2019 journal article
Strained, Photoejecting Ru(II) Complexes that are Cytotoxic Under Hypoxic Conditions
Photochemistry and Photobiology, 96(2), 327–339.
MeSH headings : Antineoplastic Agents / chemistry; Antineoplastic Agents / metabolism; Antineoplastic Agents / pharmacology; Cell Hypoxia; Coordination Complexes / chemistry; Oxygen / metabolism; Ruthenium Compounds / chemistry; Ruthenium Compounds / metabolism; Ruthenium Compounds / pharmacology; Spectrum Analysis / methods
TL;DR:
The structure and nature of the aromatic group had a subtle impact on photochemistry, altering environmental sensitivity, and had a significant impact on cellular cytotoxicity and photobiology.
(via Semantic Scholar)
open access via www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov (repository)
Source: Crossref
Added: January 28, 2023
AbstractA series of strained Ru(II) complexes were studied for potential anticancer activity in hypoxic tissues. The complexes were constructed with methylated ligands that were photolabile and an imidizo[4,5‐f][1,10]phenanthroline ligand that contained an appended aromatic group to potentially allow for contributions of ligand‐centered excited states. A systematic variation of the size and energy of the aromatic group was performed using systems containing 1–4 fused rings, and the photochemical and photobiological behaviors of all complexes were assessed. The structure and nature of the aromatic group had a subtle impact on photochemistry, altering environmental sensitivity, and had a significant impact on cellular cytotoxicity and photobiology. Up to 5‐fold differences in cytotoxicity were observed in the absence of light activation; this rose to 50‐fold differences upon exposure to 453 nm light. Most significantly, one complex retained activity under conditions with 1% O2, which is used to induce hypoxic changes. This system exhibited a photocytotoxicity index (PI) of 15, which is in marked contrast to most other Ru(II) complexes, including those designed for O2‐independent mechanisms of action.