@article{wiley_wise_2019, title={Guattari, Deleuze, and Cultural Studies}, volume={33}, ISSN={["1466-4348"]}, DOI={10.1080/09502386.2018.1515967}, abstractNote={ABSTRACT This essay maps the changing ways that the concepts and writings of Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari have been mobilized in the journal Cultural Studies over the past three decades, reflects on roads not taken, and invites readers into a new conversation about the implications of the work of Deleuze and Guattari for cultural studies.}, number={1}, journal={CULTURAL STUDIES}, author={Wiley, Stephen B. Crofts and Wise, J. Macgregor}, year={2019}, month={Jan}, pages={75–97} }
 @article{wiley_elam_2018, title={Synthetic subjectivation: technical media and the composition of posthuman subjects}, volume={11}, ISSN={["1755-635X"]}, DOI={10.1057/s41286-018-0055-0}, number={3}, journal={SUBJECTIVITY}, author={Wiley, Stephen B. Crofts and Elam, Jessica}, year={2018}, month={Sep}, pages={203–227} }
 @book{packer_wiley_2012, title={Communication matters: materialist approaches to media, mobility, and networks}, publisher={New York: Routledge}, year={2012} }
 @article{packer_wiley_2012, title={Strategies for Materializing Communication}, volume={9}, ISSN={["1479-4233"]}, DOI={10.1080/14791420.2011.652487}, abstractNote={More recently, in their introduction to the edited volume New Materialisms: Ontology, Agency, and Politics, Diana Coole and Samantha Frost echoed this sentiment, suggesting that the turn to materiality is largely a reaction to the exhaustion of a text-centered, social-constructionist paradigm. In fall 2009, we hosted a symposium at North Carolina State University, the goal of which was to assemble scholars from the fields of communication and cultural studies to engage with what is now being called a materialist turn in social theory. Subsequently, these presentations were compiled into Communication Matters: A Materialist Approach to Media, Mobility, and Networks. In the process of engaging with the scholars who contributed to the symposium and the book, we identified five distinct yet overlapping strategies for thinking about the materiality of communication. While these strategies focus specifically on communication, media, and culture, they are informed by the broader conceptual shift toward materiality occurring in philosophy and social theory.}, number={1}, journal={COMMUNICATION AND CRITICAL-CULTURAL STUDIES}, author={Packer, Jeremy and Wiley, Stephen B. Crofts}, year={2012}, pages={107–113} }
 @book{j. packer_wiley_2011, title={Communication matters : materialist approaches to media, mobility and networks}, ISBN={9780415782241}, publisher={New York : Routledge}, year={2011} }
 @article{wiley_sutko_moreno becerra_2010, title={Assembling Social Space}, volume={13}, ISSN={1071-4421 1547-7487}, url={http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10714421.2010.525482}, DOI={10.1080/10714421.2010.525482}, abstractNote={Theories of social space and place have become problematic in light of the imbrication of places within regional and global networks; the disembedding, distantiation, and technological mediation of social relations; the expansion of global media and information networks; and the mobility of people, things and resources. This article draws on assemblage theory to develop a non-Euclidean model of the production of social space and applies the model in an analysis of three case studies from ethnographic fieldwork and interviews conducted in Concepción, Chile. Supplementary material is available for this article. Go to the publisher's online edition of The Communication Review for the following free supplemental resource: A Conceptual Model of Social Space. Source: Wiley, S., Sutko, M., Moreno Becerra, T. (2010).}, number={4}, journal={The Communication Review}, publisher={Informa UK Limited}, author={Wiley, Stephen B. Crofts and Sutko, Daniel M. and Moreno Becerra, Tabita}, year={2010}, month={Nov}, pages={340–372} }
 @article{wiley_2010, title={Assembling social space}, volume={13}, number={4}, journal={Communication Review}, author={Wiley, S. B. C.}, year={2010}, pages={340–372} }
 @article{wiley_packer_2010, title={Rethinking Communication After the Mobilities Turn}, volume={13}, ISSN={["1547-7487"]}, DOI={10.1080/10714421.2010.525458}, abstractNote={Much recent research in the field of communication has focused on mobile communication, including studies of the diffusion, uses, and social impli- cations of mobile phones, mobile gaming, and mobile social media (Katz, 2008; Katz & Aakhus, 2002; Kavoori & Arceneaux, 2006). The works pre- sented in this special issue of The Communication Review ,h owever, address ad ifferent set of questions about communication and mobility by starting from a different place. These articles are concerned with the production of social space, asking how social space itself is constituted through practices that include, but are not reducible to, mobility, communication, and mobile communication. This approach differs from traditional understandings of the field of communication on several fronts. First, by situating questions of communication within a more general analysis of the production of social space, this work attempts to counter- act a media-centric conceptualization of the social that has characterized much communication research. Such a conceptualization is evident when we frame research as "the effects of television on children," "the ways in which Facebook is changing social networking," or "the impact of mobile phones on everyday life," for example. As Patrick D. Murphy (2005) argued, if our aim is to understand the significance of media and communication technologies in social, economic, and cultural life, we should not begin by placing those technologies at the center of analysis, which in effect answers the question in advance. In place of a media-centric approach, the work presented here situates communication technologies and discursive practices within a broader social field that includes the social relations of production and reproduction, social networks and interactions, the circulation of capital,}, number={4}, journal={COMMUNICATION REVIEW}, author={Wiley, Stephen B. Crofts and Packer, Jeremy}, year={2010}, pages={263–268} }
