Todd Kuiken

Macfarlane, N. B. W., Adams, J., Bennett, E. L., Brooks, T. M., Delborne, J. A., Eggermont, H., … Redford, K. H. (2022). [Review of Direct and indirect impacts of synthetic biology on biodiversity conservation]. ISCIENCE, 25(11). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2022.105423

Taitingfong, R. I., Triplett, C., Vasquez, V. N., Rajagopalan, R. M., Raban, R., Roberts, A., … Bloss, C. S. (2022, December 15). Exploring the value of a global gene drive project registry. NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY, Vol. 12. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-022-01591-w

Millett, P., Alexanian, T., Palmer, M. J., Evans, S. W., Kuiken, T., & Oye, K. (2022, January 11). iGEM and Gene Drives: A Case Study for Governance. HEALTH SECURITY, Vol. 1. https://doi.org/10.1089/hs.2021.0157

Kuiken, T., Barrangou, R., & Grieger, K. (2021). (Broken) Promises of Sustainable Food and Agriculture through New Biotechnologies: The CRISPR Case. CRISPR JOURNAL, 4(1), 25–31. https://doi.org/10.1089/crispr.2020.0098

Kemp, L., Adam, L., Boehm, C. R., Breitling, R., Casagrande, R., Dando, M., … Sutherland, W. J. (2020). Bioengineering horizon scan 2020. ELIFE, 9. https://doi.org/10.7554/elife.54489

Kuiken, T. (2020). Biology Without Borders: Need for Collective Governance? SYNTHETIC BIOLOGY 2020: FRONTIERS IN RISK ANALYSIS AND GOVERNANCE, pp. 269–295. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27264-7_12

Trump, B. D., Galaitsi, S. E., Appleton, E., Bleijs, D. A., Florin, M.-V., Gollihar, J. D., … Linkov, I. (2020, July). Building biosecurity for synthetic biology. MOLECULAR SYSTEMS BIOLOGY, Vol. 16. https://doi.org/10.15252/msb.20209723

Rasmussen, L. M., Guerrini, C. J., Kuiken, T., Nebeker, C., Pearlman, A., Ware, S. B., … Zettler, P. J. (2020). Realizing Present and Future Promise of DIY Biology and Medicine through a Trust Architecture. HASTINGS CENTER REPORT, 50(6), 10–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/hast.1194

Serr, M. E., Valdez, R. X., Barnhill-Dilling, K. S., Godwin, J., Kuiken, T., & Booker, M. (2020). Scenario analysis on the use of rodenticides and sex-biasing gene drives for the removal of invasive house mice on islands. Biological Invasions, 22(4), 1235–1248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-019-02192-6

Campbell, K., Saah, J. R., Brown, P. R., Godwin, J., Howald, G. R., Piaggio, A., … Shiels, A. (2019). A potential new tool for the toolbox: assessing gene drives for eradicating invasive rodent populations. 1.

George, D. R., Kuiken, T., & Delborne, J. A. (2019). Articulating ‘free, prior and informed consent’ (FPIC) for engineered gene drives. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 286(1917), 20191484. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2019.1484

Developing a Comprehensive, Adaptive, and International Biosafety and Biosecurity Program for Advanced Biotechnology: The iGEM Experience. (2019). Applied Biosafety. https://doi.org/10.1177/1535676019838075

Genetic frontiers for conservation: an assessment of synthetic biology and biodiversity conservation: technical assessment. (2019). In []. https://doi.org/10.2305/iucn.ch.2019.05.en

Synthetic Biology and the United Nations. (2019). Trends in Biotechnology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2019.05.011

Wintle, B. C., Boehm, C. R., Rhodes, C., Molloy, J. C., Millett, P., Adam, L., … Sutherland, W. J. (2017, November 14). Point of View: A transatlantic perspective on 20 emerging issues in biological engineering. ELIFE, Vol. 6. https://doi.org/10.7554/elife.30247

Potential Implications of New Synthetic Biology and Genomic Research Trajectories on the International Treaty for Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture. (2017). In International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture. Retrieved from http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/user_upload/faoweb/plant-treaty/GB7/gb7_90.pdf

Kuiken, T. (2017). Vigilante environmentalism: Are gene drives changing how we value and govern ecosystems? In Gene Editing, Law, and the Environment: Life Beyond the Human (pp. 95–112). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315168418

Kuiken, T. (2016). Governance: Learn from DIY biologists. Nature, 531(7593), 167–168. https://doi.org/10.1038/531167a

