@article{isleib_milla-lewis_pattee_copeland_zuleta_shew_hollowell_sanders_dean_hendrix_et al._2015, title={Registration of ‘Sugg’ peanut}, volume={9}, ISSN={["1940-3496"]}, DOI={10.3198/jpr2013.09.0059crc}, abstractNote={‘Sugg’ (Reg. No. CV-125, PI 666112) is a large-seeded virginia-type peanut (Arachis hypogaea L. subsp. hypogaea var. hypogaea) cultivar with partial resistance to four diseases that occur commonly in the Virginia–Carolina production area: early leafspot caused by Cercospora arachidicola S. Hori, Cylindrocladium black rot caused by Cylindrocladium parasiticum Crous, Wingfield & Alfenas, Sclerotinia blight caused by Sclerotinia minor Jagger, and tomato spotted wilt caused by the Tomato spotted wilt tospovirus. Sugg was developed as part of a program of selection for multiple disease resistance funded by growers, seed dealers, shellers, and processors. Sugg was tested under the experimental designation N03091T and released by the North Carolina Agricultural Research Service (NCARS) in 2009. Sugg was tested by the NCARS, the Virginia Agricultural Experiment Station, and five other state agricultural experiment stations and the USDA–ARS units participating in the Uniform Peanut Performance Tests. Sugg has alternate branching pattern, intermediate runner growth habit, medium green foliage, and high contents of fancy pods and medium virginia-type seeds. It has seeds with pink testa averaging 957 mg seed−1, approximately 40% jumbo and 46% fancy pods, and extra-large kernel content of ∼47%. Sugg is named in honor of Norfleet “Fleet” Sugg and the late Joseph “Joe” Sugg, cousins who served consecutively as executive directors of the North Carolina Peanut Growers Association from 1966 through 1993.}, number={1}, journal={J. Plant Reg.}, publisher={American Society of Agronomy}, author={Isleib, T.G. and Milla-Lewis, S.R. and Pattee, H.E. and Copeland, S.C. and Zuleta, M.C. and Shew, B.B. and Hollowell, J.E. and Sanders, T.H. and Dean, L.O. and Hendrix, K.W. and et al.}, year={2015}, pages={44–52} }
 @article{isleib_milla-lewis_pattee_copeland_zuleta_shew_hollowell_sanders_dean_hendrix_et al._2010, title={Registration of ‘Bailey’ peanut}, volume={5}, ISSN={["1940-3496"]}, DOI={10.3198/jpr2009.12.0742crc}, abstractNote={‘Bailey’ (Reg. No. CV-111, PI 659502) is a large-seeded virginia-type peanut (Arachis hypogaea L. subsp. hypogaea var. hypogaea) with partial resistance to five diseases that occur commonly in the Virginia-Carolina production area: early leaf spot (caused by Cercospora arachidicola Hori), late leaf spot [caused by Cercosporidium personatum (Berk. & M.A. Curtis) Deighton], Cylindrocladium black rot [caused by Cylindrocladium parasiticum Crous, M.J. Wingf. & Alfenas], Sclerotinia blight (caused by Sclerotinia minor Jagger), and tomato spotted wilt (caused by Tomato spotted wilt tospovirus). It also has partial resistance to southern stem rot (caused by Sclerotium rolfsii Sacc.). Bailey was developed as part of a program of selection for multiple-disease resistance funded by growers, seedsmen, shellers, and processors. Bailey was tested under the experimental designation N03081T and was released by the North Carolina Agricultural Research Service (NCARS) in 2008. Bailey was tested by the NCARS, the Virginia Agricultural Experimental Station, and five other state agricultural experiment stations and the USDA-ARS units participating in the Uniform Peanut Performance Tests. Bailey has an alternate branching pattern, an intermediate runner growth habit, medium green foliage, and high contents of fancy pods and medium virginia-type seeds. It has approximately 34% jumbo and 46% fancy pods, seeds with tan testas and an average weight of 823 mg seed−1, and an extra large kernel content of approximately 42%. Bailey is named in honor of the late Dr. Jack E. Bailey, formerly the peanut breeding project's collaborating plant pathologist.}, number={1}, journal={J. Plant Reg.}, publisher={American Society of Agronomy}, author={Isleib, T.G. and Milla-Lewis, S.R. and Pattee, H.E. and Copeland, S.C. and Zuleta, M.C. and Shew, B.B. and Hollowell, J.E. and Sanders, T.H. and Dean, L.O. and Hendrix, K.W. and et al.}, year={2010}, pages={27–39} }
 @article{isleib_pattee_sanders_hendrix_dean_2006, title={Compositional and sensory comparisons between normal- and high-oleic peanuts}, volume={54}, ISSN={["1520-5118"]}, DOI={10.1021/jf052353t}, abstractNote={The high-oleic-acid trait improves the oxidative stability of peanuts (Arachis hypogaea L.) and their products. The explicit effect of the trait on sensory quality, particularly on off-flavors associated with oil rancidity, has not been well documented. To assess the effect of the trait on off-flavors, data from two independent databases were analyzed to compare sensory quality and composition in normal- versus high-oleic peanut genotypes. In data collected using a sensory panel in the Department of Food Science at North Carolina State University, there were small differences between near-isogenic lines for intensities of the roasted peanut, astringent, over-roast, and nutty attributes, with the high-oleic lines exhibiting slightly greater intensities of those attributes. There were no differences for off-flavors such as fruity, painty, stale, moldy, or petroleum. In data collected from the multistate Uniform Peanut Performance Test and evaluated by a panel in the USDA-ARS Market Quality and Handling Research Unit (MQHRU) at Raleigh, NC, there were differences in chemical composition associated with the high-oleic trait, including differences in oil content, tocopherols, and carbohydrates in addition to the expected differences in fatty acid contents. There were small decreases in the intensities of the sensory attributes cardboard and painty associated with the high-oleic trait in the MQHRU data when all high-oleic lines were compared with all normal-oleic lines. Comparison of the near-isogenic pair NC 7 and N00090ol showed differences in oil and glucose contents, but not in sensory attributes. The high-oleic trait does not appear to have a major impact on sensory quality on average, although there were individual instances in which the trait was associated with shifts in sensory attribute intensities that may be perceptible to consumers. Keywords: Arachis hypogaea L.; flavor; fatty acids; chemical composition}, number={5}, journal={JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY}, author={Isleib, TG and Pattee, HE and Sanders, TH and Hendrix, KW and Dean, LO}, year={2006}, month={Mar}, pages={1759–1763} }
