 29 to 43 d after treatment (DAT). Both glyphosate formulations and paraquat alone provided ≥ 91% control of common chickweed and henbit 29 to 43 DAT, but control of common lambsquarters, common ragweed, large crabgrass, Palmer amaranth, and smooth pigweed was ≤50%. Treatments including flumioxazin injured cotton (≤ 5%) at one location. In all comparisons within a location, cotton treated with flumioxazin PP at 71 or 105 g/ha in mixture with either glyphosate formulation or with paraquat provided equivalent or higher yields than did cotton not treated with flumioxazin PP. Nomenclature: Flumioxazin; glyphosate; paraquat; common chickweed, Stellaria media L. Vill. #3 STEME; common lambsquarters, Chenopodium album L. CHEAL; common ragweed, Ambrosia artemisiifolia L. # AMBEL; henbit, Lamium amplexicaule L. # LAMAM; large crabgrass, Digitaria sanguinalis (L.) Scop. # DIGSA; Palmer amaranth, Amaranthus palmeri L. # AMAPA; smooth pigweed, Amaranthus hybridus L. # AMACH; cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L. ‘Paymaster 1218 RRBG’, ‘Paymaster 1220 RRBG’; wheat, Triticum aestivum L. Additional index words: Burndown treatment, cover crops. Abbreviations: COC, crop-oil concentrate; DAT, days after treatment; glyphosate-IP, isopropylamine salt of glyphosate; glyphosate-TM, trimethylsulfonium salt of glyphosate; PDS, postemergence-directed spray; POST, postemergence; PP, preplant; PRE, preemergence; WAP, weeks after planting.}, number={4}, journal={WEED TECHNOLOGY}, author={Price, AJ and Wilcut, JW and Cranmer, JR}, year={2002}, pages={762–767} } @article{burke_askew_wilcut_2002, title={Flumioxazin systems for weed management in North Carolina peanut (Arachis hypogaea)}, volume={16}, ISSN={["0890-037X"]}, DOI={10.1614/0890-037X(2002)016[0743:FSFWMI]2.0.CO;2}, abstractNote={Abstract: A study was conducted to evaluate flumioxazin preemergence (PRE) at 71 and 105 g ai/ha, when used with dimethenamid PRE, dimethenamid preplant incorporated (PPI), or ethalfluralin PPI, for crop injury, weed control, and yield. Peanut injury from treatments including flumioxazin 2 wk after soil-applied treatment (WAST) was less than 2% at two locations and 50 to 67% at a third location. Peanut injury increased with flumioxazin rate. Soil-applied treatments that included flumioxazin at either rate controlled common lambsquarters and prickly sida at least 96 and 89%, respectively. Addition of postemergence (POST) herbicides to any soil-applied program controlled prickly sida and ivyleaf morningglory at least 94 and 98%, respectively. Treatments that included ethafluralin or dimethenamid controlled goosegrass at least 82%. With a few exceptions, peanut yields were not improved by use of POST herbicides. Where peanut injury occurred, increased flumioxazin rate resulted in lower peanut yield when averaged over PPI and POST herbicide treatments. Nomenclature: Dimethenamid; ethalfluralin; flumioxazin; common lambsquarters, Chenopodium album L. #3 CHEAL; goosegrass, Eleusine indica (L.) Gaertn. # ELEIN; ivyleaf morningglory, Ipomoea hederacea (L.) Jacq. # IPOHE; prickly sida, Sida spinosa L. # SIDSP; peanut, Arachis hypogaea L. ‘NC 7’, ‘NC 10C’. Additional index words: Acifluorfen, bentazon, 2,4-DB, imazapic. Abbreviations: fb, followed by; POST, postemergence; PPI, preplant incorporated; PRE, preemergence; WAPT, weeks after POST treatment; WAST, weeks after soil-applied treatment.}, number={4}, journal={WEED TECHNOLOGY}, author={Burke, IC and Askew, SD and Wilcut, JW}, year={2002}, pages={743–748} } @article{scott_askew_wilcut_2002, title={Glyphosate systems for weed control in glyphosate-tolerant cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)}, volume={16}, ISSN={["1550-2740"]}, DOI={10.1614/0890-037X(2002)016[0191:GSFWCI]2.0.CO;2}, abstractNote={Field studies were conducted at three locations in North Carolina to evaluate clomazone preemergence (PRE) in glyphosate-tolerant cotton. Cotton was injured by fluometuron PRE at one location. Clomazone PRE controlled common ragweed, goosegrass, large crabgrass, and prickly sida better than trifluralin preplant incorporated (PPI). Trifluralin controlled Palmer amaranth better than clomazone. The addition of a late post-directed (LAYBY) treatment of cyanazine plus MSMA improved the control of goosegrass. Glyphosate at 0.8 kg ai/ha, used postemergence as needed, controlled tall morningglory and entireleaf morningglory at least 84%. Common ragweed was controlled with all herbicides, except trifluralin PPI. Prickly sida was controlled 94% or greater in glyphosate-containing systems. Cotton yields and net returns were similar for all glyphosate systems, regardless of soil-applied herbicides and LAYBY treatment options. Nomenclature: Clomazone; cyanazine; fluometuron; glyphosate; MSMA; trifluralin; common ragweed, Ambrosia artemisiifolia L. #3 AMBEL; entireleaf morningglory, Ipomoea hederacea var. integriuscula Gray # IPOHG; goosegrass, Eleusine indica (L.) Gaertn. # ELEIN; large crabgrass, Digitaria sanguinalis (L.) Scop. # DIGSA; Palmer amaranth, Amaranthus palmeri S.Wats # AMAPA; prickly sida, Sida spinosa L. # SIDSP; tall morningglory, Ipomoea purpurea (L.) Roth # PHBPU; cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L. ‘Paymaster 1330RR’, ‘DP5415RR’. Additional index words: Economic analysis, herbicide-resistant crops. Abbreviations: ANS, as needed spray; DAP, days after planting; EPOST, early postemergence; fb, followed by; LAYBY, late post directed; POST, postemergence; POT, postemergence over-the-top; PPI, preplant incorporated; PRE, preemergence.}, number={1}, journal={WEED TECHNOLOGY}, author={Scott, GH and Askew, SD and Wilcut, JW}, year={2002}, pages={191–198} } @article{askew_wilcut_2002, title={Ladysthumb interference and seed production in cotton}, volume={50}, ISSN={["0043-1745"]}, DOI={10.1614/0043-1745(2002)050[0326:LIASPI]2.0.CO;2}, abstractNote={Abstract Studies were conducted to determine the effect of interference between ladysthumb and cotton on plant growth and productivity. Ladysthumb remained shorter than cotton until at least 70 d after cotton planting. However, ladysthumb grew over twice as tall as cotton and, depending on plant density, produced between 179 and 681 g dry biomass per plant by cotton harvest. Ladysthumb biomass per plant was not affected by weed density when grown with cotton. When grown alone, ladysthumb produced over 2,000 g dry biomass per plant, which was over four times greater than biomass produced by plants grown with cotton. Cotton lint yield decreased between 0.7 and 0.9 kg ha−1 with each gram increase in weed dry biomass per meter of the row. The relationship between ladysthumb density and cotton percent yield loss was described by the rectangular hyperbola model with the asymptote (coefficient a) constrained to 100% maximum yield loss. The estimated coefficient i (yield loss per unit density as density approaches zero) was 35 ± 5 and 14 ± 2 in 1998 and 2000, respectively. Ladysthumb seed production was also described by the hyperbolic function. Estimated seed production at 1 plant m−1 of cotton row was 33,000 and 47,000 seed m−2 in 1998 and 2000, respectively. Nomenclature: Ladysthumb, Polygonum persicaria var. persicaria L. POLPE; cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L. ‘BXN 47’.}, number={3}, journal={WEED SCIENCE}, author={Askew, SD and Wilcut, JW}, year={2002}, pages={326–332} } @article{askew_wilcut_2002, title={Pale smartweed interference and achene production in cotton}, volume={50}, ISSN={["1550-2759"]}, DOI={10.1614/0043-1745(2002)050[0357:PSIAAP]2.0.CO;2}, abstractNote={Abstract Field studies were conducted at two North Carolina locations to determine the effect of interference between pale smartweed and cotton on plant growth and productivity. Pale smartweed remained shorter than cotton until at least 70 d after cotton planting. However, pale smartweed grew over twice as tall as cotton and produced considerable dry biomass by cotton harvest. Pale smartweed biomass per plant was not affected by weed density up to 3.5 plants m−1 of row when grown with cotton. Cotton competition reduced pale smartweed dry biomass per plant at least 400%. The relationship between pale smartweed and cotton percent yield loss was described by the rectangular hyperbola model with the asymptote (coefficient a) constrained to 100% maximum yield loss. The estimated coefficient i (yield loss per unit density as density approaches zero) was 29 ± 4 and 23 ± 4 in 1998 and 2000, respectively. Pale smartweed achene production was also described by the hyperbolic function. Estimated achene production of smartweed at 1 plant m−1 cotton row was 63,000 and 25,000 achenes m−2 in 1998 and 2000, respectively. Nomenclature: Pale smartweed, Polygonum lapathifolium var. lapathifolium L. POLPE; cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L. ‘Stoneville BXN 47’.}, number={3}, journal={WEED SCIENCE}, author={Askew, SD and Wilcut, JW}, year={2002}, pages={357–363} } @article{askew_wilcut_2002, title={Pennsylvania smartweed interference and achene production in cotton}, volume={50}, ISSN={["1550-2759"]}, DOI={10.1614/0043-1745(2002)050[0350:PSIAAP]2.0.CO;2}, abstractNote={Abstract Studies were conducted to determine the effect of interference between Pennsylvania smartweed and cotton on plant growth and productivity. Pennsylvania smartweed remained shorter than cotton until at least 80 d after cotton planting. However, Pennsylvania smartweed produced considerable dry biomass by cotton harvest. Pennsylvania smartweed biomass per plant was not affected by weed density when grown with cotton. When grown alone, Pennsylvania smartweed produced 1,640 and 2,060 g dry biomass plant−1 depending on the year. This biomass was over four times greater than the biomass produced by plants grown with cotton. Cotton lint yield decreased between 1.3 and 1.1 kg ha−1 with each gram increase in weed dry biomass per meter of row. The relationship between Pennsylvania smartweed density and cotton percent yield loss was described by the hyperbolic function. The estimated coefficients a (maximum yield loss as density approaches infinity) and i (yield loss per unit density as density approaches zero) were 102 ± 23 and 51 ± 12, respectively, in 1998 and 53 ± 1 and 98 ± 5, respectively, in 2000. Pennsylvania smartweed achene production was also described by the hyperbolic function. Estimated achene production at 1 plant m−1 cotton row was 18,000 and 26,000 achenes m−2 in 1998 and 2000, respectively. Nomenclature: Pennsylvania smartweed, Polygonum pensylvanicum var. laevigatum Fern. POLPY; cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L. ‘Stoneville BXN 47’.