@book{laura linker_2011, title={Dangerous women, libertine epicures, and the rise of sensibility, 1670-1730}, publisher={Farnham ;|aBurlington, VT: Ashgate}, author={Laura Linker}, year={2011} } @article{linker_2008, title={Mother and daughter: Augusta Webster and the maternal production of art}, volume={44}, number={1}, journal={Papers on Language and Literature}, author={Linker, L.}, year={2008}, pages={52–66} } @article{linker_2007, title={"Th'unhappy poet's breast": Resisting violation in Anne Finch's 'To the Nightingale'}, volume={88}, ISSN={["1744-4217"]}, DOI={10.1080/00138380601154967}, abstractNote={From its earliest classical appearance, the nightingale has intrigued poets, who have not always regarded it as a violated figure, but often as a melancholy one. While literary representations of the nightingale alternated in various ways, this figure increasingly became associated with the raped Philomel, whose transformation into a nightingale in Book Six of Ovid’s The Metamorphoses provides one of the earliest and most famous examples of the nightingale’s victimization in literary history. Nevertheless, Charles Hinnant reminds readers that the nightingale in poetry appears most often as a figure of poetic song, particularly in early modern lyrics that precede Anne Finch’s 1713 poem, ‘‘To the Nightingale’’. Finch’s lyric not only features the nightingale as a musical figure, but also as a victimized one. It functions as a symbol Finch employs specifically to allegorize women’s positions as writers, who, like the nightingale, suffer from the ‘‘poets that have speech’’ (line 30). Nightingale poems prior to Finch’s typically feature a contest between an artist figure and the nightingale, with the outcome traditionally resulting both in the triumph of the artist over the nightingale, or of art over nature, and in the nightingale’s death. This contest, which Pliny first describes as one between two competing nightingales, with the loser dying of exhaustion, results, in the poetic tradition prior to Finch’s poems, both in the triumph of the male poet over the female nightingale and in the nightingale’s death. Sir Philip Sydney, John Milton, Philip Ayres, and Richard Crashaw, among other early modern lyricists, present versions of the contest in their poems, with Crashaw’s version in ‘‘Musicks Duell’’ (1648) implicitly recalling the Ovidian rape narrative in a violent way that parallels the nightingale’s treatment in Finch’s poem. As both Messenger and Hinnant have observed, Crashaw’s earlier version of the nightingale in ‘‘Musicks Duell’’ appears}, number={2}, journal={ENGLISH STUDIES}, author={Linker, Laura Alexander}, year={2007}, month={Apr}, pages={166–176} } @article{linker_2007, title={Goblins of desire: Carew's libertine women in 'A Rapture' (Thomas Carew)}, volume={69}, number={3}, journal={CEA Critic}, author={Linker, L. A.}, year={2007}, pages={1–12} } @article{alexander_2006, title={Breathings of the heart: Reading sensibility in Pope's "Eloisa to Abelard"}, volume={3}, number={1}, journal={XVIII, New Perspectives on the Eighteenth Century}, author={Alexander, L.}, year={2006}, pages={32–45} } @article{linker_2006, title={Imagining Adam's dream: Keats's Chamber of maiden thought in the Eve of St. Agnes}, volume={34}, journal={Miscela?nea: A Journal of English and American Studies}, author={Linker, L. A.}, year={2006}, pages={11–29} } @inbook{alexander_2006, title={Suffering the muse: Charlotte Smith's interior other}, ISBN={0739116517}, booktitle={Auto-poetica: Representations of the creative process in nineteenth-century British and American fiction}, publisher={Lanham, MD: Lexington Books}, author={Alexander, L.}, year={2006}, pages={93–99} } @article{alexander_2005, title={Senecan stoicism and Shakespeare's Richard III}, volume={14}, number={1}, journal={Ege I?ngiliz ve Amerikan Incelemeleri Dergisi}, author={Alexander, L.}, year={2005}, pages={27–48} } @article{linker_johnson_stimac_poe_1984, title={ANALYSIS OF SAMPLING PROCEDURES FOR CORN-EARWORM AND FALL ARMYWORM (LEPIDOPTERA, NOCTUIDAE) IN PEANUTS}, volume={13}, ISSN={["0046-225X"]}, DOI={10.1093/ee/13.1.75}, abstractNote={Relative-density estimates from two insect-sampling devices (sweep-net and shake cloth) were compared with absolute-density estimates for three size classes of the corn earworm, Heliothis zea (Boddie) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), and the fall armyworm, Spodaptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), in peanuts. Linear regression analysis indicated that medium and large larvae of corn earworm and all size classes of fall armyworm were consistently recovered by both devices (r2 ≥ 0.80). Small corn earworm estimates were poor for both devices (r2 ≤ 0.38).}, number={1}, journal={ENVIRONMENTAL ENTOMOLOGY}, author={LINKER, HM and JOHNSON, FA and STIMAC, JL and POE, SL}, year={1984}, pages={75–78} }