William J Kinsella

The Hanford plaintiffs: voices from the fight for atomic justice

Kinsella, W. J. (2022, February 9). LOCAL ENVIRONMENT.

SPLITTING (OVER) THE ATOM Nuclear energy and democratic conflict

ROUTLEDGE HANDBOOK OF ENERGY DEMOCRACY, pp. 224–238.

Extracting Uranium's futures: Nuclear wastes, toxic temporalities, and uncertain decisions

EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND SOCIETY-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 7(2), 524–534.

Communicating/organizing for reliability, resilience, and safety: special issue introduction

CORPORATE COMMUNICATIONS, Vol. 23, pp. 154–161.

Communicating Nuclear Power: A Programmatic Review

Annals of the International Communication Association, 39(1), 277–309.

Rearticulating Nuclear Power: Energy Activism and Contested Common Sense

ENVIRONMENTAL COMMUNICATION-A JOURNAL OF NATURE AND CULTURE, 9(3), 346–366.

Risk, Regulation, and Rhetorical Boundaries: Claims and Challenges Surrounding a Purported Nuclear Renaissance

Communication Monographs, 80(3), 278–301.

Environments, Risks, and the Limits of Representation: Examples from Nuclear Energy and Some Implications of Fukushima

ENVIRONMENTAL COMMUNICATION-A JOURNAL OF NATURE AND CULTURE, 6(2), 251–259.

FORUM Communicative Action in Response to a Nuclear Crisis: Representations of Fukushima across Communication Contexts

Environmental Communication, 6(2), 250–250.

Special issue: Learning from the 2008-09 global financial crisis

Electronic Journal of Communication, 21(3).

Risk communication, phenomenology, and the limits of representation

CATALAN JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION & CULTURAL STUDIES, 2(2), 267–276.

Cultures of contamination: Legacies of pollution in Russia and the U.S

[Review of Cultures of contamination: Legacies of pollution in Russia and the U.S, by M. R. Edelstein, M. Tysiachniouk, & L. V. Smirnova]. Russian Journal of Communication, 1(2), 230–234.

Forum: Narratives, rhetorical genres, and environmental conflict: Responses to Schwarze's "Environmental melodrama"

Environmental Communication, 2(1), 78–109.

Identity, community, and risk: Some constitutive consequences of environmental melodrama

Environmental Communication, 2(1), 90–93.

Narratives, Rhetorical Genres, and Environmental Conflict: Responses to Schwarze's “Environmental Melodrama”

Narratives, Rhetorical Genres, and Environmental Conflict: Responses to Schwarze's “Environmental Melodrama.” Environmental Communication, 2(1), 78–109.

Becoming Hanford downwinders: Producing community and challenging discursive containment

In B. C. Taylor, W. J. Kinsella, S. P. Depoe, & M. S. Metzler (Eds.), Nuclear legacies: Communication, controversy, and the U.S. nuclear weapons complex (pp. 73–107). Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.

Heidegger and Being at the Hanford Reservation: Standing Reserve, Enframing, and Environmental Communication Theory

ENVIRONMENTAL COMMUNICATION-A JOURNAL OF NATURE AND CULTURE, 1(2), 194–217.

Introduction: Linking nuclear legacies and communication studies

In B. C. Taylor, W. J. Kinsella, S. P. Depoe, & M. S. Metzler (Eds.), Nuclear legacies: Communication, controversy, and the U.S. nuclear weapons complex (pp. 1–37). Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.

Nuclear legacies: Communication, controversy, and the U.S. nuclear weapons complex

Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.

Finding our way(s) in environmental communication proceedings of the Seventh Biennial Conference on Communication and the Environment2005

Corvallis, OR: Department of Speech Communication, Oregon State University.

Finding our way(s) in environmental communication: Proceedings of the Seventh Biennial Conference on Communication and Environment

Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University.

Nuclear Legacies: Communication, Controversy, and the U.S. Nuclear Weapons Production Complex

Annals of the International Communication Association, 29(1), 363–409.

Nuclear legacies: Communication, controversy, and the U.S. nuclear weapons production complex

Communication Yearbook, 29, 363–409.

One hundred years of nuclear discourse: Four master themes and their implications for environmental communication

Environmental Communication Yearbook, 2, 49–72.

Rhetoric, Action, and Agency in Institutionalized Science and Technology

TECHNICAL COMMUNICATION QUARTERLY, 14(3), 303–310.

Fusion power and rhetorical power: A communication perspective on nuclear energy research

In Power in focus: Perspectives from multiple disciplines (pp. 3–38). Lima, OH: Wyndham Hall Press.

Nuclear discourse and nuclear institutions: A theoretical framework and two empirical examples

Qualitative Research Reports in Communication, 5, 8–14.

Public expertise: A foundation for citizen participation in energy and environmental decisions

In J. W. D. S. P. Depoe & M. A. Elsenbeer (Eds.), Communication and public participation in environmental decision making (pp. 83–95). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.

Problematizing the distinction between expert and lay knowledge

New Jersey Journal of Communication, 10(2), 191–207.

Nuclear boundaries: Material and discursive containment at the Hanford nuclear reservation

Science as Culture, 10(2), 163–194.

Discourse, power, and knowledge in the management of "big science": The production of consensus in a nuclear fusion research laboratory

Management Communication Quarterly, 13(2), 171–208.

A fusion of interests: Big science, government, and rhetorical practice in nuclear fusion research

Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 26(4), 65–81.

Communication and information technologies: A dialectical model of technology and human agency

New Jersey Journal of Communication, 1(1), 2–18.