}, number={3}, journal={WEED SCIENCE}, author={Askew, SD and Wilcut, JW}, year={2002}, pages={350–356} } @article{pline_wilcut_edmisten_wells_2002, title={Physiological and morphological response of glyphosate-resistant and non-glyphosate-resistant cotton seedlings to root-absorbed glyphosate}, volume={73}, ISSN={["1095-9939"]}, DOI={10.1016/S0048-3575(02)00014-7}, abstractNote={The level of tolerance in herbicide-resistant plants may vary among different tissues or growth stages. Studies were conducted to determine relative tissue sensitivity in glyphosate-resistant (GR) and non-GR cotton seedlings to the herbicide glyphosate. Glyphosate is often applied as a pre-plant treatment (burndown) in minimal tillage cotton production systems to remove any unwanted, emerged vegetation. Timing of these glyphosate applications may be in close proximity to the time of planting and seedling emergence. As glyphosate leaches from roots of nearby senescing weeds, it may be absorbed into the roots of cotton seedlings. Therefore, cotton seedlings were grown in hydroponic solutions containing technical grade glyphosate to ensure constant exposure to glyphosate. In all tissues, GR cotton required a greater concentration of glyphosate to reach 50% fresh weight reduction than non-GR cotton. Glyphosate inhibited the growth of non-GR cotton cotyledons, hypocotyls, and roots 50% at concentrations of 23, 69, and 27μM glyphosate, respectively. In contrast, growth of GR cotton cotyledons, hypocotyls, and roots was inhibited by 50% at 3.5-, 8-, and 5-fold greater glyphosate concentrations, respectively, than non-GR cotton tissues. Correspondingly, shikimic acid, an intermediate in the shikimic acid pathway, which accumulates upon 5-enolpyruvyl 3-shikimate phosphate synthase (EPSP synthase) inhibition, reached levels of 17.3, 21.6, and 8.8μMg−1 fresh weight at 1 mM glyphosate in non-GR cotyledons, hypocotyls, and roots, respectively. In contrast, shikimic acid levels in GR cotton were 4.2, 14.0, and 8.2μMg−1 fresh weight at 1 mM glyphosate for cotyledons, hypocotyls, and roots, respectively. Thus, roots of GR and non-GR cotton accumulate similar amounts of shikimic acid, whereas GR cotyledons and hypocotyls accumulated less shikimic acid than the corresponding non-GR tissues in response to glyphosate treatments. Additionally, glyphosate inhibited the development of lateral roots at concentrations of 0.01 or 0.1μM glyphosate greater, in GR and non-GR cotton, respectively. Lateral roots of GR and non-GR cotton inhibited by glyphosate appeared shorter and were surrounded by a thick layer of necrotic cells or root exudate which was not present in roots from plants grown in media not containing glyphosate. The quantity of GR CP4-EPSP synthase was 4.7 and 6.6 times greater in cotyledons than in hypocotyls and roots, respectively. Tissues from dark-grown GR cotton seedlings contained 1.2–2.1 times less CP4-EPSP synthase than their light-grown counterparts. Because lateral root development was inhibited, fresh weight was reduced, and shikimic acid accumulated following treatment with glyphosate in both GR and non-GR cotton, the potential exists for glyphosate to negatively affect cotton seedling establishment.}, number={1}, journal={PESTICIDE BIOCHEMISTRY AND PHYSIOLOGY}, author={Pline, WA and Wilcut, JW and Edmisten, KL and Wells, R}, year={2002}, month={May}, pages={48–58} } @article{pline_wilcut_edmisten_2002, title={Postemergence weed control in soybean (Glycine max) with cloransulam-methyl and diphenyl ether tank-mixtures}, volume={16}, ISSN={["0890-037X"]}, DOI={10.1614/0890-037X(2002)016[0737:PWCISG]2.0.CO;2}, abstractNote={Abstract: Field studies were conducted in 1995 and 1996 at three locations in North Carolina to evaluate weed control and soybean injury with postemergence (POST) treatments of cloransulam-methyl alone or in tank-mixture with acifluorfen, fomesafen, or lactofen compared with a commercial standard of acifluorfen plus bentazon. Soybean injury was 2 to 3% 7 d after treatment with cloransulam-methyl applied alone and 11 to 46% when applied with fomesafen, lactofen, acifluorfen, or acifluorfen plus bentazon. Cloransulam-methyl applied alone controlled 95% of entireleaf morningglory and ivyleaf morningglory. Control was not increased by the addition of acifluorfen, fomesafen, or lactofen. Cloransulam-methyl improved the control of common lambsquarters to at least 81% compared with dimethenamid applied preemergence alone (69% control). All diphenyl ether herbicide treatments controlled common lambsquarters at least 91%. Prickly sida control by cloransulam-methyl ranged from 14 to 73% 8 wk after treatment. Control of prickly sida was varied by diphenyl ether herbicides (73 to 100% control). Tank-mixtures of cloransulam-methyl + fomesafen and cloransulam-methyl + acifluorfen increased the control of prickly sida over either herbicide applied alone. Soybean yield was greater for all tank-mixtures than for any diphenyl ether herbicide or for cloransulam-methyl treatment applied alone. But only the acifluorfen + cloransulam-methyl treatment had higher economic returns than the cloransulam-methyl treatment alone. All other POST systems, with the exception of lactofen applied alone, had similar economic returns. Tank-mixtures of cloransulam-methyl and diphenyl ether herbicides increased the spectrum of control and soybean yield compared with these herbicides applied alone. Nomenclature: Acifluorfen; bentazon; cloransulam-methyl; dimethenamid; fomesafen; lactofen; common lambsquarters, Chenopodium album L. #3 CHEAL; entireleaf morningglory, Ipomoea hederacea var. integriuscula Gray # IPOHG; ivyleaf morningglory, Ipomoea hederacea (L.) Jacq. # IPOHE; prickly sida, Sida spinosa L. # SIDSP; soybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr. Additional index words: Economic analysis, tank-mixtures. Abbreviations: ALS, acetolactate synthase (EC 4.1.3.18); fb, followed by; POST, postemergence; PPI, preplant incorporated; PRE, preemergence; WAT, wk after POST treatment.}, number={4}, journal={WEED TECHNOLOGY}, author={Pline, WA and Wilcut, JW and Edmisten, KL}, year={2002}, pages={737–742} } @article{pline_viator_wilcut_edmisten_thomas_wells_2002, title={Reproductive abnormalities in glyphosate-resistant cotton caused by lower CP4-EPSPS levels in the male reproductive tissue}, volume={50}, ISSN={["0043-1745"]}, DOI={10.1614/0043-1745(2002)050[0438:RAIGRC]2.0.CO;2}, abstractNote={Abstract Glyphosate treatments to glyphosate-resistant (GR) cotton have been associated with poor pollination and increased boll abortion. Anatomical studies were conducted to characterize the effect of glyphosate treatments on the development of male and female reproductive organs of cotton flowers at anthesis. In comparison with nontreated plants, glyphosate applied at both the four-leaf stage postemergence (POST) and at the eight-leaf stage POST directed inhibited the elongation of the staminal column and filament, which increased the distance from the anthers to the receptive stigma tip by 4.9 to 5.7 mm during the first week of flowering. The increased distance from the anthers to the stigma resulted in 42% less pollen deposited on stigmas of glyphosate-treated plants than in nontreated plants. Moreover, pollen from glyphosate-treated plants showed numerous morphological abnormalities. Transmission electron microscopy showed the presence of large vacuoles, numerous starch grains, and less organized pockets of the endoplasmic reticulum containing fewer ribosomes in pollen from glyphosate-treated plants than from nontreated plants. Pollen development in glyphosate-treated plants is likely inhibited or aborted at the vacuolate microspore and vacuolate microgamete stages of microgametogenesis, resulting in immature pollen at anthesis. Although stigmas from glyphosate-treated plants were 1.2 to 1.4 mm longer than those from nontreated plants, no other anatomical differences in stigmas were visibly evident. The presence of the GR 5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase (CP4-EPSPS) enzyme from Agrobacterium sp. strain CP4 was quantified in reproductive and vegetative tissues using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The content of CP4-EPSPS in the stigma, anther, preanthesis floral bud (square), and flower petals was significantly less than that in the vegetative leaf tissue. Glyphosate effects on the male reproductive development resulting in poor pollen deposition on the stigma, as well as production of aborted pollen with reduced viability, provide a likely explanation for reports of increased boll abortion and pollination problems in glyphosate-treated GR cotton. Nomenclature: Glyphosate; cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L. ‘Delta Pine & Land 5415RR’, ‘Delta Pine & Land 50’, ‘Delta Pine & Land 90’, ‘SureGrow 125RR’.