@article{bolick_cross_2024, title={1.1 Basics and Definitions of ScholComm}, url={https://doi.org/10.52843/cassyni.lfmxm3}, DOI={10.52843/cassyni.lfmxm3}, abstractNote={Join authors Josh Bolick and Will Cross as they discuss Chapter 1.1: Basics and Definitions ScholComm exploring key concepts of scholarly communication, including the creation, evaluation, dissemination, and preservation of scholarly work through both formal and informal channels.}, author={Bolick, Josh and Cross, Will}, year={2024}, month={Oct} }
 @article{bolick_cross_inefuku_2024, title={1.2 The Economic Context: ScholComm is Money}, url={https://doi.org/10.52843/cassyni.ht2b5d}, DOI={10.52843/cassyni.ht2b5d}, author={Bolick, Josh and Cross, Will and Inefuku, Harrison}, year={2024}, month={Oct} }
 @article{goller_vandegrift_cross_smyth_2021, title={Sharing Notes is Encouraged: Annotating and Co-creating with Hypothes.is and Google Docs}, volume={22}, ISSN={["1935-7885"]}, url={http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-85102278708&partnerID=MN8TOARS}, DOI={10.1128/jmbe.v22i1.2135}, abstractNote={Effectively analyzing literature can be challenging for those unfamiliar with studies from rapidly evolving research fields. Previous studies have shown that incorporating primary literature promotes scientific literacy and critical thinking skills.}, number={1}, journal={Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education}, author={Goller, C. and Vandegrift, M. and Cross, W. and Smyth, D.}, year={2021}, month={Jan} }
 @inproceedings{waller_cross_hayes_2019, title={Supporting Open Education with the Wind at Your Back: Lessons for OER Programs from the Open Textbook Toolkit}, url={https://doi.org/10.5703/1288284317058}, DOI={10.5703/1288284317058}, abstractNote={What does it take to move open education from idea to practice? In this session we led a discussion about what supports instructors need to engage with open education and how we can make adoption and adaptation easy and inviting. We set the stage with an overview of findings from our IMLS‐ funded research (LG‐ 72‐ 17‐ 0051‐ 17) on the needs and practices of psychology instructors for adopting or creating open textbooks and OER. We then shared some lessons on what faculty say they need and where they feel we can do better, as well as offered some insights from our research on student needs and desires in learning resources. Next, we opened a conversation about how transferable these lessons are and the unique needs of other academic communities. This paper describes the project and documents our discussion about these issues.}, author={Waller, Mira and Cross, Will and Hayes, Erica}, year={2019}, month={Nov} }
 @article{thompson_cross_rigling_vickery_2017, title={Data-informed open education advocacy: A new approach to saving students money and backaches}, volume={14}, url={https://doi.org/10.1080/15367967.2017.1333911}, DOI={10.1080/15367967.2017.1333911}, abstractNote={ABSTRACT The North Carolina State University Libraries has long recognized the financial burden textbook costs place on students. By crosswalking information on use of our textbook collection with textbook cost and course enrollment data, we have begun to map the environment for textbook use at the university and identified opportunities for faculty outreach in promoting alternatives to traditional textbooks, including our Alt-Textbook program. This article describes our programs, our investigation of textbook use patterns, and how we are using these data to inform our practice.}, number={3}, journal={Journal of Access Services}, publisher={Informa UK Limited}, author={Thompson, Sydney and Cross, William and Rigling, Lillian and Vickery, John}, year={2017}, month={Jul}, pages={118–125} }
 @article{cross_2017, title={Hot Coffee and Freeze-Dried First Amendment Analysis: The Dubious Constitutionality of Using Private Ratings for Public Regulation of Video Games}, url={https://doi.org/10.31229/osf.io/jp2y4}, DOI={10.31229/osf.io/jp2y4}, abstractNote={This Note argues that simply grabbing pre-packaged analysis off the ESRB’s shelf and running it through legislative machinery is not a recipe for good, or even constitutionally acceptable, law. This legislation, which curtails expression protected by the First Amendment, cannot rest on such stale standards. Additionally, this Note aims to suggest the importance of a serious and respectful application of First Amendment jurisprudence for video games. Although a recent phenomenon, video games comprise a medium that is increasingly popular and has already begun to demonstrate the ability for expression as sophisticated and powerful as any other speaker in the modern marketplace of ideas. Any legislation governing the medium should be grounded in fresh First Amendment analysis. But the legal percolation of the “Hot Coffee” controversy should also serve as a wake up call for the expressive possibilities of the medium as a whole.}, author={Cross, William}, year={2017}, month={Sep} }