 @article{isleib_rice_mozingo_copeland_graeber_novitzky_pattee_sanders_mozingo_coker_2006, title={Registration of 'Brantley' peanut}, volume={46}, ISSN={["0011-183X"]}, DOI={10.2135/cropsci2005.12.0492}, abstractNote={Crop ScienceVolume 46, Issue 5 p. 2309-2311 Registrations of Cultivars Registration of ‘Brantley’ Peanut T.G. Isleib, Corresponding Author T.G. Isleib tom_isleib@ncsu.edu Dep. of Crop Science, North Carolina State Univ., Box 7629, Raleigh, NC, 27695-7629Corresponding author (tom_isleib@ncsu.edu)Search for more papers by this authorP.W. Rice, P.W. Rice Dep. of Crop Science, North Carolina State Univ., Box 7629, Raleigh, NC, 27695-7629Search for more papers by this authorR.W. Mozingo II, R.W. Mozingo II Dep. of Crop Science, North Carolina State Univ., Box 7629, Raleigh, NC, 27695-7629Search for more papers by this authorS.C. Copeland, S.C. Copeland Dep. of Crop Science, North Carolina State Univ., Box 7629, Raleigh, NC, 27695-7629Search for more papers by this authorJ.B. Graeber, J.B. Graeber Dep. of Crop Science, North Carolina State Univ., Box 7629, Raleigh, NC, 27695-7629Search for more papers by this authorW.P. Novitzky, W.P. Novitzky USDA-ARS Soybean and Biological Nitrogen Fixation Group, 3127 Ligon St., Raleigh, NC, 27607Search for more papers by this authorH.E. Pattee, H.E. Pattee Dep. of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, North Carolina State Univ., Box 7625, Raleigh, NC, 27695-7625Search for more papers by this authorT.H. Sanders, T.H. Sanders USDA-ARS Market Quality and Handling Research Unit, North Carolina State Univ., Box 7624, Raleigh, NC, 27695-7624Search for more papers by this authorR.W. Mozingo, R.W. Mozingo Dep. of Soil and Environ. Sciences, Tidewater Agric. Res. Ext. Center, 6321 Holland Rd., Suffolk, VA, 23437Search for more papers by this authorD.L. Coker, D.L. Coker Dep. of Soil and Environ. Sciences, Tidewater Agric. Res. Ext. Center, 6321 Holland Rd., Suffolk, VA, 23437Search for more papers by this author T.G. Isleib, Corresponding Author T.G. Isleib tom_isleib@ncsu.edu Dep. of Crop Science, North Carolina State Univ., Box 7629, Raleigh, NC, 27695-7629Corresponding author (tom_isleib@ncsu.edu)Search for more papers by this authorP.W. Rice, P.W. Rice Dep. of Crop Science, North Carolina State Univ., Box 7629, Raleigh, NC, 27695-7629Search for more papers by this authorR.W. Mozingo II, R.W. Mozingo II Dep. of Crop Science, North Carolina State Univ., Box 7629, Raleigh, NC, 27695-7629Search for more papers by this authorS.C. Copeland, S.C. Copeland Dep. of Crop Science, North Carolina State Univ., Box 7629, Raleigh, NC, 27695-7629Search for more papers by this authorJ.B. Graeber, J.B. Graeber Dep. of Crop Science, North Carolina State Univ., Box 7629, Raleigh, NC, 27695-7629Search for more papers by this authorW.P. Novitzky, W.P. Novitzky USDA-ARS Soybean and Biological Nitrogen Fixation Group, 3127 Ligon St., Raleigh, NC, 27607Search for more papers by this authorH.E. Pattee, H.E. Pattee Dep. of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, North Carolina State Univ., Box 7625, Raleigh, NC, 27695-7625Search for more papers by this authorT.H. Sanders, T.H. Sanders USDA-ARS Market Quality and Handling Research Unit, North Carolina State Univ., Box 7624, Raleigh, NC, 27695-7624Search for more papers by this authorR.W. Mozingo, R.W. Mozingo Dep. of Soil and Environ. Sciences, Tidewater Agric. Res. Ext. Center, 6321 Holland Rd., Suffolk, VA, 23437Search for more papers by this authorD.L. Coker, D.L. Coker Dep. of Soil and Environ. Sciences, Tidewater Agric. Res. Ext. Center, 6321 Holland Rd., Suffolk, VA, 23437Search for more papers by this author First published: 01 September 2006 https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2005.12.0492Citations: 18 Partial support for the development of Brantley was provided by the N.C. Peanut Growers' Association, Inc., the N.C. Crop Improvement Association, and the N.C. Foundation Seed Producers, Inc. Registration by CSSA. Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditWechat No abstract is available for this article.Citing Literature Volume46, Issue5September–October 2006Pages 2309-2311 RelatedInformation}, number={5}, journal={CROP SCIENCE}, author={Isleib, T. G. and Rice, P. W. and Mozingo, R. W., II and Copeland, S. C. and Graeber, J. B. and Novitzky, W. P. and Pattee, H. E. and Sanders, T. H. and Mozingo, R. W. and Coker, D. L.}, year={2006}, pages={2309–2311} }
 @article{isleib_rice_mozingo_copeland_graeber_pattee_sanders_mozingo_coker_2006, title={Registration of 'Phillips' peanut}, volume={46}, ISSN={["0011-183X"]}, DOI={10.2135/cropsci2005.12.0491}, abstractNote={Crop ScienceVolume 46, Issue 5 p. 2308-2309 Registrations of Cultivars Registration of ‘Phillips’ Peanut T.G. Isleib, Corresponding Author T.G. Isleib tom_isleib@ncsu.edu Dep. of Crop Science, N.C. State Univ., Box 7629, Raleigh, NC, 27695-7629Corresponding author (tom_isleib@ncsu.edu)Search for more papers by this authorP.W. Rice, P.W. Rice Dep. of Crop Science, N.C. State Univ., Box 7629, Raleigh, NC, 27695-7629Search for more papers by this authorR.W. Mozingo II, R.W. Mozingo II Dep. of Crop Science, N.C. State Univ., Box 7629, Raleigh, NC, 27695-7629Search for more papers by this authorS.C. Copeland, S.C. Copeland Dep. of Crop Science, N.C. State Univ., Box 7629, Raleigh, NC, 27695-7629Search for more papers by this authorJ.B. Graeber, J.B. Graeber Dep. of Crop Science, N.C. State Univ., Box 7629, Raleigh, NC, 27695-7629Search for more papers by this authorH.E. Pattee, H.E. Pattee Dep. of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, N.C. State Univ., Box 7625, Raleigh, NC, 27695-7625Search for more papers by this authorT.H. Sanders, T.H. Sanders USDA-ARS Market Quality and Handling Research Unit, N.C. State Univ., Box 7624, Raleigh, NC, 27695-7624Search for more papers by this authorR.W. Mozingo, R.W. Mozingo Dep. of Soil and Environ. Sciences, Tidewater Agric. Res. Ext. Center, 6321 Holland Rd., Suffolk, VA, 23437Search for more papers by this authorD.L. Coker, D.L. Coker Dep. of Soil and Environ. Sciences, Tidewater Agric. Res. Ext. Center, 6321 Holland Rd., Suffolk, VA, 23437Search for more papers by this author T.G. Isleib, Corresponding Author T.G. Isleib tom_isleib@ncsu.edu Dep. of Crop Science, N.C. State Univ., Box 7629, Raleigh, NC, 27695-7629Corresponding author (tom_isleib@ncsu.edu)Search for more papers by this authorP.W. Rice, P.W. Rice Dep. of Crop Science, N.C. State Univ., Box 7629, Raleigh, NC, 27695-7629Search for more papers by this authorR.W. Mozingo II, R.W. Mozingo II Dep. of Crop Science, N.C. State Univ., Box 7629, Raleigh, NC, 27695-7629Search for more papers by this authorS.C. Copeland, S.C. Copeland Dep. of Crop Science, N.C. State Univ., Box 7629, Raleigh, NC, 27695-7629Search for more papers by this authorJ.B. Graeber, J.B. Graeber Dep. of Crop Science, N.C. State Univ., Box 7629, Raleigh, NC, 27695-7629Search for more papers by this authorH.E. Pattee, H.E. Pattee Dep. of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, N.C. State Univ., Box 7625, Raleigh, NC, 27695-7625Search for more papers by this authorT.H. Sanders, T.H. Sanders USDA-ARS Market Quality and Handling Research Unit, N.C. State Univ., Box 7624, Raleigh, NC, 27695-7624Search for more papers by this authorR.W. Mozingo, R.W. Mozingo Dep. of Soil and Environ. Sciences, Tidewater Agric. Res. Ext. Center, 6321 Holland Rd., Suffolk, VA, 23437Search for more papers by this authorD.L. Coker, D.L. Coker Dep. of Soil and Environ. Sciences, Tidewater Agric. Res. Ext. Center, 6321 Holland Rd., Suffolk, VA, 23437Search for more papers by this author First published: 01 September 2006 https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2005.12.0491Citations: 25 Partial support for the development of Phillips was provided by the N.C. Peanut Growers' Association, Inc., the N.C. Crop Improvement Association, and the N.C. Foundation Seed Producers, Inc. Registration by CSSA. Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditWechat No abstract is available for this article.Citing Literature Volume46, Issue5September–October 2006Pages 2308-2309 RelatedInformation}, number={5}, journal={CROP SCIENCE}, author={Isleib, T. G. and Rice, P. W. and Mozingo, R. W., II and Copeland, S. C. and Graeber, J. B. and Pattee, H. E. and Sanders, T. H. and Mozingo, R. W. and Coker, D. L.}, year={2006}, pages={2308–2309} }