}, number={4}, journal={WEED SCIENCE}, author={Pline, WA and Viator, R and Wilcut, JW and Edmisten, KL and Thomas, J and Wells, R}, year={2002}, pages={438–447} } @article{pline_wilcut_duke_edmisten_wells_2002, title={Tolerance and accumulation of shikimic acid in response to glyphosate applications in glyphosate-resistant and nonglyphosate-resistant cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)}, volume={50}, ISSN={["0021-8561"]}, DOI={10.1021/jf0110699}, abstractNote={Measurement of shikimic acid accumulation in response to glyphosate inhibition of 5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase is a rapid and accurate assay to quantify glyphosate-induced damage in sensitive plants. Two methods of assaying shikimic acid, a spectrophotometric and a high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method, were compared for their accuracy of recovering known amounts of shikimic acid spiked into plant samples. The HPLC method recovered essentially 100% of shikimic acid as compared with only 73% using the spectrophotometric method. Relative sensitivity to glyphosate was measured in glyphosate-resistant (GR) and non-GR cotton leaves, fruiting branches, and squares (floral buds) by assaying shikimic acid. Accumulation of shikimic acid was not observed in any tissue, either GR or non-GR, at rates of 5 mM glyphosate or less applied to leaves. All tissues of non-GR plants accumulated shikimic acid in response to glyphosate treatment; however, only fruiting branches and squares of GR plants accumulated a slight amount of shikimic acid. In non-GR cotton, fruiting branches and squares accumulated 18 and 11 times, respectively, more shikimic acid per micromolar of translocated glyphosate than leaf tissue, suggesting increased sensitivity to glyphosate of reproductive tissue over vegetative tissue. GR cotton leaves treated with 80 mM of glyphosate accumulated 57 times less shikimic acid per micromolar of translocated glyphosate than non-GR cotton but only 12.4- and 4-fold less in fruiting branches and squares, respectively. The increased sensitivity of reproductive structures to glyphosate inhibition may be due to a higher demand for shikimate pathway products and may provide an explanation for reports of fruit abortion from glyphosate-treated GR cotton.}, number={3}, journal={JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY}, author={Pline, WA and Wilcut, JW and Duke, SO and Edmisten, KL and Wells, R}, year={2002}, month={Jan}, pages={506–512} } @article{pline_edmisten_oliver_wilcut_wells_allen_2002, title={Use of digital image analysis, viability stains, and germination assays to estimate conventional and glyphosate-resistant cotton pollen viability}, volume={42}, ISSN={["0011-183X"]}, DOI={10.2135/cropsci2002.2193}, abstractNote={Abstract}, number={6}, journal={CROP SCIENCE}, author={Pline, WA and Edmisten, KL and Oliver, T and Wilcut, JW and Wells, R and Allen, NS}, year={2002}, pages={2193–2200} } @article{porterfield_wilcut_askew_2002, title={Weed management with CGA-362622, fluometuron, and prometryn in cotton}, volume={50}, ISSN={["0043-1745"]}, DOI={10.1614/0043-1745(2002)050[0642:WMWCFA]2.0.CO;2}, abstractNote={Abstract An experiment conducted at five locations in North Carolina during 1998 and 1999 evaluated weed management systems in cotton with CGA-362622 and pyrithiobac. Weed management systems evaluated different combinations with or without fluometuron preemergence (PRE) followed by (fb) CGA-362622 early postemergence (EPOST), postemergence (POST), or EPOST + POST; or pyrithiobac EPOST fb prometryn plus MSMA late postemergence directed (LAYBY) or no LAYBY treatment. The weed species evaluated include common ragweed, entireleaf morningglory, pitted morningglory, prickly sida, sicklepod, tall morningglory, and yellow nutsedge. Fluometuron PRE improved the control of all weed species by at least 17 percentage points and increased cotton lint yield compared with the systems that did not use fluometuron PRE. Prometryn plus MSMA LAYBY improved the control of all weed species and increased lint yield compared with the systems that did not use prometryn plus MSMA LAYBY when PRE or POST herbicides were used. Control with CGA-362622 at all application timings was greater than 70% for all weed species evaluated (common ragweed, entireleaf morningglory, pitted morningglory, sicklepod, tall morningglory, and yellow nutsedge), except prickly sida. Control of all three morningglory species and prickly sida was at least 70% with pyrithiobac, whereas control of common ragweed, sicklepod, and yellow nutsedge was lower. The only cotton that yielded over 800 kg ha−1 was treated with fluometuron PRE fb CGA-362622 EPOST, POST, or EPOST + POST fb prometryn plus MSMA LAYBY. Cotton treated with pyrithiobac EPOST gave yields that were similar to those given by cotton treated with CGA-362622 EPOST in systems with fluometuron PRE and less than those given by cotton treated with CGA-362622 EPOST in systems without fluometuron PRE. Early-season injury with CGA-362622 was greater than 60% at Clayton and Rocky Mount in 1998, whereas 12% or less injury was observed at the other locations. Pyrithiobac resulted in 25 to 45% injury at these two locations. No injury was observed 45 d after treatment. Nomenclature: CGA-362622; fluometuron; MSMA; prometryn; pyrithiobac; common ragweed, Ambrosia artemisiifolia L. AMBEL; yellow nutsedge, Cyperus esculentus L. CYPES; entireleaf morningglory, Ipomoea hederacea var. integriuscula Gray IPOHG; pitted morningglory, Ipomoea lacunosa L. IPOLA; tall morningglory, Ipomoea purpurea (L.) Roth PHBPU; sicklepod, Senna obtusifolia (L.) Irwin and Barnaby CASOB; prickly sida, Sida spinosa L. SIDSP; cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L. ‘Stoneville 474’.}, number={5}, journal={WEED SCIENCE}, author={Porterfield, D and Wilcut, JW and Askew, SD}, year={2002}, pages={642–647} } @article{price_wilcut_swann_2002, title={Weed management with diclosulam in peanut (Arachis hypogaea)}, volume={16}, ISSN={["0890-037X"]}, DOI={10.1614/0890-037X(2002)016[0724:WMWDIP]2.0.CO;2}, abstractNote={Abstract: Field experiments were conducted at three locations in North Carolina in 1998 and 1999 and one location in Virginia in 1998 to evaluate weed management systems in peanut. Treatments consisted of diclosulam alone preemergence (PRE), or diclosulam plus metolachlor PRE alone or followed by (fb) bentazon plus acifluorfen postemergence (POST). These systems were also compared with commercial standards of metolachlor PRE fb bentazon plus acifluorfen POST or imazapic POST. Our data indicate that diclosulam PRE plus metolachlor PRE in conventional tillage peanut production usually controlled common lambsquarters, common ragweed, prickly sida, and entireleaf morningglory. But control of spurred anoda, goosegrass, ivyleaf morningglory, large crabgrass, and pitted morningglory by this system was inconsistent and may require additional POST herbicide treatments. Systems that included diclosulam plus metolachlor PRE consistently provided high yields and net returns. Nomenclature: Acifluorfen, bentazon, diclosulam, imazapic, metolachlor; common lambsquarters, Chenopodium album L. #3 CHEAL; common ragweed, Ambrosia artemisiifolia L. # AMBEL; entireleaf morningglory, Ipomoea hederacea var. integruiscula Grey # IPOHG; goosegrass, Eleusine indica (L.) Gaertn. # ELEIN; ivyleaf morningglory, Ipomoea hederacea (L.) Jacq # IPOHE; large crabgrass, Digitaria sanguinalis L. Scop. # DIGSA; pitted morningglory, Ipomoea lacunosa L. # IPOLA; prickly sida, Sida spinosa L. # SIDSP; spurred anoda, Anoda cristata L. # ANVCR; peanut, Arachis hypogaea L. ‘NC 10C’, ‘NC 12C’. Additional index words: Economic analysis. Abbreviations: fb, followed by; POST, postemergence; PPI, preplant incorporated; PRE, preemergence.}, number={4}, journal={WEED TECHNOLOGY}, author={Price, AJ and Wilcut, JW and Swann, CW}, year={2002}, pages={724–730} } @article{price_wilcut_2002, title={Weed management with diclosulam in strip-tillage peanut (Arachis hypogaea)}, volume={16}, ISSN={["1550-2740"]}, DOI={10.1614/0890-037X(2002)016[0029:WMWDIS]2.0.CO;2}, abstractNote={Experiments were conducted at three locations in North Carolina in 1999 and 2000 to evaluate weed management systems in strip-tillage peanut. Diclosulam was evaluated with standard preemergence (PRE), early postemergence, and postemergence (POST) herbicide systems in a factorial treatment arrangement. Preemergence treatments that contained diclosulam controlled common lambsquarters, common ragweed, and eclipta by 100%. Diclosulam PRE controlled entireleaf morningglory by 88%, ivyleaf morningglory by ≥ 90%, pitted morningglory by ≥ 81%, and prickly sida by ≥ 94%. Yellow nutsedge control with diclosulam ranged from 65 to 100% depending on location, whereas POST systems containing imazapic controlled yellow nutsedge by at least 89%, regardless of PRE herbicides. Peanut yields and net returns were reflective of levels of weed management. Systems that included diclosulam PRE plus POST herbicides consistently provided high yields and net returns. Clethodim late POST was required for full-season control of annual grasses, including broadleaf signalgrass, goosegrass, large crabgrass, and Texas panicum. Nomenclature: Clethodim; diclosulam; imazapic; broadleaf signalgrass, Brachiaria platyphylla (Griseb.) Nash #3 BRAPP; common lambsquarters, Chenopodium album L. # CHEAL; common ragweed, Ambrosia artemisiifolia L. # AMBEL; eclipta, Eclipta prostrata L. # ECLAL; entireleaf morningglory, Ipomoea hederacea var. integriuscula Gray # IPOHG; goosegrass, Eleusine indica (L.) Gaertn. # ELEIN; ivyleaf morningglory, Ipomoea hederacea (L.) Jacq. # IPOHE; large crabgrass, Digitaria sanguinalis (L.) Scop. # DIGSA; pitted morningglory, Ipomoea lacunosa L. # IPOLA; prickly sida, Sida spinosa L. # SIDSP; Texas panicum, Panicum texanum Buckl. # PANTE; yellow nutsedge, Cyperus esculentus L. # CYPES; peanut, Arachis hypogaea L. ‘NC 10C’ and ‘NC 12C’. Additional index words: Economic analysis. Abbreviations: EPOST, early postemergence; fb, followed by; POST, postemergence; PPI, preplant incorporated; PRE, preemergence.