 @article{wiley_2006, title={Assembled agency: media and hegemony in the Chilean transition to civilian rule}, volume={28}, ISSN={["1460-3675"]}, DOI={10.1177/0163443706067021}, abstractNote={ Through a close analysis of the media campaign to oust Chilean General Augusto Pinochet from power in 1988, this article explores the construction of national hegemony in transnational context. The Chilean opposition's success in constituting a political and cultural alternative to military rule illustrates the process by which hegemony is constructed, but at the same time it allows us to reconsider this classic sociological concept in several important ways. While hegemony is constructed at the national level, it is composed out of transnational flows. Hegemony has also been understood primarily as a form of ideological domination. This analysis, by contrast, demonstrates the importance of going beyond culture as meaning to take into account the material, technological and affective dimensions of hegemony. }, number={5}, journal={MEDIA CULTURE & SOCIETY}, author={Wiley, Stephen B. Crofts}, year={2006}, month={Sep}, pages={671-+} }
 @misc{wiley_2006, title={The boundless self: Communication in physical and virtual spaces}, volume={7}, number={4}, journal={Social & Cultural Geography}, author={Wiley, S.}, year={2006}, pages={669–671} }
 @article{wiley_2006, title={Transnation: Globalization and the reorganization of Chilean television in the early 1990s}, volume={50}, ISSN={["0883-8151"]}, DOI={10.1207/s15506878jobem5003_4}, abstractNote={During the early 1990s, Chilean television was transformed radically by processes of deregulation, privatization, transnational investment, technological change, and ideological liberalization. Chilean media were integrated into global structures of ownership, infrastructure expanded dramatically, and Chileans gained access to a broad range of international programming. However, a substantial national televisual space persisted and thrived. National programming expanded and commanded the highest ratings among Chilean audiences despite the growing availability of imported fare. The Chilean case illustrates how national media culture is neither obliterated by globalization nor simply resistant to it. Instead, national media spaces are reorganized by transnational structures and processes.}, number={3}, journal={JOURNAL OF BROADCASTING & ELECTRONIC MEDIA}, author={Wiley, Stephen B. Crofts}, year={2006}, month={Sep}, pages={400–420} }
 @article{wiley_2005, title={Spatial materialism - Grossberg's deleuzean cultural studies}, volume={19}, ISSN={["1466-4348"]}, DOI={10.1080/09502380500040886}, abstractNote={In a series of essays published in the 1990s, Lawrence Grossberg proposed a spatial-materialist cultural studies, arguing that our key metatheoretical assumptions about reality, agency, ethics and politics needed to be reconceptualized on amodern philosophical terrain – not within, or even against, the philosophical frameworks of modernism and postmodernism but outside them. To develop this alternative terrain, Grossberg has drawn on the writings of Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari, whose work was based on a Spinozist ontology, a ‘monism of multiplicities’. Grossberg argues that Deleuzean philosophy provides cultural studies with a way out of the epistemological problematic that has dominated critical theory. He has used on Deleuzean ontology to argue against modernist, postmodernist and post-structuralist conceptualizations of identity and subjectivity and proposes, instead, that cultural studies develop a machinic theory of agency. Grossberg has also used Deleuzean philosophy to reconsider the ethics and politics of cultural studies, proposing a politics of ‘spatial becoming’. This essay seeks to highlight the productive conceptual moves that Grossberg makes, to clarify some concepts that remain ambiguous in his approach, and to identify certain claims that merit further critical consideration. Grossberg's work repositions cultural studies in relation to the discursive terrain of modern philosophy and theory, opening up new routes for thought and action. In doing so, it clarifies, rearticulates and, in many ways, radicalizes the critical interventions that reshaped cultural studies in the 1980s and 1990s. But Grossberg's most important contribution to cultural studies has remained implicit: by following Deleuze and Guattari, we are drawn into an affective state of theoretical affirmation and practical composition – a stance that is quite different from both modernist and postmodernist postures of critique.}, number={1}, journal={CULTURAL STUDIES}, author={Wiley, SBC}, year={2005}, month={Jan}, pages={63–99} }
 @article{wiley_2004, title={Rethinking nationality in the context of globalization}, volume={14}, ISSN={["1468-2885"]}, DOI={10.1093/ct/14.1.78}, abstractNote={Globalization poses a significant challenge to the nation as a social form and consequently to theories that rely on nationality as a conceptual category. This article reviews a range of approaches to the conceptualization of nationality within mass communication, media theory, and cultural studies: mainstream nation-based theories, critical nation-based theories, relational theories, globalization theories, and contextualist theories. An analytical strategy is then proposed within which nationality is conceptualized as one particular logic among others that organize economic, political, technological, and cultural territories and flows.}, number={1}, journal={COMMUNICATION THEORY}, author={Wiley, SBC}, year={2004}, month={Feb}, pages={78–96} }
 @inbook{wiley_2003, title={Nation as transnational assemblage: Three moments in Chilean media history}, ISBN={0820455768}, booktitle={Animations (of Deleuze and Guattari)}, publisher={New York :  P. Lang,}, author={Wiley, S. B. C.}, year={2003} }