 @article{young_pattee_schadel_sanders_2004, title={Microstructure of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L. cv. 'NC 7') cotyledons during development}, volume={37}, ISSN={["0023-6438"]}, DOI={10.1016/j.lwt.2003.10.016}, abstractNote={Peanut pods (Arachis hypogaea L. cv. ‘NC 7’) were sampled on a single harvest date. The fresh pods were opened, and the seeds were divided into four developmental categories: (1) very immature; (2) immature; (3) mature; and (4) very mature; according to interior pericarp surfaces, testa color and textural characteristics, and seed size and shape. Seeds for each developmental stage were processed for SEM and TEM evaluations of cotyledonary cells. The primary factors, namely, cell size and type of storage substances synthesized, which contributed to the differences occurring in the microstructure of cotyledonary cells at the selected developmental stages prior to and during maturation are described.}, number={4}, journal={LEBENSMITTEL-WISSENSCHAFT UND-TECHNOLOGIE-FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY}, author={Young, CT and Pattee, HE and Schadel, WE and Sanders, TH}, year={2004}, pages={439–445} }
 @article{isleib_pattee_giesbrecht_2004, title={Oil, sugar, and starch characteristics in peanut breeding lines selected for low and high oil content and their combining ability}, volume={52}, ISSN={["1520-5118"]}, DOI={10.1021/jf035465y}, abstractNote={Peanut seeds contain approximately 50% oil on a dry weight basis, making them a high fat food. Reduction of the oil content would make peanuts a more desirable food to fat conscious consumers. Removal of existing oil by processing is not feasible for in-shell peanuts, the dominant product of the North Carolina-Virginia area. To reduce oil content in in-shell peanuts, a genetic solution must be found. However, while reduced oil content is a desirable objective, changes in oil must not be accompanied by significant decreases in any of the desirable aspects of peanut flavor. Because the impact of selection for low or high oil on flavor is not known, it would be useful to know in what form dry matter is being stored in the seed, particularly if it is not being stored as oil. Screening of 584 accessions identified two lines (PI 269723 and PI 315608) with high and two (Robusto 2 and Robusto 3) with low oil contents, each pair differing in sugar content. The four parents were crossed in diallel fashion to investigate patterns of inheritance. General combining abilities (GCA) for oil content closely followed values of the parental lines. One low oil parent (Robusto 2) had a correspondingly elevated GCA for sugar content, but neither low oil parent had the effect of elevating starch in progeny. Reciprocal cross differences were found for starch and sugar contents, suggesting influences of cytoplasmic genes on those traits. These lines serve as resource material for researchers interested in the genetic and physiological aspects of the oil-sugar-starch relationship in peanuts.}, number={10}, journal={JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY}, author={Isleib, TG and Pattee, HE and Giesbrecht, FG}, year={2004}, month={May}, pages={3165–3168} }
 @article{young_schadel_pattee_sanders_2004, title={The microstructure of almond (Prunus dulcis (Mill.) D.A. Webb cv. 'Nonpareil') cotyledon}, volume={37}, ISSN={["0023-6438"]}, DOI={10.1016/j.lwt.2003.09.007}, abstractNote={Microstructure of almond (Prunus dulcis (Mill.) D.A. Webb cv. ‘Nonpareil’) cotyledon was observed with light, scanning and transmission electron microscopy. The objective of this study was to characterise almond cotyledon surfaces as well as to describe internal and subcellular organisation. The testa has an outer epidermis, which consists of relatively large thin-walled cells, which range from 100 to 300 μm in width. The major portion of the testa consists of approximately 14–20 layers of flattened parenchymal cells with the total thickness of the layers ranging from 80 to 120 μm. The remainder of the testa was comprised of a small amount of vascular tissue. The embryo consisted primarily of parenchymal tissue with relatively thin cell walls (1–3 μm in thickness) and a small amount of provascular tissue. Protein bodies up to 12 μm in width and spaces once occupied by lipid bodies up to 3 μm in width were present in all cells of the embryo.}, number={3}, journal={LEBENSMITTEL-WISSENSCHAFT UND-TECHNOLOGIE-FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY}, author={Young, CT and Schadel, WE and Pattee, HE and Sanders, TH}, year={2004}, pages={317–322} }
 @article{isleib_rice_mozingo_bailey_mozingo_pattee_2003, title={Registration of 'Perry' peanut}, volume={43}, ISSN={["0011-183X"]}, DOI={10.2135/cropsci2003.0739}, abstractNote={Crop ScienceVolume 43, Issue 2 p. 739-740 Registrations of Cultivar Registration of ‘Perry’ Peanut T.G. Isleib, Corresponding Author T.G. Isleib [email protected] Dep. of Crop Science, Box 7629, N.C. State Univ., Raleigh, NC, 27695-7629Corresponding author ([email protected])Search for more papers by this authorP.W. Rice, P.W. Rice Dep. of Crop Science, Box 7629, N.C. State Univ., Raleigh, NC, 27695-7629Search for more papers by this authorR.W. Mozingo, R.W. Mozingo Dep. of Crop Science, Box 7629, N.C. State Univ., Raleigh, NC, 27695-7629 Dep. of Soil and Environ. Sciences, Tidewater Agric. Res. Ext. Center, 6321 Holland Rd., Suffolk, VA, 23437Search for more papers by this authorJ.E. Bailey, J.E. Bailey Dep. of Plant Pathology, Box 7616, N.C. State Univ., Raleigh, NC, 27695-7616Search for more papers by this authorR.W. Mozingo, R.W. Mozingo Dep. of Crop Science, Box 7629, N.C. State Univ., Raleigh, NC, 27695-7629 Dep. of Soil and Environ. Sciences, Tidewater Agric. Res. Ext. Center, 6321 Holland Rd., Suffolk, VA, 23437Search for more papers by this authorH.E. Pattee, H.E. Pattee USDA-ARS, Box 7625, N.C. State Univ., Raleigh, NC, 27695-7625Search for more papers by this author T.G. Isleib, Corresponding Author T.G. Isleib [email protected] Dep. of Crop Science, Box 7629, N.C. State Univ., Raleigh, NC, 27695-7629Corresponding author ([email protected])Search for more papers by this authorP.W. Rice, P.W. Rice Dep. of Crop Science, Box 7629, N.C. State Univ., Raleigh, NC, 27695-7629Search for more papers by this authorR.W. Mozingo, R.W. Mozingo Dep. of Crop Science, Box 7629, N.C. State Univ., Raleigh, NC, 27695-7629 Dep. of Soil and Environ. Sciences, Tidewater Agric. Res. Ext. Center, 6321 Holland Rd., Suffolk, VA, 23437Search for more papers by this authorJ.E. Bailey, J.E. Bailey Dep. of Plant Pathology, Box 7616, N.C. State Univ., Raleigh, NC, 27695-7616Search for more papers by this authorR.W. Mozingo, R.W. Mozingo Dep. of Crop Science, Box 7629, N.C. State Univ., Raleigh, NC, 27695-7629 Dep. of Soil and Environ. Sciences, Tidewater Agric. Res. Ext. Center, 6321 Holland Rd., Suffolk, VA, 23437Search for more papers by this authorH.E. Pattee, H.E. Pattee USDA-ARS, Box 7625, N.C. State Univ., Raleigh, NC, 27695-7625Search for more papers by this author First published: 01 March 2003 https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2003.7390Citations: 14 Partial support for the development of NC 12C was provided by the N.C. Peanut Growers' Association, Inc., the N.C. Crop Improvement Association, the N.C. Foundation Seed Producers, Inc., and the USAID Peanut Collaborative Research Support Program. Registration by CSSA. Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL References Beute M.K., Registration of NC 3033 peanut germplasm (Reg. No. GP 9). :. Crop Sci. (1976) 16, 887http://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1976.0011183X001600060046x Carver W.A., Registration of Florigiant peanuts (Reg. No. 1). Crop Sci. (1969) 9, 849– 850 http://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1969.0011183X000900060067x, Coffelt T.A., Registration of ‘VA 93B’ peanut. :. Crop Sci. (1994) 34, 1126http://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1994.0011183X003400040060x, Gregory W.C., Registration of NC 2 peanuts (Reg. No. 5). Crop Sci. (1970) 10, 459– 460 http://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1970.0011183X001000040058x Isleib T.G., a. Registration of ‘NC 12C’ peanut. :. Crop Sci. (1997) 37, 1976http://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1997.0011183X003700060051x, Isleib T.G., b. Use of a laboratory colorimeter to measure pod brightness in virginia-type peanuts. Peanut Sci. (1997) 24, 81– 84 http://doi.org/10.3146/i0095-3679-24-2-4 Mozingo R.W. 1999. Peanut variety and quality evaluation results, 1999. I. Agronomic and grade data. Virginia Polytech. Inst. and State Univ. Inf. Ser. No. 422. Mozingo R.W. 2000. Peanut variety and quality evaluation results, 1999. II. Quality data. Virginia Polytech. Inst. and State Univ. Inf. Ser. No. 423. Mozingo R.W., Registration of VA 98R peanut. Crop Sci. (2000) 40, 1202– 1203 http://gateway.isiknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=agrocropsoil&KeyUT=000089410600060&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=WOS_CPL&UsrCustomerID=523bbf5d2a868de7bbaeea0bc70ec0e4 Pattee H.E., Adjusting roast peanut scores for fruity attribute and non-optimum CIELAB L* values. J. Sens. Stud. (1990) 9, 353– 363 http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-459X.1994.tb00253.x Wynne J.C., Registration of ‘NC-V11’ peanut. Crop Sci. (1991) 31, 484– 485 http://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1991.0011183X003100020062x, Wynne J.C., Registration of NC 7 peanut (Reg. No. 22). :. Crop Sci. (1979) 19, 563http://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1979.0011183X001900040037x, Wynne J.C., Registration of ‘NC 9’ peanut. :. Crop Sci. (1986) 26, 197http://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1986.0011183X002600010051x Citing Literature Volume43, Issue2March–April 2003Pages 739-740 ReferencesRelatedInformation}, number={2}, journal={CROP SCIENCE}, author={Isleib, TG and Rice, PW and Mozingo, RW and Bailey, JE and Mozingo, RW and Pattee, HE}, year={2003}, pages={739–740} }
 @article{pattee_2002, title={Commemorative history of the Agricultural and Food Chemistry Division}, volume={50}, ISSN={["0021-8561"]}, DOI={10.1021/jf011519x}, abstractNote={ADVERTISEMENT RETURN TO ISSUEPREVEditorialNEXTCommemorative History of the Agricultural and Food Chemistry DivisionHarold E. PatteeView Author Information Market Quality and Handling Research, ARS, USDA, North Carolina State University, Box 7625, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695 Cite this: J. Agric. Food Chem. 2002, 50, 1, 3–6Publication Date (Web):December 26, 2001Publication History Published online26 December 2001Published inissue 1 January 2002https://doi.org/10.1021/jf011519xCopyright © 2002 American Chemical SocietyRIGHTS & PERMISSIONSArticle Views468Altmetric-Citations4LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICSArticle Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated. Share Add toView InAdd Full Text with ReferenceAdd Description ExportRISCitationCitation and abstractCitation and referencesMore Options Share onFacebookTwitterWechatLinked InReddit PDF (34 KB) Get e-AlertsSUBJECTS:Biotechnology,Flavor,Food Get e-Alerts}, number={1}, journal={JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY}, author={Pattee, HE}, year={2002}, month={Jan}, pages={3–6} }
 @article{pattee_isleib_moore_gorbet_giesbrecht_2002, title={Effect of high-oleic trait and paste storage variables on sensory attribute stability of roasted peanuts}, volume={50}, ISSN={["0021-8561"]}, DOI={10.1021/jf025853k}, abstractNote={There has been much interest in the effect of the high-oleic acid trait of peanuts on various quality factors since discovery of high levels of oleic acid in a peanut mutant genotype. The trait provides greater oxidative stability for the high-oleic oil and seed. Several research groups have investigated high-oleic peanut oil and roasted peanut flavor characteristics, which were similar within high-oleic lines compared to Florunner. It was observed that some high-oleic lines derived from the Sunrunner cultivar have consistently higher predicted breeding values for roasted peanut attribute than Sunrunner itself. This study investigated if this apparent effect of the trait was an artifact arising from the handling procedures during processing and storage or from flavor fade. High-oleic lines used were derived by backcrossing the trait into existing cultivars, and the comparison of sensory attribute intensity was with the recurrent parent used in backcrossing. Previous comparisons have been between lines differing in more than just oleate content, that is, with widely different background genotypes that could contribute to the differences observed. Differential rates of change in sensory attributes were found in different background genotypes, suggesting that the comparison of high- and normal-oleic lines should be made in common background genotypes as well as in common production and postharvest environments. There was no measurable change in roasted peanut attribute in samples stored at -20 degrees C over the 63 day duration of this experiment. There were changes in roasted peanut in samples stored at 22 degrees C, confirming that storage at -20 degrees C is sufficient for large studies that require multiple sensory panel sessions over a period of weeks.}, number={25}, journal={JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY}, author={Pattee, HE and Isleib, TG and Moore, KM and Gorbet, DW and Giesbrecht, FG}, year={2002}, month={Dec}, pages={7366–7370} }