 @article{jump start your scholarly communication initiatives: lessons learned from redesigning the scholarly communications roadshow for a new generation of librarians_2017, url={http://www.ala.org/acrl/sites/ala.org.acrl/files/content/conferences/confsandpreconfs/2017/JumpStartYourScholarlyCommunicationInitiatives.pdf}, journal={ACRL 2017 Conference}, year={2017} }
 @inbook{alpi_cross_raschke_sullivan_2017, title={The North Carolina State University Libraries' alt-textbook project: Open education that opens a door to the library}, ISBN={780836915806}, booktitle={Affordable course materials: Electronic textbooks and open educational resources}, publisher={Chicago : ALA Editions, an imprint of the American Library Association}, author={Alpi, K. and Cross, W. and Raschke, G. and Sullivan, M.}, year={2017}, pages={69–89} }
 @article{waller_cross_rigling_2017, title={The Open Textbook Toolkit: Seeding Successful Partnerships for Collaboration between Academic Libraries and University Presses}, volume={49}, ISSN={["1710-1166"]}, url={https://doi.org/10.3138/jsp.49.1.53}, DOI={10.3138/jsp.49.1.53}, abstractNote={ Libraries and university presses coexist in a complex and increasingly consolidated scholarly communication ecosystem. Each brings different strengths, values, and viewpoints that can inform and enrich a joint project. In this paper we discuss potential barriers to and benefits of collaboration between academic libraries and university presses and introduce a case study of such a collaboration: the Open Textbook Toolkit. This project, funded by a grant from the Institute of Museum and Library Services, is currently investigating the components needed to support faculty in one discipline, psychology, who are considering adopting open educational resources. By leveraging both library and press expertise, the Toolkit represents one model for fruitful collaboration. }, number={1}, journal={JOURNAL OF SCHOLARLY PUBLISHING}, publisher={University of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress)}, author={Waller, Mira and Cross, William M. and Rigling, Lillian}, year={2017}, month={Oct}, pages={53–65} }
 @article{cross_2016, title={More than a House of Cards: Developing a Firm Foundation for Streaming Media and Consumer-Licensed Content in the Library}, url={https://doi.org/10.17161/jcel.v1i1.5919}, DOI={10.17161/jcel.v1i1.5919}, abstractNote={This article will introduce traditional library practice for licensing multimedia content and discuss the way that consumer-licensing and streaming services disrupt that practice. Sections II and III describe the statutory copyright regime designed by Congress to facilitate the socially-valuable work done by libraries and the impact of the move from ownership to licensed content. Collecting multimedia materials has always presented special legal challenges for libraries, particularly as licensed content has replaced the traditional practice of purchasing and circulation based on the first sale doctrine. These issues have grown even more complex as streaming services like Netflix and Amazon and video game downloads through services like Steam have come to dominate the landscape. Section IV will describe the way that consumer-licensed materials, which not only remove the ownership that undergirds library practice, but also the ability to negotiate for library use, imperil the congressionally-designed balance. Section V will present a path forward for libraries to develop robust, cutting-edge collections that reflect a sophisticated understanding of the contractual and copyright issues at play.}, journal={Journal of Copyright in Education & Librarianship}, author={Cross, William}, year={2016}, month={Sep} }
 @misc{is copyright the third rail in information literacy, or a common denominator?_2015, journal={ACRL Intersections of Scholarly Communication and Information Literacy Series}, year={2015}, month={Feb} }
 @inproceedings{cross_2015, title={Libraries Leading the Way on the Textbook Problem}, note={forthcoming}, booktitle={Charleston Conference Proceedings Paper}, author={Cross, W.}, year={2015} }
 @inbook{cross_2015, place={Lanham, MD}, title={Library Expertise Driving Pedagogical Innovation: Bringing “Open” to the Classroom with Open Educational Resources}, note={forthcoming).}, booktitle={Leading the 21st-Century Academic Library}, publisher={Rowman & Littlefield}, author={Cross, W.}, editor={Smith, K.Editor}, year={2015} }
