Khara Grieger

Benchmarks for urine volume generation and phosphorus mass recovery in commercial and institutional buildings

WATER RESEARCH X, 23.

Effective Nutrient Management of Surface Waters in the United States Requires Expanded Water Quality Monitoring in Agriculturally Intensive Areas

Oates, C., Fajardo, H., Grieger, K., Obenour, D., Muenich, R. L., & Nelson, N. G. (2024, November 28). ACS ENVIRONMENTAL AU, Vol. 11.

Environmental impacts of selected metal cations for phosphorus capture in natural waters: A synthesis

Chemosphere.

Positioning nanotechnology to address climate change

Environment Systems and Decisions.

Researchers must address regulatory regimes to scale up adoption of urine diversion systems in the US

Merck, A., Grieger, K., Crane, L., & Boyer, T. (2024, June 1). ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH: INFRASTRUCTURE AND SUSTAINABILITY, Vol. 4.

Stakeholder Views of Science and Technologies for Phosphorus Sustainability: A Comparative Analysis of Three Case Studies in Phosphorus Recovery in the US

Merck, A. W., Deaver, J. A., Crane, L., Morrison, E. S., Call, D. F., Boyer, T. H., … Grieger, K. (2024, August 13). SOCIETY & NATURAL RESOURCES, Vol. 8.

Towards realizing nano-enabled precision delivery in plants

Lowry, G. V., Giraldo, J. P., Steinmetz, N. F., Avellan, A., Demirer, G. S., Ristroph, K. D., … White, J. C. (2024, June 6). NATURE NANOTECHNOLOGY, Vol. 6.

Creating an alternative future for Earth’s phosphorus cycle in the Anthropocene via eco-prospecting, eco-mining, and eco-refining

In Treatise on Geochemistry.

Ensuring Sustainable Novel Plant Biotechnologies Requires Formalized Research and Assessment Programs

Grieger, K., & Kuzma, J. (2023, October 19). ACS AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, Vol. 3, pp. 970–972.

Guide to Understanding and Addressing PFAS in our Communities

https://content.ces.ncsu.edu/Guide-to-Understanding-and-Addressing-PFAS-in-our-communities

Identifying sustainability assessment parameters for genetically engineered agrifoods

Wei, W., Grieger, K., Cummings, C. L., Loschin, N., & Kuzma, J. (2023, July 22). PLANTS PEOPLE PLANET, Vol. 7.

Let’s Talk About Risk: A Guide to Identifying, Assessing, Managing, and Communicating Risk

NC State Extension Publication.

Phosphorus sustainability through coordinated stakeholder engagement: a perspective

Environment Systems and Decisions, 2.

Phytoextraction of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) by weeds: Effect of PFAS physicochemical properties and plant physiological traits

Journal of Hazardous Materials, 454, 131492.

Reflections on COP15

https://research.ncsu.edu/ges/2023/01/blog-reflections-on-cop15/

Using a Phosphorus Flow Diagram as a Boundary Object to Inform Stakeholder Engagement

SUSTAINABILITY, 15(15).

Views of RNAi approaches for weed management in turfgrass systems

Ethridge, S. R., Grieger, K., Locke, A. M., Everman, W. J., Jordan, D. L., & Leon, R. G. (2023, July 10). WEED SCIENCE, Vol. 7.

What are stakeholder views and needs for achieving phosphorus sustainability?

Environment Systems and Decisions.

Assessing the impacts of urbanization on stream ecosystem functioning through investigating litter decomposition and nutrient uptake in a forest and a hyper-eutrophic urban stream

Ecological Indicators, 138, 108859.

Bioaccumulation and Translocation of 6:2 Fluorotelomer Sulfonate, GenX, and Perfluoroalkyl Acids by Urban Spontaneous Plants

ACS ES&T Engineering, 2(7), 1169–1178.

Development and application of screening-level risk analysis for emerging materials

Sustainable Materials and Technologies, 35, e00524.

Eliciting Stakeholder Perceptions Using a Novel Online Engagement Platform: A Case Study on Nano-Agrifoods

Environmental Risk Assessment of Emerging Contaminants—The Case of Nanomaterials

In L. H. Guo & M. Mortimer (Eds.), Advances in Toxicology and Risk Assessment of Nanomaterials and Emerging Contaminants (pp. 349–371).

Formulating best practices for responsible innovation of nano-agrifoods through stakeholder insights and reflection

Journal of Responsible Technology, 10, 100030.

Fostering Responsible Innovation through Stakeholder Engagement: Case Study of North Carolina Sweetpotato Stakeholders

Sustainability, 14(4), 2274.

