Stephen Puryear

Puryear, S. (2021). Why Leibniz should have agreed with Berkeley about abstract ideas. BRITISH JOURNAL FOR THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY, 29(6), 1054–1071. https://doi.org/10.1080/09608788.2021.1895066

Puryear, S. (2020). THE LOGIC OF LEIBNIZ'S BORROWED REALITY ARGUMENT. PHILOSOPHICAL QUARTERLY, 70(279), 350–370. https://doi.org/10.1093/pq/pqz056

Puryear, S. (2019). Consent by Residence: A Defense. European Journal of Political Theory, 2, 147488511983300. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474885119833009

Puryear, S. (2019, October). Monads, Composition, and Force. Ariadnean Threads Through Leibniz's Labyrinth. JOURNAL OF THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY, Vol. 57, pp. 761–762. https://doi.org/10.1353/hph.2019.0087

Puryear, S., Bruers, S., & Erdos, L. (2017). [Review of On a Failed Defense of Factory Farming]. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL & ENVIRONMENTAL ETHICS, 30(2), 311–323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-017-9666-7

Puryear, S. (2017). Schopenhauer on the Rights of Animals. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY, 25(2), 250–269. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejop.12237

Puryear, S. (2016, December). Finitism, Divisibilty, and the Beginning of the Universe: Replies to Loke and Dumsday. AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY, Vol. 94, pp. 808–813. https://doi.org/10.1080/00048402.2016.1194443

Leibnizian Bodies: Phenomena, Aggregates of Monads, or Both? (2016). Leibniz Review, 26, 99–127. https://doi.org/10.5840/leibniz2016265

Puryear, S. (2016). [Review of Sentience, Rationality, and Moral Status: A Further Reply to Hsiao]. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL & ENVIRONMENTAL ETHICS, 29(4), 697–704. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-016-9618-7

Puryear, S. (2014). Finitism and the Beginning of the Universe. AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY, 92(4), 619–629. https://doi.org/10.1080/00048402.2014.949804

Puryear, S. (2014). [Review of Leibniz and cryptography: An account on the occasion of the initial exhibition of the reconstruction of Leibniz's cipher machine]. Review of Metaphysics, 67(4), 882–884.

Puryear, S. (2013). Frege on Vagueness and Ordinary Language. PHILOSOPHICAL QUARTERLY, 63(250), 120–140. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9213.2012.00103.x

Puryear, S. (2013). Idealism and scepticism: A reply to Brueckner. Theoria-A Swedish Journal of Philosophy, 79(4), 290–293.

Puryear, S. (2013). Leibniz on the Metaphysics of Color. PHILOSOPHY AND PHENOMENOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 86(2), 319–346. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1933-1592.2011.00503.x

Puryear, S., & North America, T. L. S. (2013). The Leibniz-De Volder Correspondence, with Selections from the Correspondence Between Leibniz and Johann Bernoulli, ed. P. Lodge. Leibniz Society Review, 23, 165–169. https://doi.org/10.5840/leibniz20132312

Puryear, S. (2012). Idealism and Scepticism: A Reply to Brueckner. Theoria, 10, n/a-n/a. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-2567.2012.01145.x

Puryear, S. (2012, November). Motion in Leibniz’s Middle Years: A Compatibilist Approach. Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy Volume VI, pp. 135–170. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199659593.003.0005

Puryear, S. (2010). Monadic Interaction. British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 18(5), 763–796. https://doi.org/10.1080/09608788.2010.524756

Puryear, S. (2008). Leibniz on Concepts and Their Relation to the Senses. In D. Perler & M. Wild (Eds.), Sehen und Begreifen: Wahrnehmungstheorien in der Frühen Neuzeit (pp. 235–264). Berlin: de Gruyter.

Puryear, S. M., & North America, T. L. S. (2005). Was Leibniz Confused about Confusion? Leibniz Society Review, 15, 95–124. https://doi.org/10.5840/leibniz2005153

ADefiniteDescription, & r/Science. AMA Announcement: Monday 11/14 12PM ET - Stephen Puryear (North Carolina State) on history of philosophy, metaphysics and ethics. The Winnower. https://doi.org/10.15200/winn.147879.96638

Consent by Residence: A Defense. European Journal of Political Theory.

smpuryear, & r/Science. I'm Stephen Puryear (NC State) and I'm here to answer your questions about philosophy (and whatever else). AMA. The Winnower. https://doi.org/10.15200/winn.147914.45869