@article{pirhalla_heist_perry_tang_brouwer_2021, title={Simulations of dispersion through an irregular urban building array}, volume={258}, ISSN={["1873-2844"]}, DOI={10.1016/j.atmosenv.2021.118500}, abstractNote={Following the release of a harmful substance within an urban environment, buildings and street canyons create complex flow regimes that affect dispersion and localized effluent concentrations. While some fast-response dispersion models can capture the effects caused by individual buildings, further research is required to refine urban characterizations such as plume channeling and spreading, and initial dispersion, especially within the presence of a nonhomogeneous array of structures. Field, laboratory, and modeling experiments that simulate urban or industrial releases are critical in advancing current dispersion models. This project leverages the configuration of buildings used in a full-scale, mock urban field study to examine the concentrations of a neutrally buoyant tracer in a series of wind tunnel and Embedded Large Eddy Simulation (ELES) experiments. The behavior, propagation, and magnitude of the plumes were examined and compared to identify microscale effects. After demonstrating excellent quantitative and qualitative comparisons between the wind tunnel and ELES via lateral and vertical concentration profiles, we show that a nonlinear least squares fit of the Gaussian plume equation well represents these profiles, even within the array of buildings and network of street canyons. The initial plume dispersion depended strongly on the structures immediately adjacent to the release, and consequently, the near-surface plume spread very rapidly in the first few street canyons downwind of the source. The ELES modeling showed that under slightly oblique incoming wind directions of 5° and 15°, an additional 5° and 14° off-axis channeling of the plume occurred at ground level, respectively. This indicates how building structures can cause considerable plume drift from the otherwise expected centerline axis, especially with greater wind obliquity. Additionally, AERMOD was used to represent the class of fast-running, Gaussian dispersion models to inform where these types of models may be usefully applied within urban areas or groups of buildings. Using an urban wind speed profile and other parameters that may be locally available after a release, AERMOD was shown to qualitatively represent the ground-level plume while somewhat underestimating peak concentrations. It also overestimated the lateral plume spread and was challenged in the very near-field to the source. Adding a turbulence profile from the ELES data into AERMOD's meteorological input improved model estimates of lateral plume spread and centerline concentrations, although peak concentration values were still underestimated in the far field. Finally, we offer some observations and suggestions for Gaussian dispersion modeling based on this mock urban modeling exercise.}, journal={ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT}, author={Pirhalla, Michael and Heist, David and Perry, Steven and Tang, Wei and Brouwer, Lydia}, year={2021}, month={Aug} } @article{pirhalla_heist_perry_hanna_mazzola_arya_aneja_2020, title={Urban wind field analysis from the Jack Rabbit II Special Sonic Anemometer Study}, volume={243}, ISSN={["1873-2844"]}, url={http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-85089852577&partnerID=MN8TOARS}, DOI={10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117871}, abstractNote={The Jack Rabbit II Special Sonic Anemometer Study (JRII-S), a field project designed to examine the flow and turbulence within a systematically arranged mock-urban environment constructed from CONEX shipping containers, is described in detail. The study involved the deployment of 35 sonic anemometers at multiple heights and locations, including a 32 m tall, unobstructed tower located about 115 m outside the building array to document the approach wind flow characteristics. The purpose of this work was to describe the experimental design, analyze the sonic data, and report observed wind flow patterns within the urban canopy in comparison to the approaching boundary layer flow. We show that the flow within the building array follows a tendency towards one of three generalized flow regimes displaying channeling over a wide range of wind speeds, directions, and stabilities. Two or more sonic anemometers positioned only a few meters apart can have vastly different flow patterns that are dictated by the building structures. Within the building array, turbulence values represented by normalized vertical velocity variance ( σw2 ) are at least two to three times greater than that in the approach flow. There is also little evidence that σw2 measured at various heights or locations within the JRII array is a strong function of stability type in contrast to the approach flow. The results reinforce how urban areas create complicated wind patterns, channeling effects, and localized turbulence that can impact the dispersion of an effluent release. These findings can be used to inform the development of improved wind flow algorithms to better characterize pollutant dispersion in fast-response models.}, journal={ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT}, author={Pirhalla, Michael and Heist, David and Perry, Steven and Hanna, Steven and Mazzola, Thomas and Arya, S. Pal and Aneja, Viney}, year={2020}, month={Dec} } @article{yahya_wang_campbell_chen_glotfelty_he_pirhalla_zhang_2017, title={Decadal application of WRF/Chem for regional air quality and climate modeling over the US under the representative concentration pathways scenarios. Part 1: Model evaluation and impact of downscaling}, volume={152}, ISSN={["1873-2844"]}, DOI={10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.12.029}, abstractNote={An advanced online-coupled meteorology-chemistry model, i.e., the Weather Research and Forecasting Model with Chemistry (WRF/Chem), is applied for current (2001–2010) and future (2046–2055) decades under the representative concentration pathways (RCP) 4.5 and 8.5 scenarios to examine changes in future climate, air quality, and their interactions. In this Part I paper, a comprehensive model evaluation is carried out for current decade to assess the performance of WRF/Chem and WRF under both scenarios and the benefits of downscaling the North Carolina State University's (NCSU) version of the Community Earth System Model (CESM_NCSU) using WRF/Chem. The evaluation of WRF/Chem shows an overall good performance for most meteorological and chemical variables on a decadal scale. Temperature at 2-m is overpredicted by WRF (by ∼0.2–0.3 °C) but underpredicted by WRF/Chem (by ∼0.3–0.4 °C), due to higher radiation from WRF. Both WRF and WRF/Chem show large overpredictions for precipitation, indicating limitations in their microphysics or convective parameterizations. WRF/Chem with prognostic chemical concentrations, however, performs much better than WRF with prescribed chemical concentrations for radiation variables, illustrating the benefit of predicting gases and aerosols and representing their feedbacks into meteorology in WRF/Chem. WRF/Chem performs much better than CESM_NCSU for most surface meteorological variables and O3 hourly mixing ratios. In addition, WRF/Chem better captures observed temporal and spatial variations than CESM_NCSU. CESM_NCSU performance for radiation variables is comparable to or better than WRF/Chem performance because of the model tuning in CESM_NCSU that is routinely made in global models.}, journal={ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT}, author={Yahya, Khairunnisa and Wang, Kai and Campbell, Patrick and Chen, Ying and Glotfelty, Timothy and He, Jian and Pirhalla, Michael and Zhang, Yang}, year={2017}, month={Mar}, pages={562–583} }