Gene Drives in Agriculture: Workshop on Risk Assessment and Research Prioritization

In Gene Drives in Agriculture: Workshop on Risk Assessment and Research Prioritization. Workshop Report [Workshop report].

How can we promote the responsible innovation of nano-agrifood research?

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 137, 185–190.

Informing environmental health and risk priorities through local outreach and extension

Environment Systems and Decisions, 42(3), 388–401.

Let’s Work Together in Addressing Environmental and Societal Issues - Guide to Engaging Stakeholders and Communities

https://content.ces.ncsu.edu/lets-work-together-in-addressing-environmental-and-societal-issues-guide-to-engaging-stakeholders

STEPS to Tackle Our Phosphorus Paradox

Grieger, K. (2022, August 11).

Society for Risk Analysis Strategic Initiative Funding: Final Report

Society for Risk Analysis.

Stakeholder Engagement in Risk Sciences

Society for Risk Analysis.

What Role Does Regulation Play in Responsible Innovation of Nanotechnology in Food and Agriculture? Insights and Framings from U.S. Stakeholders

Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 42(3), 85–103.

(Broken) Promises of Sustainable Food and Agriculture through New Biotechnologies: The CRISPR Case

CRISPR JOURNAL, 4(1), 25–31.

5 Risk screening tools for engineered nanomaterials

In Ethics in Nanotechnology (pp. 89–108).

Barriers to responsible innovation of nanotechnology applications in food and agriculture: A study of US experts and developers

NANOIMPACT, 23.

Influence of natural organic matter and pH on phosphate removal by and filterable lanthanum release from lanthanum-modified bentonite

Water Research, 202, 117399.

Responsible Innovation Definitions, Practices, and Motivations from Nanotechnology Researchers in Food and Agriculture

NanoEthics, 15(3), 229–243.

Responsible innovation of nano-agrifoods: Insights and views from U.S. stakeholders

NanoImpact, 24, 100365.

Accessing Legacy Phosphorus in Soils

Soil Systems, 4(4), 74.

Community-led governance for gene-edited crops A post-market certification process could promote transparency and trust

Kuzma, J., & Grieger, K. (2020, November 20). SCIENCE, Vol. 370, pp. 916–918.

Complete list of requirements for a nano-specific risk governance framework

[Deliverable]. caLIBRAte European project, Horizon 2020 research and innovation program.

Effect of microplastics on ecosystem functioning: Microbial nitrogen removal mediated by benthic invertebrates

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 754.

Emerging lanthanum (III)-containing materials for phosphate removal from water: A review towards future developments

[Review of ]. ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL, 145.

Nanomaterials: Regulation and Risk Assessment

In Managing Human and Social Systems (2nd ed.). Boca Raton: CRC Press.

Pandemics Call for Systems Approaches to Research and Funding

Issues in Science and Technology. https://issues.org/pandemics-call-for-systems-approaches/

Transitioning Machine Learning from Theory to Practice in Natural Resources Management

Saia, S., Nelson, N., Huseth, A., Grieger, K., & Reich, B. (2022, January 31). (Vol. 1). Vol. 1.

Transitioning Machine Learning from Theory to Practice in Natural Resources Management

Ecological Modelling, 435, 109257.

Best practices from nano-risk analysis relevant for other emerging technologies

Nature Nanotechnology, 14(11), 998–1001.

Biological interactions between nanomaterials and placental development and function following oral exposure

REPRODUCTIVE TOXICOLOGY, 90, 150–165.

Emerging risk governance for stratospheric aerosol injection as a climate management technology

Environment Systems and Decisions, 39(4), 371–382.

From risk perception to risk governance in nanotechnology: a multi-stakeholder study

Porcari, A., Borsella, E., Benighaus, C., Grieger, K., Isigonis, P., Chakravarty, S., … Jensen, K. A. (2019, November). JOURNAL OF NANOPARTICLE RESEARCH, Vol. 21.

Lessons Learned for Risk Governance of Synthetic Biology, Nanomaterials, and Other Emerging Technologies in a Post-2020 World

https://research.ncsu.edu/ges/2019/12/lessons-learned-risk-governance-synbio-nano-post2020-world/

Risk Governance of Nanomaterials: Review of Criteria and Tools for Risk Communication, Evaluation, and Mitigation

Nanomaterials, 9(5), 696.

Sustainable Environmental Remediation Using NZVI by Managing Benefit-Risk Trade-Offs

In T. Phenrat & G. V. Lowry (Eds.), Nanoscale Zerovalent Iron Particles for Environmental Restoration (pp. 511–562).

