@article{harwood_2020, title={Freedom and Unavoidable Judgments A Commentary on "Nondomination and the Limits of Relational Autonomy" by Danielle M. Wenner}, volume={13}, ISSN={["1937-4577"]}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.3138/ijfab.13.2.07}, DOI={10.3138/ijfab.13.2.07}, number={2}, journal={INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FEMINIST APPROACHES TO BIOETHICS}, author={Harwood, Karey}, year={2020}, month={Aug}, pages={56–59} }
 @article{harwood_2020, title={Which "New Eugenics"? Expanding Access to Art, Respecting Procreative Liberty, and Protecting the Moral Equality of All Persons in an Era of Neoliberal Choice}, volume={13}, ISSN={["1937-4577"]}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.3138/ijfab.13.2.17}, DOI={10.3138/ijfab.13.2.17}, abstractNote={In The New Eugenics: Selective Breeding in an Era of Reproductive Technologies, Judith Daar (2017) advocates for increased access to assisted reproductive technologies (ART) and minimizes concerns about the potential “eugenic logic” of some procreative choices. Although Daar’s goal of expanded access is laudable, her argument suggests an unresolved tension between the moral equality of persons and individual reproductive freedom. Exploring that tension, this paper argues that efforts to expand access to ART must still grapple with the “eugenic mentality” of quality control that some forms of reproductive and genetic technologies enable.}, number={2}, journal={INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FEMINIST APPROACHES TO BIOETHICS}, author={Harwood, Karey}, year={2020}, month={Aug}, pages={148–173} }
 @inbook{harwood_2018, place={Cham, Switzerland}, title={Decentering Whiteness in Feminist Bioethics: Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ART) as an Illustrative Case}, ISBN={9783319894287 9783319894294}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89429-4_8}, DOI={10.1007/978-3-319-89429-4_8}, booktitle={Reproductive Ethics II}, publisher={Springer International Publishing}, author={Harwood, Karey A.}, editor={Campo-Engelstein, L. and Burcher, P.Editors}, year={2018}, pages={99–112} }
 @inbook{harwood_2017, place={Cham, Switzerland}, title={Egg Freezing and the Feminist Quest for Equality in the Workplace}, ISBN={9783319526294 9783319526300}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52630-0_5}, DOI={10.1007/978-3-319-52630-0_5}, booktitle={Reproductive Ethics}, publisher={Springer International Publishing}, author={Harwood, Karey}, editor={Campo-Engelstein, L. and Burcher, P.Editors}, year={2017}, pages={63–75} }
 @article{on the ethics of social egg freezing and fertility preservation for nonmedical reasons_2015, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/mb.s66444}, DOI={10.2147/mb.s66444}, abstractNote={: The practice of egg freezing reached a new milestone in 2012, when the American Society for Reproductive Medicine removed its designation as “experimental”. Studies of the safety and efficacy of egg freezing led the ASRM to recommend egg freezing for patients facing infertility due to gonadotoxic therapies, but prompted continued caution against egg freezing when undertaken for nonmedical reasons. The European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology has more explicitly supported nonmedical egg freezing. Ethical debate about nonmedical egg freezing raises many familiar issues, including the limits of individual autonomy when a medical technology is used for an elective reason. Concerns include commercial exploitation, pressure on women to use egg freezing, and the overall impact of egg freezing on sex inequality and professional norms. The ethical debate also calls for a more careful consideration of whether age-related fertility decline should count as a medical justification for fertility preservation. In lieu of broad consensus on these matters, this paper recommends honoring the principle of autonomy while insisting on better information about utilization and outcomes. Given the significant drop-off in success rates for women who attempt egg freezing when they are older than 38 years, full disclosure in the informed consent process must involve information about success rates by age-group. Much greater consistency and thoroughness in reporting would yield better and more generalizable data.}, journal={Medicolegal and Bioethics}, year={2015}, month={Aug} }
 @article{harwood_2014, title={Bad habit or considered decision? The need for a closer examination of prospective parents’ views}, volume={7}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.3138/ijfab.7.1.46}, DOI={10.3138/ijfab.7.1.46}, number={1}, journal={IJFAB: International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics}, author={Harwood, Karey}, year={2014}, month={Mar}, pages={46–50} }
 @misc{what are the limits of "parental choice" when the state is paying for it?_2014, journal={NC Policy Watch}, year={2014}, month={Jun} }
 @article{harwood_2009, title={EGG FREEZING: A BREAKTHROUGH FOR REPRODUCTIVE AUTONOMY?}, volume={23}, ISSN={["0269-9702"]}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00680.x}, DOI={10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00680.x}, abstractNote={ABSTRACT}, number={1}, journal={BIOETHICS}, author={Harwood, Karey}, year={2009}, month={Jan}, pages={39–46} }
 @article{harwood_2008, title={Jewish ethics and the care of end-of-life patients: A collection of rabbinical, bioethical, philosophical, and juristic opinions}, volume={28}, DOI={10.5840/jsce200828135}, number={1}, journal={Journal of the Society of Christian Ethics}, author={Harwood, Karey}, year={2008}, pages={239–243} }
 @book{the infertility treadmill_2007, journal={The University of North Carolina Press}, year={2007} }
 @book{harwood_2007, title={The infertility treadmill: Feminist ethics, personal choice, and the use of reproductive technologies}, ISBN={9780807831571}, publisher={Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press}, author={Harwood, K.}, year={2007} }
 @article{teaching bioethics through participation and policy-making_2004, url={https://podnetwork.org}, journal={Essays on Teaching Excellence: Toward the Best in the Academy}, year={2004} }
 @article{harwood_2004, title={Teaching bioethics through participation and policy-making}, volume={16}, number={4}, journal={Essays on Teaching Excellence}, author={Harwood, K.}, year={2004} }