}, number={1}, journal={WEED TECHNOLOGY}, author={Price, AJ and Wilcut, JW}, year={2002}, pages={29–36} } @article{porterfield_wilcut_clewis_edmisten_2002, title={Weed-free yield response of seven cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) cultivars to CGA-362622 postemergence}, volume={16}, ISSN={["0890-037X"]}, DOI={10.1614/0890-037X(2002)016[0180:WFYROS]2.0.CO;2}, abstractNote={Field studies were conducted in 1998 and 1999 to evaluate the response of seven cotton cultivars to CGA-362622 applied postemergence at 7.5 and 15 g ai/ha to three- to five-leaf cotton. The cultivars evaluated included Deltapine 51, Deltapine NuCotn 33B, Paymaster 1220 RR, Paymaster 1220 BG/RR, Stoneville bromoxynil-resistant 47, Stoneville 474, and Sure-Grow 125. At 1 to 2 wk after treatment (WAT), CGA-362622 at 7.5 and 15 g/ha injured all cotton cultivars 7 to 9% and 13 to 15%, respectively. Cotton injury symptoms included chlorosis and minor stunting. At 3 to 4 WAT, injury from CGA-362622 at 7.5 and 15 g/ha was 2 to 6% and 7 to 9%, respectively. Except for Paymaster 1220 RR, Deltapine NuCotn 33B, and Stoneville 474, all cotton cultivars were injured more by the higher rate than by the lower rate of CGA-362622. Injury was not visibly apparent 6 to 8 WAT. CGA-362622 at either rate had no effect on cotton lint yield. Nomenclature: CGA-362622 (proposed common name trifloxysulfuron), N-[(4,6-dimethoxy-2-pyrimidinyl)carbamoyl]-3-(2,2,2-trifluoroethoxy)-pyridin-2-sulfonamide sodium salt; cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L. ‘Deltapine 51’, ‘Deltapine NuCotn 33B’, ‘Paymaster 1220 RR’, ‘Paymaster 1220 BG/RR’, ‘Stoneville BXN 47’, ‘Stoneville 474’, ‘Sure-Grow 125’. Additional index words: Crop injury, crop yield. Abbreviations: ALS, acetolactate synthase; BXN, bromoxynil-resistant; LAYBY, late postemergence directed; POST, postemergence; WAT, weeks after treatment.}, number={1}, journal={WEED TECHNOLOGY}, author={Porterfield, D and Wilcut, JW and Clewis, SB and Edmisten, KL}, year={2002}, pages={180–183} } @article{pline_price_wilcut_edmisten_wells_2001, title={Absorption and translocation of glyphosate in glyphosate-resistant cotton as influenced by application method and growth stage}, volume={49}, ISSN={["0043-1745"]}, DOI={10.1614/0043-1745(2001)049[0460:AATOGI]2.0.CO;2}, abstractNote={Abstract The influence of herbicide placement and plant growth stage on the absorption and translocation patterns of 14C-glyphosate in glyphosate-resistant cotton was investigated. Plants at four growth stages were treated with 14C-glyphosate on a 5-cm2 section of the stem, which simulated a postemergence-directed spray (PDS) application, or on the newest mature leaf, which simulated a postemergence (POST) application. Plants were harvested 3 and 7 d after treatment and divided into the treated leaf or treated stem, mature leaves, immature leaves and buds, stems, roots, fruiting branches (including the foliage on the fruiting branch), squares, and bolls. The PDS versus POST application main effect on absorption was significant. Absorption of 14C-glyphosate applied to stem tissue was higher in PDS applications than in POST applications. Plants receiving PDS applications absorbed 35% of applied 14C-glyphosate, whereas those receiving POST applications absorbed 26%, averaged over growth stages at application. Absorption increased from the four-leaf growth stage to the eight-leaf stage in POST applications but reached a plateau at the eight-leaf stage. Plants with PDS applications showed an increase in absorption from the four- to eight- to twelve-leaf stages and reached a plateau at the 12-leaf stage. Translocation of 14C-glyphosate to roots was greater at all growth stages with PDS treatments than with POST treatments. Herbicide placement did not affect translocation of 14C-glyphosate to squares and bolls. Squares and bolls retained 0.2 to 3.7% of applied 14C-glyphosate, depending on growth stage. Separate studies were conducted to investigate the fate of foliar-applied 14C-glyphosate at the four- or eight-leaf growth stages when harvested at 8- or 10-leaf, 12-leaf, midbloom (8 to 10 nodes above white bloom), and cutout (five nodes above white bloom, physiological maturity) stages. Thirty to 37% of applied 14C-glyphosate remained in the plant at cutout in four- and eight-leaf treatment stages, respectively. The concentration of 14C-glyphosate in tissue (Bq g−1 dry weight basis) was greatest in mature leaves and immature leaves and buds in plants treated at the four-leaf stage. Plants treated at the eight-leaf stage and harvested at all growth stages except cutout showed a higher concentration of 14C-glyphosate in squares than in other plant tissue. Accumulation of 14C-glyphosate in squares reached a maximum of 43 Bq g−1 dry weight at harvest at the 12-leaf stage. This concentration corresponds to 5.7 times greater accumulation of 14C-glyphosate in squares than in roots, which may also be metabolic sinks. These data suggest that reproductive tissues such as bolls and squares can accumulate 14C-glyphosate at higher concentrations than other tissues, especially when the herbicide treatment is applied either POST or PDS during reproductive stages (eight-leaf stage and beyond). Nomenclature: Glyphosate; cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L. ‘Delta Pine 5415RR’.}, number={4}, journal={WEED SCIENCE}, author={Pline, WA and Price, AJ and Wilcut, JW and Edmisten, KL and Wells, R}, year={2001}, pages={460–467} } @article{clewis_askew_wilcut_2001, title={Common ragweed interference in peanut}, volume={49}, ISSN={["0043-1745"]}, DOI={10.1614/0043-1745(2001)049[0768:CRIIP]2.0.CO;2}, abstractNote={Abstract Studies were conducted to evaluate density-dependent effects of common ragweed on weed growth and peanut growth and yield. Common ragweed height was not affected by weed density and peanut canopy diameter. Weed height exceeded peanut height throughout the growing season, indicating that competition for light occurred between the two species. Common ragweed aboveground dry biomass per plant decreased as weed density increased, but total weed dry biomass per meter of crop row increased with weed density. The rectangular hyperbola model described the effect of weed density on percent peanut yield loss. With the asymptote constrained to 100% maximum yield loss, the I coefficient (yield loss per unit density as density approaches zero) was 68.3 ± 12.2%. Common ragweed did not influence the occurrence of tomato spotted wilt virus, early leaf spot (Cercospora arachidicola), southern stem rot (Sclerotium rolfsii), and Cylindrocladium black rot (Cylindrocladium crotalariae). However, as common ragweed density increased, the incidence of late leaf spot (Cercosporidium personatum) increased. Results indicate that common ragweed is one of the more competitive weeds in peanut and a potential economic threat to peanut growers. Nomenclature: Common ragweed, Ambrosia artemisiifolia L. AMBEL; peanut, Arachis hypogaea L. ‘NC 7’.}, number={6}, journal={WEED SCIENCE}, author={Clewis, SB and Askew, SD and Wilcut, JW}, year={2001}, pages={768–772} } @article{scott_askew_bennett_wilcut_2001, title={Economic evaluation of HADSS (TM) computer program for weed management in nontransgenic and transgenic cotton}, volume={49}, ISSN={["1550-2759"]}, DOI={10.1614/0043-1745(2001)049[0549:EEOHCP]2.0.CO;2}, abstractNote={Abstract Field studies were conducted at four locations in North Carolina in 1998 and 1999 to evaluate the use of the Herbicide Application Decision Support System (HADSS™) for weed management in nontransgenic, bromoxynil-resistant, and glyphosate-resistant cotton. Weed management systems included trifluralin preplant incorporated (PPI) plus fluometuron preemergence (PRE) or no soil-applied herbicides. Postemergence (POST) options included bromoxynil, glyphosate, or pyrithiobac early POST (EPOST) followed by (fb) MSMA plus prometryn late postemergence–directed (LAYBY) or herbicide recommendations given by HADSS. Glyphosate-resistant systems provided control equivalent to or better than control provided by bromoxynil-resistant and nontransgenic systems for smooth pigweed, Palmer amaranth, large crabgrass, goosegrass, ivyleaf morningglory, and fall panicum. Trifluralin PPI fb fluometuron PRE fb HADSS POST provided equivalent or higher levels of weed control and yield than trifluralin PPI fb fluometuron PRE fb bromoxynil, glyphosate, or pyrithiobac EPOST fb MSMA plus prometryn LAYBY. The trifluralin PPI fb fluometuron PRE fb HADSS POST systems controlled large crabgrass at Goldsboro and fall panicum better than HADSS POST-only systems in nontransgenic cotton. Cotton yield and net returns in the glyphosate-resistant systems were always equal to or higher than the nontransgenic and bromoxynil-resistant systems. Net returns were higher for the soil-applied fb HADSS POST treatments in 8 of 12 comparisons with HADSS POST systems without soil-applied herbicides. Early-season weed interference reduced cotton lint yields and net returns in POST-only systems. Nomenclature: Bromoxynil; fluometuron; glyphosate; MSMA; prometryn; pyrithiobac; trifluralin; cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L. ‘Deltapine 51’, ‘BXN 47’, ‘Deltapine 5415RR’; fall panicum, Panicum dichotomiflorum Michx. PANDI; goosegrass, Eleusine indica (L.) Gaertn. ELEIN; ivyleaf morningglory, Ipomoea hederacea (L.) Jacq. IPOHE; large crabgrass, Digitaria sanguinalis (L.) Scop. DIGSA; Palmer amaranth, Amaranthus palmeri S. Wats. AMAPA; smooth pigweed, Amaranthus hybridus L. AMACH.