 @article{pattee_isleib_gorbet_moore_lopez_baring_simpson_2002, title={Effect of the high-oleic trait on roasted peanut flavor in backcross-derived breeding lines}, volume={50}, ISSN={["0021-8561"]}, DOI={10.1021/jf025854c}, abstractNote={The high-oleic trait of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) has been suggested to have a positive impact on the roasted peanut sensory attribute. A series of lines derived by backcrossing the high-oleic trait into several existing cultivars were compared with their parent cultivars at locations in Florida, Georgia, North Carolina, and Texas. Breeders grew their high-oleic lines and parents in three-replicate tests at one or two locations. The Florida high-oleic line F435-2-3-B-2-1-b4-B-B-3-b3-b3-1-B was grown at each location. The test included normal- and high-oleic variants of F435, GK 7, NC 7, NC 9, Sunrunner, Tamrun 96, and Tamspan 90. Sound-mature kernel samples were roasted, ground into paste, and evaluated by a sensory panel using a 14-point flavor intensity unit (fiu) scale. Background genotype had an effect (P < 0.01) on the heritable sensory attributes roasted peanut, sweet, and bitter. Oleate level had a positive effect on roasted peanut intensity, increasing it by 0.3 fiu averaged across all seven background genotypes. However, the magnitude of improvement varied across background genotypes. The high-oleic trait had no effect or increased the intensity of the roasted peanut attribute in each background genotype. The increase was greatest in Tamrun 96 (+0.6 fiu, P < 0.05) and Spanish genotypes Tamspan 90 (+0.4 fiu, P < 0.05) and F435 (+0.4 fiu, P < 0.10). A change of 0.5 fiu or more should be perceptible to consumers. Interaction between oleate level and background genotype was detected for sweet (P < 0.10) and bitter (P < 0.01) attributes. The trait had an increasing effect on the bitter attribute only in the background genotype of Tamspan 90 (+0.7 fiu, P < 0.01). There was a nonsignificant increase in bitterness in the other Spanish background genotype, F435. Changes in bitterness in runner- and Virginia-type backgrounds were close to zero. Incorporation of the high-oleic trait into peanut cultivars is likely to improve the intensity of the roasted peanut attribute, but it may also increase the bitter attribute in Spanish genotypes.}, number={25}, journal={JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY}, author={Pattee, HE and Isleib, TG and Gorbet, DW and Moore, KM and Lopez, Y and Baring, MR and Simpson, CE}, year={2002}, month={Dec}, pages={7362–7365} }
 @article{pattee_isleib_giesbrecht_cui_2002, title={Prediction of parental genetic compatibility to enhance flavor attributes of peanuts}, volume={829}, DOI={10.1021/bk-2002-0829.ch017}, abstractNote={As future advances in transformation technology allow insertion of useful genes into a broader array of target genotypes, the choice of targets will become more important. Targets should be genotypes that will pass to their progeny other useful characteristics, such as sensory quality characteristics, while improving agronomic performance or pest resistance. This is particularly important if flavor quality is to be maintained or improved as the transgene is moved into breeding populations via sexual transfer. Selection of genotypes with superior breeding values through the use of Best Linear Unbiased Prediction procedures (BLUPs) is discussed and using a database of sensory attributes on 250 peanut cultivars and breeding lines, the application of BLUP procedures to the selection of parents for improvement of roasted peanut and sweet attributes in breeding of peanut cultivars is illustrated.}, journal={Crop biotechnology  (ACS symposium series ; 829)}, publisher={Washington, DC: American Chemical Society}, author={Pattee, H. E. and Isleib, T. G. and Giesbrecht, F. G. and Cui, Z.}, editor={K. Rajasekaran, T. J. Jacks and Finley, J. W.Editors}, year={2002}, pages={217–230} }
 @article{pattee_isleib_gorbet_giesbrecht_2002, title={Selecton of alternative genetic sources of large-seed size in Virginia-type peanut: Evaluation of sensory, composition, and agronomic characteristics}, volume={50}, ISSN={["0021-8561"]}, DOI={10.1021/jf025601j}, abstractNote={Jenkins Jumbo, the ancestral source of large-seed size in the Virginia market type (Arachis hypogaea L.), has been shown to have a deleterious effect on flavor of peanut. The pervasiveness of Jenkins Jumbo in the ancestry of large-seeded germplasm contributes to the generally less intense roasted peanut flavor of U.S. cultivars of the Virginia market type. As a remedy to this problem, alternative sources of large-seed size were sought. Nine large-seeded selections, with NC 7 and Florunner as checks, were tested in replicated trials in North Carolina and Florida from 1996 to 1998. Pod yield, grade, weight of 100 seeds, and oil, sugar, and starch contents were measured. A descriptive sensory panel evaluated flavor attributes of a roasted sound mature kernel (SMK) sample from each plot. NC 7 scored low for sweet sensory attribute, high for bitter, and median for roasted peanut. UF714021, a multiline incorporating the Altika cultivar with several sister lines, had the best flavor profile of the large-seeded selections, but it did not have particularly large seeds relative to NC 7. The largest seeded selections were X90037 and X90053, both derived from Japan Jumbo. Flavor scores for X90037 were similar to those for NC 7 for roasted peanut (3.0 vs 2.9 flavor intensity units, fiu) and sweet (2.7 vs 2.6 fiu) but worse than NC 7 for bitter (3.3 vs 3.7 fiu) and astringent (3.5 vs 3.7 fiu). X90053 had intermediate values for roasted peanut and astringent, high value for sweet, and low for bitter. Other lines that had or were likely to have Jenkins Jumbo as a recent ancestor were generally poor in roasted flavor, supporting the hypothesis that ancestry from Jenkins Jumbo imparts poor flavor characteristics. With the exception of the unexpected relationship between astringent attribute and extra large kernel (ELK) content (r = 0.82, P < 0.01), there were no significant correlations between sensory attributes and the important agronomic traits: yield, meat, and ELK content. Among the nine large-seeded lines tested in this study, three appear to have greater potential for use as parents: 86x45B-10-1-2-2-b2-B, UF714021, and X90053.}, number={17}, journal={JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY}, author={Pattee, HE and Isleib, TG and Gorbet, DW and Giesbrecht, FG}, year={2002}, month={Aug}, pages={4885–4889} }
 @inbook{pattee_sanders_isleib_giesbrecht_2001, title={Peanut roast color and sensory attribute relationships}, DOI={10.1021/bk-2001-0775.ch013}, abstractNote={Peanut roasting develops not only a pleasing sensory flavor but also a pleasing color. In studying the genetic relationships between sensory attributes and peanut genotypes, roast color of the peanut paste test sample is an important source of variability that must be considered. Intensity of the roasted peanut sensory attribute has a quadratic relationship to CIELAB L* with an optimum for roast color at 58.7. Changes in roasted peanut, sweet, bitter, and astringent sensory attributes as roasting progresses are discussed as are the effects of peanut market-type on the intensity and rate of change in the sensory attributes. Differences in the roasted peanut quality of the peanut market-types point to the importance of cooperative efforts between plant breeders and food scientists to ensure that when new varieties are released they not only have superior agronomic characteristics but also maintain or improve upon the flavor quality characteristics.}, booktitle={Chemistry and physiology of selected food colorants}, publisher={Washington, DC: American Chemical Society}, author={Pattee, H. E. and Sanders, T. H. and Isleib, T. G. and Giesbrecht, F. G.}, editor={J. M. Ames and Hofmann, T. F.Editors}, year={2001}, pages={187–200} }
