Steven H Greene

Abortion, religion, and racial resentment: Unpacking the underpinnings of contemporary abortion attitudes

Social Science Quarterly, 1.

Counter-stereotypical messaging and partisan cues: Moving the needle on vaccines in a polarized United States

SCIENCE ADVANCES, 9(29).

A Recipe for Madness: Parenthood in the Era of Covid‐19

Social Science Quarterly, 102(5), 2296–2311.

Feminist and Anti-Feminist Identification in the 21(st) Century United States

Elder, L., Greene, S., & Lizotte, M.-K. (2021, July 8). JOURNAL OF WOMEN POLITICS & POLICY, Vol. 7.

Masks and racial stereotypes in a pandemic: the case for surgical masks

The Journal of Race, Ethnicity, and Politics, 7(2), 185–202.

Parenthood and Politics in the Era of COVID-19

SSRN.

Public Service Announcements and Promoting Face Masks During the COVID-19 Pandemic

PS: Political Science & Politics, 55(1), 7–12.

You’re not imagining it – 3 ways COVID-19 has been extra hard on American parents

Elder, L., & Greene, S. (2021, April 16). https://theconversation.com/youre-not-imagining-it-3-ways-covid-19-has-been-extra-hard-on-american-parents-157968

Do moms demand action on guns? Parenthood and gun policy attitudes

Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 32(3), 655–673.

Masks and Racial Stereotypes in a Pandemic: The Case for Surgical Masks

SSRN.

Gender and the Politics of Marijuana

SOCIAL SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 100(1), 109–122.

Marijuana legalization – a rare issue where women are more conservative than men

Elder, L., & Greene, S. (2019, April 16). https://theconversation.com/marijuana-legalization-a-rare-issue-where-women-are-more-conservative-than-men-110404

The gender gap on public opinion towards genetically modified foods

The Social Science Journal, 55(4), 500–509.

Why men support marijuana legalization more than women do

Elder, L., & Greene, S. (2018, December 21). Washingtonpost.com. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2018/12/21/why-men-support-marijuana-legalization-more-than-women-do/

Parenthood and the polarisation of political attitudes in Europe

European Journal of Political Research, 55(4), 745–766.

Parenthood and the polarisation of political attitudes in Europe

European Journal of Political Research, 55(4), 745–766.

Red Parents, Blue Parents: The Politics of Modern Parenthood

Forum (Germany), 14(2), 143–167.

Red parents, blue parents: The politics of modern parenthood

Forum-A Journal of Applied Research in Contemporary Politics, 14(2), 143–167.

Republican dads think they’re great fathers. Democrats not so much

The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/politicians-love-to-talk-about-family-but-maybe-not-yours/2012/09/07/0be2edea-f218-11e1-adc6-87dfa8eff430_story.html

The Politics of Walmart Moms: Parenthood and Political Attitudes in the 2012 Election

Journal of Women, Politics & Policy, 37(4), 369–393.

The Politics of Walmart moms: parenthood and political attitudes in the 2012 election

Journal of Women Politics & Policy, 37(4), 369–393.

One Vote Out of Step? The Effects of Salient Roll Call Votes in the 2010 Election

AMERICAN POLITICS RESEARCH, 40(5), 844–879.

Politicians love to talk about family. But maybe not yours

Elder, L., & Greene, S. (2012, September 7). The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/politicians-love-to-talk-about-family-but-maybe-not-yours/2012/09/07/0be2edea-f218-11e1-adc6-87dfa8eff430_story.html

The Politics of Parenthood: Causes and Consequences of the Politicization and Polarization of the American Family

Albany, NY: SUNY-Press.

The Politics of Parenthood: Parenthood Effects on Issue Attitudes and Candidate Evaluations in 2008

AMERICAN POLITICS RESEARCH, 40(3), 419–449.

The conditional party teams of the 2008 North Carolina federal elections

In The Change Election: Money, Mobilization, and Persuasion in the 2008 Federal Elections (pp. 108–139). http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84901043227&partnerID=MN8TOARS

The Conditional Party Teams of the 2008 North Carolina Federal Elections

In D. B. Magleby (Ed.), The Change Election: Money, Mobilization, and Persuasion in the 2008 Federal Elections. Provo, UT: Center for the Study of Elections and Democracy.

Parenthood and the gender gap

In Voting the Gender Gap (pp. 119–140). http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84894743819&partnerID=MN8TOARS

The myth of "Security Moms" and "NASCAR Dads": Parenthood, political stereotypes, and the 2004 election

SOCIAL SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 88(1), 1–19.

The Children Gap on Social Welfare and the Politicization of American Parents, 1984–2000

Politics & Gender, 2(04), 451–472.

The 2004 North Carolina U.S. Senate race.

In D. B. Magleby, J. Q. Monson, & K. D. Patterson (Eds.), Dancing Without Partners: How Candidates, Parties and Interest Groups Interact In The New Campaign Finance Environment. Provo, Utah: Center for the Study of Elections and Democracy, Brigham Young University.

The structure of partisan attitudes: Reexamining partisan dimensionality and ambivalence

POLITICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 26(5), 809–822.

Elections: Voter Support and Partisans' (Mis)Perceptions of Presidential Candidates' Abortion Views in 2000

Presidential Studies Quarterly, 34(2), 412–419.

Social identity theory and party identification

SOCIAL SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 85(1), 136–153.

The Psychological Perspective

In J. G. Greer (Ed.), Public Opinion and Polling Around the World: A Historical Encyclopedia (Vol. 1). Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-Clio.

Political information, gender and the vote: The differential impact of organizations, personal discussion, and the media on the electoral decisions of women and men

Social Science Journal, 40(3), 385–399.

The Political Psychology of Party Identification

In M. MacKuen & G. Rabinowitz (Eds.), Electoral Democracy. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

Finding the weak link: The choice of institutional venues by interest groups

American Review of Politics, 23, 19–38.

The social calculus of voting: Interpersonal, media, and organizational influences on presidential choices

American Political Science Review, 96(1), 57–73.

The social-psychological measurement of partisanship

Greene, S. (2002, September). POLITICAL BEHAVIOR, Vol. 24, pp. 171–197.

Gender and the psychological structure of partisanship

Women and Politics, 22(1), 63–84.

The role of character assessments in presidential approval

American Politics Research, 29(2), 196–210.

Party attachments and state election laws

Political Research Quarterly, 53(1), 63–76.

The psychological sources of partisan-leaning independence

American Politics Research, 28(4), 511–537.

Understanding party identification: A social identity approach

Political Psychology, 20(2), 393–403.

Changes in Presidential Popularity: A Motivational Approach

Eruditio: The Duke University Journal of Social Science.