}, number={4}, journal={WEED SCIENCE}, author={Scott, GH and Askew, SD and Bennett, AC and Wilcut, JW}, year={2001}, pages={549–557} } @article{scott_askew_wilcut_2001, title={Economic evaluation of diclosulam and flumioxazin systems in peanut (Arachis hypogaea)}, volume={15}, ISSN={["0890-037X"]}, DOI={10.1614/0890-037X(2001)015[0360:EEODAF]2.0.CO;2}, abstractNote={Abstract: Field studies were conducted at two locations in North Carolina in 1998 and in 1999 to evaluate weed control and peanut response following diclosulam at 27 g ai/ha preemergence (PRE) or flumioxazin at 87 g ai/ha preemergence (PRE) alone and in systems with postemergence (POST) commercial standards. All plots received a preplant incorporated (PPI) treatment of metolachlor at 1,400 g ai/ha. Metolachlor PPI plus diclosulam or flumioxazin PRE controlled common lambsquarters, common ragweed, entireleaf morningglory, large crabgrass, and yellow nutsedge as well as or better than metolachlor PPI followed by (fb) acifluorfen plus bentazon POST or paraquat plus bentazon early postemergence fb acifluorfen plus bentazon POST. Metolachlor PPI plus diclosulam PRE or flumioxazin PRE controlled ivyleaf morningglory as well as metolachlor PPI fb acifluorfen plus bentazon POST. Metolachlor PPI plus flumioxazin PRE controlled common lambsquarters better than metolachlor PPI plus diclosulam PRE while diclosulam PRE controlled common ragweed better. There was no difference in common lambsquarters control between flumioxazin and diclosulam PRE when POST herbicides were used. There was only one difference in peanut yield and net returns between metolachlor PPI fb either diclosulam or flumioxazin PRE when POST herbicides were used. Nomenclature: Acifluorfen; bentazon; diclosulam; flumioxazin; metolachlor; paraquat; common lambsquarters, Chenopodium album L. #3 CHEAL; common ragweed, Ambrosia artemisiifolia L. # AMBEL; entireleaf morningglory, Ipomoea hederacea var. integriuscula Gray # IPOHG; ivyleaf morningglory, Ipomoea hederacea (L.) Jacq. # IPOHE; large crabgrass, Digitaria sanguinalis L. Scop. # DIGSA; yellow nutsedge, Cyperus esculentus L. # CYPES; peanut, Arachis hypogaea L., ‘NC 7’, ‘NC 10C’. Additional index words: Economic analysis, acifluorfen, bentazon, paraquat. Abbreviations: EPOST, early postemergence; fb, followed by; POST, postemergence; PPI, preplant incorporated; PRE, preemergence.}, number={2}, journal={WEED TECHNOLOGY}, author={Scott, GH and Askew, SD and Wilcut, JW}, year={2001}, pages={360–364} } @article{mclean_richburg_wilcut_smith_2001, title={Influence of norflurazon placement on yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus)}, volume={15}, ISSN={["1550-2740"]}, DOI={10.1614/0890-037X(2001)015[0327:IONPOY]2.0.CO;2}, abstractNote={Abstract: Greenhouse studies were conducted to determine yellow nutsedge response to selective placement of a 5-cm layer of norflurazon-treated soil above, below, or above plus below pregerminated nutsedge tubers. Norflurazon at 1.68 kg ai/ha applied postemergence (POST) as a foliar, soil, or foliar plus soil treatment was also evaluated. Soil concentrations of norflurazon at 1.5 mg/kg (w/w) applied below or above plus below nutsedge tubers reduced yellow nutsedge shoot numbers at least 69%, shoot height at least 71%, shoot dry weights at least 77%, and root tuber dry weights at least 89%. Yellow nutsedge growth reduction with norflurazon was greatest when norflurazon was placed in the soil profile below or above plus below the yellow nutsedge tubers. Placement of norflurazon above yellow nutsedge tubers did not reduce shoot number, height, or dry weight until the foliar portion of plants were removed 39 d after treatment. POST application of norflurazon did not reduce initial yellow nutsedge shoot number regardless of application method. Foliar-only POST application of norflurazon was less effective for reducing numbers of emerged yellow nutsedge than application to soil only or soil plus foliage. Nomenclature: Norflurazon; yellow nutsedge, Cyperus esculentus L. #3 CYPES. Additional index words: Application method, herbicide placement, timing, herbicide concentration, cotton, Gossypium hirsutum. Abbreviations: DAT, days after treatment; POST, postemergence.}, number={2}, journal={WEED TECHNOLOGY}, author={McLean, HS and Richburg, JS and Wilcut, JW and Smith, AE}, year={2001}, pages={327–331} } @article{culpepper_gimenez_york_batts_wilcut_2001, title={Morningglory (Ipomoea spp.) and large crabgrass (Digitaria sanguinalis) control with glyphosate and 2,4-DB mixtures in glyphosate-resistant soybean (Glycine max)}, volume={15}, ISSN={["0890-037X"]}, DOI={10.1614/0890-037X(2001)015[0056:MISALC]2.0.CO;2}, abstractNote={Abstract: Glyphosate effectively controls most weeds in glyphosate-resistant soybean. However, it is sometimes only marginally effective on Ipomoea spp. A field experiment was conducted at five locations in North Carolina to determine the effects of mixing 2,4-DB with glyphosate on Ipomoea spp. control and on soybean injury and yield. The isopropylamine salt of glyphosate at 560, 840, and 1,120 g ai/ha controlled mixtures of tall morningglory, entireleaf morningglory, and red morningglory at least 96% at two locations. Mixing the dimethylamine salt of 2,4-DB at 35 g ae/ha with glyphosate did not increase control but reduced soybean yield 6%. At two other locations, 2,4-DB increased control of tall morningglory and a mixture of entireleaf morningglory and ivyleaf morningglory 13 to 22% when mixed with glyphosate at 560 g/ha, but not when mixed with glyphosate at 840 or 1,120 g/ha. Soybean yield was reduced 31% at one location and was unaffected at the other. At the fifth location, 2,4-DB increased control of tall morningglory 25, 11, and 7% when mixed with glyphosate at 560, 840, and 1,120 g/ha, respectively. Soybean yield was increased 15%. In separate field experiments, glyphosate at 560, 840, and 1,120 g/ha controlled large crabgrass at least 99%. Mixing 2,4-DB at 35 g/ha with glyphosate did not affect control. In the greenhouse, mixing 2,4-DB at 35, 70, 140, or 280 g/ha with glyphosate at 70 to 560 g/ha did not affect large crabgrass control by glyphosate. Nomenclature: Glyphosate; 2,4-DB; entireleaf morningglory, Ipomoea hederacea var. integriuscula Gray #3 IPOHG; ivyleaf morningglory, Ipomoea hederacea (L.) Jacq. # IPOHE; large crabgrass, Digitaria sanguinalis (L.) Scop. # DIGSA; red morningglory, Ipomoea coccinea L. # IPOCC; tall morningglory, Ipomoea purpurea (L.) Roth # PHBPU; soybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr. ‘Hartz 5566 RR’. Additional index words: Herbicide combinations, herbicide interactions, herbicide-resistant crops. Abbreviations: WAT, weeks after treatment.}, number={1}, journal={WEED TECHNOLOGY}, author={Culpepper, AS and Gimenez, AE and York, AC and Batts, RB and Wilcut, JW}, year={2001}, pages={56–61} } @article{askew_wilcut_2001, title={Tropic croton interference in cotton}, volume={49}, ISSN={["1550-2759"]}, DOI={10.1614/0043-1745(2001)049[0184:TCIIC]2.0.CO;2}, abstractNote={Abstract Studies were conducted to determine the effect of interference between tropic croton (Croton glandulosus) and cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) on plant growth and productivity. Tropic croton height was not affected by weed density, but cotton height decreased with increased weed density 10 wk after planting. Tropic croton biomass per plant was not affected by weed density, but total weed biomass per meter of crop row increased with weed density. Cotton lint yield decreased linearly 2 kg ha−1 with each gram increase in weed dry biomass per meter of row. Percent yield loss–density relationship was described by the rectangular hyperbola model. Estimated coefficients A (maximum yield loss) and I (yield loss per unit density as density approaches zero) were 129.6 ± 42.2 and 35.6 ± 8.0%, respectively, when asymptotic iterations were based on least sums of squares. When A was constrained to 100% yield loss, I was 42.5 ± 5.1%. Results indicated that tropic croton was less competitive with cotton than many weeds but represents an economic threat to cotton growers. Nomenclature: Cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L. ‘Deltapine 51’; tropic croton, Croton glandulosus var. septentrionalis Muell.-Arg. CVNGS.}, number={2}, journal={WEED SCIENCE}, author={Askew, SD and Wilcut, JW}, year={2001}, pages={184–189} } @article{wilcut_askew_bailey_spears_isleib_2001, title={Virginia market-type peanut (Arachis hypogaea) cultivar tolerance and yield response to flumioxazin preemergence}, volume={15}, ISSN={["1550-2740"]}, DOI={10.1614/0890-037X(2001)015[0137:VMTPAH]2.0.CO;2}, abstractNote={Abstract: Field studies were conducted in 1996 and 1997 to evaluate response of eight peanut cultivars to flumioxazin applied preemergence (PRE) at 71 g ai/ha. Peanut cultivars evaluated include ‘NC 12C’, ‘NC 7’, ‘VAC 92R’, ‘NC-V 11’, ‘NC 10C’, ‘AT VC 1’, ‘NC 9’, and the experimental breeding line ‘N9001OE’. Visible injury 3 wk after planting in 1996 was 3% or less regardless of cultivar. In 1997, all cultivars were injured 15 to 28% with flumioxazin PRE, except VC 1, which was injured 45%. No visible injury was observed at 5 and 9 wk after planting. Flumioxazin did not influence the incidence of early leaf spot, late leaf spot, southern stem rot, cylindrocladium black rot, or tomato spotted wilt virus. Flumioxazin did not affect percentage of extra-large kernels, sound mature kernels, other kernels, and total yield. Nomenclature: Flumioxazin; peanut, Arachis hypogaea L., ‘NC 12C’, ‘NC 7’, ‘VAC 92R’, ‘NC-V 11’, ‘NC 10C’, ‘AT VC 1’, ‘NC 9’, ‘N9001OE’. Additional index words: Disease interaction, Cylindrocladium crotalariae (Loos) Bell and Sobers, Cercospora arachidicola Hori, Cercosporidium personatum (Berk. and Curt.), Sclerotium rolfsii Sacc., grade parameters, extra-large kernels, sound mature kernels, sound splits, total kernels, other kernels, fancy pods. Abbreviations: CBR, cylindrocladium black rot; DAP, days after planting; ELK, extra-large kernels; PPI, preplant incorporated; PRE, preemergence; SMK, sound mature kernels; SS, sound splits; TMSK, total sound mature kernels; TSWV, tomato spotted wilt virus; WAP, weeks after planting.