 @article{pattee_isleib_giesbrecht_mcfeeters_2000, title={Investigations into genotypic variations of peanut carbohydrates}, volume={48}, ISSN={["0021-8561"]}, DOI={10.1021/jf9910739}, abstractNote={Carbohydrates are known to be important precursors in the development of roasted peanut quality. However, little is known about their genotypic variation. A better understanding of the role of carbohydrates in roasted peanut quality requires first an understanding of the genotypic variation in the soluble carbohydrate components. Ion exchange chromatography was used to isolate 20 different carbohydrate components in 52 genotypes grown in replicated trials at two locations. Inositol, glucose, fructose, sucrose, raffinose, and stachyose were quantitated, and 12 unknown peaks were evaluated on the basis of the peak height of the unknown relative to the cellobiose internal standard peak height. Peaks tentatively identified as verbascose and ajugose could not be properly integrated because of tailing. Of the 18 carbohydrates that were estimated, 9 exhibited significant variation between test environments, 5 among market types, 14 among genotypes within market types, and 11 exhibited some significant form of genotype x environment interaction. Genotypes accounted for 38-78% of the total variation for the known components, suggesting that broad-sense heritability for these components is high. The observed high genotypic variation in carbohydrate components is similar to the high genotypic variation observed for the sweetness attribute in roasted peanuts, which raises the question regarding possible interrelationships. The establishment of such interrelationships could be most beneficial to peanut breeding programs to ensure the maintenance of flavor quality in future peanut varieties.}, number={3}, journal={JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY}, author={Pattee, HE and Isleib, TG and Giesbrecht, FG and McFeeters, RF}, year={2000}, month={Mar}, pages={750–756} }
 @article{pattee_isleib_giesbrecht_mcfeeters_2000, title={Relationships of sweet, bitter, and roasted peanut sensory attributes with carbohydrate components in peanuts}, volume={48}, ISSN={["0021-8561"]}, DOI={10.1021/jf9910741}, abstractNote={Certain roasted peanut quality sensory attributes have been shown to be heritable. Currently the only means of measuring these traits is the use of a trained sensory panel. This is a costly and time-consuming process. It is desirable, from a cost, time, and sample size perspective, to find other methodologies for estimating these traits. Because sweetness is the most heritable trait and it has a significant positive relationship to the roasted peanut trait, the possible relationships between heritable sensory traits and 18 carbohydrate components (inositol, glucose, fructose, sucrose, raffinose, stachyose, and 12 unknown peaks) in raw peanuts from 52 genotypes have been investigated. Previously reported correlations among sweet, bitter, and roasted peanut attributes were evident in this study as well. Where there was positive correlation of total sugars with sweetness, there also was positive correlation of total sugars with roasted peanut attribute and negative correlation of total sugars with bitterness and astringency. The expected generalized relationship of total sugars or sucrose to sweetness could not be established because the relationship was not the same across all market-types. Further work is needed to determine the nature of the chemical components related to the bitter principle, which appear to modify the sweet response and interfere with the sensory perception of sweetness, particularly in the Virginia market-type. Also, certain carbohydrate components showed significant relationships with sensory attributes in one market-type and not another. These differential associations demonstrate the complexity of the interrelationships among sweet, bitter, and roasted peanut sensory attributes. Within two market-types it is possible to improve the efficiency of selection for sweetness and roasted peanut quality by assaying for total carbohydrates. On the basis of the regression values the greatest efficiency would occur in the fastigiate market-type and then the runner.}, number={3}, journal={JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY}, author={Pattee, HE and Isleib, TG and Giesbrecht, FG and McFeeters, RF}, year={2000}, month={Mar}, pages={757–763} }
 @article{isleib_rice_mozingo_mozingo_pattee_1999, title={Registration of 'Gregory' peanut}, volume={39}, ISSN={["0011-183X"]}, DOI={10.2135/cropsci1999.0001rcv}, abstractNote={Crop ScienceVolume 39, Issue 5 p. 1526-1526 Registration of Cultivar Registration of ‘Gregory’ Peanut T. G. Isleib, Corresponding Author T. G. Isleib [email protected] Dep. of Crop Science, Box 7629, N.C. State Univ., Raleigh, NC, 27695-7629Corresponding author ([email protected]).Search for more papers by this authorP. W. Rice, P. W. Rice Dep. of Crop Science, Box 7629, N.C. State Univ., Raleigh, NC, 27695-7629Search for more papers by this authorR. W. Mozingo, R. W. Mozingo Dep. of Soil and Environ. Sciences, Tidewater Agric. Res. Ext. Ctr., 6321 Holland Rd., Suffolk, VA, 23437Search for more papers by this authorR. W. Mozingo II, R. W. Mozingo II Dep. of Crop Science, Box 7629, N.C. State Univ., Raleigh, NC, 27695-7629Search for more papers by this authorH. E. Pattee, H. E. Pattee USDA-ARS, Box 7625, N.C State Univ., Raleigh, NC, 27695-7625Search for more papers by this author T. G. Isleib, Corresponding Author T. G. Isleib [email protected] Dep. of Crop Science, Box 7629, N.C. State Univ., Raleigh, NC, 27695-7629Corresponding author ([email protected]).Search for more papers by this authorP. W. Rice, P. W. Rice Dep. of Crop Science, Box 7629, N.C. State Univ., Raleigh, NC, 27695-7629Search for more papers by this authorR. W. Mozingo, R. W. Mozingo Dep. of Soil and Environ. Sciences, Tidewater Agric. Res. Ext. Ctr., 6321 Holland Rd., Suffolk, VA, 23437Search for more papers by this authorR. W. Mozingo II, R. W. Mozingo II Dep. of Crop Science, Box 7629, N.C. State Univ., Raleigh, NC, 27695-7629Search for more papers by this authorH. E. Pattee, H. E. Pattee USDA-ARS, Box 7625, N.C State Univ., Raleigh, NC, 27695-7625Search for more papers by this author First published: 01 September 1999 https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1999.0001rcvCitations: 41 Support for the development of Gregory was provided in part by the N.C Peanut Growers’ Association, Inc., the N.C. Crop Improvement Association, and the N.C. Foundation Seed Producers, Inc. AboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL No abstract is available for this article.Citing Literature Volume39, Issue5September–October 1999Pages 1526-1526 RelatedInformation}, number={5}, journal={CROP SCIENCE}, author={Isleib, TG and Rice, PW and Mozingo, RW and Mozingo, RW and Pattee, HE}, year={1999}, pages={1526–1526} }