Application and testing of risk screening tools for nanomaterial risk analysis

Environmental Science: Nano, 5(8), 1844–1858.

Decision Analysis Support for Implementing a Risk-Informed Decision-Making System in the FDA Foods and Veterinary Medicine Program: Final Report

U.S. Food and Drug Administration.

A framework for One Health research

One Health, 3, 44–50.

Comprehensive analysis of available tools and methodologies for Horizon Scanning

[Deliverable]. caLIBRAte research project.

Develop and Validate Risk Ranking Model v3 to Inform RRM-PT List

United States Food and Drug Administration.

The Use of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis in Food Safety Risk-Benefit Assessment

Food Protection Trends, 37(2), 132–139.

Deliverable: Evaluate Options to Aggregate Risk Scores in RRM-PT

[Deliverable report]. United States Food and Drug Administration.

Identify, Collect Data, and Perform Expert Elicitation for New Food-Hazard Pairs involving Human Food

[Deliverable report]. United States Food and Drug Administration.

International Implications of Labeling Foods Containing Engineered Nanomaterials

Journal of Food Protection, 79(5), 830–842.

Prioritizing research needs for analytical techniques suited for engineered nanomaterials in food

Trends in Food Science & Technology, 50, 219–229.

Review Public Comments and Provide Recommendations Relevant for Animal Feed/Pet Food in RRM-PT

[Deliverable report]. United States Food and Drug Administration.

The role of alternative testing strategies in environmental risk assessment of engineered nanomaterials

Environmental Science: Nano, 4(2), 292–301.

Applying comprehensive environmental assessment to research planning for multiwalled carbon nanotubes: Refinements to inform future stakeholder engagement

Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 12(1), 96–108.

Emerging Technologies for Environmental Remediation: Integrating Data and Judgment

Environmental Science & Technology, 50(1), 349–358.

Nano-remediation: tiny particles cleaning up big environmental problems

http://cmsdata.iucn.org/downloads/nanoremediation.pdf

Risk Assessment, Life Cycle Assessment, and Decision Methods for Nanomaterials

In S. K. Brar, T. C. Zhang, M. Verma, R. Y. Surampalli, & R. D. Tyagi (Eds.), Nanomaterials in the Environment (pp. 383–419).

Safe Handling of Engineered Nanomaterials: Turning Knowledge Into Practice

Update and Validate Risk Ranking Model to Inform High Risk Foods List: High-Risk Foods (HRF) Model

United States Food and Drug Administration.

A relative ranking approach for nano-enabled applications to improve risk-based decision making: a case study of Army materiel

Environment Systems and Decisions, 35(1), 42–53.

Data dialogues: critical connections for designing and implementing future nanomaterial research

Environment Systems and Decisions, 35(1), 76–87.

Investigating the invisible: Biodiversity, Ecosystems, Science

A web-based tool to engage stakeholders in informing research planning for future decisions on emerging materials

Science of The Total Environment, 470-471, 660–668.

Benefit-risk trade-offs in retrospect: how major stakeholders perceive the decision-making process in the Barents Sea oil field development

Journal of Risk Research, 16(9), 1163–1185.

Development of a Risk Ranking Tool for the Determination of High Risk Foods among FDA-regulated Products

United States Food and Drug Administration.

Finding the Key to Responsible Nanomaterial Development

EHS Today. http://ehstoday.com/training/finding-key-responsible-nanomaterial-development?page=1.

Identifying army materiel incorporating engineered nanomaterials and associated health risks

U.S. Army Center for Environmental Health Research.

Implement and Evaluate the High Risk Foods (HRF) Model: For Recordkeeping and Product Tracing

United States Food and Drug Administration.

Modeling Approaches for Characterizing and Evaluating Environmental Exposure to Engineered Nanomaterials in Support of Risk-Based Decision Making

Environmental Science & Technology, 47(3), 1190–1205.

Nanomaterials: Regulation and Risk Assessment

In S. E. Jorgensen (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Environmental Management: Vol. III (pp. 1722–1732). New York: Taylor & Francis.

Nanoparticles: Uncertainty Risk Analysis

In Encyclopedia of Environmental Management: Vol. III (pp. 1742–1751). New York: Taylor & Francis.

Analysis of current research addressing complementary use of life-cycle assessment and risk assessment for engineered nanomaterials: have lessons been learned from previous experience with chemicals?

Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 14(7).

Improving Risk Governance of Emerging Technologies through Public Engagement: The Neglected Case of Nano- Remediation?