}, number={1}, journal={WEED TECHNOLOGY}, author={Wilcut, JW and Askew, SD and Bailey, WA and Spears, JF and Isleib, TG}, year={2001}, pages={137–140} } @article{paulsgrove_wilcut_2001, title={Weed management with pyrithiobac preemergence in bromoxynil-resistant cotton}, volume={49}, ISSN={["0043-1745"]}, DOI={10.1614/0043-1745(2001)049[0567:WMWPPI]2.0.CO;2}, abstractNote={Abstract An experiment was conducted at two locations in Georgia and one location in North Carolina during 1994 and 1995 to evaluate weed management systems utilizing pyrithiobac applied preemergence (PRE) in conventional-tillage bromoxynil-resistant cotton. Weed management systems evaluated included different combinations of pyrithiobac PRE, bromoxynil or bromoxynil plus MSMA applied early postemergence (EPOST), bromoxynil applied postemergence (POST), and cyanazine plus MSMA applied late postemergence-directed (LAYBY). Pyrithiobac PRE improved control of Florida beggarweed, pitted morningglory, prickly sida, sicklepod, and spurred anoda compared with systems that did not include pyrithiobac PRE. Averaged across locations, pyrithiobac PRE increased cotton lint yields 330 kg ha−1. Bromoxynil applied EPOST or POST increased weed control and cotton lint yield. Bromoxynil EPOST, POST, or EPOST plus POST did not control sicklepod. The addition of MSMA to bromoxynil EPOST improved sicklepod control. Two applications of bromoxynil controlled more pitted morningglory and sicklepod than one application. Control of all dicotyledonous weeds was increased by cyanazine plus MSMA LAYBY, and this treatment increased yields at all locations. Cotton was not injured by pyrithiobac PRE or by bromoxynil applied EPOST or POST, but temporary visual injury was observed with EPOST treatments of MSMA. Nomenclature: Bromoxynil; cyanazine; fluometuron; MSMA; pyrithiobac; cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L. ‘BXN 57’; Florida beggarweed, Desmodium tortuosum (Sw.) DC. DEDTO; pitted morningglory, Ipomoea lacunosa L. IPOLA; prickly sida, Sida spinosa L. SIDSP; sicklepod, Senna obtusifolia (L.) Irwin and Barneby CASOB; spurred anoda, Anoda cristata (L.) Schlecht. ANVCR.}, number={4}, journal={WEED SCIENCE}, author={Paulsgrove, MD and Wilcut, JW}, year={2001}, pages={567–570} } @article{weber_wilkerson_linker_wilcut_leidy_senseman_witt_barrett_vencill_shaw_et al._2000, title={A proposal to standardize soil/solution herbicide distribution coefficients}, volume={48}, ISSN={["0043-1745"]}, DOI={10.1614/0043-1745(2000)048[0075:APTSSS]2.0.CO;2}, abstractNote={Abstract Herbicide soil/solution distribution coefficients (Kd) are used in mathematical models to predict the movement of herbicides in soil and groundwater. Herbicides bind to various soil constituents to differing degrees. The universal soil colloid that binds most herbicides is organic matter (OM), however clay minerals (CM) and metallic hydrous oxides are more retentive for cationic, phosphoric, and arsenic acid compounds. Weakly basic herbicides bind to both organic and inorganic soil colloids. The soil organic carbon (OC) affinity coefficient (Koc) has become a common parameter for comparing herbicide binding in soil; however, because OM and OC determinations vary greatly between methods and laboratories, Koc values may vary greatly. This proposal discusses this issue and offers suggestions for obtaining the most accurate Kd, Freundlich constant (Kf), and Koc values for herbicides listed in the WSSA Herbicide Handbook and Supplement. Nomenclature: Readers are referred to the WSSA Herbicide Handbook and Supplement for the chemical names of the herbicides.}, number={1}, journal={WEED SCIENCE}, author={Weber, JB and Wilkerson, GG and Linker, HM and Wilcut, JW and Leidy, RB and Senseman, S and Witt, WW and Barrett, M and Vencill, WK and Shaw, DR and et al.}, year={2000}, pages={75–88} } @article{scott_askew_wilcut_brownie_2000, title={Datura stramonium interference and seed rain in Gossypium hirsutum}, volume={48}, ISSN={["1550-2759"]}, DOI={10.1614/0043-1745(2000)048[0613:DSIASR]2.0.CO;2}, abstractNote={Abstract Experiments were conducted in 1998 and 1999 at the Central Crops Research Station near Clayton, NC, to evaluate density-dependent effects of Datura stramonium on weed growth and seed rain and Gossypium hirsutum growth and yield. Datura stramonium height was not affected by density in either year. Crop height never exceeded weed height during the growing season, indicating that competition for light occurred between the two species. Eight weeks after planting or later, G. hirsutum height decreased as D. stramonium density increased. An increase in D. stramonium density from 1 to 32 plants (9.1 m of row)−1 resulted in a decrease in capsule production per plant of 92 and 60 in 1998 and 1999, respectively. Total D. stramonium dry weight per 9.1 m of row increased via a quadratic relationship as weed density increased. Gossypium hirsutum lint yields decreased as D. stramonium biomass and density increased in both years. Estimated yield losses of 10 and 25% were caused by D. stramonium at 0.5 and 1.5 plants (9.1 m of row)−1 (572 and 1,716 plants ha−1), respectively, in 1998 and 0.6 and 1.8 plants (9.1 m of row)−1 (690 and 2,060 plants ha−1), respectively, in 1999. Nomenclature: Datura stramonium L. DATST, jimsonweed; Gossypium hirsutum L., ‘Deltapine 51’, cotton.}, number={5}, journal={WEED SCIENCE}, author={Scott, GH and Askew, SD and Wilcut, JW and Brownie, C}, year={2000}, pages={613–617} } @article{bailey_wilcut_spears_isleib_langston_2000, title={Diclosulam does not influence yields in eight virginia market-type peanut (Arachis hypogaea) cultivars}, volume={14}, ISSN={["1550-2740"]}, DOI={10.1614/0890-037x(2000)014[0402:ddniyi]2.0.co;2}, abstractNote={Abstract: Field studies were conducted in 1996 and 1997 to evaluate response of eight peanut cultivars to diclosulam applied preplant incorporated at 36 g ai/ha in a weed-free environment. Peanut cultivars evaluated included ‘NC 12C’, ‘NC 7’, ‘VAC 92R’, ‘NC-V 11’, ‘NC 10C’, ‘AT VC 1’,‘NC 9’, and the experimental breeding line N90010E. Visible injury 3 wk after planting was less than 5% regardless of cultivar. No injury was observed at 21 d after planting. Diclosulam did not influence the incidence of early leaf spot, late leaf spot, southern stem rot, cylindrocladium black rot, or tomato spotted wilt virus. Diclosulam did not affect percentage of extra large kernels, sound mature kernels, other kernels, and yield. Nomenclature: Diclosulam; peanut, Arachis hypogaea L. NC 12C, NC 7, VAC 92R, NC-V 11, NC 10C, AT VC 1, NC 9, N90010E. Additional index words: Disease interaction, cylindrocladium black rot, Cylindrocladium crotalariae (Loos) Bell et Sobers, early leaf spot, Cercospora arachidicola Hori, late leaf spot, Cercosporidium personatum (Berk. et Curt.), southern stem rot, Sclerotium rolfsii Sacc., tomato spotted wilt virus, grade parameters, extra large kernels, sound mature kernels, sound splits, total kernels, other kernels, fancy pods. Abbreviations: CBR, cylindrocladium black rot; DAP, days after planting; ELK, extra large kernels; PPI, preplant incorporated; SMK, sound mature kernels; SS, sound splits; TSMK, total sound mature kernels; TSWV, tomato spotted wilt virus; WAP, weeks after planting.}, number={2}, journal={WEED TECHNOLOGY}, author={Bailey, WA and Wilcut, JW and Spears, JF and Isleib, TG and Langston, VB}, year={2000}, pages={402–405} } @article{wilcut_askew_brecke_bridges_brown_chandler_hayes_kendig_miller_nichols_et al._1999, title={A beltwide evaluation of weed management in transgenic and non-transgenic cotton}, volume={1}, number={1999}, journal={Beltwide Cotton Conferences. Proceedings}, author={Wilcut, J. W. and Askew, S. D. and Brecke, B. J. and Bridges, D. C. and Brown, S. M. and Chandler, J. M. and Hayes, R. M. and Kendig, J. A. and Miller, D. K. and Nichols, R. L. and et al.}, year={1999}, pages={746} } @inbook{wilcut_askew_1999, title={Chemical approaches to weed management}, booktitle={Handbook of pest management}, publisher={New York: Marcel Dekker}, author={Wilcut, J. W. and Askew, S. D.}, year={1999}, pages={627–661} } @article{scott_askew_wilcut_bailey_1999, title={Command 3ME and Roundup Ultra systems for Roundup Ready cotton}, number={1999}, journal={Beltwide Cotton Conferences. Proceedings}, author={Scott, G. H. and Askew, S. D. and Wilcut, J. W. and Bailey, W. A.}, year={1999}, pages={734} } @article{askew_wilcut_bailey_scott_1999, title={Competition and proliferation of four smartweed species in cotton}, volume={1}, number={1999}, journal={Beltwide Cotton Conferences. Proceedings}, author={Askew, S. D. and Wilcut, J. W. and Bailey, W. A. and Scott, G. H.}, year={1999}, pages={753–754} } @article{bailey_wilcut_askew_1999, title={Competition and seed-rain dynamics of velvetleaf in cotton}, number={1999}, journal={Beltwide Cotton Conferences. Proceedings}, author={Bailey, W. A. and Wilcut, J. W. and Askew, S. D.}, year={1999}, pages={753} } @article{askew_wilcut_1999, title={Cost and weed management with herbicide programs in glyphosate-resistant cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)}, volume={13}, ISSN={["0890-037X"]}, DOI={10.1017/s0890037x00041786}, abstractNote={Studies were conducted at Clayton, Goldsboro, and Rocky Mount, NC, to evaluate weed and cotton response to herbicide programs in glyphosate-resistant cotton. Just prior to cotton harvest, programs containing norflurazon, trifluralin, fluometuron, glyphosate, MSMA, cyanazine, and/or pyrithiobac in various combinations controlled common lambsquarters, common ragweed, goosegrass, ivyleaf morningglory, and smooth pigweed at least 94%. Glyphosate-resistant cotton injury was no more than 5%. Yields for glyphosate programs differed only at Clayton, where glyphosate programs containing residual herbicides yielded more than glyphosate alone. Depending on location, programs utilizing glyphosate as needed required a minimum of two and a maximum of four applications to prevent yield loss when minimal soil-applied herbicides were used. Other as-needed programs required one-three glyphosate applications, depending on location. For comparison based on application, herbicide, and adjuvant costs, the standard program of trifluralin preplant incorporated (PPI), pyrithiobac postemergence (POST), and fluometuron plus MSMA postemergence-directed (PD) was $119/ha compared with trifluralin PPI followed by (fb) two applications of glyphosate ($54/ha) or four applications of glyphosate ($94/ha).