 @article{pattee_giesbrecht_isleib_1999, title={Sensory attribute variation in low-temperature-stored roasted peanut paste}, volume={47}, ISSN={["1520-5118"]}, DOI={10.1021/jf981063s}, abstractNote={Length of sample storage can become significant in sensory studies due to panel fatigue limitations and samples needed for a reasonable expectation of finding significant differences. In roasted peanut sensory studies samples are stored between -10 and -23 degrees C to prevent or retard changes. Studies of up to 13 months' duration have examined stability and slow-rate sensory changes. Sweet taste was relatively stable, whereas bitter and tongue burn attributes increased slightly. Stale taste increased, suggesting lipid oxidation was taking place even at -23 degrees C. Painty attribute did not increase until stale was >3. An increase in fruity attribute was unexpected. With increases in fruity and stale attributes a decrease in roasted peanut was expected. However, storage at -23 degrees C seems to stabilize the roasted peanut lability when compared to storage at -10 degrees C. Fruity and stale interactions with roasted peanut and lability of roasted peanut were shown to be three separate and identifiable effects on roasted peanut.}, number={6}, journal={JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY}, author={Pattee, HE and Giesbrecht, FG and Isleib, TG}, year={1999}, month={Jun}, pages={2415–2420} }
 @article{isleib_rice_bailey_mozingo_pattee_1997, title={Registration of 'NC 12C' peanut}, volume={37}, ISSN={["0011-183X"]}, DOI={10.2135/cropsci1997.0011183X003700060051x}, abstractNote={Crop ScienceVolume 37, Issue 6 cropsci1997.0011183X003700060051x p. 1976-1976 Registration of Cultivars Registration of ‘NC 12C’ Peanut T. G. Isleib, Corresponding Author T. G. Isleib [email protected] Dep. of Crop Science, Box 7629, N.C. State Univ., Raleigh, NC, 27695-7629Corresponding author ([email protected]).Search for more papers by this authorP. W. Rice, P. W. Rice Dep. of Plant Pathology, N.C. State Univ., Box 7616, Raleigh, NC, 27695-7616Search for more papers by this authorJ. E. Bailey, J. E. Bailey Dep. of Soil and Environ. Sciences Tidewater Agric. Res. Ext. Ctr., 6321 Holland Rd., Suffolk, VA, 23437Search for more papers by this authorR. W. Mozingo, R. W. Mozingo USDA-ARS, Box 7625, N.C. State Univ., Raleigh, NC, 27695-7625Search for more papers by this authorH. E. Pattee, H. E. Pattee USDA-ARS, Box 7625, N.C. State Univ., Raleigh, NC, 27695-7625Search for more papers by this author T. G. Isleib, Corresponding Author T. G. Isleib [email protected] Dep. of Crop Science, Box 7629, N.C. State Univ., Raleigh, NC, 27695-7629Corresponding author ([email protected]).Search for more papers by this authorP. W. Rice, P. W. Rice Dep. of Plant Pathology, N.C. State Univ., Box 7616, Raleigh, NC, 27695-7616Search for more papers by this authorJ. E. Bailey, J. E. Bailey Dep. of Soil and Environ. Sciences Tidewater Agric. Res. Ext. Ctr., 6321 Holland Rd., Suffolk, VA, 23437Search for more papers by this authorR. W. Mozingo, R. W. Mozingo USDA-ARS, Box 7625, N.C. State Univ., Raleigh, NC, 27695-7625Search for more papers by this authorH. E. Pattee, H. E. Pattee USDA-ARS, Box 7625, N.C. State Univ., Raleigh, NC, 27695-7625Search for more papers by this author First published: 01 November 1997 https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1997.0011183X003700060051xCitations: 21AboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL No abstract is available for this article.Citing Literature Volume37, Issue6November–December 1997Pages 1976-1976 RelatedInformation}, number={6}, journal={CROP SCIENCE}, author={Isleib, TG and Rice, PW and Bailey, JE and Mozingo, RW and Pattee, HE}, year={1997}, pages={1976–1976} }
 @article{pattee_giesbrecht_mozingo_1993, title={A note on broad-sense heritability of selected sensory descriptors in Virginia-type Arachis hypogaea L}, volume={20}, DOI={10.3146/i0095-3679-20-1-7}, abstractNote={Abstract Improvement of flavor quality is a breeding objective that merits increased attention. To obtain further information on broad-sense heritability of selected sensory attributes, 30 virginia-type genotypes sources were grown in replicated experiments at two locations during 1988 for evaluation. Roasted peanut paste samples were evaluated for 14 sensory attributes. Fruity attribute was confirmed as having a significant suppressive effect on roasted peanut attribute. Session-to-session variation was significant and use of an incomplete block design provided for control of panel variation in the experimental error. Broad-sense heritability estimates for roasted peanut, sweet, and nutty sensory attributes were higher than previously reported, 0.31 vs. 0.24; 0.68 vs. 0.14; 0.37 vs. 0.05, respectively. Nine genotypes were found to have statistically significant higher roasted peanut intensity than the industry accepted standard Florigiant. Further calculations showed that experiments with two replications at each of four locations should have an 80% chance of detecting statistical significance for roasted peanut attribute differences of 0.5 units among genotypes when testing at the 5% level. A similar experiment with two replications at two locations should have a 40% chance of detecting statistical significance.}, number={1}, journal={Peanut Science}, author={Pattee, H. E. and Giesbrecht, F. G. and Mozingo, R. W.}, year={1993}, pages={24} }
 @article{pattee_stalker_1992, title={EMBRYOGENESIS IN RECIPROCAL CROSSES OF ARACHIS-HYPOGAEA CV NC 6 WITH A-DURANENSIS AND A-STENOSPERMA}, volume={153}, ISSN={["1058-5893"]}, DOI={10.1086/297038}, abstractNote={Improvement of agronomic and quality factors in Arachis hypogaea L. through interspecific hybridization with wild Arachis species is restricted because of reproductive barriers including genetic incompatibility. A description of embryogenesis and embryo abortion in reciprocal crosses between wild and cultivated Arachis species should clarify some of these reproductive barriers. This study documents embryogenesis in the diploids A. duranensis (K 7988) and A. stenosperma (HLK 410) in reciprocal crosses with A. hypogaea cv NC 6. A significant parental effect was observed among crosses. When NC 6 was used as the female parent in crosses with both diploid species, embryos developed at a near normal rate, while embryos in the reciprocal crosses showed retarded rates. Differences in embryo developmental morphology were not observed between the two wild species. When A. duranensis was used as a female parent, however, embryos aborted at a higher frequency. In contrast, A. stenosperma had delayed fertilization, but initial embryo development was much faster and by day 5 had attained the same level of development as A. duranensis. These observations illustrate that as attempts are made to utilize the genetic resources of Arachis, different approaches will be needed to overcome the multiplicity of reproductive barriers that restrict introgression of potentially desirable traits to cultivated peanuts.}, number={3}, journal={INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PLANT SCIENCES}, author={PATTEE, HE and STALKER, HT}, year={1992}, month={Sep}, pages={341–347} }