Narayan, R. J., Boehm, R. D., & Monteiro-Riviere, N. A. (2016). Nanomedicine: Ethical considerations. In R. Bawa, G. F. Audette, & B. Reese (Eds.), Handbook of Clinical Nanomedicine: Law, Business, Regulation, Safety, and Risk (Vol. 2, pp. 1031–1055). https://doi.org/10.4032/9789814669238

Vance, M., Kuiken, T., Vejerano, E., McGinnis, S., Hochella, Rejeski, & Hull. (2016). Nanotechnology in the real world: Redeveloping the nanomaterial consumer products inventory. Nano Online. https://doi.org/10.1515/nano.bjneah.6.181

Boeke, J. D., Church, G., Hessel, A., Kelley, N. J., Arkin, A., Cai, Y., … Yang, L. (2016). The genome project-write we need technology and an ethical framework for genome-scale engineering. Science, 353(6295), 126–127. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf6850

Vance, M. E., Kuiken, T., Vejerano, E. P., McGinnis, S. P., Hochella, M. F., Jr., Rejeski, D., & Hull, M. S. (2015). Nanotechnology in the real world: Redeveloping the nanomaterial consumer products inventory. Beilstein Journal of Nanotechnology, 6(1), 1769–1780. https://doi.org/10.3762/bjnano.6.181

Kuiken, T., Quadros, M. E., McGinnis, S., & Hull, M. (2015). Public's Understanding, Perceptions, and Acceptance of Nanotechnology through the Lens of Consumer Products. In Nanoengineering: Global Approaches to Health and Safety Issues (pp. 151–171). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-62747-6.00006-3

Kuiken, T. (2015). Shaping the future of synthetic biology. Science, 348(6232), 296. Retrieved from http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=ORCID&SrcApp=OrcidOrg&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=WOS:000352999000028&KeyUID=WOS:000352999000028

Oye, K. A., Esvelt, K., Appleton, E., Catteruccia, F., Church, G., Kuiken, T., … Collins, J. P. (2014). BIOTECHNOLOGY Regulating gene drives. Science, 345(6197), 626–628. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1254287

Kuiken, T., Dana, G., Oye, K., & Rejeski, D. (2014). Shaping ecological risk research for synthetic biology. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 4(3), 191–199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-014-0171-2

Kuiken, T. (2013). Converging technologies for a smarter health and wellness future. In ICTs and the Health Sector: Towards Smarter Health and Wellness Models (Vol. 9789264202863, pp. 159–177). https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264202863-12-en

Kuiken, T. (2013). DIYbio: Low Risk, High Potential. Scientist, 27(3), 26–27. Retrieved from http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=ORCID&SrcApp=OrcidOrg&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=WOS:000320341600006&KeyUID=WOS:000320341600006

Dana, G. V., Kuiken, T., Rejeski, D., & Snow, A. A. (2012). Four steps to avoid a synthetic-biology disaster. Nature, 483(7387), 29. Retrieved from http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=ORCID&SrcApp=OrcidOrg&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=WOS:000300877900025&KeyUID=WOS:000300877900025

Dana, G. V., Kuiken, T., Rejeski, D., & Snow, A. A. (2012). Synthetic biology: Four steps to avoid a synthetic-biology disaster. Nature, 483(7387). https://doi.org/10.1038/483029a

Kuiken, T. (2011). Nanomedicine and ethics: is there anything new or unique? Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews-Nanomedicine and Nanobiotechnology, 3(2), 111–118. https://doi.org/10.1002/wnan.90

Karn, B., Kuiken, T., & Otto, M. (2011). Nanotechnology and in situ remediation: A review of the benefits and potential risks,A nanotecnologia e a remediação in situ: Uma revisão dos benefícios e riscos em potencial. Ciencia e Saude Coletiva, 16(1), 165–178. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-81232011000100020

Karn, B., Kuiken, T., & Otto, M. (2011). Nanotechnology and in situ remediation: a review of the benefits and potential risks. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, 16(1), 165–178. Retrieved from http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=ORCID&SrcApp=OrcidOrg&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=SCIELO&KeyUT=SCIELO:S1413-81232011000100020&KeyUID=SCIELO:S1413-81232011000100020

Kuiken, T. (2010). Cleaning up contaminated waste sites: Is nanotechnology the answer? Nano Today, 5(1), 6–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nantod.2009.11.001

Kuiken, T. (2010). International viewpoint and news. Environmental Earth Sciences, 60(4), 903–907. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-010-0477-7

Kuiken, T. (2010). International viewpoint and news. Environmental Earth Sciences, 60(6), 1349–1351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-010-0506-6