}, number={2}, journal={WEED TECHNOLOGY}, author={Askew, SD and Wilcut, JW}, year={1999}, pages={308–313} } @article{scott_wilcut_wilkerson_1999, title={Cotton herb: a new decision making tool for weed management in cotton}, volume={1}, number={1999}, journal={Beltwide Cotton Conferences. Proceedings}, author={Scott, G. H. and Wilcut, J. W. and Wilkerson, G. G.}, year={1999}, pages={752–753} } @article{wilcut_richburg_walls_1999, title={Response of johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) and imidazolinone-resistant corn (Zea mays) to AC 263,222}, volume={13}, ISSN={["1550-2740"]}, DOI={10.1017/s0890037x00046078}, abstractNote={Field studies were conducted in 1992 and 1993 to evaluate AC 263,222 applied postemergence (POST) alone and as a mixture with atrazine or bentazon for weed control in imidazolinone-resistant corn. Nicosulfuron alone and nicosulfuron plus atrazine were also evaluated. Herbicide treatments were applied following surface-banded applications of two insecticides, carbofuran or terbufos at planting. Crop sensitivity to POST herbicides, corn yield, and weed control was not affected by insecticide treatments. AC 263,222 at 36 and 72 g ai/ha controlled rhizomatous johnsongrass 88 and 99%, respectively, which was equivalent to nicosulfuron applied alone or with atrazine. AC 263,222 at 72 g/ha controlled large crabgrass 99% and redroot pigweed 100%, and this level of control exceeded that obtained with nicosulfuron alone. AC 263,222 at 72 g/ha controlled sicklepod and morningglory species 99 and 98%, respectively. Nicosulfuron alone or with atrazine controlled these two species less than AC 263,222 at 72 g/ha. Addition of bentazon or atrazine to AC 263,222 did not improve control of any species compared with the higher rate of AC 263,222 at 72 g/ha applied alone. Corn yield increased over the untreated control when POST herbicide(s) were applied, but there were no differences in yield among herbicide treatments.}, number={3}, journal={WEED TECHNOLOGY}, author={Wilcut, JW and Richburg, JS and Walls, FR}, year={1999}, pages={484–488} } @article{bailey_wilcut_jordan_swann_langston_1999, title={Response of peanut (Arachis hypogaea) and selected weeds to diclosulam}, volume={13}, ISSN={["1550-2740"]}, DOI={10.1017/s0890037x00042214}, abstractNote={Field studies were conducted at five locations in North Carolina and Virginia during 1996 and 1997 to evaluate weed control, peanut (Arachis hypogaea) response, and peanut yield following diclosulam applied preplant incorporated (PPI) and in systems with commercial herbicide standards. All plots received a PPI treatment of ethalfluralin at 840 g ai/ha. Ethalfluralin plus diclosulam controlled entireleaf morningglory (Ipomoea hederaceavar.integriuscula), ivyleaf morningglory (I. hederacea), pitted morningglory (I. lacunosa), common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album), eclipta (Eclipta prostrata), and prickly sida (Sida spinosa) as well as and frequently better than ethalfluralin PPI followed by (fb) acifluorfen plus bentazon postemergence (POST), paraquat plus bentazon early postemergence (EPOST) fb imazapic POST, or imazapic POST. Systems with ethalfluralin plus diclosulam PPI at 26 g ai/ha fb acifluorfen plus bentazon POST controlled a broader spectrum of weeds and yielded greater than systems of ethalfluralin PPI fb imazapic POST or ethalfluralin PPI fb acifluorfen plus bentazon POST. Peanut exhibited excellent tolerance to diclosulam PPI at 17, 26, or 35 g/ha.}, number={4}, journal={WEED TECHNOLOGY}, author={Bailey, WA and Wilcut, JW and Jordan, DL and Swann, CW and Langston, VB}, year={1999}, pages={771–776} } @article{askew_wilcut_paulsgrove_1999, title={Weed management in BXN cotton with Command-Reflex-Buctril systems}, volume={1}, number={1999}, journal={Beltwide Cotton Conferences. Proceedings}, author={Askew, S. D. and Wilcut, J. W. and Paulsgrove, M. D.}, year={1999}, pages={741} } @article{paulsgrove_wilcut_1999, title={Weed management in bromoxynil-resistant Gossypium hirsutum}, volume={47}, number={5}, journal={Weed Science}, author={Paulsgrove, M. D. and Wilcut, J. W.}, year={1999}, pages={596–601} } @article{askew_wilcut_bailey_scott_1999, title={Weed management in conventional and no-tillage cotton using BXN, Roundup Ready, and staple OT systems}, number={1999}, journal={Beltwide Cotton Conferences. Proceedings}, author={Askew, S. D. and Wilcut, J. W. and Bailey, W. A. and Scott, G. H.}, year={1999}, pages={743–744} } @article{bailey_wilcut_hayes_1999, title={Weed management in no-till cotton in North Carolina and Tennessee}, volume={1}, number={1999}, journal={Beltwide Cotton Conferences. Proceedings}, author={Bailey, W. A. and Wilcut, J. W. and Hayes, R. M.}, year={1999}, pages={738–739} } @article{bailey_wilcut_jordan_swann_langston_1999, title={Weed management in peanut (Arachis hypogaea) with diclosulam preemergence}, volume={13}, ISSN={["0890-037X"]}, DOI={10.1017/s0890037x00046017}, abstractNote={Field studies were conducted at five locations in North Carolina and Virginia in 1996 and 1997 to evaluate weed control and peanut (Arachis hypogaea) response to diclosulam that was applied preemergence (PRE) and in systems with commercial standards. All plots received a preplant incorporated (PPI) treatment of ethalfluralin at 840 g ai/ha. Diclosulam controlled common lambsquarters (Chenopodium albumL.), eclipta (Eclipta prostrataL.), entireleaf morningglory (Ipomoea hederaceavar.integriusculaGray), ivyleaf morningglory [Ipomoea hederacea(L.) Jacq.], pitted morningglory (Ipomoea lacunosaL.), and prickly sida (Sida spinosaL.) as well as and frequently better than the commercial standards of acifluorfen plus bentazon applied postemergence (POST), paraquat plus bentazon early POST followed by (fb) imazapic POST, or imazapic POST. Systems with ethalfluralin PPI plus diclosulam PRE at 26 g ai/ha fb acifluorfen plus bentazon POST controlled a broader spectrum of weeds and yielded greater than systems of ethalfluralin PPI fb imazapic POST or ethalfluralin PPI fb acifluorfen plus bentazon POST. Peanut exhibited excellent tolerance to diclosulam PRE at 17, 26, or 35 g/ha.}, number={3}, journal={WEED TECHNOLOGY}, author={Bailey, WA and Wilcut, JW and Jordan, DL and Swann, CW and Langston, VB}, year={1999}, pages={450–456} } @article{askew_wilcut_cranmer_1999, title={Weed management in peanut (Arachis hypogaea) with flumioxazin preemergence}, volume={13}, ISSN={["1550-2740"]}, DOI={10.1017/s0890037x0004625x}, abstractNote={Flumioxazin plus metolachlor mixtures preemergence (PRE) were evaluated with or without postemergence (POST) herbicides for weed control and peanut (Arachis hypogaea) response in three North Carolina studies. Metolachlor PRE at 2.24 kg ai/ha controlled goosegrass (Eleusine indica) and yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus) 93 and 80%, respectively, and control was not improved with flumioxazin or norflurazon. Metolachlor plus flumioxazin PRE at 0.07 or 0.11 kg ai/ha controlled common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album); entireleaf (Ipomoea hederaceavar.integriuscula), ivyleaf (I. hederacea), and pitted morningglory (I. lacunosa); and prickly sida (Sida spinosa) better than metolachlor plus norflurazon PRE at 1.34 kg ai/ha. Morningglories (Ipomoeaspp.) were controlled 77 and 86% with flumioxazin PRE at 0.07 and 0.11 kg/ha, respectively, and control was increased to nearly 100% with acifluorfen plus 2,4-DB or lactofen plus 2,4-DB POST. Peanut injury by flumioxazin and norflurazon was observed at one location in 1997; however, yields were not reduced. Peanut treated with metolachlor plus flumioxazin PRE at either rate yielded at least 3,750 kg/ha compared to 3,120 kg/ha with metolachlor plus norflurazon PRE or 1,320 kg/ha with metolachlor PRE.}, number={3}, journal={WEED TECHNOLOGY}, author={Askew, SD and Wilcut, JW and Cranmer, JR}, year={1999}, pages={594–598} } @article{askew_wilcut_langston_1999, title={Weed management in soybean (Glycine max) with preplant-incorporated herbicides and cloransulam-methyl}, volume={13}, ISSN={["0890-037X"]}, DOI={10.1017/s0890037x00041737}, abstractNote={Cloransulam-methyl applied postemergence (POST) following various preplant-incorporated (PPI) herbicides was evaluated in four experiments for weed control in North Carolina soybean over a 2-yr period at three locations. Acifluorfen plus bentazon or chlorimuron alone applied POST injured soybean more than cloransulam-methyl when following any soil-applied herbicide. When following trifluralin PPI, cloransulam-methyl controlled common ragweed, entireleaf morningglory, and pitted morningglory comparable to acifluorfen plus bentazon or chlorimuron. Common lambsquarters and prickly sida control was higher when acifluorfen plus bentazon was applied POST following trifluralin PPI compared to trifluralin PPI followed by cloransulam-methyl or chlorimuron. Acifluorfen plus bentazon or chlorimuron POST controlled yellow nutsedge and smooth pigweed more than cloransulam-methyl POST when following trifluralin PPI. When trifluralin was applied PPI in mixtures with chlorimuron plus metribuzin, flumetsulam, or imazaquin, control of most species was similar regardless of POST treatment used. Soybean treated with cloransulam-methyl yielded 250 kg/ha more than treatments with chlorimuron when these herbicides followed trifluralin plus flumetsulam or trifluralin plus imazaquin. Net returns with different herbicide systems followed trends similar to soybean yield.