@book{schrimper_2001, title={Economics of agricultural markets}, ISBN={013775776X}, publisher={Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall}, author={Schrimper, R. A.}, year={2001} }
 @article{schrimper_1998, title={Output, professional affiliation, and placement of Ph.D. graduates in Agricultural Economics}, number={1998 Oct. 1}, journal={ERIC, 1998. Report; ARE-16}, author={Schrimper, R. A.}, year={1998}, pages={1–29} }
 @book{schrimper_1998, title={Output, professional affiliation, and placement of Ph.D. graduates in agricultural economics}, publisher={Raleigh, N.C.: Dept. of Agricultural and Resource Economics, North Carolina State University}, author={Schrimper, R. A.}, year={1998} }
 @article{schrimper_1998, title={The agricultural marketing system, 5th edition}, volume={80}, ISSN={["0002-9092"]}, DOI={10.2307/3180287}, abstractNote={American Journal of Agricultural EconomicsVolume 80, Issue 1 p. 236-237 Books Reviewed Rhodes, V. James, and Jan L. Dauve. The Agricultural Marketing System, 5th ed. Scottsdale AZ: Holcomb Hathaway, 1998, 420 pp., [email protected]@[email protected]@53.95 Ronald A. Schrimper, Ronald A. Schrimper North Carolina State UniversitySearch for more papers by this author Ronald A. Schrimper, Ronald A. Schrimper North Carolina State UniversitySearch for more papers by this author First published: 01 February 1998 https://doi.org/10.2307/3180287AboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat No abstract is available for this article. Volume80, Issue1February 1998Pages 236-237 RelatedInformation}, number={1}, journal={AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS}, author={Schrimper, RA}, year={1998}, month={Feb}, pages={236–237} }
 @book{schrimper_1997, title={Changes in the number and characteristics of farms in North Carolina}, publisher={Raleigh, N.C.: Dept. of Agricultural and Resource Economics, North Carolina State University}, author={Schrimper, R. A.}, year={1997} }
 @article{schrimper_1997, title={US poultry processing employment and hourly earnings}, volume={6}, ISSN={["1056-6171"]}, DOI={10.1093/japr/6.1.81}, abstractNote={Abstract Various governmental information sources show sizeable differences in total employment in the poultry processing industry. Bureau of Labor Statistics employment estimates for some years are more than 20% larger than corresponding values reported by the Census of Manufacturers/Annual Survey of Manufacturers or County Business Patterns. The publicly available sources of information give more consistent reports on average hourly earning of production workers in the poultry processing industry than on total employment in the industry. Although nominal hourly earnings have increased over time, deflating these figures with different measures of relative price changes can result in varying trends in real hourly earnings. Deflating earnings by the Consumer Price Index produces a negative trend in hourly earnings between the late 1970s and early 1990s. Deflating by the price index for nondurable component of personal expenditure component of GNP, however, result in a generally upward, but not continuous, trend in real hourly earnings after 1974. Such variations among sources of information and methods of analysis account for confusion and differences of opinion about total employment and hourly earnings in the poultry processing industry.}, number={1}, journal={JOURNAL OF APPLIED POULTRY RESEARCH}, author={Schrimper, RA}, year={1997}, pages={81–89} }
 @article{schrimper_1995, title={Subtleties associated with derived demand relationships}, volume={24}, DOI={10.1017/s1068280500008881}, abstractNote={Subtleties involving measurement of quantities and prices when derived demands are graphically displayed in frameworks representing market linkages are discussed. Complications arising from assuming variable proportions rather than fixed coefficients are noted. Finally, an example developed by Wohlgenant and Haidacher is clarified.}, number={2}, journal={Agricultural and Resource Economics Review}, author={Schrimper, R. A.}, year={1995}, pages={241} }
 @article{schrimper_johnson_1992, title={Measurement issues in empirical demand systems}, ISBN={081380289X}, journal={Market demand for dairy products}, publisher={Ames : Iowa State University Press}, author={Schrimper, R. A. and Johnson, S. R.}, editor={S.R. Johnson, D. P. Stonehouse and Hassan, Zuhair A.Editors}, year={1992}, pages={121} }
 @article{schrimper_tisdell_1977, title={Comments on Tisdell's critique of Nerlove-Waugh theorem concerning optimal advertising (2) Rejoinder}, volume={45}, number={4}, journal={Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics}, author={Schrimper, R. A. and Tisdell, C.}, year={1977}, pages={186} }
 @article{schrimper_mathia_1975, title={RESERVATION AND MARKET DEMANDS FOR SWEET POTATOES AT FARM LEVEL}, volume={57}, ISSN={["0002-9092"]}, DOI={10.2307/1238849}, abstractNote={years. Analysis of the trends suggests that total onfarm use of sweet potatoes is responsive to the price which producers receive for the quantities entering commercial channels. With on-farm use responding to price changes, determination of market price and the allocation of total production between farm uses and commercial sales must be analyzed simultaneously to identify and measure the impact of various determinants affecting the separate demand components. The results of a simultaneous estimation of the demand components for sweet potatoes and the use of these relationships to project prices and allocations of sweet potato crops in 1980 are presented below.}, number={1}, journal={AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS}, author={SCHRIMPER, RA and MATHIA, GA}, year={1975}, pages={119–121} }