 @inbook{cross_2015, place={Baltimore, MD}, title={Making Space for the Giants: Copyright, Technology, and Online Instruction}, booktitle={Teaching Online: A Guide to Theory, Research, and Practice}, publisher={Johns Hopkins University Press}, author={Cross, W.}, editor={Major, C.Editor}, year={2015}, pages={131–149} }
 @article{davis_cross_2015, title={Using a Data Management Plan Review Service as Training Ground for Librarians}, note={Scholarly Communication (submitted).}, journal={Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication}, author={Davis, H. and Cross, W.}, year={2015} }
 @inproceedings{davis_cross_2015, title={What We Learned from Offering to Review Data Management Plans}, booktitle={Charleston Conference Proceedings Paper}, author={Davis, H. and Cross, W.}, year={2015} }
 @misc{your invitation to join the liboer community_2015, url={https://vimeo.com/116900928}, year={2015}, month={Jan} }
 @misc{digital media & copyright in higher ed_2014, url={https://www.higheredhero.com/3KP/0}, journal={HigherEd Hero}, year={2014}, month={Sep} }
 @inproceedings{alpi_cross_davis_2014, title={Support When It Counts - Library Roles in Public Access to Federally-Funded Research}, booktitle={Charleston Conference Proceedings Paper}, author={Alpi, K. and Cross, W. and Davis, H.}, year={2014} }
 @article{cross_2014, title={What We Talk About When We Talk About “Journal Club:” Scholarly Communication Advocacy and Public Access to Federally-Funded Research}, volume={40}, url={http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00987913.2014.923550}, DOI={10.1080/00987913.2014.923550}, abstractNote={The past decade has seen attempts by librarians and their allies to respond to inefficiencies in the market for scholarly journals and introduce infrastructure to support open solutions. Recently these efforts have contributed to success at the national level, first with the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy's 2013 policy memorandum on Expanding Public Access to the Results of Federally Funded Research and in 2014 with the Consolidated Appropriations Act, which incorporates the substance of the memorandum into law. This column provides a review of efforts by librarians to advocate for open scholarship, describes the federal actions that will expand public access to research, and concludes with a discussion of next steps in this evolving effort.}, number={2}, journal={Serials Review}, author={Cross, W.}, year={2014}, pages={123–128} }
 @article{wilson_cross_2014, title={What we talk about when we talk about journal club: Scholarly communication advocacy and public access to federally funded research}, volume={40}, number={2}, journal={Serials Review}, author={Wilson, K. and Cross, W. M.}, year={2014}, pages={123–128} }
 @article{hansen_cross_edwards_2013, title={Copyright Policy and Practice in Electronic Reserves among ARL Libraries}, volume={74}, ISSN={["2150-6701"]}, DOI={10.5860/crl-313}, abstractNote={This paper presents the results of a survey of 110 ARL institutions regarding their copyright policies for providing electronic reserves. It compiles descriptive statistics on library practice as well as coding responses to reveal trends and shared practices. Finally, it presents conclusions about policy making, decision making and risk aversion in ARL institutions.}, number={1}, journal={COLLEGE & RESEARCH LIBRARIES}, author={Hansen, David R. and Cross, William M. and Edwards, Phillip M.}, year={2013}, month={Jan}, pages={69–84} }
 @book{a.r.l._2012, title={Report of the ARL Joint Task Force on Services to Patrons with Print Disabilities}, url={http://www.arl.org/storage/documents/publications/print-disabilities-tfreport02nov12.pdf}, journal={Association of Research Libraries}, author={A.R.L.}, year={2012} }
 @article{cross_2012, title={Restoring the Public Library Ethos: Copyright, Licensing, and the Future of Librarianship}, volume={104}, number={2}, journal={Law Library Journal}, author={Cross, W. M.}, year={2012}, pages={195–217} }
 @article{cross_edwards_2011, title={Preservice Legal Education for Academic Librarians within ALA-Accredited Degree Programs}, volume={11}, number={1}, journal={portal: Libraries and the Academy}, author={Cross, W. and Edwards, P.}, year={2011}, pages={533–550} }
 @book{smith_cross_2010, title={Developing Copyright Policy: A Guide for Liberal Arts Colleges}, url={http://www.oberlingroup.org/files/DevelopingCopyrightPolicy_0.pdf}, author={Smith, K. and Cross, W.}, year={2010} }
 @article{cross_2006, title={Hot Coffee and Freeze-Dried First Amendment Analysis: The Dubious Constitutionality of Using Private Ratings for Public Regulation of Video Games}, volume={4}, number={1}, journal={First Amendment Law Review}, author={Cross, W.}, year={2006}, pages={299–340} }