}, number={2}, journal={WEED TECHNOLOGY}, author={Askew, SD and Wilcut, JW and Langston, VB}, year={1999}, pages={276–282} } @article{wilcut_askew_scott_bailey_1999, title={Weed management in strip-tillage Roundup Ready cotton}, number={1999}, journal={Beltwide Cotton Conferences. Proceedings}, author={Wilcut, J. W. and Askew, S. D. and Scott, G. H. and Bailey, W. A.}, year={1999}, pages={734} } @article{wilcut_brecke_bridges_chandler_hayes_nichols_snipes_1998, title={A beltwide perspective on new weed management technologies in cotton}, volume={1}, number={1998}, journal={Beltwide Cotton Conferences. Proceedings}, author={Wilcut, J. W. and Brecke, B. J. and Bridges, D. C. and Chandler, J. M. and Hayes, R. and Nichols, R. L. and Snipes, C. E.}, year={1998}, pages={846–847} } @article{wilcut_snipes_nichols_hayes_chandler_bridges_brecke_1998, title={A regional evaluation of new technologies for weed management in conventional-tillage cotton}, volume={51}, number={1998}, journal={Proceedings, Southern Weed Science Society}, author={Wilcut, J. W. and Snipes, C. E. and Nichols, R. L. and Hayes, R. M. and Chandler, M. and Bridges, D. C. and Brecke, B. J.}, year={1998}, pages={52–53} } @article{gimenez_york_wilcut_batts_1998, title={Annual grass control by glyphosate plus bentazon, chlorimuron, fomesafen, or imazethapyr mixtures}, volume={12}, ISSN={["0890-037X"]}, DOI={10.1017/s0890037x0004269x}, abstractNote={The isopropylamine salt of glyphosate at 420, 560, and 840 g ae/ha applied alone or mixed with the sodium salt of bentazon at 840 g ai/ha, chlorimuron at 9 g ai/ha, the sodium salt of fomesafen at 350 g ai/ha, or the ammonium salt of imazethapyr at 70 g ae/ha was evaluated for control of large crabgrass and broadleaf signalgrass. Neither grass was controlled by bentazon, fomesafen, or chlorimuron. Imazethapyr controlled large crabgrass and broadleaf signalgrass 30 and 72%, respectively, 3 weeks after treatment (WAT). Glyphosate at all rates controlled both grasses 100%. Control 3 WAT was unaffected by mixing bentazon, chlorimuron, fomesafen, or imazethapyr with glyphosate. Broadleaf signalgrass control 1 WAT was reduced 4 to 15% by mixing bentazon with glyphosate.}, number={1}, journal={WEED TECHNOLOGY}, author={Gimenez, AE and York, AC and Wilcut, JW and Batts, RB}, year={1998}, pages={134–136} } @article{paulsgrove_wilcut_hinton_collins_1998, title={Buctril and MSMA combinations for sicklepod (Senna obtusifolia) management in BXN cotton}, volume={1}, number={1998}, journal={Beltwide Cotton Conferences. Proceedings}, author={Paulsgrove, M. D. and Wilcut, J. W. and Hinton, J. D. and Collins, J. R.}, year={1998}, pages={854–855} } @article{paulsgrove_wilcut_hinton_1998, title={Buctril and MSMA combinations for sicklepod management in BXN cotton}, volume={51}, number={1998}, journal={Proceedings, Southern Weed Science Society}, author={Paulsgrove, M. D. and Wilcut, J. W. and Hinton, J. D.}, year={1998}, pages={27–28} } @article{askew_bailey_wilcut_hinton_1998, title={Command 3ME and roundup systems for weed control in roundup ready cotton}, volume={1}, number={1998}, journal={Beltwide Cotton Conferences. Proceedings}, author={Askew, S. D. and Bailey, W. A. and Wilcut, J.W. and Hinton, J. D.}, year={1998}, pages={860} } @article{bailey_wilcut_jordan_askew_hinton_langston_1998, title={Evaluation of Strongarm (DE 564, diclosulam) for weed control in southeastern peanuts}, volume={51}, number={1998}, journal={Proceedings, Southern Weed Science Society}, author={Bailey, W. A. and Wilcut, J. W. and Jordan, D. L. and Askew, S. D. and Hinton, J. D. and Langston, V. B.}, year={1998}, pages={59} } @article{askew_bailey_wilcut_cranmer_1998, title={Flumioxazin systems for weed management in North Carolina peanuts}, volume={51}, number={1998}, journal={Proceedings, Southern Weed Science Society}, author={Askew, S. D. and Bailey, W. A. and Wilcut, J.W. and Cranmer, J.}, year={1998}, pages={60} } @article{burleson_wilcut_keyes_askew_bailey_1998, title={Influence of moisture stress and temperature on sicklepod germination}, volume={51}, number={1998}, journal={Proceedings, Southern Weed Science Society}, author={Burleson, A. W. and Wilcut, J. W. and Keyes, B. and Askew, S. D. and Bailey, W. A.}, year={1998}, pages={254–255} } @article{wilcut_1998, title={Influence of pyrithiobac sodium on purple (Cyperus rotundus) and yellow nutsedge (C-esculentus)}, volume={46}, number={1}, journal={Weed Science}, author={Wilcut, J. W.}, year={1998}, pages={111–115} } @article{wilcut_hayes_askew_1998, title={New weed management programs for weed control in no-till cotton}, volume={1}, number={1998}, journal={Beltwide Cotton Conferences. Proceedings}, author={Wilcut, J. W. and Hayes, R. and Askew, S. D.}, year={1998}, pages={865} } @article{wilcut_bridges_mclean_1998, title={Nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus) management in continuous cotton with zorial-based systems}, volume={1}, number={1998}, journal={Beltwide Cotton Conferences. Proceedings}, author={Wilcut, J. W. and Bridges, D. C. and McLean, H. S.}, year={1998}, pages={872–873} } @article{bailey_askew_wilcut_hinton_1998, title={Roundup Ready systems for weed control in North Carolina}, volume={1}, number={1998}, journal={Beltwide Cotton Conferences. Proceedings}, author={Bailey, W. A. and Askew, S. D. and Wilcut, J. W. and Hinton, J. D.}, year={1998}, pages={862–863} } @article{bailey_askew_wilcut_1998, title={Velvetleaf interference and seed-rain dynamics in cotton}, volume={51}, number={1998}, journal={Proceedings, Southern Weed Science Society}, author={Bailey, W. A. and Askew, S. D. and Wilcut, J. W.}, year={1998}, pages={266–267} } @article{askew_bailey_wilcut_hinton_1998, title={Weed control in cotton with different tillage systems and herbicide resistances}, volume={1}, number={1998}, journal={Beltwide Cotton Conferences. Proceedings}, author={Askew, S. D. and Bailey, W. A. and Wilcut, J.W. and Hinton, J. D.}, year={1998}, pages={866} } @article{wilcut_askew_bailey_cranmer_1998, title={Weed management in North Carolina peanut with flumioxazin}, volume={51}, number={1998}, journal={Proceedings, Southern Weed Science Society}, author={Wilcut, J. W. and Askew, S. D. and Bailey, W. A. and Cranmer, J.}, year={1998}, pages={56–57} } @article{askew_bailey_wilcut_langston_1998, title={Weed management in soybean with combinations of PPI herbicides and cloransulam-methyl post}, volume={51}, number={1998}, journal={Proceedings, Southern Weed Science Society}, author={Askew, S. D. and Bailey, W. A. and Wilcut, J.W. and Langston, V. B.}, year={1998}, pages={274} } @article{paulsgrove_wilcut_askew_collins_hinton_1998, title={Weed management with buctril and staple mixtures in BXN cotton}, volume={51}, number={1998}, journal={Proceedings, Southern Weed Science Society}, author={Paulsgrove, M. D. and Wilcut, J. W. and Askew, S. D. and Collins, J. R. and Hinton, J. D.}, year={1998}, pages={264–265} } @article{webster_wilcut_coble_1997, title={Influence of AC 263,222 rate and application method on weed management in peanut (Arachis hypogaea)}, volume={11}, ISSN={["0890-037X"]}, DOI={10.1017/s0890037x00045358}, abstractNote={Experiments were conducted in 1991 and 1992 to evaluate the weed control effectiveness from several rates of AC 263,222 applied PPI and PRE (36 and 72 g ai/ha), early POST (EPOST) (18, 36, 54, or 72 g/ha), POST (18, 36, 54, or 72 g/ha), and EPOST followed by (fb) POST (27 fb 27 g/ha or 36 fb 36 g/ha). These treatments were compared to the commercial standard of bentazon at 0.28 kg ai/ha plus paraquat at 0.14 kg ai/ha EPOST fb bentazon at 0.56 kg/ha plus paraquat at 0.14 kg/ha plus 2,4-DB at 0.28 kg ae/ha. Application method had little effect on weed control with AC 263,222. In contrast, application rate affected control. Purple nutsedge, yellow nutsedge, prickly sida, smallflower morningglory, bristly starbur, common cocklebur, and coffee senna were controlled at least 82% with AC 263,222 at 36 g/ha (one-half the maximum registered use rate) regardless of application method. AC 263,222 at 72 g/ha (registered use rate) controlled sicklepod 84 to 93%, Florida beggarweed 65 to 100%, andIpomoeamorningglory species 89 to 99%. A single application of AC 263,222 at 36 g/ha or more controlled all weeds (with the exception of Florida beggarweed) as well or greater than sequential applications of bentazon plus paraquat fb bentazon, paraquat, and 2,4-DB. All rates of AC 263,222 applied POST and all application methods of AC 263,222 at 72 g/ha had better yields than the pendimethalin control.}, number={3}, journal={WEED TECHNOLOGY}, author={Webster, TM and Wilcut, JW and Coble, HD}, year={1997}, pages={520–526} } @article{wilcut_jordan_vencill_richburg_1997, title={Weed management in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) with soil-applied and post-directed herbicides}, volume={11}, ISSN={["0890-037X"]}, DOI={10.1017/s0890037x00042871}, abstractNote={Broadleaf weed and yellow nutsedge control with herbicide programs containing pendimethalin and combinations of fomesafen, fluometuron, and norflurazon applied alone or with POST-directed applications of MSMA or fluometuron plus MSMA was evaluated. Soil-applied herbicide combinations containing fomesafen controlled yellow nutsedge better than combinations of norflurazon and fluometuron but did not provide better entireleaf, ivyleaf, pitted, and tall morningglory or sicklepod control. Fluometuron plus MSMA controlled morningglories and sicklepod more effectively than MSMA. Seed cotton yield was greater in one of two years when fomesafen was applied and was associated with better yellow nutsedge control.}, number={2}, journal={WEED TECHNOLOGY}, author={Wilcut, JW and Jordan, DL and Vencill, WK and Richburg, JS}, year={1997}, pages={221–226} }