@inproceedings{ivanco_ford_burn_ethridge_jacobson_jones_herrmann_2024, title={A Scenario-Based Approach to Assess Continuity Gaps in Earth Observations}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/aero58975.2024.10521017}, DOI={10.1109/aero58975.2024.10521017}, abstractNote={Decision analysis processes outlined in systems engineering references, such as the Systems Engineering Body of Knowledge [1] or the NASA Systems Engineering Handbook [2], recommend following a series of steps to support decision-making for engineering applications. These steps are consistent across the literature and typically involve defining objectives, defining relevant criteria against which candidate alternatives can be assessed, selecting an evaluation method, assessing alternatives, and making a recommendation based on this assessment. These approaches are well-suited to assess systems for which sets of common objectives and constraints can be identified. A vast body of literature describes their application to numerous engineering problems, and many methods have been developed since the middle of the 20th century to support the assessment of candidate alternatives for such systems [3], [4], [5], [6]. These approaches, however, show some limitations when decisions pertain to systems of systems. These collections of individual systems typically do not share a common set of objectives and constraints, tend to be highly complex, and the definition of assessable, high-value candidate alternatives poses a challenge due to interdependencies.The formulation, development, operation, and funding of Earth observing missions are such that gaps may occur between missions, therefore impacting the continuity of measurements. These Earth observing mission architectures constitute systems of systems for which a common set of objectives and constraints can be challenging to define. When tasked with assessing gaps that may occur for a series of spaceborne missions that address similar science parameters, the authors therefore proposed to depart from the traditional objective- and criteria-based approach and instead adopted a scenario-based approach. This approach does not require a prioritized set of common objectives; rather, it assesses the impact of possible decisions on the system-of-systems and characterizes its possible future states. It also offers the flexibility to adjust assumptions, update inputs, and refine supporting models over time, while enabling the rapid, early identification of challenges and key decision points. By simulating the impact of potential decisions on the entirety of the system-of-systems, the approach enables the synchronization of multiple decisions that typically occur at the level of the individual system.This paper provides an overview of the approach that was developed to assess continuity gaps for a series of operational and planned spaceborne Earth observing missions, a description of its application to the problem at hand, and a discussion of currently known limitations.}, booktitle={2024 IEEE Aerospace Conference}, author={Ivanco, Marie and Ford, Elizabeth and Burn, Katharine and Ethridge, Bailey and Jacobson, Lindsey and Jones, Christopher and Herrmann, Nicole}, year={2024}, month={Mar} }
 @article{jacobson_ferguson_2023, title={A HIERARCHICAL EXPLORATION OF HOW DESIGN MARGINS ENABLE ADAPTABILITY}, volume={3}, ISSN={2732-527X}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/pds.2023.20}, DOI={10.1017/pds.2023.20}, abstractNote={Abstract}, journal={Proceedings of the Design Society}, publisher={Cambridge University Press (CUP)}, author={Jacobson, Lindsey and Ferguson, Scott}, year={2023}, month={Jun}, pages={191–200} }
 @inproceedings{jacobson_ferguson_2023, title={Improving Change Management by Quantifying the Relationships Between Margins and Design Variable Flexibility}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/detc2023-115312}, DOI={10.1115/detc2023-115312}, abstractNote={Abstract}, booktitle={Volume 3B: 49th Design Automation Conference (DAC)}, author={Jacobson, Lindsey and Ferguson, Scott}, year={2023}, month={Aug} }
 @misc{jacobson_ferguson_2022, title={Requirements Mapping of a High-Powered Rocket System to Explain Solution Similarities Across Generations}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/detc2022-91348}, DOI={10.1115/detc2022-91348}, abstractNote={Abstract}, journal={Volume 3B: 48th Design Automation Conference (DAC)}, publisher={American Society of Mechanical Engineers}, author={Jacobson, Lindsey and Ferguson, Scott}, year={2022}, month={Aug} }
 @inproceedings{jacobson_ferguson_2021, title={Lessons Learned About Product Redesign for Evolvability Using Reflective Entries}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/detc2021-71913}, DOI={10.1115/detc2021-71913}, abstractNote={Abstract}, booktitle={Volume 3B: 47th Design Automation Conference (DAC)}, publisher={American Society of Mechanical Engineers}, author={Jacobson, Lindsey and Ferguson, Scott}, year={2021}, month={Aug} }