International Journal of Emerging Technologies and Society, 10(1), 61–78.

Nanomaterial Case Study Workshop Process: Identifying and Prioritizing Research for Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes

[Deliverable report]. United States Environmental Protection Agency.

Operationalization and application of “early warning signs” to screen nanomaterials for harmful properties

Environ. Sci.: Processes Impacts, 15(1), 190–203.

Assessing the Potential Risks of Nano-Materials – Emerging Tools for Emerging Risks

European Safety and Reliability Association Newsletter, September, 4–5. https://esra.website/fileadmin/files/newsletter/ESRA_Newsletter_2011_09.pdf

Conceptual modeling for identification of worst case conditions in environmental risk assessment of nanomaterials using nZVI and C60 as case studies

Science of The Total Environment, 409(19), 4109–4124.

Environmental risk analysis for nanomaterials: Review and evaluation of frameworks

Nanotoxicology, 6(2), 196–212.

Modeling the Perception of Emerging Risks. Deliverable for iNTeg-Risk: Early Recognition, Monitoring and Integrated Management of Emerging, New Technology Related, Risks

Occupational safety assessment. Deliverable for PlasmaNice: Plasmas for Nanoscale Industrial Surface Processing

Uncertainty handling (unknown phenomena). Deliverable for iNTeg-Risk: Early Recognition, Monitoring and Integrated Management of Emerging, New Technology Related, Risks.

Understanding and assessing potential environmental risks of nanomaterials: Emerging tools for emerging risks - a PhD project

Miljø Og Sundhed, 17(1), 43–46.

DTU Environment Green Account Report 2009

[DTU Environment Green Account Report 2009.]. Department of Environmental Engineering, Technical University of Denmark.

Environmental benefits and risks of zero-valent iron nanoparticles (nZVI) for in situ remediation: Risk mitigation or trade-off?

Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 118(3-4), 165–183.

Nature and Nanotechnology: Science, Ideology and Policy

International Journal of Emerging Technologies and Society, 8(1), 5–23.

Risikable nanomaterialer?- øget anvendelse af nanomaterialer sætter nye krav til riskovurdering

Aktuel Naturvidenskab, 3, 30–32.

Understanding and assessing environmental risks of nanomaterials: Emerging tools for emerging risks

(PhD thesis,). Technical University of Denmark.

Adopting eco-innovation in Danish polymer industry working with nanotechnology: Drivers, barriers and future strategies

Nanotechnology Law & Business, 6(3), 416–440.

Conscious worst case definition for risk assessment, part I

Science of The Total Environment, 408(18), 3852–3859.

DTU Environment Green Account Report 2008

Denmark: Technical University of Denmark, Kongens Lyngby.

Human Health Risks of Engineered Nanomaterials

Limitations of current regulation of nanomaterials

In M. Craye (Ed.), Governance of Nanotechnologies : Learning from Past Experiences with Risks and Innovative Technologies (pp. 54–58).

Limitations of current risk assessment of nanomaterials and uncertainty analysis related to nanomaterials

In M. Craye (Ed.), Governance of Nanotechnologies : Learning from Past Experiences with Risks and Innovative Technologies (pp. 45–54).

Redefining risk research priorities for nanomaterials

Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 12(2), 383–392.

Risikovurdering i nano-dimensioner: Øget anvendelse af nanomaterialer sætter nye krav til riskovurdering

Dansk Kemi, 90(3), 14–16.

Setting the limits for engineered nanoparticles in European surface waters – are current approaches appropriate?

Journal of Environmental Monitoring, 11(10), 1774.

Strategic Approaches for the Management of Environmental Risk Uncertainties Posed by Nanomaterials

The known unknowns of nanomaterials: Describing and characterizing uncertainty within environmental, health and safety risks

Nanotoxicology, 3(3), 222–233.

Ecotoxicity of engineered nanoparticles to aquatic invertebrates: a brief review and recommendations for future toxicity testing

Ecotoxicology, 17(5), 387–395.

Pesticide regulations in drinking water versus other beverages: A case of an unjustified discrepancy

(MSc thesis,). Department of Environmental Engineering, Technical University of Denmark.

Spatial and temporal patterns in the spread of Austrian pine in four Lake Michigan sand dune habitats: Final report, including brochures, pamphlets, and public information booklets

[Final report, including brochures,]. State of Michigan, Department of Natural Resources.

Spatial and temporal patterns of Pinus nigra (Austrian pine) spread in four Lake Michigan sand dune habitats

(Master's thesis). Michigan State University.