Hartman, J. S., Weisberg, P. J., Pillai, R., Ericksen, J. A., Kuiken, T., Lindberg, S. E., … Gustin, M. S. (2009). Application of a Rule-Based Model to Estimate Mercury Exchange for Three Background Biomes in the Continental United States. Environmental Science & Technology, 43(13), 4989–4994. https://doi.org/10.1021/es900075q

Karn, B., Kuiken, T., & Otto, M. (2009). Nanotechnology and in Situ Remediation: A Review of the Benefits and Potential Risks. Environmental Health Perspectives, 117(12), 1823–1831. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.0900793

Kuiken, T., Gustin, M., Zhang, H., Lindberg, S., & Sedinger, B. (2008). Mercury emission from terrestrial background surfaces in the eastern USA. II: Air/surface exchange of mercury within forests from South Carolina to New England. Applied Geochemistry, 23(3), 356–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2007.12.007

Kuiken, T., Zhang, H., Gustin, M., & Lindberg, S. (2008). Mercury emission from terrestrial background surfaces in the eastern USA. Part I: Air/surface exchange of mercury within a southeastern deciduous forest (Tennessee) over one year. Applied Geochemistry, 23(3), 345–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2007.12.006

Zhang, H., Lindberg, S. E., & Kuiken, T. (2008). Mysterious diel cycles of mercury emission from soils held in the dark at constant temperature. Atmospheric Environment, 42(21), 5424–5433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.02.037

Zhang, H., Dill, C., Kuiken, T., Ensor, M., & Crocker, W. C. (2006). Change of dissolved gaseous mercury concentrations in a southern reservoir lake (Tennessee) following seasonal variation of solar radiation. Environmental Science & Technology, 40(7), 2114–2119. https://doi.org/10.1021/es0513990

Dill, C., Kuiken, T., Zhang, H., & Ensor, M. (2006). Diurnal variation of dissolved gaseous mercury (DGM) levels in a southern reservoir lake (Tennessee, USA) in relation to solar radiation. Science of the Total Environment, 357(1-3), 176–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2005.04.011

Lindberg, S. E., Southworth, G. R., Bogle, M. A., Blasing, T. J., Owens, J., Roy, K., … Sfeir, H. (2005). Airborne emissions of mercury from municipal solid waste. I: New measurements from six operating landfills in Florida. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 55(7), 859–869. Retrieved from http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=ORCID&SrcApp=OrcidOrg&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=WOS:000230435300001&KeyUID=WOS:000230435300001

Southworth, G. R., Lindberg, S. E., Bogle, M. A., Zhang, H., Kuiken, T., Price, J., … Sfeir, H. (2005). Airborne emissions of mercury from municipal solid waste. II: Potential losses of airborne mercury before landfill. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 55(7), 870–877. Retrieved from http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=ORCID&SrcApp=OrcidOrg&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=WOS:000230435300002&KeyUID=WOS:000230435300002

Zhang, H., Kuiken, T., Dill, C., & Ensor, M. (2005). Aquatic photochemokinetic rates of production and loss of dissolved gaseous mercury (DGM) in a southern reservoir lake of Tennessee. Abstracts of Papers of the American Chemical Society, 229, U896. Retrieved from http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=ORCID&SrcApp=OrcidOrg&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=WOS:000228177706398&KeyUID=WOS:000228177706398

Lindberg, S. E., Zhang, H., Vette, A. F., Gustin, M. S., Barnett, M. O., & Kuiken, T. (2002). Dynamic flux chamber measurement of gaseous mercury emission fluxes over soils. Part 1: Simulation of gaseous mercury emissions from soils using a two-resistance exchange interface model. Atmospheric Environment, 36(5), 835–846. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(01)00501-5

Lindberg, S. E., Zhang, H., Vette, A. F., Gustin, M. S., Barnett, M. O., & Kuiken, T. (2002). Dynamic flux chamber measurement of gaseous mercury emission fluxes over soils: Part 2 - effect of flushing flow rate and verification of a two-resistance exchange interface simulation model. Atmospheric Environment, 36(5), 847–859. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(01)00502-7

Zhang, H., Lindberg, S. E., Kuiken, T., & Nriagu, J. (2001). Photochemical production of dissolved gaseous mercury in freshwater: The role of Fe(III). Abstracts of Papers of the American Chemical Society, 222, U430. Retrieved from http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=ORCID&SrcApp=OrcidOrg&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=WOS_CPL&KeyUT=WOS:000170690002190&KeyUID=WOS:000170690002190