Rapid Communications in Mass SpectrometryEarly View e9677 EDITORIAL RCM protocols: improving reproducibility in the field of mass spectrometry Stephen W. Holman, Stephen W. Holman Chemical Development, Pharmaceutical Technology & Development, Operations, AstraZeneca, Macclesfield, UKSearch for more papers by this authorG. John Langley, G. John Langley Chemistry, Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UKSearch for more papers by this authorDavid C. Muddiman, David C. Muddiman FTMS Laboratory for Human Health Research, Department of Chemistry, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USASearch for more papers by this authorCalum Novak-Mitchell, Calum Novak-Mitchell John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Oxford, UKSearch for more papers by this author Stephen W. Holman, Stephen W. Holman Chemical Development, Pharmaceutical Technology & Development, Operations, AstraZeneca, Macclesfield, UKSearch for more papers by this authorG. John Langley, G. John Langley Chemistry, Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UKSearch for more papers by this authorDavid C. Muddiman, David C. Muddiman FTMS Laboratory for Human Health Research, Department of Chemistry, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USASearch for more papers by this authorCalum Novak-Mitchell, Calum Novak-Mitchell John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Oxford, UKSearch for more papers by this author First published: 02 January 2024 https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.9677Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat No abstract is available for this article. REFERENCES 1Baker M. 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility. Nature. 2016; 533(7604): 452-454. doi:10.1038/533452a 10.1038/533452a CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 2Miyakawa T. No raw data, no science: Another possible source of the reproducibility crisis. Mol Brain. 2020; 13(1): 24. doi:10.1186/s13041-020-0552-2 10.1186/s13041-020-0552-2 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 3Oakden-Rayner L, Beam AL, Palmer LJ. Medical journals should embrace preprints to address the reproducibility crisis. Int J Epidemiol. 2018; 47(5): 1363-1365. doi:10.1093/ije/dyy105 10.1093/ije/dyy105 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 4Sayre F, Riegelman A. The reproducibility crisis and academic libraries. Coll Res Libr. 2018; 79(1): 2-9. doi:10.5860/crl.79.1.2 10.5860/crl.79.1.2 Web of Science®Google Scholar 5Treves A. “Best available science” and the reproducibility crisis. Front Ecol Environ. 2022; 20(9): 495. doi:10.1002/fee.2568 10.1002/fee.2568 Web of Science®Google Scholar 6Twa MD. Scientific integrity and the reproducibility crisis. Optom vis Sci. 2019; 96(1): 1-2. doi:10.1097/OPX.0000000000001339 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001339 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 7Oransky I. Retractions are increasing, but not enough. Nature. 2022; 608(7921): 9. doi:10.1038/d41586-022-02071-6 10.1038/d41586-022-02071-6 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Early ViewOnline Version of Record before inclusion in an issuee9677 ReferencesRelatedInformation