 @article{pattee_stalker_1991, title={COMPARATIVE EMBRYO SAC MORPHOLOGY AT ANTHESIS OF CULTIVATED AND WILD-SPECIES OF ARACHIS}, volume={68}, ISSN={["0305-7364"]}, DOI={10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a088290}, abstractNote={Introgression of germplasm from wild to cultivated species of Arachis is severely impeded because abortion processes often occur as a prepeg-, peg-(gynophore), or postpeg-elongation event. A comparative study of embryo sac morphology at anthesis was undertaken to determine if observable differences were present that could possibly explain abortion prior to peg tip swelling following soil penetration. Two wild Arachis species (A. duranensis and A. stenosperma) plus A. hypogaea cultivars NC 6 and Argentine were studied. Differences in starch grain concentration and cytoplasmic stranding organization were observed between A. hypogaea cultivars and the wild Arachis species. These differences probably have a significant impact on energy availability at syngamy and the subsequent early cell division of the embryo. An improper energy balance could contribute to the onset of abortion in interspecific hybrids. Modification in egg apparatus organization among all species was also observed which may account for low percentages of seed recovery resulting from interspecific hybridization attempts.}, number={6}, journal={ANNALS OF BOTANY}, author={PATTEE, HE and STALKER, HT}, year={1991}, month={Dec}, pages={511–517} }
 @article{pattee_yokoyama_collins_giesbrecht_1990, title={INTERRELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN HEADSPACE VOLATILE CONCENTRATION, MARKETING GRADES, AND FLAVOR IN RUNNER-TYPE PEANUTS}, volume={38}, ISSN={["0021-8561"]}, DOI={10.1021/jf00094a031}, abstractNote={ADVERTISEMENT RETURN TO ISSUEPREVArticleNEXTInterrelationships between headspace volatile concentration, marketing grades, and flavor in runner-type peanutsHarold E. Pattee, Wallace H. Yokoyama, Maureen F. Collins, and Francis G. GiesbrechtCite this: J. Agric. Food Chem. 1990, 38, 4, 1055–1060Publication Date (Print):April 1, 1990Publication History Published online1 May 2002Published inissue 1 April 1990https://doi.org/10.1021/jf00094a031RIGHTS & PERMISSIONSArticle Views63Altmetric-Citations11LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICSArticle Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated. Share Add toView InAdd Full Text with ReferenceAdd Description ExportRISCitationCitation and abstractCitation and referencesMore Options Share onFacebookTwitterWechatLinked InReddit PDF (754 KB) Get e-Alerts Get e-Alerts}, number={4}, journal={JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY}, author={PATTEE, HE and YOKOYAMA, WH and COLLINS, MF and GIESBRECHT, FG}, year={1990}, month={Apr}, pages={1055–1060} }
 @article{pattee_rogister_giesbrecht_1989, title={Interrelationships between headspace volatile concentration, selected seed-size categories and flavor in large-seeded Virginia-type peanuts}, volume={16}, DOI={10.3146/i0095-3679-16-1-8}, abstractNote={Abstract During the 1987 crop year a quality survey using the organic volatile meter (OVM) was conducted at six (A-E) peanut buying stations located throughout Northampton County, NC. Three different frequency distribution patterns were observed for sample headspace volatile concentration (HSVC) levels. At locations A and B about 66% of the samples analyzed had an HSVC of 8.8 mg/kg air or less. An HSVC of 8.8 mg/kg air is considered to be a volatile concentration at which peanut samples are marginally acceptable. Locations C, D, and F had about 58% of the samples with an HSVC of 8.8 mg/kg air or less while Location E had approximately 45%. At an HSVC level of 24.8 mg/kg air or less the percentages were approximately 88, 87, and 69%, respectively. Most of the difference in frequency distribution patterns is thought to result from environmental factors which influenced the average maturity of the crop at harvest. Trained taste panel profiling of a roasted peanut paste made from selected screen-sized seed fractions and HSVC levels indicated that the fruity character note was most characteristic of the off-flavor associated with increasing HSVC values. Low intensity levels were characterized as sweet fruity and higher levels of intensity as an alcohol-fermented fruity character. Further flavor evaluation of roasted peanut paste from selected screen-sized seed fractions showed all fractions with an HSVC of 7.6 mg/kg air or above were unacceptable while fractions with HSVC levels between 5.3 and 3.1 mg/kg air were marginally acceptable. Fractions with HSVC levels at 2 mg/kg air or less were acceptable.}, number={1}, journal={Peanut Science}, author={Pattee, H. E. and Rogister, E. W. and Giesbrecht, F. G.}, year={1989}, pages={38} }
 @article{pattee_johns_singleton_sanders_1974, title={Carbon-14 distribution in peanut fruit parts during maturation following 14CO2 treatment of intact plants}, volume={1}, DOI={10.3146/i0095-3679-1-2-7}, abstractNote={Abstract Effects of sampling date and developmental stage on the distribution of radioactivity within the crude ethanol, lipid, and starch fractions from fruit, seed coat, and seed of peanut were investigated. Major differences were found between the first and fourth feeding dates in the amount of 14C-labeled photo-synthate translocated to individual peanut fruit parts. Maximum levels of radioactivity in the pericarp, seed coat, and seed were attained at progressively later developmental stages as the respective part became the dominant metabolic sink. Within the fruit, maximum radioactivity in starch was reached during early maturity (stage 3) and total radioactivity generally decreased with successive feeding dates. Thus the level of photosynthate being translocated to a given fruit decreases as more fruit develop on the plant. Observed relationships between level of radioactivity and specific activity of fruit-part components were interpreted as indicating that metabolic reserves are built up in the fruit and seed coat during early maturation and utilized later during seed development and maturation when the level of available translocated photosynthate has diminished.}, number={2}, journal={Peanut Science}, author={Pattee, H. E. and Johns, E. B. and Singleton, J. A. and Sanders, T. H.}, year={1974}, pages={63} }
 @article{pattee_johns_singleton_sanders_1974, title={Composition changes of peanut fruit parts during maturation}, volume={1}, DOI={10.3146/i0095-3679-1-2-6}, abstractNote={Abstract Studies are reported which follow the changes in starch, sugar, fresh and extraction residue weights of peanut fruit parts during maturation. Observations are also reported on the lipid content of the seed. Starch and sugar contents reached maximum levels first in the pericarp (hull) and then the seed coat (testa). Starch maxima occurred at early and middle maturity (stages 3 [10 mg] and 7 [10 mg]) and sugar maxima at a stage approaching middle maturity and at middle maturity (stage 6 [47 mg] and 8[9 mg]), respectively. In the seed, starch reached a maximum just beyond middle maturity (stage 9 [55 mg]) and then remained constant. Sugar content increased throughout maturation and lipid content became maximum at full maturity (stage 13 [415 mg]) then declined to 385 mg at over-maturity (stage 15). The role of regulating substrate supply to the developing seed seemed to shift from the pericarp to the seed coat with increasing maturity. Observed increases in fruit residue weight suggest that the pericarp is competing with the seed for metabolic resources during the late maturity stages.}, number={2}, journal={Peanut Science}, author={Pattee, H. E. and Johns, E. B. and Singleton, J. A. and Sanders, T. H.}, year={1974}, pages={57} }